After watching all the debates and listening to both sides...this might be the best possible outcome.

Oct 20, 2016 1:41 PM

cdub84

Views

44351

Likes

1339

Dislikes

80

I know its old, but it's never been more accurate!

Kinda like a new year's resolution?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Da, Comrade!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because some asshole would fuck it up.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sure Murica will back up from war areas. I'm very sure they will keep every promise they make.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I read that sign as el annoyo

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

Fun Fact: El Arroyo is a great restaurant.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Austin, Texas Represent!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Looking at you Spain. ;)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Here's hoping this lasts...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh cool. More false equivalence bullshit. Ever heard of the Supreme Court?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I detest the implication that the President is some sort of required authority figure to keep all us "children" in line.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I mean, have you met Americans?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We need a new Interregnum.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

it was one of the systems of society attempted by european settlers in america… 1/2 died the first winter in a race to do the least n live

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes, but those that survived went on to almost wipe out one race and enslave another.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

sophistry. even if EVERY european was the same

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Already tried that, states had the power, states were assholes and there was no army.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Just for the next 8 years lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe it's the plan to sent dumb people into debates, so the population is forced to handle stuff without relying on the government.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Thats kinda how its supposed to be. We arent supposed to be relying on our government to fix everything.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Anarchy in the USA!! LET'S FUCKING DO IT!!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Aaaand you're on a list

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're damn right I'm on A list. The Anarchy list!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Vote Joe Exotic

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Holy oh my god that is just a treasure. Thank you, that made my day.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Found it the other day (after watching that John Oliver report). Here's hoping more people see it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya that what made me aware of him saw a few interviews and ads but that was another level.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fun Fact: Belgium went years without a real government.

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

please tell me the population said they hadn't noticed

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There can be no king without a country, but there can be a country without a king.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How many? Spain's about to reach the first anniversary and it's working out kinda well.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's because they have a solid handle on their waffle situation, I bet.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Came back to upvote this

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

541 days. Footnote: only the federal government. Also the previous gov was still appointed as interim, just couldn't open new cases.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'd be ok with that. Can we do that, please?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And look at them now. Dutch bastards.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Harboring terrorists?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

During the height of the economic recession too. In the end their economy recovered faster that their neighbors.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

That's Belgium. I have a feeling shutting down a country supporting 300,000,000 people is a bad idea. Especially when nearly 10,000,000

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Thats not what he mean. Thats not how it works here.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

of those people rely on the government for welfare.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Surely your civil service could provide that entirely independently of strategic leadership?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ha.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For many American voters this year it will be a matter of voting against their least desirable candidate, rather than for their favorite.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Welcome to First Past the Post voting. Don't like it? There's a ballot initiative in Maine you might want to pay attention to.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Explain

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

For the first or second place candidates. Maine's initiative, if passed, would allow for ranked voting - rank your choices in order. 2/5

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

5/5 In other words, you can vote your conscience without the same risk that your least-favorite candidate will win the election.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

If nobody wins outright, the person with the most votes gets removed, their votes go to that voter's next-favorite, and you check again. 3/5

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So if I love A, hate B, and am fine with C, I can vote A, C, B, and if A loses my vote will go to C instead of remaining irrelevant. 4/5

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

First Past the Post is what we have now: Vote for one candidate, whoever gets the most votes wins. So the only votes which matter are 1/5

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Commentator delivered. Thanks for the great explanation

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No worries. I wish more people were informed on this; you'd think third parties would be fighting tooth and nail for it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1