The AN602 nuclear bomb, aka the Tsar Bomba

Jul 3, 2015 7:44 PM

fizyx

Views

287572

Likes

5342

Dislikes

90

The casing of the AN602 bomb

After my post on the Cannikin nuclear bomb test, there seemed to be interest in the Tsar Bomba I mentioned, so here is a post about it. The bomb itself weighed roughly 27 tons. The design was capable of a yield of 100 megatons, roughly 20 times the yield of every conventional explosive used in the entirety of World War 2, combined. However, because of the immense blast, the fallout would have been catastrophic. (It is estimated that the 100 megaton detonation would have been responsible for one quarter of ALL nuclear fallout since the invention of the nuclear weapon.) Thus, the design was intentionally modified to cut the yield by about half. Initial estimates placed the yield at 55 to 60 megatons, but all Russian sources state it had a yield of 50 megatons. Officially, only one such bomb was ever built. Regardless, it is the largest detonation of any kind caused by mankind in history.

This is the fire ball from the detonation of the Tsar Bomba.

On October 30th, 1961 the Tsar Bomba was dropped over Sukhoy Nos, part of the Novaya Zemlya archipelago north of the Russian mainland, at the extreme northeast of Europe.

The fireball, shown in this picture, was about 8km in diameter. It was projected to reach the ground, as the bomb was detonated at an altitude of 4km, however, the bombs own shockwave reflected back and kept the fireball from hitting the ground. It still almost reached the height of the bomber that dropped it at 10.5km altitudes, and the bomber and it's accompanying observation plane are considered to be lucky that they escaped unharmed.

The destructive power was immense. The effect of the bomb is shown overlaid on this map of Paris for some perspective.

The fireball alone was visible some 1000km away, and the mushroom cloud that it caused peaked at roughly 95 kilometer high, almost 11 times the height of Mt. Everest.

On the map, the yellow circle is roughly the size of the fireball, while the red circle shows the area of total destruction. The heat of the blast would have given observers 3rd degree burns as far away as 100 or so kilometers. Area's hundreds of kilometers from the blast had wooden structures destroyed, while stone structures lost their roofs, doors, and windows, and radio communications were interrupted for more than an hour. An observer of the test reported seeing the blast through darkened goggles and feeling the thermal pulse from the bomb more than 270km away from ground zero. The atmospheric shockwave was observed more than 700km away, and partial breakage of windows was reported as much as 900km away. Atmospheric lensing even led to the breakage of windows as far away as Norway and Finland.

This is the drop plane releasing the bomb

The parachute was there to slow the fall of the bomb to the 4km detonation altitude and allow the drop and observation planes time to vacate the area of the blast.

I will let the blast speak for itself.

Vault 101 here we come

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My Finnish elementary school teacher told that all of the windows on his house were destroyed and he went deaf for 30min after the blastwave

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

♫ The Future's So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades ♫

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Your people have built: 1 x 100Megaton warhead. "Ooooooooooh".

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Love these Fallout mods

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When men were men.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I seriously just read a wikipedia article about this right before i got on Imgur

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Turns out I looked it up after reading it on this guy's previous post. Huh

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Glad I sparked your interest!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nuclear Launch Detected.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

we are fucking idiots

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

I am become death...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love that video. Its really chilling when one takes a minute to really think about it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a kid, it always confused me why we needed enough fire power to destroy the world 5 times. surely once is enough?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is strangely perfect. Also, upvote for Hunter Hunter.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

C-co-could it melt steel beams? Look what I've become. Give my soul back Imgur.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

The bomb releases tiny secret government demolition teams that melt the steel. The reaction itself cannot melt steel or destroy buildings

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."

10 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 3

"But... why?" -Albert Einstein, upon been told the results of the first bombs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Robert's instant regret.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I thought Oppenheimer said that.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

J. Robert Oppenheimer. You are both correct :P

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Civ5 has really educated me.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why can't America and Russia have a biggest group hug contest as opposed to a who has the power to scare the most innocent people contest

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The shockwave of Tsar bomba took 3 laps around earth.

10 years ago | Likes 135 Dislikes 1

this! that's the information i was missing in the post! i mean cmon people just TRY to imagine what the full bomb could have done!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It shattered my grandmoms windows in northern sweden. Hefty shiet

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Leap second adjustment for other Nuclear Weapons' targeting mechanisms had to be adjusted for the alteration to time adjustment-like 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like the adjustment for the earthquake/tidal wave that hit Japan.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The seismic shockwave was measurable for 3 laps around the earth. Just to clarify :P

10 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 0

That's some 2012 shit right there

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Yes, thanks. When you science always be absolute... and beer. :-]

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Hey, could you do the US's nuclear artillery next? It's so absurd and impractical.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is absolutely no way Tsar Bomba broke any windows in Finland. Murmansk would have been completely destroyed, for one.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It did, actually. Atmospheric lensing acts to focus energy rather than disperse it, which is what happened in this case. (1)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because of it, destructive energy could be concentrated far beyond what would normally be possible when considering inverse square laws etc.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So thats what a Spirit Bomb looks like in real life.

10 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

My thoughts exactly

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More like Final Explosion

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

War. War never changes.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Or does it? No. War never changes. Or has it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless you're watching the intro to Metal Gear Solid 4. But fuck yea Fallout 4 in Nov!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Can't find a store to preorder the pilot edition at. FML

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea, I didn't know about it until it was completely sold out here :(

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an American, even with the scale I don't know how much destruction there was. miles for life.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

The third degree burns mentioned would have occurred to everyone in a 64 mile radius.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

That would literally kill every single person in the Dallas Fort Worth metroplex and a bit beyond. That's just terrifying.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you OP!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

1 mile = 1.6 kilometers. Come on people, it's not that hard to remember this simple rule when every country in the world uses metric :(

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I usually mix up which is which :( I know one is about half longer but forget which one it is

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Except for the Unites States, Burma, and Liberia...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

That's my point.. 196 sovereign nations in the world, only three still use the imperial system. I couldn't write "every country in 1)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Liberia is considering changing within 10 years, I think Burma is in the process of officially changing, aims to be done by 2018 I think.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the world except for.." due to character limit, but I figured people were smart enough to figure out that was what I meant from the context.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

dont forget, this is at HALF strength. whatever the result of it at full would be we can only guess

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

The physics are well understood; we can make good estimates. The full yield is one of the presets on http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I heard somewhere that a lot of the force would have been wasted into the atmosphere, idk if it's true or not though

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It would have taken a chunk of atmosphere with it on it's way into space.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True. There is a reason no country deploys such massive yield warheads: air is very compressible so their destructive power doesn't (1/?)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

scale linearly. It is more efficient to use multiple smaller warheads evenly spread out over the target area.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Beautiful and awe inspiring.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

Yeah, I'd have to disagree with the beautiful part, but agree with the awe inspiring part.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I tagged this awesome in the sense that it causes awe and terror. I don't think I've ever seen something that fits that meaning better.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I think it seems that way because you're looking at it on a screen. The truth of atomic weaponry is neither of these things.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well. You are sort of right. I guess it would be awe inspiring, if you look at the definition of awe, no matter what.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's terrifying to know something so beautiful could murder hundred thousands of people in a couple seconds.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

It's been 2 hours and nobody has made a mom joke. Not sure if I should be impressed or not.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, when I'm looking at imagery of nuclear blasts, I personally find it hard to joke. The devastation overwhelms my humor.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's humor, like radiation jokes. Steel beams jokes. There's nothing funny about your mom's fart catching fire and causing this.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a 50 megaton bomb would completely erase a city like new york.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

At least then you wouldn't have to experience life on Earth in such horrible circumstances. It would all be over in an instant.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Millions...

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

this

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the definition of a pissing contest. Two countries literally just one-upping the other in the worst way imaginable.

10 years ago | Likes 607 Dislikes 16

You are absolutely right, possibly more than you even know. (1)

10 years ago | Likes 162 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Thought for sure you'd post a link to your mixtape.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

B...but they're just trying to help eachother with relief packages!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And the rest of the world just stood paralyzed in horror knowing how little impact they would have against those nuclear superpowers.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

They obviously haven't dropped my mixtape yet fam.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH where'd you get that joke?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yeah well we got on the moon

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It might have handled childishly but it was for a fucking good reason. To give the other side ever better reasons not to use theirs.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In interviews with the Soviets, they were asked why they detonated such a weapon, to which they replied "To send a message." (2)

10 years ago | Likes 205 Dislikes 5

i kinda wish we just had nukes the the tzar bomb, they're just destructive without all the radioactive fallout that spreads far as hell

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

What? tzar bomb was a nuke Do you mean pure fusion? Still get fallout. Just mostly nonrad.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

well yes you get fallout but i was purely referring to the radioactive kind that weaker bombs only send into the lower atmosphere

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

These were just symbolic. The focus switched to smaller ones to put on rockets.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"No russian"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, the US lost interest in big bombs for the most part and switched to research into more conveniently deliverable warheads.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

When the bomb is so big that it blows up both them and you there's an understanding that a bomb can be too big.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So did the Soviets. Both sides recognised that anything that can't fit on an ICBM is pointless. And MIRVs are better than 1 big warhead.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 4, 2015 10:09 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Most powerful pure-fission bomb was only 500 kT. This was at least 100 times more powerful than that. Yay multi-stage fusion.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

These ARE hydrogen bombs. Both the big and the small(er).

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Russian government completely terrifies me. A nuclear superpower being run by gangsters. At least the USA is run by greedy executives.

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 9

And how is that better? Its the same..

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

three cheers for the greedy executives

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

*cough* Iran

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least "Gangsters" know how to deal with people.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 20

I'm not sure what that means, but I'm terrified of them starting a nuclear holocaust in my lifetime.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Yeah atleast they are open about torturing their own people.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

This makes me think of the Fermi Paradox. Will we be one of those civilizations that cuts it's own life drastically short?

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Probably yes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I am sort of hopeful that we will not, for the simple reason of profit. Globalization and profit will be the two things that carry us.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No we won't many creatures kill it's host, humans are not the only ones. However we are the only one capable of fixing our messes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. Literacy is up, wars are becoming smaller and rarer, diseases are on the retreat. The world is becoming a better place by the day.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably yes.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

You know of the waste we produce, the animals we kill for no reason, and all the things we dig out of earth for profit... you still wonder?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

But we would never be where we are without that, we are getting better

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I fail to see how mining for profit is a bad thing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's. Not bad if done responsibly.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i feel like if we keep digging holes in the earth and not putting anything there to replace it, we'll collapse on our greed...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At our most irresponsible point, we managed to avoid real nuclear confrontation. I like to think reason won the Cold War.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

We won the cold war by winning the spending spree of the arms race w/ Russia via the Star Wars program ending with Reagan-very expensive.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AFAIK, the closest we were to a nuclear war was actually in 1995, after the cold war. (1/?)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

a space rocket was launched from near the Russian border; they were informed, but the information failed to reach the military command.(2/?)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Problem is that the launch vessel was a repurposed ballistic missile, so it had the same signature, to boot. (3/3)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That last gif of the blast shows Castle Bravo, OP. Otherwise very nice, I think this is even more impressive: https://youtu.be/Pu88gb1EpmI

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Castle Bravo, there's a cluster fuck if I've ever seen one.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No kidding. One hell of a photogenic blast, though. That and Baker shot---gotdayum!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, that explains why I thought I had it... stupid TV producers cut from the Tsar to CB right after the explosion on me!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Blah, sorry, I was trying to find a good video and thought I had it.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Did you watch the Trinity and Beyond documentary? That contains the Tsar explosion.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not really. Ive never seen decent tsar explosion footage. its all shit, unlike the high clarity, different angles shots of american bombs

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

plus i think a few of the shots of ttasr are fake on trinity. theres a few other times like underwater bubbles on shot baker

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An 8km fireball... guys this is like instantly placing a small sun in the atmosphere

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Jesus Christ the more I think about it the more terrifying it is.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is exactly what that is. It's a goddamn man made mini-sun.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

talk about a heat wave

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you're interested in information on nukestuffs, this would probably be fun to toy around with: http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

Commenting to come back later

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

why is it so fun nuking and getting the highest deathcount?

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

China, Beijin, Tsar Bomba/100000 kilotons. 5 million points!!!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Highest I found were Tokyo and New Delhi. 13 million+

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Try Tokyo, 50 megaton, I got over 25 million

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I nuked boston with a surface blast, the tsar bomba heavily irradiated everything on the coast to Washington DC.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fallout 3 & 4

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Clicked link. Pretty sure I'm on a list now.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

You're on one more list than you were before.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Five more*. CIA, NSA, KGB, MI6, and Santa's naugty list.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

according to this, tsar bomba airburst over london would create a crater 1/4 mile deep and 1 mile wide, with total destruction of the 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

there shoul be a browser game for that ...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My mind first sore that as naked stuff and not nuke stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Hehe, it says arse.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and now I'm even less scared of north Korea, they can't even nuke my small city.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 entire city out to the countryside, and burns all the way to portsmouth and ipswich. NEAT.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Bookmarked.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, don't forget about the Trinity and Beyond documentary.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Listed

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everybody in my city would be killed by the Tsar. 117,000 casualties.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well, shit, put that in the city of Manchester and my town gets third degree burns from the tested Tsar Bomba. I live a decent distance away

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is horrifyingly fun

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

WHY DO WE MAKE SCARY ASS BOMBS!?!?!

10 years ago | Likes 1035 Dislikes 18

Because of religion and politicians.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because us humans are fucking idiots.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So we don't have to use them in anger.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So we can kill more of us in one go. Efficient. Won't say it's intelligent or smart, just .. efficient.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To protect humanity as a whole.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Assholes. Expected to find already...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Russian? Russian.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for bringing peace and democracy to whole world

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To scare other countries of course.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To get rid of ISIS and other tards

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To scare people's asses.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is why Fallout scares me.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

mutually assured destruction

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BECAUSE OF THE COLD WAR

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To be fair, IIRC this was one of the things that made the US and USSR back up and rethink MAD

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://xkcd.com/37/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We don't. Not any more. The nuclear disarmament between the superpowers has been one of the greatest success-stories of human history.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So we don't have a costly land invasion against civilians to prevent a country from attempting to infect our country with the Black Plague?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To kill each other over use-and-meaningless things we generated by ourselves. Obvious isn't it?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If we don't... Someone else will. And we must kill them first.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To ensure that we never have to use them again.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because demented weirdos like me will always think it's super cool, and will pursue advanced degrees so we can make even more.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

<3 Walter.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For when you lose sight of that spider in your house.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A cold war dick measuring contest.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Really, these were so large, expensive and powerful they were of dubious military value. Tsar Bomba was never put into production.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and do it... (Oppenheimer)

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

“We have made a thing, a most terrible weapon, that has altered abruptly and profoundly the nature of the world ... (1)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

a thing that by all the standards of the world we grew up in is an evil thing. And by so doing ... (2)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

we have raised again the question of whether science is good for man.” -- Julius Robert Oppenheimer (fin)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because someone else might make a scary ass bomb! How else will we be safe from scary ass bombs if we didn't have scarier ass bombs?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

penis envy

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

so you brush your teeth before bed, MOTHERFUCKER!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That my friend...is a really good question. I bet the answer is balance of fear.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TERRIFYING stuff. Kilotons for scale:

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

war is won only when you have ended the opposing parties will to fight.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To scare asses.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because someone built a slightly bigger bomb than us and we can't let him get through with that?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'Coz that shit's AWESOME.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

FOR SCARY ASS PEOPLE!!!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to spend tax and college loan on it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone made them to win a war, others got scared they could subjugate everyone, they got some, everyone got more scared, got bigger bombs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

War...war never changes

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

War has changed, I'm pretty sure genghis khan didn't pack this much shit.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And to be fair if they're just biologically advanced, we can definitely stub their toes before they stomp on us

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because their big scary bombs... Cold war

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hey, be fair, we had no idea Castle Bravo was gonna run away like that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Our capacity to retaliate must be, and is, massive in order to deter all forms of aggression." - John Foster Dulles

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vote in female politicians. We won't have wars, just every 30 days there will be intense negotians. - robin williams

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

So all of the female politicians will synchronize periods?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thatcher says hi

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

who?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because war is big business. You give contracts to arms makers who stimulate the economy building bombs, and bonus you own the arms company.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"We have a large bomb, fear us!" "We have a larger bomb, fear us!" "No, our bomb is the largest, fear us!" "OUR BOMB IS IRRATIONALLY LARGE!"

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And from the same guys "We know how to make a bomb we're too scared to even test! Beat that!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

idc if anyone sees this. but i'm highly upset that no one has yet yelled: "FOR SCIENCE".or. "We do what we must, because we can."

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Testosterone

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

To make sure other people do not use their scary ass bombs.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

We do what we must, because we can. For the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to kill people.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Well, we invented high speed cameras and needed something to take advantage of them.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fun. ! ?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YOU SEE, IVAN, WHEN BOMB IS BIG, ONLY NEED TO DROP ONE. ALSO NOT NEED TO KEEP PAYING FOR BOMBER AND CREW.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

i am become death destroyer of worlds

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To send a message apparently

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because we can?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's the only reason humans do fucked up shit.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To prevent invasion.When conceal carry passed,crime dropped 40%.The principal, though not sound, works very well.Global genocide is reduced.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read that as "Scary Ass-Bombs"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For the glory of Satan, of course!

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

Never a truer word said.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*sentence

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At some point just to see what they do.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This isn't scary. What is scary is that the Tsar Bomba was tested without the secondary and tertiary stages. This is only 50 megatons.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fully operational bomb was supposed to be 100mt, but the fallout was hell by soviet standards, and the 50mt blast damaged the aircraft.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... that Tu-95 was lucky to get away, and they're faster than they look.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically, this used all three stages, however the third stage used (and maybe 2nd) used a lead tamper instead of (1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was second and third stage lead tampers, instead of plutonium, meaning over 90% of the bomb's energy was from fusion.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a uranium tamper, which was enough to eliminate fast fission from the bomb and cut its yield basically in half. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ass-bombs

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To murder each other. As effectively as possible

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We should repurposed them to be giant power cells. Boom, abundant energy.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cold war

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) We didn't make that, the USSR did. 2) We don't make nukes at all anymore

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I meant as people why do we build these terrible devices

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fear, for the most part I imagine.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mankind as a species. Why?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because they're expensive and we already have 25,000+ around the world in countries like Russia, USA, china, etc.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To scare the other guy into not using his. It works quite well.

10 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 2

But this bomb is Russian!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

And you don't think the Russians were using the same mindset as the US during the Cold War?

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Absolutely. It's just that I'm more used to the 'good guys/bad guys' kind of comment.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Eh. There's not really a good/bad guy in war. Closest thing would be the aggressor, in which case the US is the "bad guy" in recent wars.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I too, have read The Butter Battle Book.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Roughly equal measures of "to win" and "spite."

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 1

Russia once planned on nuking the moon as a fireworks display during a national celebration. Add "party-throwing superiority" to the list.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We did, too, though the official reason at least was "to see what happens," with dick-waggling being secondary.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

upboated for truth

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

To make us feel better about the impending alien hordes.

10 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 0

That is the exact reason why we make scary ass bombs:

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Because the only good bug, is a dead bug. Would you like to know more?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If only that were true.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

However unlikely, it technically could be. Also asteroids

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A nuke is probably one of the worst ways to try to get rid of an asteroid. It might work to divert it, MAYBE, but not to destroy. (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... and there are more reliable ways to divert asteroids anyways. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, statistically speaking, aliens ARE out there. But logistically they're never getting here in a hurry.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We know that they will have shields and lasers that can burn the detonator of our nukes in mid flight! We should be making viruses instead.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think they will have better quarantine than humans would think.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or possibly not even DNA/RNA-based. There are other ways to encode genetic information.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how can we create a virus for another species when we cant even cure the common cold?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know what 90s kids don't get? How *real* the threat of instant nuclear obliteration felt to a kid in the 80s. Blink! And you're gone...

10 years ago | Likes 505 Dislikes 4

My dad R

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last close call was in 1995. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_rocket_incident#Response

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Jesus Christ. I never knew about this happening, granted I was only 5 at the time.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And why we liked Reagan so much!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Although he did kind of fucked us in the long run

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Baby Boomers and Millennials wail and moan, but Gen Xers are chill. We're just thankful not to be living in the Thunderdrome.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep, growing up in the 80s in the UK it was either nuclear bombs or IRA bombs that were gonna kill us all.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

so which one was it?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

both.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Margeret Thatcher

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

80s kids remember "The Day After." All we talked about in school the next day.

10 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

I re-watch it every few years. You know, for nostalgia. The effects are horrible, but the story is still gripping.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See also: Threads

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

*shudder*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I saw it in high school, about 6 years after it aired, it did not age well. At all.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

re film it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nuclear scares, cold wars, the "red menace." But I STILL loved growing up in the '80s. = )

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So true I do miss that decade:-)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Blink and you're dead. Sorry, had to.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

http://imgur.com/PnFmgne @jerseytom @MersaultX

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This reference has gone right over my head. What am I looking at?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Weeping angel

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably a liquid crystal display. Assuming your monitor is one of those flat ones.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't blink. It's a Doctor Who reference. A "Weeping Angel" is what you are looking at.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a young child in the 80's, I agree

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The way Russia is currently acting, I don't know about that... http://www.bbc.com/news/world-33151125

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I kind of got that watching Terminator 2 though.

10 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

For years after, did you regularly lie awake at night imagining you and everyone you loved being incinerated in a heartbeat? Because we did.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Exactly! That image of the playground still makes me uneasy.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Yes, except that was a movie, the cold war was not

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes, that scene gave me nightmares for years and still makes me think alot to this day

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Only 50-60-70-80s-kids-things"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well now as a 90's kid nuclear Armageddon became very real as of late

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wuchu talking about, Russia just added more nuclear warheads to their arsenal, it may become a reality again for everybody.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I lived about ten miles from an Air Force base when I was I kid in the 70s-80s. We all knew we'd be toast if bombs started flying.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, I mean. That threat isn't exactly gone. Certainly Russia and probably the US could destroy every county on earth in about an hour.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I understand the fear... but also partially don't. If it's really 'blink and you're gone' then should it happen, you won't even know.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Last time I checked there's enough nukes to end all life on earth ten times over. But you're right. I'm not from the 80s. No fear here.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

My dad told me he would lie in bed at night as a child, too afraid of it all to sleep.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You bet. I remember having a serious panic attack in 1983 one evening because I accidentally saw news about the cold war I was only 11.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Practicing Nuclear Bomb drills like tornado or earth quake drills.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep, college and grad school in the 80s. By '85 I was sure we were going to blow ourselves all to hell.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Blink, gone. Blink, gone. Blink, gone! Blink, gone! I forget what movie that's from.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You know what 80's kids don't get? How real the threat of instant nuclear obliteration actually was in the 60s.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

That's fair. But the real drop in tension didn't occur til Gorbachev. I remember it was like being able to breathe freely for the first time

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Spot on, Gorbachev is a international hero for his efforts on disarmament. Doesn't get nearly the recognition he deserves.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

60s kids were lied to. They thought they could duck and cover. We 80s kids knew we'd be toast.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"Just put a blanket over your head and the lava will go right over you!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

October, 1962. Even in elementary school we believed we were days, maybe just hours from annihilation. Duck & cover was a joke to us.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well duck and cover was meant to protect those on the outer reaches of the blast radius, it was known to be useless for direct victims

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as a 90s kid isnt that less scary than growing up and watching the world crumbling under us as we destroy our habitats ourselves bit by bit?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

and we dont even have captian planet anymore! HE WAS SUPPOSED TO FIX ALL OF THIS!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is scarier? A sinking boat or a plane crash? I think people's inherent optimism /delusion blunts the fears around the environment.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You got it. It was terrifying. 90's kids, 00's kids ... I remember hearing earth had enough nukes to destroy every inch of earth 100x.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

When in reality there are not even enough nukes to destroy 1/4 of china.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

really?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the total surface area that would be damaged by nukes is smaller than people think.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The following nuclear winter would clean up nicely, though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0