I just want logic and sustainability put over swag and luxury.

Jul 25, 2022 12:40 PM

Az663

Views

141045

Likes

2719

Dislikes

62

Imagine on your commute doing something productive like reading, relaxing, giving full attention to SO, or watching videos (with headphones)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I was a teenager I remember wondering why teens in American movies were so keen to get a car. We just did mass transit a lot.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, both. Especially for people with disabilities etc. Though I'd be okay with requiring special permits to operate cars in cities

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I use my truck for work and play but I don't live in a major city. I couldn't imagine not driving but the option should be there

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

bUt ThE pRoFiTs

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Amen to this

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can you imagine a world with only 1/3 the amount of vehicles??!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The rich country is not the one were rich people uses cars but public transportation

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

free, clean, reliabel, public transport... thats the real dream

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Citybikes and electric kickbikes have actually made huge difference in Finland. We also have really good puplic transit in capital.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty much all trains, busses, trams and metros arrive every 10mins in capital and they go almost everywhere in the city.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But you have to drive to the train? Or-wait. It’s all trains. From Everywhere? To everywhere? And it’s sustainable??? My mind! It boggles!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Worthy.OTOH they will never have public transit to places like where I live. It would take 100,000s of busses running with 0 to 3 passengers

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also would also like public transit that also gets to where you want to go in a reasonable amount of time.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Problem with the self driving cars is, as long as there are manual cars, there is too much random stuff for them.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also would help a lot if the cars share information which each other. Like "Breaking now" or "something is in the way".

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, Japan.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just came back from France, was blown away by how cool Aux en Provances downtown was

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Helsinki, move here, I will buy you a beer

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It gives me some hope that this stuff gets upvoted on imgur. Can we have bike lanes too though?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The robust public trans here in Portland, OR use to be my go to. Sadly it's inundated with shootings, stabbings, tweakers, and muggings.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I lived in Switzerland, and even during the snowstorms, the bus was at most 5 minutes late. I'd live there in a heartbeat

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't give a fuck how regular public transit is. If it doesn't go where I want it to go, it's useless to me.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

that's why you need a little e-skateboard (if you're brave)/e-scooter (if you're not) to get you the last mile

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We've got e-scooters to rent all around the centre of town. No fucking way could you carry one of those with you if you need one elsewhere.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and if have a smaller one, it's cargo in addition to your actual cargo, that you have to lug about, and store, and charge.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh and you lawfully need a helmet too. and I came off one once so I'd recommend elbow/knee pads and gloves too. my palms were raw red meat.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sounds like you need to hit the gym mate

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and if it does, it's a taxi, which is just a car you can drive while drunk. which is nice, but not an everyday plan.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Public transit works just fine for me as the everyday plan because the network is good enough.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...what?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only kind of public transport that goes where I want it to go is a taxi, which requires the same infrastructure as owning your own car.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...okay? What does that have to do with this post lmao

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm contesting his point, and saying that I do want cars as default, because cars are superior to public transport. PT is a shit compromise.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's going to take time, especially when there is so much resistance to projects like HS2.

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

HS2 seems like kind of a distraction. The same money could do so much more investing in metro transit instead of the new, "innovative" thing

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And HS2 is only 330 miles. That's literally 1/10 NY-LA. Transcontinental HSR is simply not feasible, technically or sociopolitically.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

HS2 isnt controversial because people are against high speed rail. HS2 is controversial because of...

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

its environmental impact to natural ancient woodlands, it's known lack of delivery to the places it was actually intended for...

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

and that existing rail infrastructure upgrades would have been more effective. HS2 is essentially a vanity project that serves very few.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Here's the damage it caused to natural landscapes across the UK and then was abandoned in those regions.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Here's a famous ancient tree, cut down to make way for HS2 and then abandoned in the region.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Thats nice, for you, I still want cars though. I don't want my only living options to be cities. I need a quiet home bc of my mental health.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

you can get to quiet places by train in plenty of countries.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

just come to europe.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Specifically Switzerland.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MEH. I still have to use my car everyday, bc the connections just don't work out. not enough bus stops & busses in the right places/timings.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am in Europe. Public transport is a shitshow where I live. But Finland, Netherlands and parts of Austria appear to be doing great.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Parts of Finland

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Netherlands can confirm great public transportation. However, it cost so freakin much.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Three words: hoverboards…

3 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 9

v

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Aug 6, 2022 2:42 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

syballanles?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actual hoverboards (not that no-hands Segway bullshit) would be great but the supercooled magnet infrastructure would cost a fortune.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Onewheels aren't hoverboards... they are really cool though.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sex doll + flying motorcycle = HoverBroad

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Kill Hagrid. 2 birds with 1 stone. Got it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How environmentally freindly would hoverboards be

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't seem very efficient and even safe, considering that transporation usually involves cargo.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Hovertruck. Zeppelin 2.0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ah yes hoverboards, short for hover over boards

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Imagine if we had politicians who would talk about what we can do instead of what we can't do.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One word: Europe...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I want a train from Seattle to Chicago in 8 hours!

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Thats an average of 257mph, over a distance of 2063 miles. Thats nuts considering you'd either need to bring that fuel with you, or get

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, that's what I want!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

all those states in between to power it electrically...which would requre a lot of energy. Amtrak trains typically only go 100mph.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Empire Builder between Seattle and Chicago hit high speed of 86, and average much lower!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

in America, sprawl and the pressure to have your own "house w/ the picket fence" has made things like this a far, far off dream...

3 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

Also the segregation of business and residential zones. And a lack of pedestrian shortcuts.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup. Dream about healthcare and forget about high speed rail

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I moved to the burbs so my kids could be in a great public school. STL city schools are a mess. Otherwise I would have stayed despite crime.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Same. White flight really screwed us because former generations took the best schools to the least sustainable spaces

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's actually more concrete than that. Multi-Family and Medium Density zoning is illegal is most of the US due in part to lobbying from GM.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

'House with Picket Fence' works if you have bus stops every, say, 10 houses or so, in the suburbs. Electrically powered buses, that converge

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

10 houses seems like a bit much. As long as there's a sidewalk, I'll walk a few blocks just fine.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Our nearest bus stop is a 30 minute walk down a street with no sidewalks and people who yell if you walk in their yards.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Or within biking distance with safe places for bikes that are actually maintained. Not Just Bikes on YouTube does a lot of vids on it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How dare people aspire to own a detached house, instead of rent a 400 sq ft shoebox!

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I've spent most of my life in apartments and fuck hearing every single word my neighbors say. Fuck being woken up at 4am by drunks. Fuck it.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

on a central bus station, which can then also be a hub for tram, subway or genuine railway.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Except the sprawl is too large so the bus ride would take forever to get anywhere with frequent stops.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We need to save the world! Ok. Build public transport. No. Subsidize refurbing existing cars. No. Subsidize work from home. No buy a Tesla

3 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 5

I’m lucky enough to work for bikeshare in a city expanding public transportation. One of very few in USA.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Work from home is already cheaper for companies where I live, yet my company prefers to pay me 6k/year so I can waste my time commuting...

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Think of all the money companies would save on Office space, that's pure profit. I think it's middle management that can't stand the idea.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It' not just the MM. Most older CEOs here can't get it up unless they see an army of their minions every day.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

One never met a CEO. Especially a CEO of a company I was working for. But I suspect you are correct because it makes sense.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't see a problem with mass adoption of electric self driving cars. Many traffic and environmental issues can be fixed with them.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

if we think two steps ahead.. automated electric cars are ok.. but there are better things to do than build 5 billion new cars..

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

automated electric buses, taxi fleets on speed dial, sure.. but you know , for major boulevards and highways, might as well have a tram

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And we can design new cities (even re-develop existing) to have apartments over grocery stores and malls.. bikepaths.. to be walkable

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They still take up all the space of an ICE car, so no traffic solution there (source: I have one, and still get into jams)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah as of right now, but in the future if all of them connect via a smart grid there will be little to no traffic

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You forgot about self-driving part. Idiots on road are major cause of jams and deaths (which are morbid-ironically good for the environment)

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love visiting the US, but I miss being about to walk to the shops, and a lot of areas seem to be just massive wide roads and carparks.

3 years ago | Likes 416 Dislikes 4

new york city is VERY walkable. The stations smell sometimes, but it's fine lol.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They built it that way on purpose to keep minorities out (because it was unlikely they could afford a car at the time)

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah we are starting to hate it too

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, if you visit I recommend either urban centers, or the Vast Expanse. Stay out of the suburbs/"developed areas".

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Only like a handfull of urban centers are really worth visiting though, the vast expanses are much better.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

True; the NE (DC/Philly/NYC/Boston) is worth a visit, and Chicago and NOLA, but other than that…go to the Allagash.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Our cities used to be built around public transport, but that changed as we started to get addicted to cars.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I call them Stroads. Just dull, boring expanses of no sidewalk.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Same here in Canada. A few of the bigger cities have decent public transport, but we got some wide open spaces.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Lots of towns near me have a "downtown" where you can walk and shop and eat and don't need a car all day. But you still have to drive there.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

In the US we walked from a friend's house to a nearby shopping center — a concerned little old lady stopped their car and asked are we OK?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It took a bit of explaining that we do enjoy going for a walk, though there weren't actual sidewalks all the way.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I grew up in the "wide open" part of the US, and now I live in a traffic infested metropolis. Seems like it should even out.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The worst parts of this country by a large margin is the "walkable" areas. High crime, dirty, expensive, and just terrible.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I get what you're saying as something wonderful can be said about walking around old world cities and getting places without cars. Yet, (1/

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

there is the delightful freedom one can only have behind the wheel of a car in the Americas of exploring, discovering, as the spirit (2/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

moves you. Pointing your car in one direction and just going. Perhaps with the internet and our era that there fewer people are (3/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

infected with Wanderlust.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

you're talking about highways not city centres. there is no wonderlust from driving between strip malls or stuck in traffic jams.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

America sets a "tax zone" where only one type of building can legally be built. Residential Zoning vs Commercial Zoning. It is legally 1/?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

speaking very hard to put any business within walking distance of a house. So we create the problem of massive suburbs that you would 2/?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

have to walk 40 mins through to get to the bus stop, then that bus drives 10 mins to the block with the business you want. 3/?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In a lot of non american places, the "shops" are on the corner, a 5 minute walk. Buses are for skipping a 40 min walk. 4/4

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm seeing more "mixed use" developments in the burbs in my town. Commercial on the ground floors, apartments/condos on the uppers. 1/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

/2 but it's mostly expensive condos. They're sorta trying though. Public transit still mostly nonexistent.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They build more lanes to free up traffic, and all it seems to do is invite more cars

3 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 2

Make traffic less bad in an area and Google maps routes more cars that way

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is exactly what it does. Only way to really reduce traffic is having multiple means of transit both public and private

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My neighborhood, the road in front of my house and one block up were both two-way streets that got really busy on weekdays. They were 1/n

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

both torn up to be one lane, one-way (one in either direction) with protected bike lanes. So many bikes use them that overall traffic 2/n

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

volume *increased*, despite much less car traffic, zero congestion for cars, road noise is near zero now, and fewer traffic accidents. 3/n

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Literally cannot see a downside, even for motorists. But the local conservative newspaper still cites it as an example of the 'war on 4/n

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There have been multiple studies done that prove adding lanes does not improve traffic flow. People just fill up the lanes.

3 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 0

Just immediately go from 2 to 20 lanes. Can't fill up the lanes now.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

That's all fine and dandy until those 20 lanes have to merge to 2 or 3 lanes lol.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Merge it four lanes at a time, each pair of two lanes merge, then one goes 2 meters in the air. and merges by dropping down unto the other.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They recently redid the lanes on the highway near me and all it seems to have done is made the shoulder wider on one side and smaller on the

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why isn't someone researching teleportation??? I'm ok with the risk of becoming a manfly

3 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 5

People are researching that

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Become a man-bear-pig

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If there teleportation was a ting, I would visit more places. Take a day in NY, or Hong Kong, and be home by night

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I like the fact that this thread has some theoretical discussions going on. Now let's talk about the warp and Gellar fields!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Work-from-home is a far more practical solution.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not as exciting though as I've been doing it for over 3 years now.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Teleportation is technically a hologram. Video chat is very close.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why isn't someone researching magic??? I'm ok with the risk of being turned into a newt!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm with McCoy and Barclay on Transporters. No thank you ripping my atoms apart.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are. Quantum entanglement stuff.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No they aren't. It was dumb to call it "teleportation", and, quantum isn't magic!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that only 'teleports' information, not matter.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd settle for that.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so far..

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

isn't all matter just information?

3 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 1

It is not, no.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

there are physicists that believe that information is just another form of matter, just sayin

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Teleportation is almost certainly never going be practically feasible, even in Star Trek it requires killing you and making an exact copy.

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Don't threaten me with a good time!!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The little spoken of details of transporter technology.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So basically you'd need to be able to compute the exact quantities, and configurations of atoms in your body and have a nano factory capable

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

of rapidly reconstructing it at another location, with the materials on hand. And a network to transfer that massive amount of data

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Never have I ever thought of the technical workings of teleportation

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's like a fax machine. Scan, send data, reconstruct. Only in this case also shred the original. Its a suicide box yay

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

that's the star trek-solution. but what about star gate-solutions? something with folding space and creating direct connections somehow?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Technically Star Trek's version is more theoretically possible, SG required harnessing wormholes with exotic energy (ie., naquada/ZPMs) and

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except as they explain it... they're still taken apart to be sent through the wormhole and reassembled on the other side.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If that was the case some transporter-weirdness like the stuff Barclay saw would not make sense. You are reconstructed from your own atoms.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Barclay's experience (and I think a few other cases) pretty much confirms consciousness remains continuous through the transport... somehow.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That only makes sense if there is some kind of 'soul' or paranormal consciousness that exists even if you body is pratically non-existent...

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is quite close to making a copy and killing the original though.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

mass to energy to mass

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I thought it was an actual beam of particles. But now that I say it loud, that would not got through solid rock... hmmmm...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0