The mayor of NYC at the time of 9/11 forgot 9/11.

Aug 17, 2016 5:43 AM

"Under those 8 years before Obama came along we didn't have any radical Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States." -ex mayor on NYC Rudy Giuliani. (He was mayor during the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001.

Cause that never happened... Right.

It gets me so heated that he said this at a trump rally and most of the people there will believe him.

Also how our motto on 9/11 is "We will never forget" and the mayor at the time of 9/11 forgot it.

Sorry I had to get that out of my system.

You missed the bit less then 1 min before were he specifically talked about 9/11

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Thanks, Obama!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People how sit in the back of limos never notice bumper stickers.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm not into politics but you guys are taking it out of context he literally talked about 9/11 in the previous sentence. CONTEXT PEOPLE!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The context is that Giuliani was FUCKING LYING, there were at least three other Islamic terror attacks in the US during Bush after 9/11.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuckin giuliani (in ny accent)

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

As someone with the same last name (no relation luckily), why I oughta!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heyyy! Ooohhhh! Your mother. (Also in a NYC accent)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Um, right before that quote he talked about 9/11. He meant the 8 years after the patriot act was signed. Weird argument but whatever 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

saw this live, thanks for spreading the truth. out of context media explosions are horrifying.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Floats your boat. Sauce: http://youtu.be/qoKsw8HCVZs. At 7:58 he starts talking about it... just wanted to clear things up. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is taken out of context. He does adress 9/11. Check the Original footage, propaganda scum.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

I believe without a shadow of doubt that terrorists really did hit those towers with planes, I do not believe they collapsed on their own.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Down with Drumpf

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

1) The quote is taken our of context. If you listen to the whole thing, he does state 9/11 as being the worst attack since the War of 1812.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

2) Then continues to say that between 2001 (but after 9/11) to 2009 there were no terrorist attacks. Which is technically a lie, but he did.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

3) So my guess is you read an article but never listened to the speech. Posting what you been told instead of discovering it yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I would recommend watching a minute or two before he said that part. He was saying there weren't attacks after the patriot act. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Why watch the full speech when you can get all your news from memes?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm by no means a supporter of Giuliani or much of what he says, but I prefer that people don't just regurgitate cherry picked lines.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I saw this in the daily news yesterday, i cannot tell you how frustrated that made me

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

i bet shapes frustrate you equally. he didn't actually say this http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/16/rudy-giuliani-911-remarks/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guys, I don't support the man, but literally a minute before in his speech he talked about 9/11. This quote references the patriot act.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

OH LOOK, SOMEONE WHO'S NOT WEARING THEIR ASSCHEEKS FOR EARMUFFS

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That was the most angry compliment I've ever gotten.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

GOD DAMMIT

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Which is a valid thing to attack him on, IMO. The patriot act is terrible. I'm confused why we aren't focusing on that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's something worth attacking, but not researching what somebody actually said, even if you don't like them... That isn't chill.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure all those interns dont even do a google search when they are "fact checking"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fact checked, this isn't true, he said between 9/11 and Obama's term

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Fact checked, you're wrong. #1: December 2001: Miami shoe bomber.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

#2: July 2002: LAX shooter.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

#3: March 2006: UNC SUV attack.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

And that's if we're generous to Bush and count John Allen Muhammad as a serial killer rather than islamic terrorist.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I'm not claiming Rudy was correct, I'm saying his statement was taken out of context.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Literally a minute before he said that, he talked about 9/11. I only know this cause of Phil D Franco

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I think we all knew what he meant @OP

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

maybe...just maybe...he's saying 911 wasn't actually carried out by muslims...maybe..just maybe ... he's insinuating it was an inside job

9 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 19

Maybe...just maybe...Trump is paying him a ton of money to endorse him. Or he misspoke. I wanna hear his side tho.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Jets out for Harambe.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It was surely a hint for smart people like you, who are also worried about chemtrails and never been on moon

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

well i've never been on the moon . chemtrails from planes IS funny. the us gov aware this was going to happen yes, yes, they did

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Bush did 9/11. Jet fuel can't melt steel beams. Harambe was an inside job. Lol

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 3

Dicks out can't melt meme dreams.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This is wonderful

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still don't know anything about this harambe.. Issue?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Gorilla shot after toddler fell in zoo enclosure. Some ppl freaked out, blamed the parents etc, then the internet turned it into a joke

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Well no I get that. But like.. Why the memes? This happened a while ago and now people are going nuts about it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And now everyone wants to put their dicks on the monkey corpse....#dicksoutforharambe

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

no. he was saying between 9/11 and obama there werent any major terrorist attacks because of the patriot act. op read and reposted a>

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Giuliani just was not careful with his words because 9/11 was during Bush's first term. Bush got the USA into deep poopoo in those 8 years.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no, he was making a point about the patriot act, and how (in his opinion) we are now vulnerable without it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thanks, just read it. he did word it carefully though. but, thats politics i suppose

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You fucking idiots didn't even watch the full speech, did you?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

WAKE UP SHEEPLE. THIS WAS HIS CONFESSION

9 years ago | Likes 193 Dislikes 12

what confession?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

He's jokingly referring to the theory that 9/11 was not a terrorist attack but actually orchestrated by the US Govt to justify a war in iraq

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Joke.....yes. I am make joking.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fuckin A

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Though I agree with the sentiment against people who blindly follow the crowd,I cant ever take someone who uses the word "sheeple" seriously

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Bruce?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

JF

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Other than those guys that tried to bomb that same place under Clinton.... oh yeah the same guys.

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 8

Yeah, the year Giuliani was elected. So that's two in his city.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

You know Clinton had been in office for like 6 weeks when that happened right? They had been planning it since at least 1991 under Bush

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

I think he was just trying to make a point that there were mutiple occurrences

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They waited for the weaker cabinet lol.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

911 was planned under Clinton and only 8.5 months into Bush's presidency. This whole argument is dumb.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Agreed, chalking any global actions to a single person is dumb. No President could have caused or prevented these attacks.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

President Camacho could have prevented this. Sadly we are still years away from his glorious wisdom.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ignore the post! Have a shot at Hillary for no good reason!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 23

You know Bill is a different person right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read above.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You know we had a Clinton prez before Hillary, right?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Post is about Rudy saying there were no Islamic terror attacks in the USA until Obama. Someone another attack before 9/11 makes that 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

false. I say Hillary because you guys are somehow using that attack under her husband's watch as a weird counter argument

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The best part about that guy's comment is that your comment was actually referencing the post. "Ignore the post!"

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Except he didn't reference the post. His post had nothing to do with Rudy forgetting 9/11

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol, his post is referencing the quote in OP's post. I know reading comprehension can be hard, but we all have to do it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Giuliani is losing his marbles. Doing more harm than good for Trump at this point

9 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 13

Losing? he's been a fuck from the beginning.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

That's a whole lot of work.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Good

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

truncated quote

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Good.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Good. Keep at it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

People probably cheered this comment. Trump supporters care nothing about truth, they just like anything criticizing that black president.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Maybe that is his plan.

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 4

nah, guy is just an idiot

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile Trump's plan could be to sabotage his campaign so HRC wins. This is getting too meta

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

We must go deeper!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He was paid by HRC to run against her and say crazier and crazier things once nominated so she's a sure win. Only the plot backfired!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It really does seem like he's actively trying to lose and for some reason people still support him.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Right? Adding freakin Breitbart to his campaign team cannot possibly be a strategic move towards winning

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Like Trump himself said, "[He] could stand on 5th Ave and shoot somebody and not lose any support."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Its like an episode of Seinfeld where George decides to run for office but realizes half way through that he really doesn't want it, but 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 refuses to drop because of how many people are backing him and he likes the attention.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1) quote out of context 2) it's wrong because there WERE Islamic extremists attacks during Bush, after 9/11. Reps want to rewrite history.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 15

While I agree it is out of context, it doesn't really make a lick of sense in context either.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He was using "abbreviated" language. Which is utter nonsense. But he didn't forget about 9/11, he just blatantly lied about no terrorist 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Attacks by Islamic extremists in between 9/11 and the end of Bush's term, because he was praising the patriot act. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Was the Antrax thing traced to them? Or was that just someone who wanted to sew chaos? That kinda got forgotten about.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, that was probably some scientist named Bruce Edwards Ivins, not connected to Islamic terrorists. He committed suicide, so no convictions

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

o.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can put it in context and it still doesn't get better.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

This is true.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Is there any context that makes it mean something else?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

nope

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Watch the whole clip you dumbass. Stop taking things out of context. Memes are not an appropriate source of info believe it or not.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 15

is actually right. gets downvoted.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

There is no context. I watched the entire speech and it's pretty clear that Giuliani is a fucking moron

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/16/rudy-giuliani-911-remarks/ it's pretty clear that you and OP are collectively one whole moron

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

What in the world is this from???

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*where in the world trade centre is this from*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A video of bush

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

-__- You're so helpful. Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9/11

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Really?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By "before his presidency" I mean like back before like mid 90s time frame

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it was him setting up for a news interview before his presidency. He kept messing up the take so as a joke he did this. Got some laughs

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That makes more sense than anything anyone else has said. Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it's been documented that he attended the funeral and checked the hospital of every firefighter or type of officer who risked their life

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

He also refused to get firefighters better radios, and when he did get new ones, they were shitty and still broken

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This directly led to many firefighters perishing as the towers collapsed and they couldn't hear the evacuation order due to broken radios

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then Rudy had the gall to say the dead firefighters "ignored the evacuation order" to cover his ass

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also spent a total of 29 hours in three months at Ground Zero and claimed he was there more than most recovery workers

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and refused to consider moving the Office of Emergency Management out of the WTC complex after the 1993 bombings despite safety concerns

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

UGH no he didnt. he basically said between 9/11 and when obama came there were no other major successful terrorist attacks, which there>

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

The 7/7 bombings were in 2005. Which had more deaths than Orlando & Boston combined, the only "major" terrorist attack with any links to >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Islamic Radicals in the US since 2001. Also 11 Mar 2004, in Spain, 191 dead. If you're going to count Europe now, you have to count it then.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

>werent. way to truncate the quote. he was talking about the patriot act.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

But there were, UNC, the shoe bomber, the DC sniper, and the anthrax letters were all under the Bush administration

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the DC sniper wasn't a muslim extremist he was a crazy guy. the shoe bomber was caught before he could do anything, and the anthrax letters>

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

> I don't even remember if they were successful at all, but even if they were it was a couple of people, not a major terrorist attack\

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually, he didn't. He did mention 9/11 in his speech right before this comment. https://youtu.be/5AGeel-VeeY?t=479

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

unless.. he knew 9/11 was inside job! dun dun duuun!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't like him, and I certainly don't like trump, but let's not stoop so low as to make things up.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Skip to 7:57 for the 9/11 comment.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I get the vibe that he is trying to say that 9/11 wasn't a terrorist attack, but rather an attack by a foreign nation. Which is just nuts...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

This doesn't really validate the comment though. He mentions 9/11 and the previous bombing, but then goes on to say there were no successful

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

except yeah, it does. he said between 9/11 and obama there werent any major terrorist attacks because of the patriot act. and there werent.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But there were, UNC, the shoe bomber, the DC sniper, and the anthrax letters were all under the Bush administration

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Oh, I agree, but let's not stoop to his level. He mentioned 9/11, which is something that should be acknowledged.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

attacks. Either he's crazy, or he's deliberately making misleading statements.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

He's also praising the patriot act, which is deplorable, IMO.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah, like many Americans he considers that the first major attack and was referring to subsequent attacks on USA soil

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Under those 8 years before Obama came along we didn't have any radical Islamic terrorist attacks in the United States." His statement.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

(1/2) Ok, so imagine if I said "I don't think people should eat babies" you can the claim correctly that I said "people should eat babies"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0