Maple flavored sass

May 14, 2017 6:27 PM

The coffee might be more nuanced, but there are still the frozen dinners that all need to tell you to take it out of the carton first. >_<

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just means we have some really good lawyers!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't forget to mention that it is made out of paper and you have to hold it with your hand.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

We can't really have a Southern area, since most of the main population of Canada is all along a curved line.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

Clever Canadians!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

HER CLOTHES MELTED ON TO HER SKIN

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Canada is sorry if you don't smart enough.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

The point of the "warning" isn't to actually warn people, just to prevent them from being able to sue

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

sorry for being sassy

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

We may be sassy, but the Canadian geese are Evil FCUK's!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Hey! The old lady just wanted her medical bills to be paid, she didn't want to go to court but McDonalds cornered her.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

I am not immune to the internet. I went to go find images of the lady that got burned from the coffee,&I don't want to share them.Fuck that.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Don't judge a whole country off the ignorance of a few!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

Watch the doc Hot Coffee.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing you don't know the details of the case. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI-OLa8iNOk

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I know enough! But there's a lot of stupid people here. Doesn't make us all stupid

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Punitative damaged for the win! Simple invention to screw up your whole society

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

When a company makes 1.35 million in just coffee A DAY, any amount tends to be very trivial with no incitement to change their practices

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants simple invention to punish a company that otherwise would have laughed

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The actual story is more complicated. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI-OLa8iNOk

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is always is. The root cause why you have to have disclaimers everywhere is in punitative damages. It screws up lots of other places too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

That poor woman has been mocked, but all she wanted them to do was cover like 10k of medical expenses when she had to get skin grafts

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Disclosure statements don't stop lawsuits and aren't a defense in court. They just help prevent them.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Man I expected to be pissed at the comments. I am so happy I'm not :)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Do they know the lady from that lawsuit that got McD's to put that on the cups nearly died of shock after 3rd degree burns from that coffee?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

All these comments about coffee being hotter than normal. What the fuck is hotter than normal? You boil water, you make coffee or tea, you/1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

The coffee was 180 degrees, which caused 3rd degree burns in 2-7 seconds. At industry standard 160 it would have taken 20+ seconds for 3rds

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then drink it when it's an acceptable temperature for your taste. And since water doesn't get hotter than boiling, the fuck you expect?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

Do you even know about this lawsuit? 3rd degree burns. It was from a spill.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's no wonder people can't fend for themselves. Point is, you should expect that coffee by nature is hot, potentially boiling so be careful

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The coffee shouldn't be able to cause 3rd degree burn no matter what.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Coffee at normal temp could, but would take 20 seconds of exposure, not 2-7

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just so many lawsuits. America

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

The McDonald's lawsuit occurred because their coffee was at 180 degrees causing third degree burns in 2-7 seconds.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The point of the jury awarding high punitive damages was to make McDonald's actually change and lower the temp rather than take the $ hit

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By the McDonald's quality manager's own admission, 700 burn incidents in 10 years or so was economically too few to bother changing policy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oddly enough. The story of the lady with the hot McDonald's coffe is actually pretty bad. She went to hospital with serious burns and 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Was really close to dying. Google Stella Liebeck lawsuit. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Nobody ever mentions her namee

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I first read this as 'Maple Flavored Ass'.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm American so can't confirm, but I bet they have maple flavored asses

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think you have to be Canadian to confirm this. You just have to know a Canadian.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know Canadians but I don't know any Canadians in a way which would tell me what their asses taste like.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That sounds like a situation that could be rectified. Heh. Rectified.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But the cup still has a message about the temperature of it's contents

9 years ago | Likes 238 Dislikes 3

You're not invited to my birthday party

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Its for tourists, sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 10

the McDonalds lawsuit was far more nuanced than its reputation. They served coffee dangerously hot, hotter than safety standards allowed

9 years ago | Likes 428 Dislikes 4

The reputation came when McD's legal and marketing departments got together to go full "Tazmanian Devil" spin doctor on the whole lawsuit.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Yes, but this probably implies that the legal loopholes that caused the warning/legal mitagation of company/payout wouldn't have happened

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes.. it drives me crazy when people say "spill some coffee on myself, get a million dollars, har har har"

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Yup and the woman got 3rd degree burns on her genitals. Almost died, and just wanted Mcdonalds to pay her medical bill. They refused.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

The woman had never litigated in her life and only initiated the suit after McD's offered her $730 towards her medical bills

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Shhh you're ruining the theme of 'stupid americans don't know coffee is hot lolz' with logic and reason.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Those companies put a lot of effort into making the people who sue them look like greedy morons

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The same company that had just ignored 700 previous burn incidents because $1.35 million a day in just coffee is louder than their pain

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

800+ reports of burns caused by 180 degree temp coffee and still didn't change the policy.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Correct. They were cited for it being too hot previously, just under boiling. She only wanted medical covered. They said no.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It was so fucking hot it gave the woman third degree burns almost instantly. They were serving lethally hot liquids as a beverage. Fucked up

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

yeah, the woman went into shock and almost died, all she wanted was McDonalds to pay her medical bills but they wouldn't so she had to sue

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Yeah.... I'm not buying McDonalds anymore. I can't read that and go "yeah nah that's about right.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thing is nearly every fast food place would be like that :(

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If I recall correctly, it was like 190??° and 212°f is boiling. And she just wanted help paying her like $20k medical bills and McD's was

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Like "nah fam here's $500."

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Correct.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because many people have burned themselves on hot coffee and so they wanted to say "no more!" And a bad time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*And at a bad time. Arguably the worst time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Paralegal here: Correct. They'd been cited by the health dept multiple times for the coffee being too hot - almost boiling. (1)

9 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 1

(3) She needed months of extremely painful skin grafts, which cost her over $10,000. McDonald's offered her $500 to settle.

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

(4) She sued for just the $10K, not for pain or suffering. She won.

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 1

McDonald's wouldn't settle so it went to court. The jury thought McDonald's should be punished and awarded her millions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The figure arrived at I believe was based on the daily revenue from McDonald's coffee sales

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

(2) They handed the woman 200F (95C) coffee with a loose lid at the drive through, and it spilled on her lap. She got 2nd degree burns.

9 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 0

The lid wasn't loose until she did so to add cream and sugar, but the temperature served at eliminated a fair chance to respond to a spill

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

3rd degree burns on 6% of her body, lesser burns on 16%. Permanent disfiguration, 2 years partially disabled.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

and the woman never got her millions. They tied it up in court for years

9 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 1

and she wasn't going after millions, the court was like wtf mcdicks you keep doing this were going to award her millions so you'll stop 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

doing this ffs! People kept burning themselves and they kept not fixing the problem 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And she was seriously injured.

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 0

Yeah I'm sorry if the coffee is hot enough to give you 3rd degree burns, and skin grafts, then yes, you have a legitimate lawsuit.

9 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 1

Also at first she only asked for medical bills

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Her family only asked for medical bills, she didnt ask for anything. It was a measly 60k they wanted help with for skin grafts.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

and her millions was literally just the medical costs.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

This part is wrong. The medical costs were $10k or so. The judge slapped them with a larger amount because of they were jackasses who had

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

ya, I put air quotes around the word millions, werent you watching me?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

been cited multiple times in the past and did nothing about it, then offered a bullshit settlement of $500. It was punitive.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Canada. Where you get a citation for having a cigarette by yourself in your own car away from others.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 5

We stand on guard for non smokers... i suppose

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That can happen in Davis, CA now too.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 16, 2017 8:20 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1) ~15 years ago Davis passed a law that there can be no smoking within 20 ft of a public building door or window. Cars are not exempt

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) so if you are driving down the street in your car (even with the windows up) and you are within 20 ft of a door/window you can be cited

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Citations for giving yourself cancer?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Just being alive can give you cancer....

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Ay mate lets make fun of an old lady who had 300° coffee spilled on her groin

9 years ago | Likes 208 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 17, 2017 2:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That hair tho

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

how the fuck do we people in other countries survive???

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

You think that a warning label might have kept it from spilling?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I had to watch a video about that case in law school. Her injuries were horrific. The sight was sickening. Poor lady :(

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

What, 300 K? That's pussy, room temp coffee.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Not when it spills ON a pussy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

300 K would literally be pleasant.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Water boils at 212... coffee is water based

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It boils at 212, but doesn't stay that way once its passed through dried beans and into a carafe.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It was canned coffe-flavored vape.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's figurative speech. That said, imagine my impression as an SI user when someone replies that it actually was at 180 degrees.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or 202 at 5,300ft in Albuquerque where this happened.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 14, 2017 10:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The main thing the case forced was for companies to use sturdier cups that don't spill as easily, which I think is a good thing.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 14, 2017 9:19 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1970s/80s cars didn't have enough cup holders I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Isn't this the lady who returned the cup twice for not being hot enough, after being told they weren't supposed to make it any hotter?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 34

I don't know why you're being DVted. This is correct, it just wasn't on the same day.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

And now the idiots are DVting me. Don't assume you know what you're talking about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI-OLa8iNOk

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I don't believe so. Iirc she went through the drive thru

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Too long ago to remember details, don't care enough to re-research it. I'm just gonna say I think the wounds have healed, and anything that

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

can be said about her is probably worn thin by now.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Basically people kept complaining that the coffee was too cold at the drive thru by the time they got where they were going, so McDonald's..

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Why would a warning on a cup saying it's hot prevent you from accidentally spilling something?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

thats not how warnings work. they dont give a fuck about you, they just want to avoid being taken to court.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The warning isn't preventing you from spilling, but from suing.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

It was excessively hot, their machine was set to go much higher than normal, resulting in genital fusing.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Or at least, 180 was deemed excessive, 160 is closer to standard and wouldn't have injured her the way she was.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The comparison that apparently won in court was at 180 degrees, 3rd degree burns take 2-7 seconds. At 160°, around 20 seconds

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

180°... she had 3rd degree burns & originally only asked for what was needed to cover medical expenses for her 3rd degree burns (~$20K)

9 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 0

Iirc they found that the coffee was being kept way too hot at that restaurant.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Yep, correct.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. You and I could argue that forever and it wouldn't matter.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

Because you don't care about other sides even when evidence is presented to you showing your biased view is wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

My biased view that she only asked for enough to cover her medical expenses but since McDonald's refused she got more?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

McDonalds offered $800, so she lawyer'd up. He offered $90k, & a mediator suggested $200k. McDonalds refused both pre-trial settlements.

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

In the trail it came to light that McDonalds knew the coffee was a burn risk, & ignored it anyway. Jury awarded 160k, & 2.7mil in punitive

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

then both parties settled out of court so all we know is McDonalds ended up settling for less than $600k.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0