Thanks for wrecking my childhood Neil!

Oct 9, 2017 9:29 AM

jestefarean

Views

207466

Likes

4458

Dislikes

279

Udder nonsense

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What a douche

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Now we just need a cow that leaps at about 25,000 miles per hour.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But it's ~250K miles, travel time would be 10hrs not 3 days! I admit I've put too much thought into this... still...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if she only jumps over the moon from a single point of view, from any other point of view she is just jumping

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That cow would die in the vacuum of space.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As long as it makes the little dog laugh when it sees such sport. Also, has anyone seen my dish and spoon?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In fairy tales, cows jumping over the moon are impervious to friction and can traverse the distance in seconds

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Hi kids, my name is Neil and despite having an advanced degree, all I do is talk shit on everything and make other adults hate science."

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Do you hate science now?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But science has proven you can only kiss yourself on the lips in a mirror

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did he essentially just say that a cow can jump over the moon if a cow was physically able to?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I really think he's forgotten how to human.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How it feels to chew 5 gum

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've always wondered how much he got his ass kicked in high school because he's a total prick now.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Probably not, because millions of people like him. He's one of the greatest science communicators out there.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"About"? Neil? If I'm gonna get my cow-flinger working, I can't have 'about'

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Ok, so Super Cow then, got it.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Finally someone mention Super Cow.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I honestly cannot stand this man

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 7

I think if he adjusted his tone a bit he could do well, he has done some great initiatives for public sci discussion but needs work.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like he is trying too hard to appear smart.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Depends on where the cow jumps from! How fast would the leap need to be if she jumped from the ISS?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No idea but it would knock the ISS ut of orbit

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*out

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if it was a calf instead?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still would

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Am I the only one that's getting sick of his shit?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

No. I used to like this guy. Then he started tweeting these pretentious "science facts".

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Exactly! He went from being that likable nerd to being a pretentious d-bag. This is why Mr Wizard is better than him and Bill Nye

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Everytime someone posts one of his tweets, he gets a ton of hate, so no, you are not the only one.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was never not sick of him. I never thought he was more than a stage presence even with his education.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He always seemed like that guy who posts "enlighted by my own intelligence" stuff on facebook.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is obnoxious "The impossible is possible if you did this impossible thing to do it" - Neil deGrasse Tyson 2017

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

Wouldn't the air friction of moving at 25,000 mph incinerate the cow anyway?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's the joke

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same as xkcd comics. If that's obnoxious to you, you have a very weak threshold for what is obnoxious. It's a thought experiment.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's not a thought experiment, it's useless rambling accompanied by numbers. A cow could also jump over the moon if we bred them the 1/

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

size of Neptune, or if we shrunk the moon to the size of a beach ball. It's a couple of equations more than the thought of 2/

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

a 6 year old presented as if it were a witty and relevant statement. "Dad, a cow can jump over the moon if hes fast". "Thats great sweetie"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah, exactly like xkcd. The earth won't stop spinning. Yet people still enjoy the what if. Get over yourself.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ok but what about the dish and the spoon

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Little boy blue and the man and the moon?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

When ya comin' home, son?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't know when...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But we'll get together then

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This dude is such a dickhead.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

What is wrong with his tweet?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I don't think they're talking about this tweet specifically, although taken in context with his other tweets this can sound worse than it is

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

https://what-if.xkcd.com/28/

8 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

That was wonderful.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why can't we favorite comments!?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Totally need to try this!!!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

XKCD's what if series is super good.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"As far as I know, this steak question originally came up in a lengthy 4chan thread, which quickly disintegrated into poorly-informed...

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

...physics tirades intermixed with homophobic slurs. There was no clear conclusion." Priceless lol

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

A wild ride from the start, thanks

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is math related to science?

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

No, not really

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Where did this come from

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Katy Perry did an interview with him. She asked that question

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is Katy that tarded

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It gets so much worse. She tries to be relevant and make comments throughout, and she just doesn't do well

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

link?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, real science doesn't use numbers.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

plot twist, upper division math classes are harder when there are numbers (proofs, logic and set theory)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we do use calculus. It's just all variables.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And/or set some shit equal to 1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is physics. Physics is essentially explaining the universe using maths. So yes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I... don't even know if you're serious. But in case you are: That answer can best be classified as "it's complicated", on the one hand math

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

itself isn't bound by scientific laws because it deals in proof and absolutes, science deals in probabilites, margins of error, theories and

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

evidence. BUT, well how do you think we calculate said margins of error, probabilites, etc. At the end of the day most scientific laws are

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

or can be expressed as equations and maths are definitelly used in scientific fields, but only to process evidence, not as a source of

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

evidence. And yes, that IS a very important distinction because the reason why math deals in absolutes is that it's abstract and therefore

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Bullshit. That cow would decelerate down to 0 mph in a few milliseconds (at most) due to the air resistance.

8 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 14

No, no, ignore how the cow would stop due to being torn apart by the same atmospheric resistance. I see.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just squirt milk in the opposite direction to for the additional thrust needed.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’m not even going to BEGIN explaining for you

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Hey get that air resistance out of here, we're talking about a cow jumping the moon, keep it high school

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

"Children, the world is like a perfect vacuum with no other forces to play with" jk wait until college

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A few milliseconds can’t even be imaginably accurate. I would think it more likely for the cow to be torn to shreds from friction.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Considering what happens when something hits the surface of water too fast, I'd assume it's as the cow would hit a mountain...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mmmm. Well done steak.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Assuming you're right (you're not), then launch it at 250,000 mph. Or 2.5 million mph. 25,000 would overcome airfriction tho.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At ground level air pressure, the breaking force on the cow would initially be around 50,000 kN at 11176 m/s -> 50.000 m/s² deceleration.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

However, I hardly think the usual formulas for air resistance can still be applied to such extreme cases.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, it'd work, but you have to pretend the cow wouldn't turn into a fine mist :)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This reminds me of that one time nuke-engineers put a what amounts to a manhole cover into space. Probably. Maybe. Parts of it. Some atoms.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There wasn't enough air in front of it to actually stop it, particularly when accounting for tumble that would let it pass through much 1/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

without impacting. Similarly there wouldn't be enough to hit for huge amounts of heating - it may have been partially melted and may have 2/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

broken up into a few chunks just due to stress, but it likely would go into space with a good fraction of its speed, largely intact. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was 4 inches thick, so each square cm of face has 82g of steel behind it and 1.03kg of air in front of it. Even with random tumbling...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

reducing the average projected area, that's gonna stop.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not when it's starting from at least 60 km/s. It can take *all* air in front of it with it and get hours of hang-time.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well first off the friction and subsequent rise in temperature would likely be sufficient to atomize the cow almost instantaneously.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Kinda like jumping into water from very high kills you because it's like hitting concrete at those speeds. /2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Right, yeah, that too. Crushed into a cowcake, then ablated away into nothing. Still, it'd die pretty quick.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not even considering the amount of energy it's muscles would have used to accelerate it to 25.000 mph would've burned it up already...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure. I think that the cow would be crushed due to the extremely high air pressure caused by the fast acceleration to 25000mph. /1

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Regardless, wouldn't the cow just end up painting the landscape?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty much. The question is if that paint would be more reddish or more blackish...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if we put the cow in a frictionless perfect cone?

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Then we shove that cone & cow arrangement up NDTs fat ass for posting such utter nonsense on Twitter...

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Udder nonsense*

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Shame on me for not thinking of that pun myself...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Assume a spherical cow.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

With a massive flatulence problem

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't change much. cw of a sphere is 0,45, cow probably 0,75.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

In a vacuum.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

But not a Dyson

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Jesus, Neil! How about 1 day @ 75,000 mph? Efficiency, Neil... learn it

8 years ago | Likes 1266 Dislikes 17

But then it won't be hopping over the Moon, that would be going right past it into deep space. Free return trajectories are a thing though.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah this all sounds like a matter of speed..I thought Neil was supposed to be smart.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

As long as we're talking about impossible jumps, the cow could aim for where the moon will be in 1.3 seconds & leap at the speed of light.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trajectory doesn't work that way. The goal was to jump over the moon. Not shoot past it and never come back

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then you're above escape velocity. This is why you're not a scientist and Neil is.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well to go over the moon you have to circle it and return. if you go to fast you wouldnt return since the moons gravity would be lacking

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Does imgur still hate Neil? Is that still a thing?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Found the project manager.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The problem with that is that the animal would shoot past instead of catching a gravity slingshot. It would die. ANIMAL HATER!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you go too fast you won't go over it but get launched into space

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Yes because you don't want to launch into space when jumping over the moon.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Escape Velocity.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well I mean, *technically* that's still over the moon. Just way, way, way over.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But if you go to fast the cow won't catch the moon's gravity and instead of jumping over it it will just jump past it

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well drag isn't linear, so if you want to be there three times as fast you'd have to go 9 times the initial speed.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Except the drag is only present the first fraction of the journey.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair enough, I was thinking of satellite height. The moon is of course way higher up, so I guess drag isn't really that detrimental.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This would be passing rather than over the moon. Too much speed and you won't get gravity capture. Assuming a cow has no thrust ability.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

The existence of baby cows proves your assumption wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

cows definitely have thrust ability.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

So do horses.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it's thrust you want, you need a bull.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 hours at 225k seem reasonable?

8 years ago | Likes 481 Dislikes 1

what about puting ths cow on a metal platform and lighting a nuke underneath

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

ashes to ashes... beef to dust

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Floor it??

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about we do this without killing the cow? Hm? On that note, does anyone know how many Gs a cow can take before it turns into a mush?

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Cowphysics are a tad different from ours but mine has just told me it is approximately 6 MOOs and a smacking sound.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

8 hours at minus 41 degrees celcius... she'd be frosen solid

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So........ a cowsickle? Or moosickle?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For my salary? Sure! For cow chuckin... Not so much.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah, the cow would burn up at that speed. And what sort of monster eats their steak well-done?

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

It would burn up from the radiation in the Van Allen belt as well.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My mom's ex. He always cooked shitty cuts well done. It was terrible and so so dry.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted May 6, 2025 2:04 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

fastest achieved so far

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yea cause all those cows that realistically jump 25,000 mph

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

By humans, those cows have very advanced 'Moon jump' technology.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

So we talking realistic shit?

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Don't think a toilet can survive a 36,000 mph shit

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It cant

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

wanna bet

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Realistic" sure but it would have to be a pretty fit cow

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fastest achieved by a human* We don't know how fast cows can take off at.

8 years ago | Likes 171 Dislikes 1

Cows weigh more than people and assuming that their tech would be on-par with humans is fair for the sake of a hypothetical physics prompt.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hear that their methane based propellant is pretty effective.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

20 speed.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They can achieve a little extra thrust with simultaneous coordinated udder squirts.

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if that was a comic strip i would read that comic strip

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not the same but I always loved Cudley the Cowlick in the TMNT comics.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Na, they use those as control thrusters.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Science has come a long way. We use aerosol spray cheese canisters for that now.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reaction controller udders

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This MF must sit at his desk all day thinking up pointless stuff to say to try to remind people he's smarter than them

8 years ago | Likes 591 Dislikes 44

"...smarter than they are.*" https://imgur.com/WLuyUyH

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but this one was pretty funny though.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Aaahhhkchtually

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Dammit let me favorite comments imgur

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He is smarter than most, why do you seem to have a problem with that?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is it not okay for him, but perfectly okay for what-ifs on xkcd? Quit being intimidated. Take interest and participate in the humour.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Cause what ifs have a lot of thought and effort put in. NDT didn't even account for air resistance!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Except he tweets wrong stuff from time to time.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Eh. Not all his jokes come across, but I found this one funny. It's just some basic math anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, basic algebra.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As much as im inclined to agree, i think this post in particular is neat and cute.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is supposed to be funny though

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He kinda goes into that in one of his specials. Says he is one of the luckiest people on the planet cause he can just sit and think

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

At least he's qualified to talk about the stuff he does, unlike Bill Nye who just as a mechanical engineering degree

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Take mechanical engineering and get back to us about easy it is. Try not to committ suicide when you realize how much you overreached

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It must be very hard if it also makes you a evolutionary biologist and a climate scientist.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's like saying that a guy with a business law degree could be a financial analyst. They aren't the same

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Engineering helps develop an analytical mind. It doesn't limit you to one field. Good people don't fit into boxes like you believe.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats is the most sanctimonious piece of crap I've ever heard. He's a tv show host trying to stay relevant and you know it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

His job is to teach people about science; this is what he does in his tweets. I don't know why you interpret this as him reminding you 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 24

If this was all he was doing then why didn't he mention the cow would die in space and not achieve the 'jump'?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You seem to not

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think it’s the subtlety of “FYI” at the beginning as if to say “look what I knew and you didn’t you ignorant swine”

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

that he's smarter than you are, or why you feel the need to be a twat. If you don't like him, move on. I thought it was funny. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 19

I'm not saying this makes me think he's smarter than me, just that that's what he's going for. Look up his leap day tweet

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He is smarter than you. So what? There's a guy half my age at work who's a lot smarter than me. Love talking with him and learn a lot daily

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's not much educational about this. He basically did a highschool physics level calculation and didn't demonstrate how

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Kind and f like if you don’t like this comment you could not be a twat and just move on?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I get that he is something of a 'face' of science. But he is often smug or pedantic about it and I feel his mannerisms could be better 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

if he is trying to be another Sagan. Neil has good content sometimes but he jumps out of his lane a lot and it breaks down imo.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Opinion ain't truth

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And? That doesn't negate what I have to say about him. If he is to be an envoy of science, perception of him is very important to the role.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, peer review, results, evidence, knowledge count, not whether or not you step on some cupcakes toes

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think he does this to brag, some people really love science, just like imgur loves memes.

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 16

It's a little of both. Watch him interact with other science presenters like Bill Nye/etc. you can see that they're annoyed by him a lot.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

No they're not. You're imagining that. Bill Nye and others speak very highly of him.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Plus how can you be bragging by making some simple calculations. It's just a tweet, can hardly post serious shit at 140 characters anyways

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, he’s definitely a pompous ass.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

He could be more humble. As there are plenty of other "science people" who are. But I still think he is pretty 'okay' all thing considered

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Almost everything he tweets tries to sound like a profound statement. For me personally, it gets old fast

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

He is not my favorite "science" person but yeah I don't think he is a good comedian honestly. But I find him mildly interesting atm

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

His tweets don't come off as "isn't this so cool?", but instead "well actually". Look to Carl Sagan or Richard Feynman to see it done well.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is my general criticism of him. He seems to be trying to fill that void but hasn't captured the tone of either which can be bad.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont like him that much. Im so glad he wasn't a part of the series "how the universe works" which is a fav of mine

8 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 23

He strikes me as the kind of person who rubs it in your face. Not a fan.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 12

His field aren’t supposed to have to deal with fame.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He's doing a good enough job at it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm hoping he readjusts after a bit and learns how to better present his discussions over time.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, the internet kind of put him on a pedestal, and I don’t really blame him for letting it go to his head, considering people in1/2

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's funny cause all your trends and family told me you love when guys rub it in your face

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 5

One day you'll see Tyson as the clowning attention whore that he is and STFU. I loved this guy, but it's over.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Heyyooooooooooo

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

...ok.. Youre sooo hilarious.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

My trends and family think I'm hilarious

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Somebody please call an ambulance, there's a 3rd degree burn

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All over but specially onnthebface

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0