Logically Impaired

Oct 4, 2017 12:20 AM

oseo

Views

192003

Likes

5555

Dislikes

993

The Las Vegas Shooter was using "bump stocks" to increase his rate of fire. They are replaceable stocks that greatly increase a semi-automatic's rate of fire with no permanent or mechanical modification. These items are currently LEGAL. The first step to avoiding another tragedy like this is to make them ILLEGAL. Please contact your Congressmen and urge that these items be outlawed.

For those arguing more armed citizens would have reduced the death toll, the United States already is the most armed nation in the world with 90 guns per 100 people. For comparison, 2nd place goes to Serbia with 58.21 guns per 100 people.

Furthermore, the general public has no need for assault rifles. There is no practical purpose for having them and they pose a significant public health risk.

you don't need a bump stock to bump fire a rifle

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

This ain't borderlands, I don't just have a handy sniper rifle in my butthole that I can just pull out when I need it.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

You don't? Maybe you should. I do.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The worst part of this, is that Genius Thomas carries a gun and probably has a lot of them

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

Or the confusion it would have caused law enforcement, probably resulting in more innocent lives lost.

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 7

Yeah I read people were carrying there, but didn't draw to avoid being mistaken for the shooter(s).

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

And I applaud them for having that foresight and showing that respect to the responding officers.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Look I love guns. In going to the range on Thursday. But I wouldn't have even drawn my weapon in that situation. That's dumb.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 15, 2017 6:46 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Would have caused more harm than good. I damn well know I'm not a good enough shot to hit someone 32 stories up with a pistol.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This entire event and the response to it are absolutely fucked.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I read that there were people carrying there, who didn't want to draw because they didn't want the cops to think they were part of it?

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

And LvPD on the ground were unable to return fire because of high probability of collateral damage.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

And they were damned smart too. Drawing in the middle of that crowd could have gotten them ripped apart.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even the Band had guns. And even if they were able to. This dude had an Assault Rifle. There is no need for Assault Weapons in Private Life.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

I have no problem with pistols or rifles. But a fucking assualt rifle? why the hell do you need that?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

The definition of assault rifle entails having select fire capabilities, which are already illegal without going through the ATF.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What is an assault rifle? The rifles in question are just regular semi autos, nothing special about them.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Maybe im mistaken but i think i read something about AR-15? if thats the case its an Assault Rifle.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

my friend...you have fallen victim to the scary word the media made up to make certain rifles sound scary

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You dun fucked up now, Thomas.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

The man had a long time before he was caught. Bump stocks being illegal wouldn't have changed shit

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

"Bump stocks are illegal" Paddock: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/08/knox150814.jpg

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

you're absolutly right, and preventing future buyers to get one is a communist concept

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Oh good, someone's here to tell us how heroic and badass he would have been, if only he and his trusty six shooter had been there.

8 years ago | Likes 328 Dislikes 37

I know this is unrealistic expectation but I present to you Jerry Miculek https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ3XwizTqDw

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The biggest roadblock to gun reform in this country is this "good guy with a gun could've saved the day" narrative.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's always the same "pride" narrative. Convince someone they're the best (with no evidence) and they're yours.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most pistols carry 9-18 these days depending on if they're pocket or duty size.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Oh come on that was funny.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Every. Damn. Time.

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 5

It's high noon

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

up you go

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Murica at its finest

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's really what it is, isn't it? Those people really think they'd be the hero to save the day.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

as a gun lover learning to be an EMT, teach people CPR and basic EMS in fucking HS. god knows how many people would be saved nation wide.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I was taught CPR in jr. high, but no follow up, just a couple hours teaching. I wouldn't be much help. ...I should find a CPR class near me.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In germany you need first aid training to get a drivers license. might be an idea for the U.S. as well.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Should probably also include some gun safety classes as well. teach kids early their not toys, rather than trust the parents who lie to them

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Start with not giving kids and loonies access to AR's in the first place, then other kids wouldn't have to do CPR in a hail of bullets. J/s

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Shootings are not the only situation you need CPR in. Teaching the general populace basic first aid is a good idea.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree that more shooting wouldn’t help. But personally, I just want to be able to protect myself and my loved ones.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 17

you are falling victim to the "counter force with force" fallacy, but it means you have a ~50% chance to be dead...thats just not smart...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And you can. But the retard in post is suggesting lobbing pistol rounds 32 floors up and hundreds of yards away.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Move to canada, responsible gun laws make it so your family will be safer than a gun can make them!

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Defintiely the gun laws and not having totally different soceio economic circumstances, just the gun stuff.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Well, thats the indicator. We dont have a stupid fuckin patriotic worship of guns glorifying their use against people.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Or a totally different population distribution. And demographics. And the war on drugs. And large porous borders. But what u said too, sure

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"But how can I defend myself when billy decides he wants to shoot up the neighborhood?"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People seem to be thoroughly convinced that the guns are the issue. If somebody wants to hurt a bunch of people, they'll find a way.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

The flaw here is that guns are one of the best ways. Also, for some, not all, but some cases making it a little harder to get the weapon...

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

...might prevent the crisis by giving someone time to cool down. Probably won't stop mass shooters but could stop crimes of passion.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Nice (in France) attack - a TRUCK - killed 86 and wounded 458 others. If someone wants to kill, they will. Similar numbers w/ zero guns.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

1) yes and almost all countries that had vehicle attacks started implementing barricades either permanent or just for certain events.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

2) to keep pedestrians safe. So i think a lot of non americans are wondering why after all these mass shooting, the US doesn't do more

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

It's because they're a constitutional right and because deranged people will always find a new way to kill. The only difference is (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

that getting rid of guns entirely will leave law abiding citizens without them and crooks all the more powerful. (2/2)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

80 died yes, that's the same as 1 DAY death toll by guns in the US.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fine, by same logic. More people die via cars each day than guns.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And obesity and smoking and suicide and so on. There's no cure-all, but small changes together can have a big impact.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That number is a bit exaggerated and includes death by cop.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Death by cop is more than half.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would I not include death by cop?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"The first step to avoiding another tragedy like this is to make them ILLEGAL." LOL. I just... *rubs eyes* LOL.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

There's a difference between gun bans and gun regulations.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

You do realise this only happens in America right? You guys are all habituated to it, you think it's normal and unpreventable.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

next step: put rivets in magazines so they have mag limit! Except it only takes 2 seconds with a drill to take it out. that will stop them!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Yeah we should just continue to do nothing, every time something like this happens. Doing nothing will fix it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

90 guns for 100 people does not mean 9 out of 10 people own a gun or carry it with them at all times.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Plus most of those guns are owned by the same groups of people. I don't own a gun but my buddy owns like 20. Misleading statistic

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's only misleading if you don't understand ratios. It clearly says "90 guns per 100 people", not "90% of people".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More armed citizens =/= more people carrying guns at a concert. Firearms are prohibited and handguns would have been useless at 1/4 mile.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But... what if they like, turned it sideways. I've heard that is a kill shot.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Nah you got to flail it around to curve the bullet

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Would be hilariously American right there.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Last Action Hero was pretty great

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Highly underrated v

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dog pyramid slays me every time.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"I SAID... I JUST KILLED A MAN AND I WANT TO CONFESS!" ... ... "ˢʰᵘᵗ ᵘᵖ ᵃˢˢʰᵒᶫᵉ!"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

While we're at it we should make murder illegal. Then criminals won't be able to do it. Because they care what the law states.

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 13

Well said, it's amazing how much people weighing on shit they don't understand

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Criminal lawyer, criminologist and gun owner here. Yours is the dumbest argument in this entire debate.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is such a stupid argument. Replace the word "guns" with "tanks". Suddenly you see how making things restricted helps.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Tanks are 100% legal to purchase. All you need is a special license and to cement the barrel shut and have about 3 million dollars

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So they're restricted.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically yes. Museums can get away with not blocking barrels as far as I know

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look, it's the dumbest argument a human being could make on the topic, presented without irony!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actual logic that we see people use every time this happens. Making things illegal doesn't matter if you don't care about the law

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

James Corden said it right. Why does every other developed nation has made it right? And it works. Its not like guns are illegal, they are

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

In germany the problem didnt exist, they banned guns, and now we pretend like the ban made the rate drop. Makes no sense.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

like i said, guns arent banned. i know a lot of gun owners.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guns are de facto banned for civilian ownership, you can not get one for self defense. A right w/gov permission is not a right

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just harder to get. So mass shootings and gun related murder are not common at all. When somebody in germany gets shot it will be reported,

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

nationwide. because its unconmon.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

They havent made it right, they never had the problem to start. Gun murders have never been prevalent in other countries that are low now.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

so whats your solution then?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Enforce the laws we do have, fund the FBI to actually run down bad purchases, stop this worrying about gun cosmetics.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you arguing that murder should be legal because criminals don't care? Obviously criminals break laws. We still need them.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

In part because without them we get more criminals. Stopping some is better than stopping none.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Making the bump stocks illegal wont do shit.

8 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 8

Agreed, make the bullets illegal. That would help. "Here, have all the guns you want..."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

So that the guy who has all the guns he wants can buy black market ammo? Underworld economies thrive on banned commodities.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Agreed, we should make guns illegal as well as the ammo.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Yeah, that's how we got people to stop drinking alcohol with prohibition

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It'll stop your drunk Uncle Jesse from shooting up his neighbor Earl's Harley. Earl's always comin' home late at night and makin' a racket.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

for those downvoting please explain why you think that would actually help.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Because they don't know how guns work, or don't know how belts and thumbs work.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

Or 3d printers work. Make them illegal and people will just print their own.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I own two 3D printers. Can confirm. But you dont need to 3D print the gun You can make them easily out of scrap metal, if you know what 2 do

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I meant 3D print the bump fire stock (its literally a piece of plastic) but absolutely yes recievers can be printed or made from scrap.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm not convinced they know how their shoelaces work.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Keeping them legal sure as fuck won't help either

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

thumb through trigger guard, through belt loop. pull gun forward with other hand. wow bumpfire.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If that worked as well why does anyone buy the parts?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

less painful for the thumb. Also people will buy any horse shit.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wouldn't less painful mean easier to do for longer?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Way too many action movies.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Everyone was probably better off since he was using a bump fire stock. They're not made for accurate fire. He could have killed more people

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 6

you don't need accuracy when you're shooting at a massive crowd of people...

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Considering muzzle rise exists, yes you do.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

with accurate semi-automatic fire. Ask anyone who has taken weapons training in the military. FA is for suppression, not accuracy.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Yup, when I was in, we didn't have "burst" as a select fire option, it was safe, semi and auto. Still learned to fire "3 to 5 round burst"

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I understand how accuracy scales with distance and all, but is the stock-thing a big difference considering he was firing into a crowd?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In the initial bursts, no. As people started scattering and finding cover, absolutely yes.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many shots likely went in a safe(er) direction because he was bump firing. There's not much muzzle control with it, even with actual FA you

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

need to train to control it, and actual FA is more controllable.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

He was firing blindly into a crowd from a great distance. Accuracy was not his goal. That's a stupid argument.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If you're less accurate, you're less likely to hit someone. Do you understand the logic there?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes. Still a stupid argument when you are firing a semi automatic into a crowd of 20 thousand from the 32nd floor. No aiming involved.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's always aiming involved. Do you shoot guns?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 years of military training. If you think you can aim from that distance in automatic mode, put the PS4 controller down.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You do know that you can bump fire without a bump stock... ffs im done trying to explain to people with no idea how things work. look it up

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 6

But why make it easier? sure you could use a rubber band or trouser loop but that can't be as effective/ practical for this kind of attack.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

may not be as practical per se, just stating that bump fire in general is extremely ineffective for hitting a target or crowd at 1300ft

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah it's not even that hard to do without a bump stock.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

easier to blame an object than blame the dark side of humanity that is created by the way we treat each other.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

damn

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Learned how to do it long time ago with trouser blousers. Not hard at all.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I hear you can use fertilizer and molasses to make a bomb. Better ban fertilizer and molasses.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I call it Fertilasses!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

nevermind the fact that bump firing is wholly inefficient

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's inefficient, but you don't need to be efficent to spray into a massive crowd.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but that's just the thing. it would be more efficient to fire semi auto at a crowd 1300ft away...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They don't want to look it up, they want to be mad about TEH BIG SKARY GUNZ OMG.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

well, guns are a BIT scary

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

so are vehicles before you learn about them and how to use them

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm all for concealed carry, carry most days myself but this situation was not one that could have been stopped by CCW holders.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

why do you carry? I'm not from the US and have never seen a civilian carry a handgun.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks for asking. Sorry for the late reply, I'm at work now and I wanted to try give a considered answer to your question. 1/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In short, the answer is personal defense, both of myself and my family, and others if the need to do so presents itself. 2/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I understand that the likelihood of me having to use lethal force to defend myself is extremely remote, and personally hope I never end 3/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

in a situation where I have to make that choice. But the world is an unpredictable place, and not everybody in it has good intentions. .

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe it could have, from one in the hotel. Because his room was located an hour before the police entered it at which point he shot himself

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Well in this situation you could probally smash down his door and not get in trouble.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He was firing for an hour?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you fucking kidding me? It was a country music crowd. I can guarantee you at least 30% of them were armed. And you know what? There's a

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 9

I'd be willing to bet next to no one in that crowd was armed. Can't even bring a knife into events like that most the time

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

pretty sure it was all ages and walk-ins allowed

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

post out there from one of the musicians in attendance where he literally goes through why he didn't draw his weapon and fire back. It's

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 8

almost like this myth of the "heroic gunman" is 100% bullshit in a mass shooting situation.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 15

Not to mention they couldn't have done anything regardless. The shooter was WAY out of handgun range.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Many of the shootings take place are Gun free zones. So chosen for that risk. This guy planned his high rise/multi-gun assault.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Uh, you can’t take guns into a concert grounds, idiot. There are metal detectors and rules

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

im JUST saying, not trying to rile you up or anything, calm down

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

but isnt the general reason for not banning guns is because criminals will still have them regardless?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's a reason, not the main one.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You'd think there would be at least one example of super magic gun hero stopping evil baddy shoot shoot. It happens often enough.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

There are limited examples of individuals reacting to robbers, or individual gunmen in a non-mass shooting scenario. That's it.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It happens quite often. The problem is that a "mass shooting" was defined as 4 or more victims, but return fire or defensive 1/

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

use of a weapon stops the threat before they hit that mark. I think that's why they used that number for their stats. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

not from 1500 feet with anything but a rifle I can tell you that much.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Yep. And with how dude was shooting he only hit anything because there was so many people in a confined space

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also how do you know who the fucking baddie is when multiple people are shooting.

8 years ago | Likes 1499 Dislikes 37

Dude we're not playing hardcore. There's no friendly fire. Right guys? Guys?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We get it, you have a low opinion of people. Go find out how often your nightmare scenario happens in states that carry.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 32

I teach hunter safety licensing classes. I sure do have a low opinion of people common sense gun safety knowledge.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too bad your low opinion is not supported by facts. With the number of guns in the USA, the number of "accidental" shootings is minimal.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Indeed. Cops would've just shown up and shot everyone.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Press Z

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Badguys always have blackhats, goodguys have whitehats... Or redteam vs blueteam.... Or Pushtab to see who's on the enemy team.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Duh. The red dots on your hud map

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shoot everyone and let God[tm] sort em out?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Everyone just keeps shooting until only one is left alive. The ultimate expression of the American dream! Hugh Ess Aye! Hugh Ess Aye!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are they red on the map?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Eagle vision?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thier names usually appear red over thier heads

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Details

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Target acquisition before firing. and if 20 people around you are pointing their guns at one that is pointing back my guess is thats the one

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just turn off friendly fire

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah it would quickly turn into a war zone

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

This. In active shooter training, we were told to just lie low unless we got positive ID on the shooter. Too much crossfire otherwise.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

I said this exact same thing once about the batman movie shooting and got downvoted to hell and people saying it would have helped/

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

/if more people had guns. Um sure everyone starts shooting blindly in a dark theatre. What could go wrong

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

1) Some people thought there were 2 shooters then. That's how confusing the situation was. If even one 'good guy' identified the correct

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

2) 'bad guy' and started shooting, any other bystander would easily mistake them for the 'bad guy'. It would be fucking ridiculous.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Exactly.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure the good guys shoot blue lasers and the bad guys shoot red lasers.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

in these situations the bad guys always miss and the good guys only need a single shot to hit and kill...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

but there were a bunch of people that died are you saying the shooter was the good guy?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

accuracy by volume

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The shooter was armed with high powered rifles. The armed concert goers would have had the same type of weapons to even come close 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

2/2 to stopping the sniper...if they could have determined which room he was in

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Even if they did, from 400 meters, several people taking potshots would have guaranteed other rooms getting hit, probably killing innocents.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I concur. A bunch amateurs with handguns would have increased the fatalities and wounded greatly.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This. I had a dream once where I was carrying concealed, saw someone shooting, blew them away just to find out they werent the attacker...

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

People forget the Cowboy Fantasy is a domino firing-squad waiting to happen.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...or how do you keep the cops from thinking your the one running around shooting into the crowd...

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

Did you see the post from one of the band members? He said he and his crew all had guns but figured if any of them pulled them out the cops

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

probably would have shot them.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Plus all the guns were in the tour bus.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

tbh if more tour buses were armed like that, the Vegas Shooter probably wouldn't have hurt even half the people he killed and been taken dwn

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Fun thought: The baddies are the ones with guns shooting others.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 20

1) Here's another thought: guy walks into a bar and starts shooting. Guy sat at a table gets up and shoots back. Third guy, who was in the

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

2) restroom, comes out with his gun drawn; how can he identify which is the bad guy?

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: bathroom guy was the bad guy all along.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So many fucktards here. Amazing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And more importantly.... how do the cops?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is such a simple point that it boggles my mind how some people overlook it.

8 years ago | Likes 384 Dislikes 9

Because it's not a point. In real life, that situation does not materialize. It's not armed citizens happened just yesterday.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Literally this. I mentioned something similar a while ago about an armed crazy guy. Response: ARM US ALL, PROBLEM SOLVED ...wtf?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Amazing how plain logic carries the day.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

In my experience, people with this view seem to buy a few guns then think they're a fucking navy seal despite having 0 training

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

They enjoy the fantasy of being a badass who would take down the shooter and save dozens of lives in a situation like this when in reality

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

They would just add to the body count

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Just look for the red health bar above their head. This is common sense guys, come on.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Don't the baddies all have skulls on their hats?

8 years ago | Likes 318 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:31 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah the baddies names that show up red when you hover your crosshair over them.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Maybe in the 90's

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The baddies are red with red health bars. Sometimes they also wear red hats. These could also be your team so hope friendly fire is off.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Tiki torches

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perfect on so many levels

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

....That explains why my great grandfather never talked about his time in the concentration camps...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Multiple people aren't shooting. You don't draw and fire unless you have a target. It doesn't play out like a movie. It's not the OK Corral.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 32

As a hunter safety instructor I have to say I don’t trust 80% of people that carry guns. I would not trust any of those people to have any

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Active shooter training. Or any training at all. In my state now anyone can call conceal a gun. It’s madness.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Again man, the interpretation of what is a target... especially from someone who fears for their life.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's positive ID. Something LE and mil must have to engage a target. If you carry, you should have training in the concepts.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

How many people who conceal carry actually have that training, though?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It should be all of them. A person shouldn't drive a car without being taught how. Fortunately there are good classes out there.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Ok, you hear a gunshot, you look up, see a guy with a gun aiming. Is he the shooter, or another like you who also reacted?

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 4

He would be obviously shooting into the crowd, soooo, obviously a bad guy..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

I see where this is going. Fact is there could be a situation where even if you do everything right, you can still get killed. 1/x

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I would even suggest that there were probably several people in that vicinity that had guns that chose not to make the situation worse. 5/5

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

If you decide to concealed carry a gun, it comes with rules and restrictions you should have training in. Including only drawing 2/x

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

I'm only suggesting that in general, people that carry don't draw handguns out willy-nilly, without knowing what's going on. 4/x

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

and firing when you have positive ID on a 'target', have a clear shot in front of and behind, and feel comfortable taking it. 3/x

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

You have a second to decide if he's the shooter or not and, if he's not, he's doing the same with you.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

See I don't have a second though. If I haven't drawn, I look unarmed. If he aims at me, then he's no "good guy".

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

When there's a shot, it's not like everyone with a gun immediately draws. They look around and figure out what the hell is going on

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

You know, like everyone else.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 12

Wow that is a really great point and a good explanation

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 17, 2017 6:00 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Shooting unarmed citizens = threat

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Gun pointed at me while I'm unarmed = threat

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Citizen with drawn firearm, unsure of target/threat = moron that will probably get shot

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Does anyone have actual statistics to support this point or is it just fearful conjecture

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

I'm not sure there are any examples of private citizens trying to stop potential mass shootings using guns. We'd need that first...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It has happened. But in those cases the firefight is resolved long before law enforcement arrives so this problem doesn't arise

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Because of this bullshit Rambo fantasy that sooooo many Americans carry around in their head of how they *think* it would go down.

8 years ago | Likes 157 Dislikes 17

I have them - I keep it as fantasy, though. No illusions here.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Funny how often reality crushes Americans delusions.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shut the hell up, it's to keep from getting mugged/ jumped. Or you could go out whimpering. Not for me.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 29

Found the Rambo.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Self defense is a pretty basic human instinct, snowflake.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How must it be to go through life so scared?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Prepared, not scared. Just because it hasn't happened to you..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok, but in your fantasy of being mugged, how much time do they give you to reach for your gun before you get shot or stabbed?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I don't fantasize about being jumped, moron. It's happened, and when it happens to you, well, good luck!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Situational awareness has kept me out of some situations, my 40 cal out of others.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure there is like one documented instance in US history where a good guy with a gun did actually help the situation.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 11

There it is: the dumbest thing I'll read today..

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Find me some data that says otherwise, and I'll retract my comment and admit that you're right. I was being hyperbolic but, factually,

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"good" samaritans with guns almost never help in these situations. There are statistics, and they don't help your argument.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hope this is sarcasm.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Yeah, but Im also sure theres one where they didnt.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Yeah, I think about 270 times in 2017 so far...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are a ton of them: http://www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/gun-save-lives-stories/2014/10/28/id/603652/ That's just one list

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Also, google "defensive gun use"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Defensive gun use is a right and I understand that, but it only helps a single family, and often puts them in more danger.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Setting aside mass shooters for a moment. It looks like the number of lives saved by defensive gun use is eclipsed by the...

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

You would be dead wrong about that, there are plenty of instances where a conceal carry person has saved lives or defused situations that..

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Not so much dead wrong as off by a handful. There's a reason one has to go to Google to find an obscure case where this occurs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In all dangerous situations i was in (drug mafia, nazies, amok run), me pulling out a gun would have killed me. I'd be an immediate threat.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yes there are situations where they helped but many more where they didn't. We have to make our decisions on statistics not some anecdotes

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The statistics are not in the "good guy's" favor in this case, unfortunately.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could of lead to deaths.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

The phrase is "concealed carry," and the reality is usually far different.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The only ones I've heard of were off duty cops and military. Which only technically count as random civilians helping out.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

And for every defensive shooting there are 20+ homicidal/suicidal shootings.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I actually have nightmares about hitting a bystander in a situation like that. It's a huge responsibility. People don't treat it that way.

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 6

I carry, and it's saved my ass once before, but I have zero Rambo fantasies and looots of training and practice.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

You shouldn't be looting.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hah!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you teach the guys who think shooting at a target on a wooden fence in the suburb is a good idea a thing or two about gun safety?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I have, actually. They're lapsed now, but I held NRA instructor credentials for a number of years.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A lot of training is the key. Going out in the country, shooting cans and whatever moves is not training.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, I mean... it's a lot of fun, and it -is- building familiarity and confidence with the equipment! You have to like it to DO it.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even if you had a gun, you're facing a person ok with killing everyone around you, while you're trying to avoid the innocent bystanders.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

True fact. Why would I have nightmares about it if it wasn't scary as -fuck-?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1