I don't care, I'm still free..

Nov 8, 2019 12:52 AM

AncientEldritch

Views

129943

Likes

5094

Dislikes

81

Shamelessly stolen but I haven't seen it here yet.

This needs to be an easter egg in some space game. Random encounter where a manhole cover just nails your ship.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This entire post is why you need to start teaching physics while considering air resistance. Even if it went that fast. It would slow down.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuckin neato!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

NASA Helios 2 space probe is the fastest man-made object ever. It set a record speed of 157078 mph during the mission.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Apparently this isn't real, the story took on a life of its own and the initial guy who said it refutes it vigorously now.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I think Michael Bay bought the rights to this story actually. He is turning it into a trilogy. Just a bunch of loud noises and explosions

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's a myth; the claimed velocity is actually from a calculation that made huge simplifications.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The thing is, this just isn’t true. Unfortunately.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’m fairly certain the manhole cover didn’t continuously propel itself at 125,000 mph and also that a speed camera could even read that

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As Larry Nivin once wrote: *Klang* "What the fuck was that?!"

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love science!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Total BS. If it was moving at 125,000mph it would have definitely burned up before leaving the atmosphere. Only meteor to leave earth tho..

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Iron based minerals are one of the few that regularly DON'T burn up in the atmosphere. Most actual impacts are meteoric iron.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Helios 2 solar probe's speed is 150,000 mph

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It actually peaked at like 253k mph in 1973

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whether true or not, everything about this story is fantastic.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Donatello: "I bet I could get close to that, if I just reversed the polarity of the Turtle Van's manhole launcher."

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Source? When did this happened?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

YEET!

6 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 12

Yeetimus maximus.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Just keep it inside. Don't yeet anything please

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What's yeeted cant be un yote

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

This is a whole new breed of yeet. This is like, the “whomst’d’ve” of yeet in its absurdity.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've seen the original source for this story as well. It's based on *one* frame from a high speed camera and is a back-of-the-envelope type

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

calculation from a scientist working on the project. IIRC he ignores air resistance.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If this were true an ant falling off the Empire State building would drive a person into the ground like a hammer hitting a nail.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am dubious if only because I’m fairly certain a normal iron manhole cover being accelerated to that speed that fast would be obliterated

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Air resistance can’t melt iron manhole covers!

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Ya that's the real answer is that it was vaporized by the atmosphere, but hey never let the truth get in the way of a good story

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, if things burn up coming into the atmosphere at these speeds, a manhole cover would burn out going through the entire atmosphere

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Guy who did those tests said it was flying so fast that it move out of atmosphere before burning, but there's now way to be 100% sure.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But maybe I’m wrong, I’m no scientist

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It has recently been topped: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Solar_Probe

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Nov 8, 2019 4:48 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Sep 117:50 UTC, Perihelion #3: 95 km/s ~ 200,000 mph right?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Technically that one hasn't reached this speed yet has it?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's at 212,000 mph currently

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah, got the record already then.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope this manhole cover is the deus ex machina in an interstellar war sometime in the future.

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

The REAL reason the Death Star exploded

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or sideswipes Elon's Tesla

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha. In the middle of interplanetary space and a manhole cover from a road hits a car that drives on a road. In space

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure that the air friction at that kind of speed in lower atmosphere would cause the manhole cover to melt.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Pretty sure that the story made my manhole melt.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 MH covers r round so along as wasnt topling end over end the shockwave will keep the compressed superheated air from the surface

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 Mhc was traveling over 55 km/s so it will pass the karman line in less than 2 sec. The faster a round object moves the further shokwv is

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter how it's flying; 2 seconds at 200 kilometers per second is gonna vaporize a 300 lbs iron disk.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are correct, drag is indeed a thing.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m gonna bet it got real hot and pulled apart real quick

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

THEORY: eventually, that manhole cover will hit something, somewhere, way out in deep space, and cause some serious fn damage. Just like 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

a meteor. much like the one that hit earth millions of years ago, that eventually terraformed the earth. So my theory becomes: what if 2/3

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the meteor that hit the earth millions of years ago was just an alien manhole cover that some dumbass alien blew into space accidentally 3/4

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and unwittingly caused the rise of a new civilization, and us launching a manhole into space is just the next step in an endless pinball 4/5

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

game of terraforming planets, and paving the way to new life, simply by blowing shit up. Just the way God intended.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Brilliant. Sign me up. At least there’s some scientific basis that means it’s theoretically possible. More than I can say for religion..

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can't take the skies from me

6 years ago | Likes 220 Dislikes 2

v

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Burn the land and boil the sea.

6 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Beat me to it

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I feel very good about this

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I will If that's what you're into I guess.. Sure. My rates are flexible. Mask on? Or off?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gotta at least buy me dinner first

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like a leaf on the wind!

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Watch me fl---

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Like a radioactive manhole cover on the wind! ;)

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thanks, now I'm sad!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tooling around the web. Kinetic E calc yields the effect of 2 Father of All Bombs from one manhole cover.

6 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 2

150kg mass going 150k mph.

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

So a nuclear blast that was much smaller than FOAB somehow gave a manhole cover kinetic energy equivalent to 2 FOAB? This doesn't add up.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It makes more sense when you take into account that all that energy was concentrated to push a tiny manhole cover. Kinda like guns work.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A blast with less than 50MT of total energy can't give something over 100MT worth of kinetic energy, no matter how well it's focused.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're right, my bad. It seems we kinda forgot that FOAB, although it's a huge bomb, is not nearly as powerful as nuke. So I guess that's it

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Megajoules is my unit which is smaller than megaton

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s interesting but it’s also tumblr so I’m not convinced anything in that post is true in any way.

6 years ago | Likes 344 Dislikes 3

Essentially, it's not possible to prove or disprove it. https://youtu.be/1hABwCY6g2U

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It’s not.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The high speed camera part is total crap, the legend comes from speculation about how fast the

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Could have been launched, but that is pretty much just bored napkin math as it would have likely been vaporized

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Nah it's a real thing that happened, it was some nuclear test underground done by the United States, can't remember why though

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 6

To destroy the mole people's empire.

6 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Ah yes, my mistake

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Plumbbob not a manhole cover, many times larger, probably burnt up in atmosphere

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also they are calculating manhole travels at the same speed. Just as it leaves Earth atmosphere its speed would drop a lot

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I'm also confused how they positioned the manhole outside of the vaporization zone, but close to the shockwave and at the right angle.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It was the top of a loooooong narrow hole, at the bottom of which was the nuke. Air compression likely did the trick rather than the blast

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's typical tumbler: bit of urban legend, bit of partial truth, then a bunch of breathless exaggeration.

6 years ago | Likes 171 Dislikes 3

I only hate this because it's too true.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

yeah but as long as we know that, it's still entertaining to read even if it's likely not accurate.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

DID YOU JUST

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This describes nearly every political pundit who later claims that they're "only an entertainer" later under oath in court.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Nov 8, 2019 4:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Nov 8, 2019 4:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'm the same way with booze

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Slapping fables around like truth is how boomers got that reputation in the first place.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Ok, zoomer...

6 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 4

Account since 2012. 50 points. This is just some loser punks whiney ass troll account he uses to vent his pent up REEEEEs like a coward

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Nov 8, 2019 4:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

This is the adult equivalent of throwing a rock at your brother and then crying when he gets mad

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Getting interested in science isn't good if it's bad fake science.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I like that you used the ok boomer line, and then when they used almost the same thing back, you got angry and defensive

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

https://io9.gizmodo.com/no-a-nuclear-explosion-did-not-launch-a-manhole-cover-1715340946

6 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 2

There are articles arguing both points of view.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

This makes me sad. I wanted it to be true, damn it. Take all the fun out it.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It might have flown off like a frisbee into orbit.. he didn’t say it was impossible.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story.

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Oof, true.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's basically the moral of "the things they carried"

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, this doesn't say that it didn't happen, just that the guy who did the calculation is a grump about it.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yup, that’s where I stopped looking, i mean.. it’s not like anyone found it...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now, that said, it DID still send a 900Kg metal plate upwards at a sufficient velocity that it was only caught in one frame. It PROBABLY1/

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

got vaporized by the atmosphere, because that's what happens to things when they exceed the speeds at which air can get out of the way. 2/

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Mach 33 is Escape Velocity. 1/10th of that is sufficient to set the nose of a plane literally BUILT to minimize friction and maximize 3/

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

A plane nose isn't a single 900kg piece of steel. As a black I could heat an foundry to 2000°C and it would still take more than 5 min to >>

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

>>melt such a mass. Also, meteorites (with iron core, way more easier to melt) hit the ground every year and a lot don't weight so much >>

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

speed, aflame, and heat it to the point where expansion becomes a serious concern, in that heat-buckling could cause a catastrophic failure4

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

and that is the FASTEST a non-rocket craft is capable of travelling. The fastest MANNED ships only do 7.8km/s, 3.3km/s LESS than this 5/

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

If we knew the date, time, and location, we could figure out where it is.

6 years ago | Likes 613 Dislikes 5

It most likely burned up before it left the atmosphere.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

It probably spun a bunch and flew apart

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What about the angle it was traveling? If it was acute enough, is it possible it shed speed in atmo and didn't leave the solar system?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Humans are such an interesting species!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Might need a trajectory

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Assuming it was level, that’s probably as close as we’re getting.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doppler effect. Only helps if you know when the trajectory started. It all has a red-shift as it’s passing away... only *when tells you when

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

unlikely. figuring out how much energy it lost in the atmosphere means an object smaller than a person could be in any number of orbits

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Actually, it is usually sufficient to know a thing's location in order to figure out where that thing is.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might need more than that for an exact location.

6 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

Mmhmm, fun puzzle though

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, we need a velocity.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You'd also have to account for the movement of the solar system within the galaxy, and whether a gas giant's mass altered its trajectory.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds like a fun puzzle huh‽

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering the way it handles incoming objects, it's entirely possible that Jupiter has a manhole cover for a moon right now.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Musk is gonna have one helluvah insurance claim...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless it hit something.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How old is ur mom?...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

close to 60

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Daaaaaamn! That’s a big ass baby!...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't understand

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

August 27, 1957, Nevada test was conducted at night.

6 years ago | Likes 335 Dislikes 0

Thx

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So we beat Sputnik. NIIIIIICE!

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

So then, give or take a few thousand miles, that manhole is approximately in space.

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Unless it hit the moon. Which is even funnier if they find it stuck in a new crater at some point.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, you're not wrong.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's good, if it was done during the day space would have been on the wrong side of the planet.

6 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 0

i mean if it would have been day time it could have potentially went straight into the sun

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It would have just ended up in the daytime sky.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Dude, I'm at work. You can't just make me randomly laugh like that. Not cool.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What’s your vector, Victor?

6 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

We have clearance, Clarence.

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

Roger, Roger.

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Huh?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That’s Clarence Oveur, over

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Huh?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Watch those wrist rockets!

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Damn... I wanted to say "Roger, Roger"

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Around 545,231hours Aug27,1957 x 125000mph=68165125000m away 109701134928km=0.0115 light years Pluto and back 14.5 times.Give or take So far

6 years ago | Likes 239 Dislikes 3

Over a hundredth of a lightyear *already* -- impressive!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Amazing job.

6 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 0

If we conservatively take half that number and figure that it averaged 100,000kph for 62 years, it'd be about 54 light-hours away.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For reference, Voyager 1 is currently about 12 light-hours away.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

so yeah, Voyager was NOT the first man made object to leave the solar system

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Depending on your definition of solar system, Voyager still hasn’t left. (The end of solar system isn’t clearly defined)

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yeah, I've read at least three articles about Voyager having left the solar system, first passing pluto's orbit, then two other milestones.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Missing the speed loss from escaping solar system. Just because it’s above escape velocity doesn’t mean it isn’t slowed escaping

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

but if it was heading in a direction ~180 degrees towards our sun, it would increase in speed as it got closer and only slow down passing it

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And slow down by the same amount of gained by the time it reached the Earth's distance from the sun. So doesn't matter much which direction

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure, but it would lose 30,000 mph by the time it's out of the solar system and by 18X the distance from Pluto it's lost most of that.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's only loosing 30,000 mph over the course of an hour. Its traveling 4 times that speed and left our solar system in about 15 minutes.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

What is this Pluto that you talk of?

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

"Your MOM thought I was big enough!" Pluto.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's no moon.

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Moons haunted

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What do you mean?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Just because it's not classified as a planet doesn't mean it ceased to exist. XD

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

it regained planetary status a few years ago

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Some of us are that petty.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well fuck that particular astronomical society that downgraded its status.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That assumes it didn't bleed any speed to air resistance as it left the atmosphere. Without knowing its trajectory, we can't calculate that.

6 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 0

That’s also ignoring the possibility that it’s buried 5 miles into a mountainside

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably almost no air resistance at all actually. Blast front is pushing all the air at 125000mph. Manhole cover is just riding the wave.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

125000 mph = 34.72 miles/sec. Air resistance only really matters in bottom 10 miles of atmosphere, which it would have passed in 1/3 sec.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fair, but if it was at angle, that 10 miles could become 100. You're probably right, I'm just pointing out other variables.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Manhole covers are designed to lay horizontal. Even if it were at like 75 degrees for some reason it'd still only be 40-ish miles to space.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It punched through the atmosphere in a couple seconds. Speed loss was probably negligible.

6 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 2

I mean we also didn't consider other planets. Is it a crater on Mars? Did it get a gravity assist off Jupiter? It might be going faster!

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Very unlikely.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

I dunno why but this made me laugh! Just the fact it got yeeted on the planet so fucking fast is hilarious!

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

We got one frame of its trajectory. We need the CSI team to enhance! Enhance I tell you!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean starting position to position in frame would give us at least a good idea right??

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Can we measure how wide the show is by the number of pixels in the manhole cover to total number of pixels wide or does the fov affect this

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What were the wind patterns that day? I'm thinking phwoomph with a whole lot of twirling

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have to figure out how wide the shot was, too, because the info we're given is that it was sitting still one frame, the next it's in motion>

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0