usually

Dec 30, 2020 3:55 PM

I wonder if Imgur would send a post by someone named "SpiritofHitler" to the front page.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Just look at what happened to China and North Korea without CIA help!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People who post critical posts also get the COIN "disruption" treatment https://www.aclu.org/other/more-about-fbi-spying

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yep...it was called Operation Condor.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Luckily, the CIA can’t operate in “home soil” so we’re good!

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

They should, we need to invade the us and install a democracy

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It doesn't even sound good in theory.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I am curious to convo with someone who thinks every socialist idea is communism and because communism is horrible it means socialism is too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can always VOTE yourself INTO Communism, but then you have to SHOOT your way OUT if you change your mind. One Man One Vote for One Time!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ignores eastern Europe, where it collapsed of it's own inertia and inherently rotten foundation.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 11

that is why we have the EU, to throw money at parts of eastern europe hoping things will change.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

And the USSR, where that didn't happen, and China, where it has yet to, was/is a wonderland.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Fuck socialism. Just end the cronyism and corruptions. It doesn’t matter what it is. If the people at the top are corrupt, it’s fucked!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Can be said for any form of government, they are just tools made by people to govern people. If they are used poorly they will be bad.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just a reminder that the majority of "developed" (i.e. places people want to live) countries are, in some ways, socialist. USA is a 1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ corporate autocracy. There is nothing about socialism that says it can't also be democratic.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The same is true about democracy in South America.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are the proud boys being backed by the cia?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

/a/KBwlUKi

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It didn’t work in Chile and soon will be gone after the thug Maduro is dead in Venezuela.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Anybody that downvoted me should take a vacation to Venezuela and see how socialism work.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

except when it doesn't, but that's not true socialism anyways. hell, it's never even been really attempted!!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Give it time, when we got androids and shit there's gonna need to be a universal basic income.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well, that won't be "true socialism" either because the "means of production" will not have been "seized"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's communism

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

lol THATS WHERE THAT FUCKING COMES FROM? That's great!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

oh my, that's one pissed hick! I love him! /the swede

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Check out Trae Crowder AKA the Liberal Redneck

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

this is amazing, thank you! do you have a link to the full video?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I don’t... I just stole this one fair and square this morning from another post

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well that's Corey Ryan Forrester, part of WellRed comedy if that helps you find it

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Both the US and the Soviet Union overthrew multiple governments during the cold war. That's part of the whole "proxy war" concept.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think limiting wealth inequality should be the goal. But what amount would morally acceptable?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No one needs more than $100mil, hell , prob even $50mil. And with socialism, that money goes a lot further

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hard to implement when the ones you're talking about are the ones making and influencing those decisions

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd settle for: dont let the same guys who control all the capital also write the rules for taxation/the administration of capital

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

How about you focus on the raw standard of living for poor people instead of jealously worrying about the gap between them and the rich?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well, enviously. And whilst absolute poverty is terrible, most people don't realize the true extent of the disparity. Poverty is hidden and

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Foreign, whereas wealth is everywhere. Gap minder/ dollarstreet has a good resource on this, can explore different homes

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Typical socialist. Blaming others for the failures that they themselves cause.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 29

Socialism caused american capitalism to run amok, leaving the non-rich behind? Please explain.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Typical capitalism. Being shit.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Capitalism has its place. It's insanely hard to be a successful socialist nation without being capitalist first.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Capitalism's International Army hates anything that resembles democracy.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thankfully the US of A is a REPUBLIC. Democracy is basically Mob Rule. As in "If the Majority Wills It, then Tough Luck to any Minority".

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like the minority running the USA now?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who is in the 'Minority' goes back and forth, so having Constitutional Protections for whomever is in "the Minority" is a Good Thing.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not in an oligarchy it doesn't. The power shifts between a select small group. That's not a republic or democratic. American Business Party.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sharing a tweet on a image site prolly from a phone, sure are participating in that “disease” there bud.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 71

5 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

lmao I was gonna post the Bors one but this is way better

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Turning point peloponnese

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

“I *need* Amazon Prime, six vidya consoles, a PC, Netflix, etc. etc. I *need* it.” Most socialists prob give more to corps than capitalists.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 17

So maybe people don't actually want what your idea of socialism is?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most “socialists” just want a modern consumerist society except where they don’t have to pay for anything, so I guess you’re right?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Pretty much everyone wants that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most people who claim to hate socialism rely on tax-funded programs like SNAP, WIC, public schools, and social security.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

I literally have none of the things you mentioned but even if I did, you can participate in society and critique it at the same time.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Okay. The point is that it’s not hard to walk the walk and not support megacorps, but it’s inconvenient so most “leftists” won’t do it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

What was the CIA backed fascist coup that overthrew the Soviet Union?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The ... the whole Cold War?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Economics 101.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well there was that German backed socialist coup that overthrew the Russian Republic.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Are you one of those who think that every socialist idea = communism ussr style? And because every socialist idea is communist and ussr 1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

failed it means every socialist idea fails? OG post is pretty stupid in principle, but i am curious. It seems weird logic. end/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Socialism doesn't work at all, only idiots and traitors would support it in the US.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 69

All forms of government work. It's just a tool.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"tRaItOrS" wanting policies that better support the majority of the population... Ok lol

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"Now where's my $2000 stimulus check Daddy Trump promised me?!"

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You mean like Social security, which is why pensioners don't have to wait on bread lines to feed themselves?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except when it does.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Socialism or social safety nets?

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I feel this is a rhetorical question because there is no way that guy has the capacity to differentiate.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*Looks around at the bread lines, mass unemployment and 300,000 deaths that brutalist capitalism created*

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

*looks as the Republicans literally back a fascist coup and commit actual sedition* Whatever you say, guy.

5 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 6

Jesus.... thats just fantastic.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please explain this to me like I am 5 years old as I am venezuelan and i don't get it

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ven was found oil, set up a ton of social policies funded by oil, oil prices falling and corruption caused a collapse.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Right wingers use Ven as an example of failed socialism. But its economic troubles stem from a single commodity economy. Bad faith argument.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Socialism/communism only works on the small scale. On the national scale it falls apart.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 91

in conservative fantasy land, economies of scale work in reverse when it isn't walmart or amazon doing it

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The 30+ developed nations that have adopted the policies that the progressive Americans support which you are attributing to "socialism" and

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

have found that it works perfectly fine determined THAT was a lie.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Said the guy who has literally no understanding of how anything works but still feels the need to parrot dumb shit he thinks he heard once.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Funny how the US keeps falling on all citizen quality of life scales while Finland and NZ keep rising tho.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Finland and NZ arn't socialist though. They got good social policies but they are still capitalist for the most part.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So why does attempting to implement those policies get met with the cry of 'but that's socialism', then?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because americans are told that socialised healthcare policies are bad and us europeans cant understand why.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly, let's make that happen in the US.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Absolultely. Theres a mid ground thats not quite socialism and not quite capitalism that Europe and a lot of the first world enjoy.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So why not I plement those social policies in the US?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes do it. crooked capitalists run the US and the rest of the world knows that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's socialism!!!! /s

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And yet when other countries try out these "socialist policies" on a national scale it works just fine. Hmm.

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 2

Can you give example of socialist country that works well? Socialist state provided wellfare policies, like in west Europe,aren’t socialism

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

That's my point. Whenever guys like him cry about socialism, they always refer to policy change in the US and compare it to places like

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Cuba or Russia. Which still were never really socialist or communist.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

There hasn’t been a socialist country that would work well, unless you like to torture people. Stop supporting socialism if don’t want it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Socialism vs. Capitalism makes as much sense as choosing hammers vs. Saws when building a house. Best option is to use both.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

True, but the way I would explain it is to start with Capitalism to generate wealth then transition into socialism slowly afterward.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Wow, someone who actually understands the issue instead of thinking things will magically improve by switching systems. That's a rare sight.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where do you think you need capitalism?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

In places where there is an actual market place of production and demand, such as most luxury products.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's not an answer to the question because markets aren't exclusive to capitalism. So you don't know wtf you're talking about.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Capitalism is and will always be the best form of government for generating wealth, although it's one of the worst at distributing it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well it's not a form of government at all. What makes you think it's the best at generating wealth?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's a direct quote from my extremely knowledgeable college professor, but SURE, You Must be the ExPerT.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 585 Dislikes 10

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I chortled

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

PragurU went mask off with their who was Robert e Lee video. Disgusting.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

since this blew up here's a bonus

5 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 2

Not sure if you're joking or trying to spread propaganda, but either way, I love your posts lmao

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That sounds more like an interpretation of Communism.

5 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 5

Yup, socialism is more of a safety net.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dennis wouldn't know the difference, everything to the left of Pinochet is just "socialism" to that crowd

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Communism doesn't require enforcement of rules. It assumes that everyone is a good and motivated person. That's why it's unrealistic.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

You don't require a state to enforce mores and laws

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The irony of anti communist pro libertarians is their theories have much the same achilles heel. The good part at least.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

No, going to have to disagree there

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Socialism isn't equal wages. Communism is. Socialsim is helping the poor live comfortably because everybody deserves comfort.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Eh that's fair, didn't realize in the initial one it was setting equal wages (which wasn't even a thing in ussr, it was just a smaller rang)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I feel a better interpretation is that socialism is helping *everyone* have a better bare minimum

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

True. But the level of help should be proportional to the need.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I understand it's a joke but that's def communism and not socialism. Socialism is more like the kids earns their respective allowance, but

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

OK. There are no 'official' definitions of these words, but you can usually see 3 kinds. 1) Marx: socialism is a society where the state ~>

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or a comparable collective institution owns the means of production. It's goal is to create communism, a classless stateless society. ~>

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) pre-/non-Marx: socialism->societies have a social responsibity for their members; freedom a political AND economic question. Communism ~>

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The community shares all its resources and responsibilities; property may be more or less abolished. 3) american: socialism= government ~>

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They also are given the basic necessities of life (sustinence, shelter, and healthcare) and enough allowance to allow them free will, with

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

The option to do more chores to make more money. Being a parent is literally exactly like socialism.

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

If you want a similar comparison for capitalism, it's that the parents will not provide those things unless the kids work for them.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Nice capitalist memes there. You don't even understand how badly you're fucking yourself

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 16

communism and socialism have been conflated for political propaganda for at least as long as I've been alive (I'm 50)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a natural progression. Capitalism breeds competition. We elect members of society we think can create a fair set of rules by which we

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Live and do business. But capitalism is raw competition, where you do anything to succeed, so over time corruption is a when, not an if.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Socialism outlines similar things, but with standards

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The picture of the twitter handle is James Connolly, a Scottish Born Irishman and hardcore socialist. No Lenin but just thought I would FYI

5 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 2

And that makes the statement not true?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I didnt refer to the statement at all, just the picture in case anyone was interested

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks for that mate

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Scottish born Irishman? So Scottish?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Following the model of x-American, it might make him Scottish-Irish. Scottish-born Irishman doesn't sound too bad by comparison.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, born to Irish parents in a mostly Irish community. Back then it was all under British empire so being accepted as Irish likely easier

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My name is James Connolly, I didn't come here to die https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wukfdjJv340

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Duh... That's why it says "Spirit of Lenin" not "I am Lenin."

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dont think Lenin was much of a Tweeter ;) besides James Connolly was executed (while tied to a chair) by the British Empire in 1916

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you actually think this person is claiming to be Connolly? Do you REALLY think that?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean the Irish Socialist leader who was executed 104 years ago? Surely not

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Executed by firing squad while tied to a chair, as he had been so badly injured in the Easter Rising that he couldn’t stand

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Doesn't make the statement anymore incorrect.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yea but that wasnt my intention. Just to say who is in the picture in case people are interested.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lenin was also a communist, not a socialist, though I know especially Americans have trouble telling those apart.

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Everyone has a problem telling them apart because they've been used in different ways by different people in various times.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Per VI Lenin: "The goal of socialism is communism."

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Lenin said a lot of shit. He always said he was a communist, he had absolute power somehow it wasn't communism.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a bit like a Christian saying "I don't practice Christianity, the goal of monotheism is Christianity"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, which means one cannot be the other. But especially in the US they're used interchangably. Even ar times mixed with socialdemocracy

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yep. 99% of references to socialism, communism & capitalism are from people who don't understand any of them.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not really, that's just Lenin being a tricky bugger. Lenin and his party was communist. When they got their way, that's communism.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They didn't get their way though, they got derailed pretty fast, and then they just kept straying farther away.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1