There's quite a difference between skirting the rules and putting musket balls through it

Sep 25, 2016 6:22 PM

Merced

Views

1883

Likes

83

Dislikes

22

funny

Same.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:40 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Damn rapscallions.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Quite so good sir ! They get more intrepid by the day !

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I thought the your founding fathers wanted you to be armed so you could take down a tyrannical gov via militia. Not personal protection?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

Jefferson also said every law and constitution should expire every generation or 19 years and be revised

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Start here: https://origins.osu.edu/print/836 - you'd also need to understand the history of militia in the US, and taxation among others.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, they wanted people to have guns for personal protection. Militia were organized by the state

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Ahh. I get it. Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd suggest reading this: https://origins.osu.edu/print/836

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We arent supposed to have a military...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah, a statement full of gross assumption and over simplification of the issue. Surprised to find one of those on the internet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm not American so that's why I added a question mark.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was referring to the reply to your question, where someone had the audacity to assume they knew exactly what the founding fathers meant. 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The 2nd amendment is one of the most debated amendments to the Constitution, so to presume perfect understanding of intention is asinine 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1