Post Title (required)

Feb 15, 2022 4:57 AM

Yes. I noticed the main theme between talk with friends about who wins the lotto is that we spread it around and people we know get a home.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The quote is not true even for food. Have you all heard about the hunger problem in africa?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Your Twitter post isn't quite as good of an argument as Housing Corpo's "donation" to various political entities.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is quite literally a case of, "You're damned if you do and damned if you don't."

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US just voted in a UN poll AGAINST food being a human right....so we still got a ways to go....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Love to live in a country with several times more unoccupied homes than homeless people while we "struggle with growing homelessness".

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be ?communism?, ?capitalism? is letting rich people hoard things in order to take more money from poor people when sold.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or also for plates.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Novel idea, exponentially increasing taxes on properties. In short, make it so anything after a 2nd/3rd property has diminishing 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

Returns. At a certain point, its only losses. Actual laws would need to be more complex of course, but the basic idea prevents hoarding 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

This is the way to do it.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yep, the tricky part is finding a comfortable medium that lets normal people still be full time landlords without making loopholes for banks

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stop that socialist talk right now. If you weren't born with a home, then too bad for you, go live under a bridge.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we also do that with you know, food? Some poor bastard out there digging through trash for his next meal.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Easier with housing. People only need one house and they’re good for a few years, food is a continuous need

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do agree though

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are five times more empty houses and apartments in the world than there are homeless people. It's a problem we could fix in a month.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

most of the empty ones are empty for a reason; not hooked up to utilities, not up to code on structural integrity, not close enough to shops

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Most of the time though that reason is "Landlord wants more money"

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Any landlord will tell you the absolute WORST thing is to have an empty unit. Most will drop asking price after a month of vacancy

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

landlords getting $0 a week from an empty room, you think they want more money than $0 and that's why its empty? I think there's more to it

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My friend is a tenured professor at a resoectable university...he still can't afford s house

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Unions should be organizing mutual aid groups.. (& buying housing to rent (at-cost) to members). Beyond that, college campuses, staff..

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

grad students, students.. should be working on practical solutions to their own & community problems (in smart peer networks).

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know prof salaries (UK). They definitely can, by leaps and bounds. Does he have lots of optional expenditure? Debt? Etc.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If they’re talking about tenure, it’s probably the US, we treat educational careers better in the UK. Not great but it’s still better

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also you forget that some places are very expensive to live in, it’s difficult to own a house in London on teaching salary for example

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is true. But I'd expect 'London' to be stipulated due to that bubble. Most Academic salaries match very well with cost-of-living

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Finally in a position to buy a home...Every offer we made "sorry, we went with another offer"

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

@ScorpionSage

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would be nice

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eat the rich.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I pay an absurd amount of money for a studio apartment.

4 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 0

In SF the cheapest studio I could find was $1800 p/m and I was LUCKY to find that! It was directly above the garbage room and had one window

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

To that end I feel very fortunate to be living in the Sac area, paying $1770/mo for 2 bed 2 bath duplex with a garage…

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So cal, Ventura county: $2500 cheapest 1 b1bath apartment available

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which, mind you, was a $450 increase from 6months and 1year ago

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm from SB, believe me I know. My dad likes to say I should just move back home. Oh ok are you going to pay half of my rent that I can't?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Austin TX was 33% investors last year, that means normal home buyers faced 50% increased competition due to Corporations & 3rd-home-buyers

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vienna had an extreme housing problem in the 19th and beginning of the 20th century, with literal slums and all. They started building 1/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Large, decent rental blocks in the 1920, financed by a dedicated communal tax (Wohnbausteuer), and didn't stop till today. Now we have 2/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

43% of the households renting public housing or a private social housing, 19% in self owned flats and houses, and the rest in private rental

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It all starts with continual public investment, which I think will be controversial in the USA.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The basics. Housing food healthcare...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

wait, you guys have housing?

4 years ago | Likes 344 Dislikes 3

You guys have plates? And seconds?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That’s what we are trying to do

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, it's like 5 people who own everything

4 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

And 3 of those people are actually the same person just with some clever paperwork.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

And the other two are a bunch of rats in a trenchcoat.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wait you guys have plates?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

you HAVE things?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You guys Have?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

one part of this other than hedge funds is the wrong kind of homes are being built. big lots with McMansions

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So we are making bigger poorly made plates, rather than many well made plates. (McMansions are known for poor build quality).

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about a simple number cap? You can buy 3 or 4 houses that’s it. Should be more than enough right

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

right now the biggest issue is corporations buying up all the houses at higher than asking price, then hiking the price for resale driving 1

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the market up and up - I'd say there should be a cap on the number of 'uninhabited, for-sale' homes a corp can own at any given time, which2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

would encourage them to sell quickly (lower price) and prevent them from hoarding properties. you might also want to set a maximum amount 3

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

time they are able to hold those properties if they remain uninhabited, there are lots of little nuances, but it would be a good start to 4

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

slow the market hike and encourage them to sacrifice large profits on a single property, in favor of quick turn around so they can 5/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I keep seeing people defending small scale landlords because they’re ‘just trying to make a living’. No. They’re taking money which should

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 17

I know plenty of people that prefer to rent. And when I rented, I preferred small landlords. Just bc some are shitty, don’t mean all are.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

my husbands best friend owns 3 rental houses, and provides housing to section 5 families so they have an affordable place to live.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey man my landlord is just trying to make a living off of all 15 of his properties

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

be paying off that person’s mortgage. They’re driving up property prices. They’re deciding what kind of people should live in their property

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 17

, deciding who they should live with, whether they should be allowed such frivolities as pets, what colours they can paint their walls…

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 15

All the while they charge the absolute maximum they can get away with and 99% of the time do the minimum work possible to ensure they’re

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 14

providing a safe, happy, clean place to live. Landlords are fucking parasites, making money off you because they made enough money

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 13

to do so before you. Rental property should only exist in the hands of local authorities, and as an organisation where every penny of rent

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 11

The problem with that, is that to achieve it...we kinda gotta do a bit of communism.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Socialism, and yes because socialism is an equitable system.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A new law where ownership on having to live there more than half the year. If one does not, then the state seizes the residence and sells it

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Sounds fiddly. Like how "squatting rights" gets. To make it air tight law would take an amount of surveillance I'd be uncomfortable with.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just takes a few letters a year at random times to sign and send back within a week. If you don’t respond they investigate

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Filing taxes will show what the primary residence is for residents and Corps (treated as humans) don't live in residential houses.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes please. I know to many people who own multiple houses and I still rent.

4 years ago | Likes 120 Dislikes 9

Because it's an appreciating asset and investment? I owned a house about 5 years before I could actually afford to live in it.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Houses aren't stocks though. They do not follow the usual free market choice constraints (for many reasons). Housing shouldn't be an 1/

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

investment (within reason) just as life-saving medicines shouldn't be an investment (within reason).

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Of course there is some room in there for investment - but we've left that point a long time ago regarding housing 3/3

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you are in Polk County, Iowa... look up IMPACT. They have(had?) both state and fed funds to pay your current and back rent, stopping /@

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Evictions. Also look up Hawkeye care to get FREE health insurance for your children. Polk Co takes care of its peeps./@

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeeeep. Same hurrrr bud

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I may get hammered for this. I know a few guys who purchased multi-unit properties(duplex, apartments) with their money. 2 of the 3 saved /1

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Everyone's situation is different= they're still banking on others base needs

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Due to career reasons, i have to move a lot internationally, so absolutely rely on landlords. There is a valid path there, fully agree. 1/

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But living frugally so you can buy houses and rent them out for more money sounds more like frontrunning rather than a career. 2/

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

People like me who NEED to rent because we move every two years are the minority. And if those with stable incomes can't buy a house, 3/

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

or need to pay an absolute fortune, while others have bought several houses to rent out to the former, that's not really a productive 4/

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

EVERY DIME to buy rentals. Including having their family in rentals. And those 2 were in armed forces(1 Army 1 AF) the 3rd chucked /2

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Packages at UPS and lived BROKE. He ate Ramen packs so he could get the $$ for his n first house. Then he lived in an apartment so he /3

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Could afford to rent the house. All 3 sacrificed stuff to get there. I had a phone w data, they had flip phones. I had Netflix, they would/4

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Rent a movie every couple weeks from Blockbuster. Not every landlord is an evil shit. It was a valid career path. Villainizing every /5

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

oh jees not this sh!t again.. the problem is not a guy with a second house. the problem is the corportation with 5000

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You could.. but see how well that worked out for the Russians but hey by all means try it for yourselves

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You can say A LOT of bad things about the Soviet Union. So many things. But they actually had really low rates of homelessness.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is because they shoved everyone (and i mean 3 families) in 2-room appartments. It easy to solve homelessness when you have labour camps

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

And I'm sure we won't find anyone living in worse conditions in the US, right? And hate to break it to you, but we've got labor camps too.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know, saying I think I should be able to buy a house before a boomer buys his 5th rental property doesnt mean I want to be a Soviet.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Tax the rich. Some people work 2 jobs for years to buy a home or an investment property

4 years ago | Likes 428 Dislikes 22

If the rich get their way it'll be everybody except them and 3 jobs.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bruh I work 3 rn and cant afford a house within a 45 min commute to work. I dont sleep and I eat like shit. I cant with med bills.

4 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

Well, 'medical bills' are another thing that shouldn't exist.

4 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Preach

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Are you taking the piss? I work two jobs to pay rent! And I have a degree.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Dude. A load of people work for years and never buy so much as a cardboard box.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Need to tax 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc home rental investments too. I would put money down that it's the biggest cause for price rises.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Investment property? Work 10 jobs if you want. We're talking about roof over one's head.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Officially, yes, our strategy & proposed laws should be getting middle-class voters against the worst mega billionaires & land hoarders..

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

but technically, a bunch of people buying second homes to rent out is still a huge problem.. (and many of those vote against apartments)

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Invest in companies, even better- green, ethical, even worker-owned companies, or portfolios.. and the world would be a better place..

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty easy now, though some more work could make that easier for more people, but unofficially, there's nothing heroic or noble about

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2nd home investment / landlordism.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe you guys would have more housing available if you replaced your suburbs with blocks of flats ;)

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

we would also have it if those suburbs werent absurdly overpriced and constantly being bought out by big business

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

not a huge surprise, but old laws for zoning are racist and classist.. https://youtu.be/SfsCniN7Nsc

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

- though I will add that beyond fighting over breadcrumbs, which is noble, there's also good reason to design new sustainable towns..

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

just outside of cities, and not have to deal with the nimbys.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not about having housing available. It's about 1: allowing housing to be build, especially inexpensively and 2: prohibiting landlords.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It's okay for someone to briefly rent a place, but it should be affordable enough to own a home that this isn't necessary. Buying out many

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

homes just to rent them is toxic profiteering and provides little to no justifiable benefit to renters. Affordable housing solves it all.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's not always practical to buy. There were about 13 years while my husband and/or I were in school when it made way more sense to rent

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sure. Now imagine if it cost half as much to buy. That is reasonable and feasible if homes and property weren't used as investment engines.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Even though we could have afforded a house during part of that

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I wish all these keyboard warriors in here could have spent one month in some Soviet state housing and experience property redistribution.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

well...what do you call people calling for the redistribution of private property?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Why? Because our only options are predatory capitalism, or Marxism-Leninism? That's as far as your worldview allows you to imagine?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

no but when every third comment on such posts involves eating landlords it is pretty clear that what most people seem to go for

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Clear to you, maybe, not clear to me. People are calling for reform. People are acknowledging that the current system is not working. That

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

doesn't automatically mean we're going to implement the worst kind of communism possible. Lighten up.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Again. I am not against people calling for reform.. i am against idiots saying kill the landlords

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are more options besides what we have now and stalinism.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It doesn;t sound like that from the majority of comments here who think anyone with and extra flat is by default a parasite

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Current conditions are not solving the problem of affordable housing for a lot of people.. while I share your concern, generally,

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that too many internet people call for revolution.. our answer has to be to help good programs and orgs to solve these problems in good ways

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Landleeches ARE parasites.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Only because you aren't one

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Case and point....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8