Tell me I got this wrong...

Dec 18, 2020 7:21 PM

rigello

Views

346

Likes

7

Dislikes

7

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/health/covid-vaccine-first.html

Basically, 'fuck teachers and fuck your grandma, she lived enough'...

Risks compared by race: https://i.imgur.com/JzcdnM6.png

Risks compared by age: https://i.imgur.com/s3X3fHS.png

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/assessing-risk-factors.html

coronavirus

nytimes

weird_shit

savethegrandmas

Essential workers because they're fucking essential and don't get paid for it. The old can stay home for a bit longer

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Essential workers because they are the ones that interact with the most people (elderly included) and it would help more to have that>

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I can see logic in this. Not in 'Fuck them cause they're white.'

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sad part is there is a reason the surviving elderly population is disproportionately white.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And, um... we need to 'level the field'?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Couldn't be bothered to read the whole article, or just reaction baiting by circling out of context lines you know will get people mad?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Would you say the same if it read "are mostly black"?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Does playing What-Ifs instead of paying attention to context and stats make you feel better?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So blatant racism is 'out of context lines' now?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It is if you ignore the context of the question - Should we immunize people who are most likely to get infected (Essential Workers) or...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not denying various possible strategies. I don't get what race got to do with it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's because you're not reading. "It’s a question increasingly guided by concerns over the inequities laid bare by the pandemic, ...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

from disproportionately high rates of infection and death among poor people and people of color..." You wanna bitch, you gotta pay attention

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

groups that have the worst outcome from infection (Minorities and the elderly). The Doctor is pointing out there's not a huge overlap there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or more accurately, that there's not a huge overlap in sub groups, I should say.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Being old (over 70) means IMMENSELY higher risk of severe/fatal illness than being Black/Latino. No comparison here.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would be why the paper mentions both, and why the article starts by saying the 'worst' of the elderly will be getting the vaccine first

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Whoever sees the most people should get it first...they are the most likely conduit of transmission, then vulnerable...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Or people most at risk of dying, along with people with most contacts. Both strategies are debatable, it's racial preference I don't get.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

After all, high contact ppl are more likely to have an immunity.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, article says that term 'essential' became diluted, up to 70% of US workforce fall under this category.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I say we give everyone like 10% of the dose cause then we will have 10x as much to give! Thank you for attending my TED talk.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

BTW similar thing happened with Oxford/AZ vaccine. ½ dose proved to be more effective

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya, immunology studies are notoriously rigid...We will figure it out eventually!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1