As European watching the US election

Nov 5, 2020 9:45 AM

Peynus

Views

89618

Likes

4609

Dislikes

115

Whenever I see a blue county (often with 60+% of the total state vote), I can pretty much assume it's a city. In this dumpster fire, this has kept me moderately amused. Go Biden!!

election_2020

funny

memes

societal_collapse

iq_test

Haha Facts

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are still hundreds of thousands of votes to be counted from my city of Philly. It's trending well for Biden!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Is the entirety of massachusetts a city then?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The district system was designed to benefit voters what live in less population density. Republicans gerrymander, redraw lines to win votes.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why the disconnect between red and blue on some issues is so big. Metropolitan lifestyle vs Rural lifestyle.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every election in Texas... Dallas, Austin, San Antonio and Houston (most of our major cities) are blue islands in a sea of tiny red counties

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

In indiana theres 3 blue counties. All associated with collages and major cities. Purdue, university of indiana, and indianapolis. Restisred

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ya them stupid fucking city slickers

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You either forgot the /sarcasm tag or an education.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Isn't it weird how cities with universities tend to vote blue, and country towns whose main export is syphilis tend to vote red? Weird

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a Californian living in Florida, this statement could not be more true.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Our President was never meant to be selected by a majority of people, but by people in a majority of places.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

DING! (light bulb moment) That's the first time reasoning behind the electoral college made sense to me. Coulda used you in civics class.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Even in most red states, the major cities all vote democrat.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a European I keep forgetting that you have your colours backwards, and your left(ish) party is blue, not red.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

As a fellow European, that's not all that is backwards in the land of the "free"

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Tbf, it didn't start off that way...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's actually a fairly recent development, too. I believe it only really got set in stone that way around 2000.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

100% this lol

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah civilization!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or they contain multiple colleges/universities. I went to uni in Indiana w/4 schools in town. We were an island of blue in a sea of red...

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

I currently live in Indiana. Voted for Biden.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But what’s the city in the middle of Pennsylvania? I think it’s Centre County, but don’t recognize any city names.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

State College. Penn State is located there.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Ohhhhhhhhhhhh! That makes a lot of sense! Thank you!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sorry we can’t count your vote. Not because your a different nationality but because it’s for Biden.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As european I think after the counting the candidates have to fight on a circular paltform using padded crooks.

5 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 1

This is america, pal. Blades, not pads.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As an American... that’s a GREAT idea!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As the founding fathers intended.

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

This, but Senators.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We still do this in the old world

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would probably be better if they weren't padded

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Why would we wrap our politicians in padding if we wanted them to fight it out?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So do you say it like “a yuropean” or “an uropean”?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I live in one of the blue parts, it’s nice here.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Really? You aren't getting burned and looted to death by weekly BLM riots? Antifa death-squads aren't patrolling your streets? Are you sure?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of the fabled no-go zones ruled by Shariah law on my side of the Atlantic.Closest thing I've seen was a street with 5 Döner shops

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We just look past the death squads. I'm in a blue part of Utah. There are 3 of us in the whole state

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Better educated people tend to live in cities. They also tend to vote more liberal. Been that way for awhile.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 10

Trump support (by state demographic) is inversely proportional to post-high-school education levels.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Good thing we have the electoral college to ensure that the clueless, poorly educated people get an equal say in government!

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

So, only people with a fancy piece of paper should be allowed to vote?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think you meant to say, village fools shouldn’t be allow to vote?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The rhetoric going around suggests there isn't a difference between the two statements.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Haha that’s the joke.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe we should stop looking at education as a bad thing, or at being an uneducated voter as a virtue?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1) Perhaps, although having a college degree doesn't make someone smart, nor does lacking one make someone stupid. To the original point

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) don't start with the "one person = one vote" if you're going to withhold that basic right simply based on education level.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Living in Lexington, KY

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Lived in FL, I understand such shame. Our role is to be a horrific warning to other states. Not proud work, but our job is essential.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Is that why your state didn't shut down for the pandemic? Because it's an essential worker?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It is the nation's dong after all.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lmao

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an outsider, why do America only have two parties to choose from?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Who knows

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the system is fucked, is the short answer.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Electoral college maintains two parties. It's winner take all in each state. Similar parties take votes from ea. other.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, there is no "middle road" to choose from except in primaries. We end up with mortal enemies on the national ballot.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's many more, but they never make it to the final round.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Easier to control the narrative, easier to convince the populous we have a choice; plus "Poppa Washington" *specifically* told us not to, so

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because ~95% of us are too stupid to realize that more parties would benefit us.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think there's also the part that if a third party arises, it will ONLY cannibalize voters from one of the 2 current parties, thus >

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Creating one majority party and 2 minor parties with too few a majority to compete. But no one wants to break further.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily. A 'true moderate' party could arise while the major two continue on their way to each extreme.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My county went blue for the second time since '64...very proud boy here in MI

5 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 6

Michigander here as well! And very proud to say so!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My Michigan county went red. Still proud of Michigan as a whole though.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

?1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Uhmmmm.. I hope you know what Proud Boy means.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 14

He’s taking it back

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Certainly taking it ;)

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"Rural voters are being disenfranchised because statistically there are fewer of them"

5 years ago | Likes 666 Dislikes 11

Mate, as an American, forgive us. But it's likely it will get better. Sorry that you had to watch us as close as you watched Brexit

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 7

Brexit is that scene for Austin Powers where he runs a guy over with a bulldozer. Anybody could have stopped it and nobody did.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

The Irish tried pretty hard to be fair!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rural electoral votes are very inflated

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And thanks to the EC, their vote counts more.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which was fine, but with feds ignoring the 10th amendment and states taking over more authority from the counties, it's a problem now.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Direct democracy is a problem too, it turns to just rule of the lowest common denominator.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

LMAO!! ? Holy shit that made me laugh, thank you @GravyEducation

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hey man I think I voted for you

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's because they keep annexing these rural areas into the cities. Happen to me twice. Moved after both times.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Beware majority rule, because one day you may not be in the majority.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Ah yes, instead having a system that revolves around a few battleground states is the best.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm cool with that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tyranny of the majority

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How is minority rule superior?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

false dichotomy

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you don't have the majority rule, a minority rules. What's the other option?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When the majority wanted Jim Crow, who stopped it? If the majority want slaves (which they did in the south), does that make it ok?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Nov 6, 2020 11:40 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well, that was the original point of the electoral college. That system is old and broke now though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It was more of a north v. south situation in 1787. A popular vote would hinder the south since most eligible voters lived in the north. >

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The rural v. urban issue is a more recent development. One that probably grew out of industrialization.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No the EC exists because Hamilton & others didn't trust people. They thought the electorate were idiots who needed smart men to rule.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If only we had some sort of system that allowed groups of people to vote for one person to represent them in the gov't, and that one person/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

's sole job was to listen to the people who they represent, and advocated for them in the gov't, and knowing that they are helping their/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fellow man was reward enough, that they had the honor of being the voice of the people, and money was not involved whatsoever

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Crazy, I know

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wasn't that exactly the reason we have the House and the Senate? It was a compromise on this idea.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Those people's needs are addressed, they have more representation per person, already. Much more. I mean, we can split ourselves into /1

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

How is this downvoted? It’s absolutely true

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

The current election system has made rural white voters first class citizens in terms of elections. It’s aristocracy by another name.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's not about equal power, its about proportional representation.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well rural voters already have proportional representation and then some, so I don't quite see how their needs require *more* addressing.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I didn't say they did. I pointed out you conflating representation w/ power.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

whatever groups we want, like furries AND non-furries. Or me AND not-me. But it hardly follows we must give each group exactly equal power.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

This!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gee, it's like 'majority rule' isn't democratic or something...

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

Tyranny of the majority

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We are a Rebublic

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Woosh

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So minority rule is?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Shouldn’t minorities be protected from majority oppression?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I'm pretty sure those rural voters are the ones that are fine with taking away LGBT rights and disenfranchising black people.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Or maybe everyone's voice should be counted equally and fairly. Maybe the president should have less power and local government more.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Their votes carry more weight. A single rural vote can carry as much weight as 3 urban ones. That's garbage.

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 9

Thats not true what so ever.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 14

Id rather people get to rule themselves. Rural voters don't know what urban voters need nor the reverse.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Word. An urban voter has an apartment, maybe a house and vehicle. Rural voters for houses, vehicles, sometimes land. Taxes hit them harder

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's not how that works.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously a gross oversimplification. But the life style is different and changes that don't effect urbanites can affect ruralites.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Its the reason you guys fought a civil war and a war of independence.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In Mississippi there is a Senator for every 2 million people. In California there is a Senator for every 20 million. That’s disenfranchised.

5 years ago | Likes 507 Dislikes 27

The two Wyoming senators represent 600k people have as much power as the two California senators representing 40 million people.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If there are 2 Dakotas & 2 Virginias we should do 6 Californias. 10 more senators would be a start to having a system resembling democracy

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

In Wyoming there's a senator for every like... 300k to 400k people. That's it.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

What I find crazy is that we’re only allowed to vote for prez at all because every state agreed to base their votes on the result. Not in...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the constitution at all that we should have a say. We’re supposed to elect local governments that decide all that for us. It was always...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

meant to be states first, union second. Only reason the common zeitgeist of “one US” manifested is from the result of many wars.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Civil war told us we were one country, WW1 that we are part of the global community, and WW2 that we were better than everyone else.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Woah. In the UK I think the largest constituency is less than double the size of the smallest. And there's 650 of them!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Word.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uhh that's by design buddy. That's why we have a house and a senate. Though we have had the same # of reps since 1917.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

In DC there are zero senators for an infinite population, and they are ruled by everyone else's Reps.

5 years ago | Likes 203 Dislikes 2

Which is funny (in a sad way), considering the people living in the nation's capital are being taxed without representation.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They actually have a license plate style that says "Taxation without Representation." I don't understand why anyone lives there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dc overwhelming voted against Trump.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

DC is ultra left

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Cities are left. This is how it works. Look at a map.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And lets not forget Wyoming, 2 senators, 500,000 people on a good day

5 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

Not to mention 3 EC votes, despite having basically no people, for the sole reason that the minimum EC amount was set at 3, but doesn't

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

linearly with population.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, we have more representation and more say than populous area. Please note that I did not say BETTER representation. Fuck our 3 dipshits

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Which is why wyoming only has one representative in the house... Senate is by state, house is by population...

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 7

That doesn't make it ok nor does it make it equal. The Senate is the more powerful body and should be the more equitable branch.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I think you’re ignoring the point that they’re saying the senate gives voice to land and is inherently less democratic.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

yeah and it's nonsensical and every single person supporting it would change their tune if say California decided to split to six states

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Except senators don't represent the people. They represent the state. That's why we have the House of Representatives.

5 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 13

That hasn't been true since the 17th amendment was ratified.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree. The 17th was a mistake IMO. It removed power, checks, and balances.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which has so much less power. Why should “the state” be more important than “the people”? The people should be the represented vote, always

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 3

When the rules were written, the state was FAR more important than the country. We're far more unified now than back then.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I agree. The state shouldn't be represented at the expense of the people.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

States are people as much as corporations are. Neither deserve a say in our democracy.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

I agree they're not people and shouldn't be represented as such. But I disagree that they shouldn't have a say. That's effectively what 1/

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

the US had under the Articles of Confederation (at least for the federal state) and that didn't work out well at all.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And what do they represent in that state? The land? The buildings? The leaves on the trees?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're supposed to represent the interests of the state as a sovereign entity.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And those interests are actually held by people. "The state" is a construct created by people for the benefit of people.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're supposed to be a check against populism.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wrong. They represent the corporate interests. Who else will take care of our poor, poor billion dollar businesses?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Won't someone think of the corporations?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is the lower house and doesn’t get to choose judges. Then the electoral colleges disenfranchises voters in a whole other branch.

5 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 6

I agree, I'm just pointing out that representing the people has never been the purpose of the Senate.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

The problem w/ that idea is they stopped letting the States (governor & legislature) choose Senators. They're just super representatives now

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And yet McConnell is holding up bills blocking the voice of the people and got reelected anyways.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And infact it took a constitutional amendment for Senators to be directly elected.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

California has 1 Representative for every 745,471 people. Mississippi has 1 for every 744,000. Texas, however, is at 1 for every 805,555,

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Because they rig the census against counting minorities.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It’s nice to see facts and not BS. Wish more would take the time

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The senate meme has been annoying the shit out of me for years. Because it's sheer propaganda behind it, and it's dangerous.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

the house isnt even balanced either.... democratic reps account for more votes for less seats. Everything is skewed towards rural just to >

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Hey there fucko! Just letting you know that Wyoming has one representative for every ~200k people!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

yea cause its not like the senate does anything important, like confirm supreme court justices...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

here you go bud

5 years ago | Likes 1489 Dislikes 8

Thank you, this is so good. “Red landslide” is part of the stupid ignorance that fuels their fascism and delusions. LAND DOESNT VOTE

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

check out Native American country with the blue in the bottom left center

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's too many people in California, spread out a little JFC

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll have to keep this as reference if I ever want to move somewhere.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*squints at east coast* is the entirety of massachusetts a city or smthn?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wonder if isolation and self-reliance has a measurable effect on someone’s tendency toward individualism as opposed to collectivism

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was looking for this Tuesday night to make my wife feel a bit better. Thank you!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So all areas that are condensed are democratic, except... Florida. Now things make so much more sense.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Shout out to Ann Arbor, Kalamazoo, and Detroit.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

now we need this with a population density map behind it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This map shift creeps me out, but still informative. Also, it's the 2016 for anyone wondering

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I absolutely love this visualization

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That just looks like America got fucked up in the microwave.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Speaking for utah, it's pretty accurate. Not many people anywhere but around the salt lake valley and we tend to lean progressive

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Even with all the mormons around?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Indeed. Believe it or not but utah isn't one giant mormon commune. There's even *whispers* diversity...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those dots make me feel uncomfortable

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mr. States, I don’t feel so good...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was just about to go find this!

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Yeah but that's not the full story: https://imgur.com/IdaiRVf.jpg (from the same creator of that gif above)

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's more accurate, because it violates the "land doesn't get to vote." The land votes through its state's 2 senator seats in the EC.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good thing Empty Land doesn't have voting rights, despite Republicans best efforts.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Mr. Stark, I don't feel so good.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Why are there even representatives for all that empty space?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Fuck you guys for downvoting my legitimate question

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because that empty space grows food, houses industry, and supplies power to all those non-empty spaces

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The more you know, thank you for taking the time to answer ^^

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you see it in movies, it's often depicted as straight up nothingness, so knowing it's not all like that is informative

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but that's not the full story: (from the same creator as the gif above) https://imgur.com/IdaiRVf.jpg

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Looks more like the second map than the first

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh that’s another good one. I love data viz

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Baffling how thinly populated the US are in some areas

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

drive through Nevada sometime. Central and E Nevada is basically uninhabitable. Pretty much looks like mars.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And how the Republican is over-represented on Supreme Court, senate, and White House, despite being a minority of the country

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If you look at a topographical map you'll see. Desert.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

And corn.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So basically, mostly rural areas with poor education vote trump? Not surprised.

5 years ago | Likes 397 Dislikes 32

Birds of a feather...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Don't forget white people. Rural, poor, white people...

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

theyre taking our jerbs in the boonies

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Uneducated does not necessarily mean stupid. Don't have to be a genius to get a $40k+ piece of paper. City schools are far from perfect

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My wife and I are that blue dot surrounded by red in north Louisiana

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Trump this time, but these states are generally always Republican states, so they always vote Republican

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

and they aim to drag it backwards from there

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This kind of elitism is why we have Trump.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 22

we have trump because they are bat shit crazy and think they are better than poor urban people and don't want to change a thing

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

I think defunding schools, thus lowering the educated population, combined with fear & no accountability of news reports is why Trumps here

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

He loves the poorly educated. Literally said this.

5 years ago | Likes 196 Dislikes 5

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

They’re his sheeple

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's a pretty shitty thing to say.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 12

its true though, red states have lower education, higher obesity, and take in most of the govt money but socialism bad. blue states

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

literally keep this country running

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Interesting conclusion considering the majority of blue city exports are digital goods, entertainment, movies, games, sports, art, music

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the actual "keep this country runnning" argument

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile infrastructure, livestock, large portions of vegetation, energy production mostly come from red areas. . . Which is more important

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I grew up in the country. Like, listen! there be banjo playin'! And I'm full on biden. Not stupid, just not well represented or informed

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poor education, highly religious, so basically zealots that will fall for the false crusade for justice he is peddling.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Isolated people want things to stay the same. They also have less exposure to new ideas, leading to more bigotry and stubbornness.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean education, less money, not as good jobs, we could do something to help, or just click our tongues at them...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Democrats literally run on a platform of social safety nets and education funding.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But they’re literally voting for the people that WON’T help.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

While yes, the dems could also do a bit better to try and reach out to them.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

How? Honest question. They have such a diverse coalition how should they appeal more to them without losing other voters?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, they couldn't. There's literally nothing that can be done to reach them, if this election hasn't made that painfully clear, then...

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

When you live your whole life in the middle of nowhere, getting raped by uncle-daddy, it's hard to feel anything but hatred towards others.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seriously, how do you reach across the aisle to people who revel in their own oppression and the suffering of the side reaching out to them?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Morality does not appeal to them. Civility does not appeal to them. Community and altruism do not appeal to them, there is nothing that 1/

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Brit here, why don’t many people live in those cities on the left?

5 years ago | Likes 234 Dislikes 1

Mountains. Lots and lots of mountains. Or deserts

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's hot and dry, less arable land and water. Cities did not develop there.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

So lots of people do live in those cities, relative to the surrounding areas. Take Nevada - the whole of the population is basically in (1)

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Las Vegas, and outside of that is desert and little rural towns leftover from the gold rush. And Reno, which is a medium sized shit hole.(2)

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But what Brits have trouble imagining is HOW BIG the desert is. You drive all day at 70 mph tiger from Vegas to Reno. (3)

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The distance from LV to Reno is the same distance as the entire island of Britain from north to south (approx 400 miles/660 km). (4)

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Also, those cities on the right side are heavily populated cause the US was settled from right to left

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The VERY left is Cali, a ton of people live there. The whole middle-left is an alkaline desert. Soil sucks, temp. sucks. It's where we

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

forced the Native Americans to move! On account of how bad it sucks! And where we did our first nuclear testing, same reason.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

They got no water, and shit's always on fire!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's hot.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Part history, part geography. Basically, the eastern seaboard has been settled by Europeans for 3x as long as the west coast (1/2)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also by the time America conquered the western US the federal government existed with enough power to keep a lot of the land there (2/X)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Add onto this that it’s mostly mountainous and deserts until you get to the Pacific, people cluster more densely in the west (3/3)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No water.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When y’all got here in 1607, y’all started @ the east coast (close to water sources, fertile soil etc). No one outside of indigenous >

5 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

Peoples knew how vast the country was and it was a huge gamble to venture west, so y’all stayed put for the most part.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Until a brave few did travel west and were greeted by monolithic mountain ranges and said “fuck all that, I’m going home.”.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

But the ones that braved those mountain ranges, forded the rivers, and risked it all, found their reward at the end. Dysentery.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty much the plot of Wagons East

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Are you asking why fewer people live in the western side of the country [minus coast]? Cuz it's all mountains and desert there. Mostly.

5 years ago | Likes 391 Dislikes 0

A good portion is farm land. California is the largest agricultural producer in US measured by $ generated.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And speaking from Massachusetts, for most of this past year— lots of that western portion was hot hot HOT with wildfires

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Not very true. It’s mostly because the US doesn’t have enough people to fill all that land yet. Perfectly livable

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And earthquakes, don't forget the earthquakes.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last to get incorporated too. East coast has a 50+ year head start. It may not sound like much, but when politicians get involved, slooow.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’d say it’s a mix of that and also we discovered it last and not many people made the trip out. different now but I think it effects it

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

*cough* Gold Rush

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dust Bowl also. The whole middle where it happened is still pretty empty.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And as a Californian, I can attest, the weather is magnificent in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles areas

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I could believe that, but does the average resident pay more than half their income on a place just big enough to be a closet?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/2 Not quite, it’s not nearly as dense as New York City. And at least for home loans, most banks won’t let you spend more than 45%

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a former Californian, yes they do.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes that’s what I needed to know. Thank you for not making fun. Education is power.

5 years ago | Likes 334 Dislikes 0

And if you know your history, the map was settled on the east coast and spent the next 300 years going west.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And farmland. Miles and miles and miles of farmland.

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Keep in mind, the big cities are absurdly big so the scale looks weird

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's also hot and expensive in a lot of those places

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lot of empty space out west, you can count on at least 50 miles between many towns.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Which is why it's always important to get gas before you get below a 1/4 of a tank on road trips.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rocky Mtns, Death Valley, Sierra's.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Also there's a ton of corn, soy and meth production in the Midwest

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The two big dots in the middle of that expanse are Salt Lake City, Utah and Denver, Colorado, if you were interested.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I am interested. Thank you. I have only been to the east coast once and to San Fran back in March. Would love to do more one day.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's sexy.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now, do you need someone to tell you the benefits of EU membership?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude, I voted remain.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Visiting that part of the country is absolutely beautiful. Recommend if you have never been to the rocky mountains

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Such an awful name for mountains. Oh no, they're Rocky? Who could have guessed that from a mountain?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Google Yosemite, Redwoods National forrest, the Grand Tetons, and Yellowstone to start.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, the circles on this map represent voting districts rather then cities. And a city can take cover multiple districts. US map is weird

5 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 0

Houston Texas is in Harris County, not Houston County, and Harris County has 2x+ the population of Houston (City).

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

US map is super rigged basically

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

They actually represent counties, typically the lowest subdivision that reports results to the states.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0