While our attention is diverted on the pandemic, Congress is trying to eliminate end to end encryption

Jul 1, 2020 6:29 AM

hypemonkeyOG

Views

113258

Likes

1934

Dislikes

78

Last stand for digital privacy.

International implications due to the platforms having back doors.

Sauce: https://slate.com/technology/2020/06/lawful-access-encrypted-data-act.amp

FP Edit: was suggested in the comments I add a couple links referring to the EARN IT bill as well. Shout out to @maqp2

As requested:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/earn-it-bill-governments-not-so-secret-plan-scan-every-message-online

https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2020/06/there’s-now-even-worse-anti-encryption-bill-earn-it-doesn’t-make-earn-it-bill-ok

2020

current_events

I hate republican Bill. Vote him out!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m not so sure I want uncle Sam using my backdoor any more than he does already ... it’s still tender from tax day

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Just left a voicemail for my state senators for the first time ever regarding opposing both bills. Thank you for the info.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If only there was a way to rebrand the bill as the Obama-Communist-Decryption-Plan....

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Old pricks in power that have no fucking idea how tech works.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This doesn’t end well.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Encryption, and the technology surrounding it, exists already. The government can't do shit to "weaken" it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good luck making maths illegal, stupid fucks

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Worked for China…

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you want a hacked election? this is how you get a hacked election. Oh, wait, they do want that.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

China looking forward to this.

5 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 1

China's already banned encryption, so they're way ahead of the US in this. But yeah, I can see how they could use this to their advantage.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

China doesn't care. They won this war before it even started. Almost every equipment done by them has backdoors to them.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It'll be great when all the future apps come from China though.. /s

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why are republicans always trying to pass bills that would make life harder for us?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Time for Silicon Valley 2.0 over in Europe.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please, Republicans, tell me more about "bOtH sIdEs!"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Alright, where does this Bill guy live?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He’s at the Barr

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bruh, America needs a hard reset.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Republicans bad brrrrrr

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just making it easier for Russian bots to rig our election.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck this.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait republicans know what encryption is?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They haven't a clue how it works. Never give them the encryption key.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, they just know it makes data more expensive, not why or what it is

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Government wants you to build an extra door into your house so they can enter it in case of ... an emergency. And the key is a screwdriver.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Potential for abuse according to the government: none. Potential for abuse according to sane people: infinite.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yay big marketing!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@OP, A link for people to act: https://act.eff.org/action/stop-the-earn-it-bill-before-it-breaks-encryption

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

+1 for a link to EFF and not a shitty change.org petition that won't do a damn thing (other than give you spam)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Allowing law enforcement to access encrypted content MAY provide evidence that they don't currently have access to. It WILL weaken...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... security for EVERYBODY in the process. Sensible politicians would realise the sacrifice isn't worth the cost. Unfortunately...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...we seem to have a shortage of sensible politicians.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its not going unnoticed. I havent spoken to anyone who has thought this is a good idea. Even those in intelligence lament the lack of

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

security it will create by making it easier for outside operators to gain access through the same back doors. They're about to shoot

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

themselves in the foot with this one.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's funny how the thumbnail is for Zoom. Which is notorious for NOT using encryption at all...

5 years ago | Likes 367 Dislikes 12

Not so. Zoom has always used encryption, but not end to end encryption. It's decrypted in the middle to provide things like telephone dialin

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

Did mean that. Got lost in translation of limited characters ?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And data mining...have to pay for those free users somehow. End-to-end encryption is a feature you pay for.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everyone uses encryption. Thing is zoom, like almost all other video/chat services, decrypts on the way so they can read/see what your doing

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Ok, ok. I meant end to end encryption. Which should really be implied, but guess users don't understand

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That doesn't mean it isn't a blatant disregard for privacy, but unfortunately every well known chat/video service does this

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Most, but not every well known video service. Jitsi for instance does not, and you can host it yourself if you want.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More a - we need to run off the shelf server software and video isn't used to secure communications - then people used it for secure comm

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They should need a warrant to be able to do anything with our data

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well this bill doesn't change that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but also, don’t give it up so easy. Protect yourself, your gov does not care.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know,

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

GOP are currently passing dozens of bills that allow selling out to enemy powers. They are cashing out before jumping ship but you lose

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

got any sources for this? or what bills they are?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unpopular opinion these days but just because a bill is introduced by a republican doesn't make it a "republican's as a whole" bill.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They are a hivemind.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It does. But it doesn't make it a conservatives bill. The Republican party no longer pretends to represent conservative values

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So by that logic, a single individual speaks for the entire human race? Just because I choose to do something does not mean I represent you.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Strawman fallacy. You can't do better than that? A group does represent a larger group if they defend those decisions

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a Democrat presented that bill the article would just say "A bill has been presented..." What I'm trying to get at is the title is biased

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you can't ban anyway cryptography anymore than you can ban away trigonometry or chemistry it just doesn't work like that. and anyone with -

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

a basic understanding of computer science should know this. these type if idiot laws won't stop a single intelligent terrorist or pedo they

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

only serve to make spying on the populace easier and could quite literal backfire if it drives many privacy conscious but innocent people

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to use non hobbled encryption services. where as previously you could at least glean some insite from meta data and suspect anyone using tor

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

or an international vpn may be hiding something, now that will be lost in the swamp of people who just don't want Uncle Sam peeking in.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is not about catching criminals, this makes *easier* for criminals to steal passwords, bank details, private messages, and lives -

5 years ago | Likes 427 Dislikes 3

Because Slate is, like so objective, and stuff. Totally trustworthy. X'D. Oh well, it's good for fake points around here, so BOOOO GOP! LOL

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Criminals like the lawmakers

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'd just hope they use it against the politicians. Use the backdoors to obtain information about them that none would want us to see.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They’ll probably have some loophole where they can e2e encrypt without being liable to the rule they made. They’ll claim National Security

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That’s what I was thinking; wouldn’t this be a hackers dream?

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Both individual hackers and state backed groups, China and Russia would love this.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

For a cybercriminal's, yes. Most of hacker culture is not about that though, and they fucking hate living in a world ran by profiteering >

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

gluttons who deliberately weaken security just so they can live off stealing user data. It's just another thing that's a crime unless >

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you're rich enough to have your company's name be used as a generic noun or verb in everyday conversations.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be honest I would bet that even white hat hackers would race to crack the back doors open, just to see who could do it fastest.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, but also with the intent to fix them. Which doesn't apply if said backdoor is legally mandated and will have senators fighting for >

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

its existence. Although, in that case white hats will just be more aggressive, since it's about proving the regulation is stupid, which is >

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is about allowing government agencies access to vast amounts of data that they previously would have needed a court order to have.

5 years ago | Likes 182 Dislikes 1

It seems that not only Russia takes the worst ideas from the US, but US also takes the worst ideas from Russia

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You should probably read the bill.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 17

It literally says the opposite of what you just said here

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

I'm gonna go ahead and assume you don't work in IT. There is no such thing as a "safe" backdoor. It will get exploited.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

If it's so easy why are they trying to create the law?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Also my comments aren't about the technology. It's the dumbass who said the opposite of what the bill states.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Encryption is built so only a server and client can read the data exchanged. There is no way to build a safe backdoor. 1/*

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

If there is a backdoor, malicious actors will find the key eventually. This includes govt, which doesn’t care about our privacy. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

But the whole thing is based on requiring a court order.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yes, let's trust the authorities to act lawfully and in the public interest...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you don't then it doesn't matter if this is legal or not.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It does because currently it's impractical to decrypt messages, if you make it mandatory to add backdoors then they can just help themselves

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0