jfd8u438fdsfkds
1550
41
1
Dec 22, 2023 3:56 AM
jfd8u438fdsfkds
1550
41
1
jfd8u438fdsfkds
(That's 38+16 = 54% majority who agree with him being disqualified, vs 28+7 = 35% who don't.)
laner7112000
Broke the law"s". Should be held accountable for that.
bourbonandbaddecisions
Read the court docs. I know there are a lot of them but you need to read them and understand for yourself. Don’t listen to the media puppets.
eclyptix
This is why polling is fucking stupid, you got these polls and at the same time the fat orange twat is beating Biden in polls...like what the actual fuck? And anyone who supports Trump is a fucking idiot
jfd8u438fdsfkds
This isn't a poll of Trump vs Biden. Biden is deeply unpopular, too.
jfd8u438fdsfkds
lol why am I getting downvoted for explaining this?
lackinglife
Polling has traditionally always skewed towards the conservative option in spite of any attempt to correct the bias. It has to do with who's going to most likely actually answer any polls which are traditionally done mid day by phone. Older retired folks who traditionally lean right are who the pollsters are gonna reach. It's why in close races where they polled higher, conservatives tend to lose
eclyptix
While this true its also fascinating how these same pollsters consistently find policy to have a liberal bent while polling in favor of conservative politicians who publicly oppose the policies people actually want
TyrTheTired
It's fun, because polling data is skewed heavily by people willing to answer unknown phone numbers, often in the middle of the day, and they take such *tiny* samples of the population (in this case 0.001% of the total USA population), then present them as percentages (with the total number in the fine print), that way the numbers look better. You know... fun!
Side note: I get it, polling is actually hard to do well, but I still hate how it's done.
Totallynotarealbear
And even with the poll skewing HEAVILY right trump is still barely beating Biden. That's not a good sign for trump if we actually vote.
jfd8u438fdsfkds
https://today.yougov.com/about/panel-methodology
Corrodias
So, 0.0005%, only half as many respondents as even TyrTheTired said.
PerthAussieMike
Of course he should be charged with the alleged crimes, if he is innocent then he will be absolved of any charges and then he would be in a stronger position than ever before. How could you disagree/disapprove with charging him... unless, of course, you know he is guilty as charged!
Exyr
He was never charged.
HopelessNecr0mantic
He has. Currently scheduled for trial on j6 charges in March, pending Supreme Court appeal on immunity claims, which he will lose.
sniggly5212
"13 criminal counts, including racketeering"
Exyr
Nothing to do with the 14th ammendment which is what the ruling is based on.
Corrodias
-- the ruling in Colorado. The criminal charges are a separate case.
jfd8u438fdsfkds
How do you figure?
Exyr
What the ruling is is based on article 3 of the 14th ammendment that he participated in an instruction. Has nothing to do with any of the other charges.