Oh it was 19 in the original, apparently the scans of the documents were not normal scans but character recognition. So they printed the files they already had digitally then scanned them in for some fuvking reason
Yeah i googled and noted that in my next comment. Trafficking isa crime regadless of age. It just wouldnt be any child related offence. But in a best case she was paid to be there and participate, but more likely it was rape
no, the = is part of the e-mail encoding mechanisms, depending on what the encoding was (i.e., was it actually a =CRLF?), this may or may not be evidence of a coverup...
There were multiple copies of this email. One gad a formatting error and said “=9” the other did not have a formatting issue and said “19”. Sex trafficking is illegal and disgusting no matter what age.
PerthAussieMike
AND NOTHING IS BEING DONE ABOUT THESE VILE MONSTERS !!!!!!!!!
ScienceIsNotALiberalConspiracy
I wouldn't say "nothing". They are being well-cared for. That is something.
uplookdont
Pretty sure it said "9 year old" not 19
uplookdont
Oh it was 19 in the original, apparently the scans of the documents were not normal scans but character recognition. So they printed the files they already had digitally then scanned them in for some fuvking reason
[deleted]
[deleted]
uplookdont
Yeah i googled and noted that in my next comment. Trafficking isa crime regadless of age. It just wouldnt be any child related offence. But in a best case she was paid to be there and participate, but more likely it was rape
IGetAllMyFactsFromHere
no, the = is part of the e-mail encoding mechanisms, depending on what the encoding was (i.e., was it actually a =CRLF?), this may or may not be evidence of a coverup...
https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2026/02/02/whats-up-with-all-those-equals-signs-anyway/
myotherusernameismorebetter
There were multiple copies of this email. One gad a formatting error and said “=9” the other did not have a formatting issue and said “19”. Sex trafficking is illegal and disgusting no matter what age.