Sex-traffickers got redacted

Feb 8, 2026 12:39 AM

AND NOTHING IS BEING DONE ABOUT THESE VILE MONSTERS !!!!!!!!!

1 month ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I wouldn't say "nothing". They are being well-cared for. That is something.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure it said "9 year old" not 19

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Oh it was 19 in the original, apparently the scans of the documents were not normal scans but character recognition. So they printed the files they already had digitally then scanned them in for some fuvking reason

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

1 month ago (deleted Feb 8, 2026 12:21 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yeah i googled and noted that in my next comment. Trafficking isa crime regadless of age. It just wouldnt be any child related offence. But in a best case she was paid to be there and participate, but more likely it was rape

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no, the = is part of the e-mail encoding mechanisms, depending on what the encoding was (i.e., was it actually a =CRLF?), this may or may not be evidence of a coverup...

https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2026/02/02/whats-up-with-all-those-equals-signs-anyway/

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There were multiple copies of this email. One gad a formatting error and said “=9” the other did not have a formatting issue and said “19”. Sex trafficking is illegal and disgusting no matter what age.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0