The south don't travel

Feb 14, 2026 5:08 PM

LordoftheHildago

Views

19360

Likes

560

Dislikes

32

Travel leads to experiencing other cultures and ideas, which leads to liberalism. That’s why the GOP has always tried to keep people poor and in one place. They always fight to prevent mass transit and rail travel.

1 month ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 1

"Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake."

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Given the electoral collage it really doesn't matter how few vote, only that the "right people" vote and they'll make sure that happens. If 23 million California's voted and they all voted for Democrats but two people from Wyoming and two people from South Dakota and two people from South Carolina voted and they all voted Republican you still end up with all those votes and all those Congress people delegated to Red States.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ok so can someone clarify something for me on this? does the real id bs not count as proof? as someone outside nashville i see plenty of ids there and plenty of them have the star on them. i know the point is to not have what amounts to a poll tax as the argument against this and agree but keep seeing people saying youll need a passport that is far more difficult to get than the real id crap.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im reminded of the married women thing..... aren't most married women republicans? I'd assume that couples that refuse to be legally married but are together are not republicans for one.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fun fact on the State Department cutting non-profit libraries out as passport application centers: about 85% of libraries in Pennsylvania are modeled off of the original Free Public Library in Philadelphia and are non-profit institutions.

Going to be really hard to get one in rural PA.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just curious for anyone in Mississippi. What the fuck is going on over there? I hear mostly shit talking to West Virginia but it seems like you guys got a run for their money for being the shithole state. No offense. Kind of surprised Florida is kicking your ass All things considering. Florida man should move to Mississippi and be Mississippi man.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the reasons for the "florida man" stereotype is Florida's unusually strong "open records" or "sunshine" laws, which make it easy for cub reporters to fill column inches with "From the police blotter" type stories. Those stories are then picked up by the wire services and circulated across the US. So a lot of it is an artifact of publicity and reporting rather than Florida being unusually wack.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Um, states having fewer people being able to vote doesn't mean whoever they often vote for will get fewer points. (And if anything, I suspect this would end up strengthening the right wing vote on those already red states.)

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter if it's 60 people voting or 60 million in a state. If you disenfranchise enough of the "others" than all that's left is the people you want voting for you and your party. That's what they're doing here. It's not about protecting the white men's right to vote, it's making it as hard for everyone that isn't a white man to vote, even if a fair few of the white men also lose their rights. As long as they come out ahead, those white men that do lose their rights are just fodder.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem with requiring ID to vote is that every form, even a state ID, costs money. It turns voting into a paywall. So I would fully support needing an ID to vote if we made it free to get an ID and you could get one on voting day.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, getting an ID should be free anyway. You kinda sorta need one, even if you don't drive, but I have to pay for this thing you make me need (damn hard to prove who you are without one) ? So ipso facto I'd have to pay to vote? Hilarious, because the poorest are the ones voting red, and ergo more likely to not be able to pay for an ID, so then by their laws wouldn't be allowed to vote.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This will not pass the senate? Really?

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Y'all act like this law, if passed, would be enforced equally across the board. The reality is it'll only be enforced in blue counties.

1 month ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

States run their own elections though so it wouldn't matter.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good ole boy counties will break the law enough that nobody can complain until they cheat enough to win. Probably. They already have laws like you can vote once you're in line, but giving someone water or food or bathroom breaks is not allowed. Big cities / poor / minority places have very few voting mahines

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trump wants to change that. I don't think he'll be able to without starting Civil War II, but he wants to.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Do they think the average cheeto worshiping rural fucktard ever leaves their state much less has a passport?

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You can thank the heritage foundation for that vile piece of legislation

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are assuming that the rule is enforced equally everywhere. I would bet anything that Joe Hillbilly walking in with a Trump flag will not be asked for his passport, but everyone who is not white will definitely be.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like Jim Crow laws, this passport requirement will only be enforced on people likely to vote democratic

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pro tip: yes the identities of political parties changed since the early 20th century, and the party enforcing him crow back then was the dixiecrats

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is there any congressperson recommending people have a passport to vote or is this just more nonsense that made it to the front page because of gullible people?

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're actively trying to make it law right now.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Source me.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have a passport and have yet to use it. I had planned on going to Europe this year, but with the increase in prices, I can't afford it. /sigh Maybe after he's dead....

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

honestly I am hoping they get all the "requiring proof" they want...and then lose and they can not blame "stolen/rigged" ever again and get the "youre just losers in the end after all"
Also if they try to pass this take it SCOTUS as passports have a cost & take a while to get sent out after you order one....this is not gonna float as you have made voting behind a paywall & risk of not getting in delivered in time due to backlog if everyone is ordering one.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They to poor

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They will also likely only enforce it in "select areas".

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of NYC residents have passports even though they never travel outside the US. It's because they never learned to drive and use a passport as ID in lieu of a driver's license. They could get a non driver ID from NY DMV but that last for five years and a passport lasts ten; furthermore their local post office is almost certainly more convenient than the nearest DMV office.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I lived in Buffalo and my mom once yelled at me for letting my passport expire. Her quote was basically "you never know when you will need to leave the country in a moments notice and carry cash."

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Half of me wants them to pass the Bill the other half doesn't because reason. Mostly because I want a challenge. But to want them to pass it and see as most of their base gets fucked for not having a passport and demanding to vote and being hauled out with handcuffs because they cant would be interesting videos to watch online.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's not about the percentage of people who own passports. It's just a tool they can selectively enforce to repress only specific voters, same as the literacy tests they used to use which were mostly given to black voters.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No no let them shoot themselves in the foot.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Never interrupt your enemy while he's making a mistake."

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The SAFE act is currently working through congress trying to ban anyone from voting if their name doesnt match their birth certificate. Which would include everyone whose name changed after they got married

1 month ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 1

A small consolation is that all of the women in my family kept their maiden names after marriage. Still, total dick move from the dick-tater.

1 month ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

It won't pass

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember when I had your level of optimism

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would also include people like me, who were born in broke-ass hospitals that didn't notarize birth certificates, not realizing some dipshit 40 years later would make it necessary for me to vote.

1 month ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

It will be in favour of all those cousin bangers since they share the same last name

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is well within the tenants of the Heritage Foundation's concept of women as 2nd class and that only the head of the household, i.e. the husband, should be allowed to vote.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wonder how many women essentially voted to forfeit their own right to vote, and how many of them are related to the women who fought for their right to vote a century or so ago.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't it a part of project 25?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That would ban JD Vance from voting.

1 month ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

1 month ago (deleted Feb 16, 2026 3:13 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

How does that apply to women but not to James Bowman? I mean, I get it's different because he changed his name because he fucking wanted to whereas married women are kinda coerced by tradition, but doesn't his name differ from what he was born as after all?

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Can we please start deadnaming him?

1 month ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Sure what's his deadname?

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

James Bowman.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean Jimmy "Couch Fucker" Bowman?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We can all still call him Couch Fucker

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

i call him JV Dance

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

JV Dunce

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Ted Cruz. And Donald Drumph (or was the name changed before him?)

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is just a heat map of "percentage of each state that isn't dirt poor". The correlation between "net wealth" and "owns a passport" is probably .95. So this is exactly what the republicans want: a poll tax to keep the poors from voting

1 month ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

Yeah, I feel like whoever made the original post was thinking that red states having fewer people being able to vote would somehow mean fewer electoral votes coming from those states, and therefore less republican representation.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And they're oblivious to the fact that poor whites are pretty much the only reason most of them hold office.

1 month ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

They aren't, they know and understand that. This is just meant to further disenfrachise women and minorities. Yeah they will lose a bunch of poor whites, but a lot more women and minorites will also lose access to voting, so it will be a net gain for them at the end of the day.

It's calculated. Sacrifice a few poor whites to hurt a lot of marginalized groups.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not to be THAT guy (OK, maybe I was...), but I just ran the numbers. The correlation between avg. household income and percent of individuals over 18 with a U.S. passport is 0.81.

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Also, even if only one person votes, they still get the Electoral College.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Their voter base is literally the poors.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

not really, it’s the petit bourgeois

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and the lumpenprole silly enough to think he’s on track for billions

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, their voter base are the suburban big–truck crowd who think driving an hour to work makes them rural.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but they don't own passports because the people talk funny in other countries.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dont understand how passport ownership can be below 95% or so.
Are they counting young kids or something?
America is so fucking weird man

1 month ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

We don't need passports to travel to other states

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You think in a country without national healthcare, no national maternity/paternity leave, no mandatory vacation time, slimming workers' rights and a rapidly growing wealth gap that travel is going to be encouraged? They don't want us to travel because that would let us see first hand that the horror stories we're fed about other countries are lies.

1 month ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Sounds suspiciously like North Korea. Not that you're _wrong_ ...

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The U.S. is HUGE. Literally 96.5% of the size of the entire continent of Europe, which has 44 countries in it. That's why so many Americans don't have a passport.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

its also why we find a canyon so fascinating or have the Largest X in the world. we are a very boring country aside from the left and right side of the country

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The country is huge, three thousand miles east to west and two thousand from Canada to Mexico. Just totally different from Europe.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you aren't traveling internationally, you don't need one.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most Americans never leave the US (either because of financial reasons, or just no desire to leave). If you're not leaving, what do you need a passport for? You have to remember, Americans are some of the most heavily propagandized people on the planet. They really do believe their own bullshit that they're the greatest country on Earth. And when you think that, why the hell would you want to go anywhere else?

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Costs money, some people barely have a pot to piss in

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

cause it cost 135 fucking dollars and the post office is only open during the work week.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most Americans never leave their state, much less the country

1 month ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

Or even their hometown/county. Often they don't even travel to other parts of their hometown or county. Several times in my life I have moved to a new town/city in the US and, within a month or two, knew more about other parts of that town/city and surrounding county than those who had lived there for generations. I could mention a location, a point of interest, and they would be clueless about it. My having lived in other places was, in many of those towns, seen as incredibly remarkable.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Most Americans hardly leave their hometowns. People look at me like I have 5 heads if I tell them I've lived across the USA and have visited most states. "You said you were from State A but you were born in State B?" I just default to whatever answer is the least likely to make their brains cook off these days.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Lisbon - Moscow, 2400 miles
San Francisco - Boston, 2690 miles
Seattle - Miami, 2700 miles

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

1 month ago (deleted Feb 15, 2026 1:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Are you not required to have a passport when travelling between states? I can just compare to the EU, where you can travel with just national id card, but passport usually makes it simpler.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

We don't require passports to travel between states, we need them only when traveling out of the country

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Don't give them any ideas. But no, passports aren't required to go from one state to another.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope. There's no border crossing. You just drive, walk, etc.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

1 month ago (deleted Feb 15, 2026 1:46 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Thanks! I just assumed it'd require a passport, since so many regulatory things seem to differ between states, like some laws, car registrations, etc. It's hard to keep track of the rules in a different country on a different continent 😊

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can enter Canada with an enhanced drivers license. No passport required.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So many people in the US are almost literally trapped and can't travel internationally for money or language reasons. (Native english speakers growing up in the US do NOT get other language education, unfortunately)

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They won't, by choice, even travel to see another county, not even one that's adjoined to their own, or explore all parts of their own town/city outside of their very confined neighbourhood. And, it is 100% by choice. They don't want to see anything different, especially if it might happen to expose them to something different/new.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

And the language education we do get is crap. I took Spanish every year of my education through university and every single one of them just retread the same basic bits of grammar and classroom objects.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I took two years of Spanish in high school (2 years of non-English language was required in the state and the school), and we barely got to about halfway through the book by the end of the second year. We never reached a point where we could hold a conversation in Spanish.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That was a problem for every single class I took. Never once did we learn how to converse save for introducing ourselves. Never learned how to order food. Never learned how to call for help. Never learned the nuances that could take a genuinely innocent statement or question and have it sound like something revolting on the other side of the language barrier.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both you and suiseiseki's experiences were by design. We had an absolutely phenomenal Spanish teacher at my HS who was booted just a few weeks into the semester for this white lady who only conjugated verb types with us and never did any conversation or actually..useful language for us to use in life.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm in my 50s and don't have a passport. I can't fly for medical reasons. Even when I played hockey back in my youth, we didn't need a passport to ride the bus over to Canada. If at some point I decide to take a cruise ship to Europe or the Caribbean, I can get one, but as of now, there's just no reason for me to get one.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There is if you want to vote!

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't need a passport to vote in my state. I've voted in every election (even the off-year local elections) since I turned 18.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That statement, along with "I can get one", might be subject to change in the near future, so it might be a good idea to consider getting one just in case…

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Getting a US passport ***as a native citizen*** takes an hour or two, can cost over $100, and processing takes several weeks or months. If you don't know anything about something, perhaps the better response is to not say anything at all?

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Dude, you can get passport pictures anywhere. You can even take a selfie. They should you how to do it. The expected time to complete the DS-11 is literally 30 minutes. For your first passport, you make an appointment at the post office or library to deliver your official documents and verify everything. Another 20-30 minutes. Renewals can be mailed in. And a passport lasts TEN YEARS. You're making it sound like some excruciating experience. It's not.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I had to go to a courthouse, my local libraries and post offices didn't offer rhat service. But still, the time and convenience is not the reason people don't have passports here. The real problem is a few hundred bucks to spare is something people living in poverty don't have. And then if they get it, they can't afford flights to anywhere that will require a passport anyway. And then if you're getting one for yourself, spouse + any kids? That adds up.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A whole hour or two? $100? Several weeks? Wow, super inconvenient and not doable.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Don't know what they're on about with the time because that was negligible. The cost was more in the $300 range though, which for a lot of folks living paycheck to paycheck won't have. Flights are also hundreds of dollars that people don't have, so it's kinda like "why get a passport when I can't afford to go anywhere that needs one anyway?"

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's never been $300. A brand new -not a renewal- passport for an adult is $165. Renewals are less.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think I conflated the cost of my wife's and mine, because we got them at the same time. Still valid though, because even 165 bucks is something a lot of folks don't have sitting around. And if you are married the cost still would be 300 bucks because well what you're gonna get one and not your spouse? And then if you have kids? Hundred bucks here and there adds up. And again, how would you afford a flight? Guess driving to Canada would be possible, but that also adds cost.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0