Actual Justice

Mar 29, 2019 11:22 PM

makesense

Views

122658

Likes

3713

Dislikes

64

For those who forgot, this is a man from California who called the cops in a swatting attempt on another person online. The other person gave a fake address. The cops arrived at the address and something (the cops were cleared) caused them to shoot the occupant of the home when he answered the door.

justice

swatting

criminal

Death of an innocent man? 20 yrs doesn't come close. He should be locked up for life.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Like someone else said on the post on the front page, while this guy should rot let's not forget/excuse the police killing an innocent man.

7 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 14

It's also kind of a problem that calling the cops in the US is an effective way to execute someone

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 6

Soldiers in an active warzone can follow the orders of Dont fire unless fired upon. Yet stuff like this happens nonstop.

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

Put a team of Navy seals in and see the big difference. Not expecting high school dropouts who barely passed to be that smart

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Wow, something we can all agree on for once.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 7

I hope everyone can agree on the other most recent case, Smollett can get fucked

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Except his 5 fans and the 5000 people who are so far up their own politics they have lost all sense.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"the cops were cleared". It's quite rare when they're not.

7 years ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 19

And I would agree that the cops acted too quickly here. But in this case there wasn't other evidence before the shooting to act on.(1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(2/2) Unlike some where they have the guy pinned down and think arm movement is 'reaching for a gun' he couldn't possible get to.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember this, hope this is some small comfort to that guys family.

7 years ago | Likes 538 Dislikes 3

1) According to CNN, this plea deal also covers bomb threats to the FCC & FBI; he'd previously received 2 years for calling in a

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) fake bomb threat to a CNN affiliate in 2015. I think this post kinda glosses over the additional details that almost certainly affected

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3) his sentence, which was one his attorney requested. Prosecutors wanted 25 years.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4) https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/29/us/swatting-suspect-20-year-sentence/index.html link at bottom for the previous bomb threat & sentence.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Should been longer. 20 years should be the charge for any swatting.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This guy has the most punchable face I've ever seen. I didnt even read the story, I just wanna kick his ass.

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

okay pussy.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Cops shoot unarmed man. This guy goes to jail.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 9

he sent the cops to the location if he hadnt made a fake police call to get a swat response the unarmed man would still be alive

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yea but like if the cops hadn't shot him he would probably still be alive.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's also like calling a hitman to kill someone, both hitman and caller would be charged and serving time

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Those cops are still murderers.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 8

"Something caused them to soot the occupant" - Trigger happy nervous cops with poor training possibly?

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 6

cams show there's one idiot who's way out to get a better angle for a shot and another one has to remind him of crossfire

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

20 years for murder isn't justice. He should be looking at life.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cops didn't even arrive at the address of the intended SWAT victim. This whole story is pretty fucked

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Not long enough in my opinion .. he murdered a man

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wasn't he charged with 50 something counts? Probably not long enough of a sentence

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The dude absolutely deserves this, but, trigger happy cops are kind of a problem and should be held responsible/ accountable.

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 9

responsible/accountable/by their kneecaps over an open fire

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 5

This a tremendously disturbing gif.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Dude looks like a colorized picture from a sketch artist.

7 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 1

Looks fake as fuck

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude looks like a dunmer.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Like a randomly generated dunmer.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Holy shit that's a perfect description

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

These needs more coverage so maybe it would prevent other people from doing it.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It could also inspire some weirdos too

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yup. if the history, news and internet have proven one thing, it's that there are some truly fucked up people out there. Where's that meteor

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Arent american cops always, routinely, cleared of any wrongdoing when they shoot someone dead? I mean... This happens every day.

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 9

Hardly an attempt if it ended up killing someone.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The cops claimed they saw a "gun" in the hand of the victim and shot him in his doorway. As always, nothing happened to the cop.

7 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 10

You obviously dont understand the difference between a disturbance call and the swat team being dispatched. It’s ok, be uniformed forever

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 26

Oh hey, it's you again! Does it have to be the same uniform for forever or can they wear like khaki&polos one day & blue coveralls the next?

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Then get glasses. Even the blurry footage, I can see nothing in his hands or pants. How tense can you be that you turn into a blind person?

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

if only he had political connections and a corrupt state's attorney....oh well

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

20 years? No no no. To mitigate this stuff from happening again, we need death penalty if someone dies in the outcome. Sorry, not sorry.

7 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 53

Dying is easy though. This guy needs to suffer.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Yes, seriously.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Good luck, it’s California. If he was illegal they would have stopped the prosecution

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 23

Hammurabi's code, but seems a bit dated. No?

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Not if you see the point of your criminal justice system as retributory punishment instead of rehabilitation while protecting society.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The death penalty has never been an efective deterrent.

7 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 17

yup. like a dare. denis leary has a bit on how viagra sales went up after listing Death as a side effect https://youtu.be/Sy6o7BKfNZI?t=338

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For swatting/mass shooters, I want death penalty, but not as deterrent. They've so egregiously violated life that they renounced right to it

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

The problem with that is most of them go into it prepared or even wanting to die. You're just giveing them what they want.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok then, perfect. What was the argument then?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im not sure what you are asking. My commemt seemed fairly obvious.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There isn't a proper death penalty in most states anymore. We prison them for life which costs more. *Accidental killings are different tho.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gets them permanently out of society though. *effective.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

We put down an animal if it has harmed and remains a danger to those around it, no reason to keep a similar human alive frankly.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

You are a pretty disgusting person.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I’m okay with you thinking that stranger. There’s plenty of rings of ethics and beliefs systems. A vegan thinks a meat eater is disgusting >

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

A pro-life activist thinks a woman getting an abortion is disgusting. Whatever religious or moral views lead you to believe that a human >

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

To be fair, it permanently deterred the people on death row

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 11

I guess the re-offence rate is pretty low :)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yet you still have more violent criminal offenders per capita than any developed nation. By great margins, no less.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

we have a larger minority population percentage than any other developed nation by great margins, so that's no surprise

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Lol, fuck off, you racist twat. In my country, 1 in 3 people have at least one foreign parent and we have magnitudes lower rates of crime.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No you don't. And if you had done a quick Google search before justifying your racism you would have realized your ignorance.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In 2017, Ireland, Sweden, Norway, Austria. Switzerland, Canada, Austrailia New Zealand all had a greater foreign born percentage than the US

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only places to have the death penalty are China, the middle East, parts of Africa... And the US. Says a lot. /a/H6yx6cy

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 7

Not every state in the United States has the death penalty. Those that do, take years, and sometimes decades to execute. You have rights.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Yea, all horrible places with really high crime rates and hige corruption.... oh wait japan. Yea japan uses long fall hanging.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yeeaahhh, I rather not waste money imprisoning shit bags like Jeffrey Dahmer, John Gacy, Ted Bundy....etc

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

Death sentencing actually costs more than life imprisonment

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Not if you switch it to a bullet or a noose

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

I think you severely misunderstand the cost of imprisoning someone...

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yeah but we have a source with info, unlike you. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I get that, you would rather kill them

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Yes

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Serious question, are you against the death penalty because it is inhumane?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm against the death penalty because A) mistakes happen B) it's pointless and C) everyone should have the right to live

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm personally against the death penalty because we have and will continue to execute innocent people

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Sorry, swatting?

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Getting a SWAT team sent to a person's house by reporting a false threat.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Right? What is swatting people? Seems like common knowledge that I missed

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It's when someone makes an emergency call that results in a SWAT team being sent to someone's house. Dangerous waste of resources.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiW-BVPCbZk Trolls use the IP address to make fake calls about a "crazy gunman"

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

swat-ting, watching a stream in twitch then some calling police on the streamer, aka crank calling

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Swatting is when you call the police with a false claim that someone is dangerous; the police are obliged to act upon it, and send in a 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

SWAT team. They usually involve stuff like bomb threats, so the team won't just knock at the front door. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's when someone makes an emergency call that results in a SWAT team being sent to someone's house. Dangerous waste of resources.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

SWAT = Special Weapons And Tactics

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Everyone knows that, Einstein. That wasn't what he wanted to know.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I was including that for non-US Imgurians who may not know.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it really that easy to get the swat team called in? I thought it had to be Nakatomi Tower level of shit going down to get the swat out.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's happened to me hundreds of times. The worst part is that no matter how many times it's obviously fake, they still have to show up.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apparently they function more as a SaaS (Shooting as a Service). Place a call, they shoot and bring their own excuses.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the police just need to be given information that a serious situation involving innocent life is at stake, like a hostage.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They can't be sure the call is fake, cuz if it's real they can't spare the time to be check before someone potentially dies

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

imagine a hostage call is made. If they waste time verifying its legitimacy, and it happens to be real, the hostage may already be dead

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would only make sense if the cops were punished too. They were as trigger happy as any COD player, just in real life.

7 years ago | Likes 246 Dislikes 82

Listen to the 911 call. You’ll change your opinion. They thought they were engaged with an armed lunatic.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Cops should be held to the consequences of their actions, not the circumstances. A higher standard for law enforcement.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All the cops knew was that he was armed, had killed someone, and was holding a young boy and mother at gunpoint.

7 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 19

Well, clearly it was very important for them to act without trying to find anything else out.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

They didn't "know" this, they were told this, and this information should have been suspect from an "anonymous" tip. Cops effed up. Period.

7 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 25

Well I'm glad that in your mind you always have the chance to talk things out and assume the best of everyone. >

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 36

> I hope for your sake you're never put in a situation like these cops.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 30

They could have put forth, I don't know, literally any effort to confirm this information before shooting a man in his own home.

7 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

It must be nice to live somewhere with Minority Report technology... cops are only human. They can't just dismiss a tip because its anon.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

And I can’t afford to be shot by a cop. Shoot on sight? I wanna go home to my family too. Feared for my life.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Shoot on sight for making sudden movements, when the cops were responding to a tip on a 'dangerous' individual. Let your pants drop.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then there's this guy who was an obvious threat to the public. He ran down 26 people in a van was taken alive. https://youtu.be/qOW05IVejNE

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude, no killer would answer the door that easily when asked by the cops. The cops were dumb because a killer would shout and shoot back.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's interesting that you know this for a fact. I take it you're very educated in criminal psychology.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

These were officers put in a lose lose situation.

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 14

No they weren’t, they had all the power to act and have no responsibility to the citizens they’re supposed to protect.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

What the fuck? What would they have lost by not shooting the unarmed guy right after he opened the door, bootlicker?

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Why not just try and have a civil discussion instead of instantly insulting others?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sorry, is that coming off as a kind of "shoot first, ask questions later" response?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Their lives and the lives of citizens they were told were in danger. You don't know if hes armed or not when he's reaching for something

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Mmmm boot

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yes you do. What kind of armed killer politely opens the door first? A killer would shout backx tell the cops to back off & have a shoot out

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Their lives, if he actually drew a gun.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Incredible

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It would *also* make sense, not only. This dude is garbage, swatting is appalling, and he deserves to serve for his crime

7 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 2

Swatting is only appalling because police are willing to kill innocent people.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

hold up what? So it's bad because of the police, not the actual douchebag wasting the authorities' time and possibly hurting someone else?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it involved a simple invasion of privacy and no deaths, then would the original act be as bad? No. It's bad because police kill innocents

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not an invasion of privacy wtf. If the swat team find out some dude in the area is holding his family hostage and save them 1 / 3

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seriously, wtf.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honestly 20 years is a little light to me. A man died.

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I normally agree. Our laws disassociate being a killer from causing a death negligently. You'd see many of these people only get 5 years.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Jun 19, 2019 11:23 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

the kid is mentaly ill. Your mental healtcare system failed. Police failed and all those americans using a fucked up kid as a scapegoat.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And so should the cop(s) that shot him

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What “caused the cops to shoot him when he answered the door”?

7 years ago | Likes 504 Dislikes 12

USA... that’s your thing!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Unfortunate level of melanin pigmentation?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

After his hands were up, reached down quickly to pull his pants up. One of the police thought he was going for a gun and fired

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Mar 30, 2019 4:00 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

he answered the door

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

The usual. Resorting to lethal force first instead of the multiple non lethal options available.

7 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 33

Agreed, I hate they dont follow othe countries leads and attempt non lethal disarming techniques first

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Same thing that "causes" 40% of cops to be domestic abusers.

7 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 56

[Citation needed]

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Aren't American cops just trigger happy?

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

What everyone seems to be forgetting is the cops were told that there were hostages at gunpoint.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 21

Seriously swatting happens all the time why the fuck do police not check it out before shooting

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

How does murdering one of the potential hostages that the supposed gunman could have sent to the door help the possible hostages?

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

But clearly he was reaching for his waist you know, the one place hands dont usually reach?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He dropped his hands suddenly. In an intense situation like that, hesitation is life or death.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"It's coming right for us!"

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SWAT is there to shoot first and ask questions later. They are not "peace officers", they are enforcers for the regime.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Well if it was in America they don't need a reason...

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 23

Police state is the reason

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 38

I’m scared by the number of people rationalising the cops actions here. So yeah, they went there because someone said a terrorist was 1/

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

there and was wearing a suicide vest. “Therefore whatever happened was because he move his hands in the wrong way”. Well what if 2/

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

they were given the wrong address? What if the person who called them was mistaken (or lying, as it turned out to be)? When you cross 3/

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

a street on a green light (for pedestrians), do you not still look for incoming cars? 4/4

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Watch the video. They gave him about 5 second between opening the door and firing a rifle killing him. They were across the street BTW.

7 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 2

Additionally the way they staged themselves demonstrated to me how incompetent they were because, they were aiming guns AT EACH OTHER.

7 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 1

If the cops on the left or right had fired they would have hit another cop. Any cop worth a shit is going to account for crossfire.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

I got to act as an OpFor for a local PD standing a SWAT team up. The training was garbage, and they were inept as hell.

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I am just some jamoke with basic gun safety knowledge and I could see it. Bunch of barney fifes shitting their pants.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The scenario they had us play through was completely static. We weren't allowed to move within the vacant bank building we were in.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They gave me hostages and stuck me in the worst possible room, and wouldn't let me move dynamically for better on-the-fly training.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's the USA, even if you lie down on the ground with your arms in the air, you still get shot. It's their thing.

7 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 45

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Mar 30, 2019 5:34 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Or piled on top of by 6 of them until you can't breathe and die of suffocation.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ive watched a bunch of videos including the two mentioned below rescently and i cant believe there hasnt been a massive uprising yet

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That uprising might well get you shot...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And so can being a completely law abiding citizen.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s not a constant, it’s a rarity. It’s a result of poor training and anti cop community, not bloodthirst.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It’s uncontrollable fear. In every case they are afraid of the suspect. The question is why are they always in such a state of fear?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Afraid that if they make a mistake the media will ruin their lives, that their lives are ruined just by being in that situation. Idk.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I highly doubt they are thinking of the media at the time, and they definitely shouldn’t be.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How does one not die in that situation?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I watched the video like three times and he shouldn't have reached behind him like that.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 13

Dude was drunk and scared shitless and confused by the officers stupid ass commands. There was 2 officers, 1 could have easily cuffed him.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Get in close range and risk getting shot from around the hallway? Would you put your life in danger like that?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Mar 30, 2019 5:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Took me a solid 5 seconds to realize you meant downvoted. But I dunno. I think we just live in a society where a good chunk of the

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Population is way too gung-ho about violence., Especially preemptive violence. The idea that a cop should shoot someone if they aren't 100%

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sure that they DON'T have a weapon (gun, knife, or spork...) seems backwards and monstrous to me. And I will get downvoted for saying so.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lack of quality training.

7 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 39

Lack of intelligence, morality, ethics, empathy and anything else that would make them decent human beings.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You're right. Downvotes be damned. They'd rather kill an innocent than take any risk to themselves at all. No training, no responsibilities.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

SWAT aren't normal cops, they're practically the Delta Force of police. They serve a very specific purpose.

7 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 31

At least on TV.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Usually just regular cops with special weapons in the trunk of their crown Vic right?

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Except that Delta force is capable of busting down doors and taking people alive who are armed and intending to shoot them.

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Kill innocent people?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Is that very specific purpose murdering innocent people? They’re pretty good at that

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

This is true. SWAT and special action units are usually the guys cops call when they need help. So go figure.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

They are NOT military. They are law enforcement and their rules of engagement are supposed to reflect that.

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I agree, they're not. And they should and most often they do.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why wd cops assume a civilian report is legitimate without doing their own reconn? They're lazy and trigger happy.

7 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 26

Failing to be proactive is detrimental when time is a factor. Parkland is a prime example of this.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

Parkland had multiple complaints over a long period of time, to say the least. There's a lot of room between these two extremes.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, I’m referring to the actions of the resource officer during the emergency.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So many ignorant comments... yes he was unarmed but FOLLOW POLICE INSTRUCTIONS they aren't psychic or perfect.

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 29

They are psychopaths and sociopaths.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You are sick.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yeah, because multiple armed gunmen showing up at your door fosters lucid thought processes. You fucking putz.

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

What he said ^^

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe "don't kill an unarmed man in his home" is more important than "try your best not to die when inevitably assaulted by police."

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

I understand that but he literally did the exact opposite of what they were telling him to do

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

"Put your hands up!" *puts hands up then rapidly down whole police are pointing guns* all I'm saying is follow orders. I've had police 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Roll up on me in their car. Slam on their brakes. Felony stop me screaming "Hands up!". Know what I did? Put them up and left them there.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

That's a terrible fucking argument. Just follow their instructions so they don't murder you, even though their training should prevent that.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's never that simple, my dude. Take your average person, suddenly jarred out of a totally relaxed state by armed people, and ask them 1/

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm an average person. At the time I was jogging down the street in a normal neighborhood and fit a description. again.l all I'm saying 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

To do anything in a loud and hostile tone. "Just follow instructions" is easy when you're saying it. Not so much when you're 2/

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He raised his hands and then put them back down very rapidly, cops thought he was going for the gun they were told he had on his person.

7 years ago | Likes 381 Dislikes 13

Ah. Makes sense.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

probably pulling his pants up. loose belts kill.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only way is to be naked i guess

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So the police are in the right then.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

Also in the right there

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Mar 30, 2019 3:18 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Loser take

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I mean there's bodycam footage of the incident, so unless you're going to argue that it was doctored then you don't really have ground here.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

It wasn't the up and down motion that got him, that was when he was still behind the screen door. You can see in the bodycam (and this 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

supported by the account of the officer who took the shot) that when he stepped onto the porch, he noticed additional officers to his 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

right who were about 20 feet away and raised his hand in their direction. The officer reported that he wasn't sure what was in the man's 3/?

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

hand, so he erred on the side of caution and fired under the assumption he was defending another officer. 4/4

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

So they murdered him.

7 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 14

Look up what murder means.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 14

Killing someone with intent. SWAT teams hopped up on military delusions loaded with military weapons are a hammer looking for a nail.

7 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 12

“Military weapons” you do know ANYBODY without a record can obtain those weapons, right?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Ahhh the downvotes! So many fans of extrajudicial executions!

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 10

Justifiable homicide does not equal murder.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

To that I can only say getting shot by police is an almost 100% american thing. These people have no relevant training except shooting.

7 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 52

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted May 7, 2022 4:31 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They are the joke. Not me for saying it.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted May 7, 2022 4:32 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

So when did you finish the academy?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

oh i didnt know we were making ignorant statements based off no experience at all today.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Are you fully versed on the training they received?

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Yes I did some research when I wrote a big thing on this some years ago.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Sweet, then you know how bollocks that statement is.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So if the person you've been told has a gun appears to reach for it really quick, you should let him/her shoot you?

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 15

Allegedly these are trained professionals. “Shoot first, ask questions later” is not an acceptable stance for law enforcement.

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Why not bring a ballistic shield?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

You’ve seen too many movies as played too much siege

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There's so much time between actually shooting and having your hands up in the first place. Could have waited until he at least drew the gun

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Like I said above... Why does ONLY americans solve everything by shooting. Because they have no relevant training.

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 11

S.W.A.T. is the reason. It’s the exact opposite of deescalating a situation. No perimeter, no recon, no fact verification. All escalation

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Relevant training for any police force regardless of country is that if they make a sudden movement to the waistband or another area where..

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

The same thing could happen in other countries. It's a fucking SWAT team, most countries have similar teams.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Good luck linking me to sources for any of that bull shit. Stop talking to other people until you can say better things.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

100% American thing? Police in some other countries literally go around slaughtering their own people due to corruption.

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 9

These guys acted on the information they had and did what they had to protect themselves. I used to hate on cops too until I realized how

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Much they really do for society.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Ok, the US would be a great third world country by comparison, I give you that. But its a shitty first world country.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

US police, legally and without any hint of corruption, shoot and kill more innocent people than just about anywhere else in the world.

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

I should say "legally" in quotes because even though the majority the killings are questionable, the police get only a slap on the wrist.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Dont kid yourself. There's tons of corruption. It's just not always relevant to killing folks.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So they killed an innocent man because what they though was happening was not actually happening.

7 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 5

If it's the one I'm thinking of, they went to the wrong address so they killed the wrong innocent man.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

And this is why you comply with the orders from the police.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

I agree, but it go both ways. The individual should comply but cities need to better train police forces for de-escalation. We live (1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

in a technologically advanced enough world that we should be able to have officers safely resolve incidents like this without anyone dying.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

'Murica

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

yeah and the reason he raised his hand up was because they were shining a light at him as he walked out and he was covering his eyes.

7 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Jul 9, 2025 8:07 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's done to disorient you. Your pupils contract and you can't focus past the cops

7 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

From my understanding, it’s an officer safety thing. Kinda hard for a person to get a good target to attack if they can’t see anything

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

To disorient you temporarily so you are unable to effectively attack them if you chose to.

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

So you're saying it's there to prevent unnecessary shootings?

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

It's to make you react, and then they shoot you for reacting.

7 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 36

No.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 16

Police can only go off the information they are given in these situations. They can’t know everything.

7 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 75

I will NEVER give up m,y guns you know why? Because Ignorant, trigger-happy BASTARDS LIKE THIS are the alternative! No thanks!

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 36

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

everybody downvoting my comment can suck it. v

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Except they didn’t do any checking up on where they were going or who they were looking for. They are supposed to assess situations.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The y should know enough to... "Don't believe everything you're told." It's something everyone is taught early in life.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Nah, the guy was literally obeying police instructions, while completely baffled, and got murdered.

7 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 26

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Mar 30, 2019 5:29 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Fuck you, they shot him in a matter of seconds because they were trigger happy retards who didn't even get the latest info from 911

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Re-read my comment you soft fucking melon...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was up until he decided to rapidly move his hands down to his waist.

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 63

No one's fault but his own he got confused. Moved his hands fast: murdering him seems a proportionate police response to me!

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 24

It is believed he was trying to stop his pants from falling down.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Still didn't have to straight up kill the guy. Aren't American police taught to shoot (that being the very final option) to disarm?

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 13

I mean, yes. But... wow.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see your point, but in a situation like that, can you even control your movements? Guy must have been terrified

7 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 2

This is also known as the universal sign of "the fuck?"

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

I’ve never pulled the trigger of my firearm at anyone. That’s because I have never been sure it was a threat.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I’m pretty sure if I knew a guy just murdered two people and he was still armed and he rapidly moved his hands towards his waist where

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

People normally store their firearms, I’d shoot because I’m not going to go home in a box because “I wasn’t sure”. I’m going to go home

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Yeah, you haven’t listened to the tapes. There is a lot there the cops could have used to at least be skeptical but didn’t.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But they didn't "know".

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fuck that, no positive ID no shooty. Its that simple. Fuck those cops. Hands at waist level should not be a death sentence.

7 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 12

Yeah i can't help but imagine a group of 6 year olds with real weapons sent out to do real police work get scared and act prematurely

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Instead of "hands at waist level," think "hands at holster level." Appearing to try to kill me IS a death sentence, if i have any say in it.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 21

They still have a job to do. "Not getting killed" isn't their only job. Hence why people have to remind them that other lives matter too.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Bitch please. Im an 8 year army vet, multiple deployments. Never fired my weapon without positive ID. How many life or death situations 1/

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Of course it's dumbasses like you who have all the say in it. That's why innocent people are killed

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

True, but outside America the cops would've handled it differently with a tazer or a baton.... You know.. Normally?

7 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 38

This is the dumbest fucking thing I've read.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Sure, using a taser on a possibly dangerous person who as far as they knows just murdered two people with a gun. I’d like to know the person

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 10

brave enough to run up to that dangerously armed person with a tazer.

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

So you’re going to trust that the man isn’t reaching for a gun? Also you’ll need a source for your claim.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Swat is almost never needed. Negotiators work better.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Outside the US, its safe to fix your waistband or have an aul' scratch, because we don't have a gun problem therefor don't end up shot.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0