SomeCrazyNerd
1738
24
22
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/25/republicans-border-wall-vote-240957
The GOP is trying the pass the border wall funding with US taxpayer dollars but won't even let the full house vote, including some of their own members. Members like Ileana Ros-Lehtinen who know the whole thing is half-baked and wildly inneficient as border control anyway.
SomeCrazyNerd
My post got seven upvotes how can I handle this much fame?
EnjiNightsHips
I wouldn't trust politico if they said rain was wet
SomeCrazyNerd
Why would you distrust them automatically? Unless it's some trollbot site, it's normally bias more than fabrication you have to worry about.
SomeCrazyNerd
And here's another source; https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2017/07/24/defense-spending-bill-could-include-1-6-billion-to-start-border-wall/
SomeCrazyNerd
Here's the Hill; https://www.google.com.au/amp/thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/343656-gop-lawmakers-push-back-against-funding-for-borde
SomeCrazyNerd
And another; http://thehill.com/policy/defense/341583-republicans-move-to-strike-anti-border-wall-provision-from-defense-bill
Actualdeadpool
Come on guys. Obviously what we need is a wall with a mile long moat behind it. But the water is actually chemical waste.
SomeCrazyNerd
Honestly read some of the companies proposals for extras on the wall. That's actually more sensible that some of those real suggestions.
SomeCrazyNerd
In all honesty that is a big problem with it. It'll just increase the sea and air travel which will have to get more money too.
cas86
So filled with Mexican water?
Actualdeadpool
Chereazi
But how deep is the moat? we don't want tunnels!
Actualdeadpool
190 feet deep.
Septagrim
Thats a good start, but why not an even 200 feet deep?
Actualdeadpool
190 is even.
Septagrim
Ya but its not 200.