Masterlp3
6839
158
13
.
Feb 3, 2017 1:28 AM
Masterlp3
6839
158
13
ReitnesTenought
>not using timeless physics to see reality as probability waves in 2017
JibJibletsOfficial
Hey OP you referring to an atomic clock? I genuinely want to know.
TheBlackestKey
Time is an illusion, lunch time doubly so.
AmbiguousGardens
Why that number specifically
sanspersona
haileyquinnade
johnnyratbastard
Me too man, me too...
poplopo
What do you mean by "real"? Are you asking if it's a real useful convention for comparing occurrences of events in physical space?
Masterlp3
Originally I was intrigued about the radiation decay of cesium 133 if it were near a super massive black hole. Would the decay take longer?
CUNTDESTROY3R
FishingForConversation
It's funny every time
Alberny
Lmao
PizzaGovorun
reallylamelol
Wtf!? Lol!
tridad
I genuinely enjoyed that more than the post.
Masterlp3
Yeah what a shite post
Masterlp3
I dont know what I just watched but I dont regret it.
FishingForConversation
It's a joke on your post
redhatbluehatonehattwohat
Both. The latter is just a rather reasonable approximation of a second.
LargeAlbinoBeluga
I thought it was the literal definition of a second
redhatbluehatonehattwohat
Only since the 1960s; only until they come up with a better one. *cough*Strontium*cough*
ZacWasTaken
Ikr? #StrontiumClocksMasterRace
SuperLuminalMan
And this was how I learned that subculture is fractal