When I see a slate article suggesting George Bush's dog isn't a goodest boy

Dec 4, 2018 2:58 PM

Some saucy sauce: https://slate.com/human-interest/2018/12/sully-hw-bush-service-dog-george-hw-bush-funeral.html

good_boy

theyregooddogsbrent

They are all good dogs bront

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If i had respect for slate, it would be gone. But i had none to begin with so ill just ignore their stupid opinion

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

ahahhahaha only six months what a scam.. from the weather to a service dog the media just misleads

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

This is just stupid, we're making dogs political now too?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I think the author just wanted to correct some misinformation people are spreading about the dog, like "oh he was a lifelong pet!"

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Even still, ridiculous. What difference does it make?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

#WhenYouHateConservativesSoMuchYouMustShitOnTheirDogsToo

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

It's a catty move.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#WhenYouHateFactsSoMuchYouConsiderThemAnInsult all they did was mention that he's a service dog...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Slow ur roll. Did u check out the article’s title? “Don’t Spend Your Emotional Energy on Sully H.W. Bush”. Might as well b “screw that dog”.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

#WhenNewspaperHeadlinesAreYourTrigger and #HowIsThisArticleHatingConservatives my roll is of sufficient speed, i shall maintain it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think you are jumping to many conclusions. I am merely pointing to the fact it seems off to act like the dog shouldn’t be pitied. (Cont)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I ask you, do you think the dog got attached to Bush in those six months? Do you feel a dog doesn’t bond in that time?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1