I don't even know what to say.

Apr 9, 2016 4:16 AM

SpaceCunt

Views

91895

Likes

4954

Dislikes

414

imgur_circlejerk

funny

But the couple insisted that the Christian cake shop makes them one rather than go to the one that was down the street.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thats like forcing a Rabbi to marry a muslim couple.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I still bet Jesus didn't eat with a vegan

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And this is why Matthew 7 means so much to me, they are people, who deserve to be treated as such and not be judged.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Who's telling who to do what? Oppression divides, both oppression of, as well as by, gay persons. Jesus cared about all. See your own hate

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If they don't want to make the cake - that is their right. Take your $$ somewhere else and let the bigoted cake shop go out of business...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The "religious protection" laws are often very narrow and specifically targeted only at "religious" beliefs against gay/trans people >>>

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

>>>but there are no protections for religious beliefs against things like mixing meat and dairy in the same meal, or w/e. It's obv. bullshit

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

IDK if someone doesn't want my business I have a tendency to take it to someone that does.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm vegan

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

We get it you vape

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I can have dinner with a gay person, but why would I engage in an act to support them. What act did Jesus do to support stealing/adultery?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Imo, it's wrong to discriminate ala not letting them in the store or selling them an existing cake but ludicrous to insist they cre8

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

its about freedom to run ones own company as one likes. If you deny this, then you have to accept the jewish showshiner being forced to 1/

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

shine the shoes of the neonazi in full ss uniform. Either that or you have to accept different rules for different groups. Thats facism.2/2

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

shoeshiner*

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Oh, Sky Cake...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But did Jesus eat with a gay dude?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's already been all over facebook, tumblr and whisper, I supposed it was only a matter of time before it made it's way here.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think it was the message, not the cake, wasn't it?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What if the message is in the cake?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, if they had just asked for a cake, the owner's would have been happy to do it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also told them "Go and sin no more" John 8:11 He didn't want people to continue in a life of sin.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

But considering he walked with and loved the man he knew would betray him, that has to speak toward his capacity to love and forgive.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

but he never condoned sin...he forgave it. definitely not the same thing

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I literally used the word love, not condone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jesus makes great tacos

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

I'm going taco crazy now. Thank you for that.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Apr 22, 2016 7:38 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Heh, heh.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dammit! Now I want tacos.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

@OP, you know, don't you, that you opened up a can of worms.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Heh, heh.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't agree with the anti gay Christians but they should have the right to kick ANYONE out of their shop for any reason.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

private businesses should be able to refuse service to whomever they wish for any reason.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

What about public ones?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

public business and services should be held to the highest degree of scrutiny for any type of discrimination.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don't even know what the other side to this argument is.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Should you be able to refuse service to blacks because they're black? That used to be the other side. I would say yes, you should.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I am not for turning people away based on sexuality, but why would you want to force someone to do something?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It should be an equality issue. You cannot deny blacks into your dinner, you shouldn't be able to deny gays a service as well, or anyone tfm

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well duh, but who is to say that just because they have to do business with you that they will do their most quality work?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

last/ it is after all, YOUR shop. That does, and should, carry more rights with it than a customer has.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wouldnt want to force a jew to accept muslims or neonazis into his shop. These things have to be equal for all groups, or its facism.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think you should be able to deny blacks entry into your establisment. The bad press is on you, but it should be your right.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Gays aren't thieves though

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Are you sure though? I've no idea what it's about, but I have heard of a thing called "Butt pirating" or something.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Technically correct.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, partially correct since gays can still be thieves, it is just not an inherent trait

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What would a gay thief steal?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GlitterSeriously: The same stuff a straight thief would steal, like money

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But would they spend it differently?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hit enter instead of space XD

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah He never endorses the behaviour. He loves the people but he most assuredly doesn't bless behaviour that's contrary to His Father's word

10 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 4, 2016 2:02 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Usually people just say we're getting married, not, "Billy Bob Bobber is my fifth husband to be!"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If they REALLY worried about the sins aspect they shouldn't go with a "LALALA ITS NOT A SIN IF I DONT KNOW"-approach.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You have no idea what you're talking about, and it shows. Did you know homosexuality isn't a sin? If it is, Jesus ain't your savior.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Oh wait, you're one of those people who believe you should be put to death for wearing clothes of different fabrics, or for getting a tattoo

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

No, I'm not- but thank you for reading what I said and being comfortable in assuming what I really meant...

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You have no idea what you're talking about, and it shows. Did you know homosexuality isn't a sin? If it is, Jesus ain't your savior.

10 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 16

Explain

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the whole "died for your sins" part wipes out the "old testament" rules, which is why no Christians keep kosher, for instance

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It didn't wipe out the law, the new testament just explains the new covenant. Being "kosher" is an old covenant tradition, not a god given

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Law. Read the difference between law and tradition. Sinning is a matter of the motives of the heart, not what we eat or wear or how we

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry, but love between two, consenting adults isn't a sin. The bible was written by people, not God or Jesus.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm confused. So what the Bible says doesn't matter, or there is a place in the bible where it says that? Sorry I really don't know

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, closer to the first. But I mean more along the lines of "the Bible is dated and written by humans, not some divine wisdom."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jesus did those things for 2 reasons. For the people who needed Jesus the most and for the ones who thought they needed Him least.

10 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 10

Which is which

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The ones who think they need Him least will need Him most. Their way to heaven is through deed, action, kindness but not Christ alone.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Serious question here, do you have verses to back up this claim?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The chief priests, Pharisees all thought Jesus was a heretic. They needed Him most but they hung Him. Matthew is a good book to start with.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I've read the bible, I just haven't read any verses that say this. It sounds like this is your interpretation, which is fine, but not canon

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I've always lived by "Love the sinner, hate the sin" because when people needed Jesus, he extended Love to them. I have no problem (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

(2/2) with the command to love others - it's great. But I also think I should be able to deny my services without having charges brought up.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

If Jesus died on the cross to fulfill the laws of the old testament & you still follow those laws, what are you saying about his sacrifice?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Are you only in service to people that follow the word of the Lord?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No greater love hath a man that would lay his life down for another. Enter Jesus.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure there's a pretty seriously non-judgemental theme there. He was happy to chill with anyone who was up for it.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

No. Where do these ideas come from?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Chilling isn't what he did. Teaching, leading by example. Just because I treat you with respect doesn't mean I agree with your choices.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Don't get me wrong, I support gay marriage. The government shouldn't base laws on religion. But don't base religion on popular opinion.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Nope. Above reasons apply

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Yeah, that 2000 page book is cut and dry. Nothing left open to interpretation...

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Pretty much

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

You're kidding right? If it is so cut-and-dry, why are there so many denominations?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've used this argument before with my religious in laws and they said "but he didn't eat with gays"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

That's hilarious. Also tragic.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your reply to them should be "prove it".

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Start with an epic lack of understanding of Christianity. Never failed the media before.

10 years ago | Likes 238 Dislikes 27

Great comment!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

For something supposedly created by a super intelligent being it sure seems difficult to get straight what it is and isn't.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

Because a super intelligent being would make a compelling argument with clear points on which all could agree. But there aren't.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Humans aren't always rational. In fact most of the time they aren't.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some also argue the bible is written enigmaticly to encourage it's study

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't get it. What did the meme fail to understand?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Christ was reaching out to sinners to try to change their behavior, not in any way to condone it or support it.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

But did his out reach begin with the sinner 's repentance? Or did it begin with their asking for help, or them showing vulnerability?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Depends on a case-to-case basis. He understood men's hearts so he knew what they personally needed.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We aren't relay told specifically, though I would assume it began with repentance, since that made up a large part of his teaching.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

We are told specifically. Jesus asked for help. He asked the woman at the well. When she helped, THEN he offered everlasting life.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We're given examples of both. What I take away is that I should extend my love and welcome anyone. That way they can talk or ask for (1/3)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, see, they have a lot of fodder to work with. Start with an epic lack of understanding of Christianity in... well, Christians.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 19

Sad, but true.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"Jesus would support gay marriage." is something that someone who does not understand Christianity would say.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Religion is gay

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Without using Pauline texts, show me some evidence of this.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Matt 5:17. His sacrifice removed the corporeal punishment, it did not make sins to be no longer sinful.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

1/Sure, but do you understand that the Greek for the type of Sodomy that is condemned in the Bible only speaks of penetration between

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Saying its blanket sinful is something an unquestioning christian would say.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

I'm not making a moral judgement here. But it is a tenet of Christianity that willingly engaging in gay sex acts is forbidden.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

there wasn't a word for two men in a monogamous pairing during that time period. That concept didn't exist in language at that time. 3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

of men having sex with men but it wasn't homosexuality. Most were married and were cheating on their wives for example (greeks, romans ect)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

the reality is thought that homosexuality wasn't something that was actually defined until much more recently. Yes there is historic cases 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

not neccisarly. There is a lot of problems with that idea outside of just translation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezQjNJUSraY

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Jesus was also apparently smart and reasonable. So you can't really force those standards on everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 790 Dislikes 33

Ohhhhhhh noesssssss!!!! Hahaha! Burrrrnnnnnnnn!!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Ooooooohhhhhh burrnnnnn

10 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 1

Ha!!!! I was going to just say that...ill say it anyways.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Jesus wouldn't bake a cake for a gay wedding. That's Buddy Jesusâ„¢ you're thinking of.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Separate from the new testament there is no credible evidence JC was a real person BUT the characters words & principles are A1 solid.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I think most historians agree that Jesus existed. Of course most arguments are whether or not he did those miracles

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Plus, you cant expect Jesus to represent how Christians should act. He was Jewish.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Lol this was one of the funniest comment I've read. I hope to God you are trolling

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ahh my daily gay atheist preachy post by 12 year olds neckbeards who have never read any basic philosophy

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 24

Sooooo....philosophy and the bible. How are these related exactly?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I dunno, man. Dude got himself stuck to a cross so how smart was he if he couldnt reason himself down to a proper stoning, eh?

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

Your username makes this

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reformers are typically very intelligent and are usually killed based on circumstance. In this case saduces thought it would discredit him

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Well it shut him up for a few days.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

That is one of the funniest jokes about the resurrection I have ever hear. It warranted a full explanation a lol would not suffice

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

there was that one time he cursed a fig tree for being out of season...and that other time he made a scourge and attacked people with it...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm pretty sure he only whipped the animals out of the temple. He did flip some tables, though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have you ever met a fig tree that wasnt an asshole? Cause I havent

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Harsh...but fair

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe he was just a really friendly tard, like Forrest Gump.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 17

Yes, that's the ticket; the son of God was a "friendly tard." Actually, could be legit. It offends me, but is plausible.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Who better to unconditionally love all of humanity. A dog, I guess. But obviously Jesus wasn't a dog.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

If he just didn't speak and act with such wisdom this would totally check out. Would that we could all be more like Him.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Reportedly. The New Testament is about Jesus. There's no gospel according to Jesus.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I dont think anyone in Palestine 2000 years ago could reasonably be called "smart and reasonable."

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 43

Why?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

He's a Zionist.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because they didnt know bacteria exist or that women should be treated equally or that humans should never be owned by other humans.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 28

Leonardo Da Vinci didn't know bacteria exist.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yup. He was pretty fucking stupid. Socrates was wrong about almost everything he ever postulated.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was smart for the time, I bet in 2000 years someone will say "because they didn't know how to make a quantum generator at home"

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Are you saying we're smart? Have you met us? Have you seen the state of our world

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

They didn't even have teleporters, they just went everywhere in person like fucking animals, so stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Hey everybody! Let's ask the dumb guy what smart and reasonable means!!

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

- Says Zeldabutts.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

Haha.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would you make a Jewish person bake a Nazi cake? I know it's not the same thing but people have a right to refuse service if it bothers them

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 14

Like when restaurants in the 60s refused to serve Black people? That worked out well, didn't it?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

(1/2) Can a business refuse to make something they find offensive? Yes. Can a business refuse to make something for a person they find

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

In every case that has made the news, the couple is asking for a design that the baker already offers to straight couples.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Well, there's also the requests for same-sex caketoppers. "Can we get two men in suits?" "NO!" "Why?" "... It... makes the cake taste bad?"

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Actually, in many cases people do NOT have the right to open a business to the public and then refuse to serve a minority of that public.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

(2/2) offensive? No. See the difference?

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

So they can refuse to bake a wedding cake but offer to sell them cup cakes and they'll be in the clear? Just getting a feel for your stance

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(3/?) would not otherwise make. It's discrimination when said bakery is asked for something they DO make but refuse because the customer

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/?) it or that says "kill straight people" in icing or that depicts human so organs. It's okay for a business to refuse to make a thing

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(4/?) belongs to a group the business owner dislikes. Hope this helps.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(1/?) I actually don't understand what you're asking. To clarify, a business, such as a bakery, can refuse to make a cake with a swastika on

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm asking if it's okay, in your opinion, to not bake them a cake for a gay wedding as long as they don't refuse service to gay individuals.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(1/2) No, it is NOT okay to refuse to make a wedding cake for anyone. It is a service they already offer, refusing based on the customers'

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I can't see my last reply. No, it is NOT okay. Refusing to make the wedding cake was/is discrimination.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(2/2) sexual orientation is discrimination.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He ate with them to preach to them and try to get them to turn away from their lives of sin. Are you sure that's what you want on your cake?

10 years ago | Likes 403 Dislikes 35

awesome answer LMAO!!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't hesitate a second to kill or die for cake so yes

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Cake or death?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exactly. He didn't have dinner with them to congratulate them for their behavior.

10 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 4

I don't think He would want them to feel shamed and like outcasts either though... Does refusing service really embody the Christian spirit?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

or spread the message of the Lord?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Hey! I was enjoying my short simple narrative -- don't go bringing "THE REST OF THE STORY" into it !!!

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 2

"Wow, this cake is so good it turned me straight!"

10 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 3

it was made with vagina fluids (im just asumming it was made for a guy)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More he refused to judge and offered unconditional love.

10 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 67

He did judge. He let people know when they were sinning, but also told them there was a better way.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Uhh... Have you read the bible?

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 15

Unfortunately.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 27

Why unfortunately? Whether you believe in it or not there is still value in understanding a point of view.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

It's just really long and boring.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 13

He smited the fuck out of a fig tree because he got salty that it didn't have any fruit.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 4

Yeah. It's pretty fucking black metal as fuck!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

I guess you missed the whole lake of fire and judgement for our sins sections of the Bible.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 10

In the new testament, Jesus died for our sins that we couldn't repay. We were going to hell, and through him we don't have to. He did 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Allegedly.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Offer unconditional love, but he never refused to judge. Rather he came to make it clear we couldn't get to heaven on our own. He was 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Isn't it conditional love though? Cause unless you devote your life and love him back he'll cast you into a lake of fire/refuse to save you

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

He never refused to judge?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

our scapegoat. I once heard it like this: before he died, we were in a sinful world, in broken bodies, and so we had no choice but to 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Jesus' purpose was never to judge, as he represented man while on earth. The bible always says judgement is left for the father.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

This cannot be overstated

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wow. Do you ever not know the Bible-or even general tenets of Christianity. Matthew 25:31-46 Jesus will Judge the world, among other things.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I'll be sure to check that verse out. Of course I'll be sure to read surrounding passages to ensure I gain the full meaning.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Of course he judged, he loves us anyway. But he commanded his apostles to stand against evil

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 6

do you understand what he meant when he said "let he who is innocent cast the first stone"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Are you forgetting the part where he said: 'go and sin no more'?

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

actually maybe we aren't communicating properly. What is judgement to you?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

how is that a judgement? That is a message to carry forth.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

So Jesus said "go and sin [...]" back then?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1