Matt Bliss (R) : "...this brings us closer to a democracy, which you know, that's not a good thing..."

Apr 8, 2023 3:12 PM

The701

Views

1010732

Likes

954

Dislikes

9

Matt Bliss (R) : "...this brings us closer to a democracy, which you know, that's not a good thing..."

Minnesota state Representative Matt Bliss, having some totally normal Republican thoughts on switching a national popular vote to elect the president...

Pew Research: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/08/05/majority-of-americans-continue-to-favor-moving-away-from-electoral-college/
"Around six-in-ten U.S. adults (63%) say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency, while 35% favor keeping the current Electoral College system, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted June 27-July 4, 2022."

Edit: After posting, I found the full video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7B8r9m9-W8&t=2287s (38:07 in case the link doesn't go there)
He goes on to acknowledge that polls say that the national popular vote bill is popular, but I guess because that doesn't support his case, he says they're all biased anyway.

politics

democracy

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Republicans, the Fascist Party of Nazis.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The Minnesota GOP is desperate to regain relevance within the RNC. Every year MN stays blue, they have the nerve to act surprised and grow a bit more wackadoodle.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The GOP used to be quietly anti-democracy. Since Trump they have gone all in and opposing democracy is now a cornerstone of their public platform

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want every "We'Re NoT a DeMoCrAcY wE'rE a CoNsTiTuTiOnAl RePuBlIC" dweeb to put up or shut up by refusing to vote or participate in the political process

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I always vote, but I live in a red state. I know that my vote for president is virtually meaningless, but down ballot votes are incredibly important. I believe that every vote for president should count, and the president should be elected by popular vote.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Said the quiet part out loud

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

INCORRECT! We are a Representative Democracy. This means we elect fucks like this asshole to do what we elected them to do.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's meant to be a representative democracy, but It's really a federal republic under a constitution. Also the constitution doesn't really matter. Also the ruling class aren't policed. And apparently that's all working as intended.

3 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Constitution doesn't matter?! It says it matters right in it, right after the "well-regulated militia" bit. See also, "I need my lawyer dog."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Get em out. Just fucking get. them. out.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looks like even he has indigestion hearing this crap.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Republicans frequency claim the United States is not a democracy and they're the ones who should run it no matter how few of them there are.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Translation: "More direct democracy is not a good thing for Republicans".

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wait a minute what did he say right after "… democracy, this is not a good thing… "?

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

"And I keep hearing in this committee that we're a democracy, we need to support the democracy. We're not a democracy, we're a constitutional republic. We're a set of 50 independent states that have our own laws, that follow the constitution and part of a federal government. The national popular vote, I know some people say it strengthens each individual vote, but this brings us closer to democracy, which you know that's not a good thing. Our founders saw this and saw the strength of the

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

independent states, and the independent voices of each state. And for the life of me, I don't know why we would put our election integrity in the hands of people in California, Alabama, New York. This is our election. We decide where our electoral votes go." And he continues. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7B8r9m9-W8&t=2287s (38:07 in case the link doesn't go there)

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I've got it! Why don't Republicans just come up with policies that don't hurt the middle class and everyone likes? Easy peasy!

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The country is a Republic. The voting system is a democracy. He won't acknowledge the difference.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

He also won't acknowledge polls saying that the national popular vote is popular. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7B8r9m9-W8&t=2417s

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The quiet part, now ear-splittingly loud.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It has been 43 years since the Republican party took the White House with a popular vote win. They know that if the US switches to a popular vote for President, they're never seeing the inside of the White House again :)

3 years ago | Likes 142 Dislikes 3

We might even have more than…*GASP* 3 parties! Gorsh, too much like commi-nizm fer me. /s

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is phrased confusingly. It means a Republican hasn't won the presidency while a democrat was in office in 43 years, not that a Republican hasn't won the popular vote in 43 years. Both Bushes won a popular vote.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or as I like to call it “the goal”

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds good. Where do we meet?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GWB won the popular vote in 2004, though

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That is true, but doesn't change the original statement; in 2004 the Republicans didn't take the WH - a Republican president already had it. He was the incumbent. Definitely worth saying, though, that GWB was the last Republican president to win the popular vote, very nearly twenty years ago. Well done GWB for actually winning the popular vote.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wait until they hear about rank D choice voting.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Electoral college exists so the mob couldn’t elect in someone who would destroy the republic. It failed. Get rid of it.

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

The Electoral College existed because at one point you physically had to send to someone to Philadelphia to cast the vote on your Town's behalf. the Electoral College exist in the United States before widespread usage of the telegraph existed. that's the only reason.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Electoral college exists to give conservatives more power. Literally. It was done that way to prevent conservatives from seceding/leaving/etc. just like with the 3/5 compromise.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

It's hard not to just type out, "break his fucking legs," over and over and over. I don't actually want harm to come to someone, but man, that feeling comes up fast.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Those fucktards are not even close to being conservatives anymore. Outright fascists is what they are.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They abandoned conservatism long ago and now they are rejecting democracy.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"We're not a democracy,"-some dude who as elected via democracy.

3 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 2

Except he wasn't. He won because someone else gerrymandered his district so people who oppose is ideology are minority.

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

*are a statistical minority

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was still a direct vote from the people in his district. That's democracy.

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Yes but ironically it’s failed democracy because the people most likely did not elect him but in fact the map elected him

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Is it, though? When elected officials create district maps that purposely exclude voters to guarantee a victory in their favor, that's not the people electing a leader, but a leader electing their colleagues. That's why gerrymandering is so insidious. We still have the illusion of the vote, but the outcome was decided by a redrawn district map years prior

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's what drives me up a freaking wall! A republic IS A DEMOCRACY! It is a TYPE of democracy! It is a democratically elected form of government! *throws up hands* but words don't matter, this is is just more proof.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

If the US system was even remotely fairer the GOP wouldn’t exist.

3 years ago | Likes 583 Dislikes 3

The country was setup to protect slavery and most importantly slave owners.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I have an idea, put it on the ballot and let the people decide

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine if we had ranked voting.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't win elections without tipping the scale

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As a Canadian, it blows my mind that people have to register and do anything to vote... Here, we just get a card telling us when to vote and where, confirming that we are on the voting list. If you don't get it for some reason, you call and it will be fixed. Never had the issue, but it probably happens to new citizens.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think it would, a two party system just means that they would need to shift on a lot of policies (which they had done, like same-sex relationships, but later abandoned for christo-facism). Under Obama, the GOP chased the middle a bit, since they were unpopular. Sadly the middle was already fairly far to the right.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It's a nice thought - but the UK has a fairer system (still not fair - but fairer), and we have the Tories, so...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If Texas was blue the GOP would never elect another president.

3 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 1

v

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Texas is blue, it's just jerrymandered

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

They still abbot back in after Uvalde

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Gerrymandering doesn’t affect the popular vote for President

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Nope, it effects the Electoral College...which should also be abolished.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Texas was purple in 2020. It’ll be blue soon enough.

3 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 2

Grew up in Texas and left years ago. Texas democrats have been saying that for ages. I remember it back during the second Bush campaign. "in ten years Texas will be blue"

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, Texas is no where near purple. Certain areas are blue, but the state as a whole is red red red until they’re dead.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Almost sounds like you've provided a solution, but I don't think I should say what it is.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The solution is not waiting until they’re dead. I know many republicans that are younger than me, and I’m in my 30’s. The best way is to educate, and unfortunately the elected officials are trying to prevent that. They are trying to destroy public education here.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He looks like an actor I can't place the movie though. Plays a heavy set character but looks exactly like this guy!

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Kyle Gass the other half of Tenacious D

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The dude from Constantine with nystagmus?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Damn that's who I was gonna say. The shifty eye guy that drowned in a bodega

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He died recently, iirc.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes!! Thank you and that sucks I didn't know.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0