idrinkcheapbeer
21925
559
18
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cjd0vl1d9vrt
Jan 25, 2026 4:44 PM
idrinkcheapbeer
21925
559
18
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cjd0vl1d9vrt
Shadowkrieger
I think they need to start making ice victims
Isaidwhatsup
everyone ruining their careers and lives over someone that wouldn't even piss on them if they were on fire.
Cyclicus
Just a matter of time before cops start getting ambushed and shot in the face. Don't believe me? Scroll back to the 60s and 70s.
Larkins
says the Nazi
medici
We all saw the video. ICE murdered that first responder.
Antininny
Munchman347
There were several groups that chastised the nazis early on by citing the law, didn't do shit then, won't do shit now. And those groups wound up in the camps when the fascists gained complete control via the gestapo and Brown shirts... Just remember what happened to those same Brown shirts...
OperatorWay
Government officials derive their official powers from the constitution, and they delegitimize themselves when they reject the constitution.
In violating the people's 1st, 4th, & 5th amendment rights, they seem to be provoking the exercise of the 2nd.
CatSparkleBreaker
I think until a critical mass of peaceful protestors outfitted in assault rifles who display more trigger discipline than the goon squads terrorizing their cities march en masse, they won't listen. There's bound to be more blood shed either way, the institutions meant to make change peacefully are crumbling under this administration
MendoncycleSmith
Hey Greg, you still have a drunken murderer for a father, keep trying to push it down, your pain is showing.
Stumpkiller
Law enforcement? Pepper spraying and pushing around a woman is law enforcement?
Xalten2
Only one problem with Bovino's statement - the video shows that it's a flat out lie. He did not have his gun out.
Evi1Gav
If he doesn't know who shot Pretti, how can those involved be on administrative leave? This is also another step where an agency says the constitution isn't applicable to them.
rossimus
Trump admin has fucked the far right on every single issue and, besides all the tragedy that has come with it, that has been hilarious to watch.
IncognitoEnthusiast
Noodlesocks
Wasn't the second amendment written specifically as defence against law enforcement were they to ever become subservient to a tyrannical government.
petonious
What about the right to shoot nazi's?
vorasaurus
That's literally why the second amendment exists, to be able to fight back against a tyrannical government
woodintunoit
No, Bovino. Having a gun in a waistband =/= brandishing you liar. You can see it plainly in the video that it was an agent that pulled it
deletable
Not supporting ICE, I’m asking about language. Is there a legal aspect of “Intimidation” that can be triggered by unzipping one’s jacket to expose one’s firearm that was formerly concealed? Is it “better” to open carry? Like the Black Panthers recently did.
ShearingBlizzard
So they stole his gun and shot him, let's make sure they cant shoot us any more, by any means necessary.
Freyja33
He knows it. This kind of lie is not meant to make you believe it. It's meant to intimidate you by demonstrating they can manipulate the narrative even when it's extremely obvious they just murdered him. It's like someone saying "stop hitting yourself". They know they're the one's hitting you.
ImGoingToGoFallAsleepOnABench
Nah, see, brandishing is when you, as an ethnic or political undesirable, possess a firearm in any way, just like being a terrorist is when you are recipient to an unpleasant encounter with federal agents and get extrajudicially executed. Basically, crimes are the actions of perceived dissidents, as opposed to actual criminal activity.
woodintunoit
from him , and shot it into the street, triggering the others to shoot and kill him. Turn the sound on and you can hear that shot, too:
DaisyfromDownunder
Maybe the right to use a longarm from a distance to do Kirking of ICE will work better than getting murdered by KKK dress ups as police.
anjeleyezjr
The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Seems pretty cut and dry.
charondaboatman
Well, based on the comprehensive video footage which has no gaps, he wasn’t brandishing anything but his phone. Also, he wasn’t trying to help law enforcement, shitbird, he was trying to help the innocent citizen who was being lawlessly assaulted by your agents. And finally, you fucking fucktardatron, the second amendment doesn’t “sometimes apply”, it always applies. And, there was no “riot”, and the only disrupting was being done BY law enforcement. Fucking little nazi shitstain motherfucker.
MadamPuddifoot
THEY AREN'T LAW ENFORCEMENT. THEY ARE MASKED THUGS.
MajorasTerribleFate
Whatever happened to "shall not be infringed"?
billstranger
Infringement
RetrogradeLlama
Is the gallows still up at Nuremberg?
Just curious.
Seras91
just get a good craftsman and thats an easy task...in doubt i´m sure there are tutorials on youtube
perlninja
Rules for thee but not for me. Shocking.
JRSYJAY
The second amendment is specifically designed to interrupt the government!!
beerkrump
Whenever LEOs claim to be victims, the public is screwed.
SleepyHollowAppleTree
So the guy running away is Pretti, then? That short little nazi bitch needs to fuck off.
CitrusyGarlic
Pretti, the person who was shot, is on the ground in that clip. The guy running away is the shooter, not Pretti
unusanimus
Pretti's the guy that got shot.
SleepyHollowAppleTree
Read the article.
CitrusyGarlic
Huh? Pretti is the shootee, not the shooter
SleepyHollowAppleTree
Read the article.
CitrusyGarlic
You read the article! "Federal immigration officers have shot and killed a man in Minneapolis, identified by local officials as 37-year-old Alex Pretti"
SleepyHollowAppleTree
"but insists Pretti was "brandishing" his gun." I'm mocking the dumb little nazi and his bullshit lies. I know that isn't Pretti running away with his gun, that's one of the thugs who took Pretti's gun from his holster and ran away before Pretti was murdered.
CitrusyGarlic
Then you should have said that instead of "read the article" because I wasn't incorrect