"I'm keeping the $15."

Apr 10, 2024 6:14 PM

Maulbert

Views

14908

Likes

701

Dislikes

2

You can't make this shit up. Maybe the files are at Four Seasons Total Landscaping. LOL.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/files-man-tells-trumps-lawyers-after-subpoena-wrong/story?id=109090579

funny

politics

current_events

Guy should have downloaded some files from the web, sent them, and shown up at the trial.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“I’m keeping the $15” is my favorite part

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He did say he loves the poorly educated, and that looks like it extends to his attorneys, too.

2 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

well, birds of a feather shit the bed together, I guess.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That is the best shit I have seen in a while. He even tried to call them, but the number they had in the letter was disconnected.
Cherry on top was when he wrote 'I'll keep the 15$ tho.', which they send him to send them back the files. Just chefs kiss

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"How were we to know? They all look alike." trumps defense attorneys

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Smells like a Big Lebowski moment

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Only the best.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Totally on brand.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hilarious. Keeping the money too. "And another thing Vonnegut: I'm stopping payment on the check!".

2 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 0

I laughed, but really nobody expected a NY attorney and his multi-millionaire client to go into their pockets for a whole fifteen bucks, I hope

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Clearly Vonnegut didn't understand his own work. F-material.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Jesus, it's like they're not even trying. Oh, they really aren't, are they?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When your entire legal team gets their mail-in diploma's from the Bahamas.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If his lawyers are the worst and he's still getting off scot free.... well then. Looks like some country's judicial system is total garbage!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jeremy Rosenberg Total Landscaping

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Idiots or stall tactic? Hard to tell anymore

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe he’s a landscaper.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He enjoys all four seasons.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I swear all of this has to be for show to appease the masses because they have so much on him and have done nothing about it

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"$8 million Brooklyn home"
"I'm keeping the $15"

I'm definitely laughing, but if that isn't a perfect analog to our kleptocratic oligarchy of a society IDK WTF is.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

What a fucking joke that man is.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This... is not uncommon, even amongst the largest, most prominent law firms. My office has errantly received numerous law firm requests for documents or for individuals to appear, which have nothing to do with us... My organization unfortunately shares a name with a much larger, broader entity, and they just assume we're them.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yo mama's a much larger, broader entity.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Similar company/organization names I can see, but they subpoenaed just, some guy, at his home address. Like, they know multiple people can have the same name, right?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, when the guy replied "I don't have any files for you," they assumed the guy was being uncooperative, instead of them contacting the wrong guy.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There is an appeal for 'incompetent counsel'. I think they're playing to that to draw the legal process out until after Trump's long dead rom old age.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"$8 million home" - We're sorry, but your witness is in another castle

2 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 2

Oh wow. I didn't realize she'd been doing game journalism that long. (or maybe I just don't like what decade it is.)

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pictured: an $8 million home in 2024.

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Apr 11, 2024 1:02 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I was making a joke, not creating a Zillow listing.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This seems like another strategy at delaying

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the rare few to GET money from Trump.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope, just another $15 dollar expense his lawyers will never get reimbursed.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude lives in an $8m house and he’s keeping the $15 because you don’t get rich by turning down money.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I could have a billion dollars and I'd still be happy to remove $15 from Donald Trump's pockets.

2 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

How common is this sort of error? Are we hearing about it because it's an unusually dumb screwup, or because it's an ordinary screwup in a high-profile case?

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's a REALLY dumb screwup.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Maybe my tinfoil hat is on too tight, but I don't think it's a screwup. I think it's planting the seeds for a mistrial claim due to incompetent and ineffective counsel.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not unusual but usually it gets corrected quickly unless you have an overworked public defender. If you have a highly paid team, this is inexcusible.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

the highly paid team member in this case has little to no experience as a defense attorney. Funny as this is, it's probably just another hail mary delay tactic.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'Paid' might be the key term here.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Rosenburg that got the subpoena should have replied that he would bring everything he had to court and then showed up with any empty box

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

"I'll meet you in front of the Four Seasons to do the exchange"

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Anything that could disrupt court proceedings risks contempt of court, I believe. (Source: I have watched legal shows on TV.)

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'm waiting for a show where the protagonist gets tackled by the bailiff on the regular for getting too close to the jury box or the judge.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only if you’re poor, a woman, or a minority. If you’re Trump you can literally threaten the jury, the judge, and their families and get off with a mild bit of brow furrowing.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He gets all the best lawyers, doesn't he?

2 years ago | Likes 266 Dislikes 0

They're doing exactly what he wants them to do: stall for time while trying to look like they're legitimately working. Trump wants to run out the clock so he can cheat his way back into the presidency and spend the next four years dismantling the system from the inside until he can break enough things to get away with his crimes.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the best that money can't buy, since he doesn't pay his debts anyway

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The lawyers get all giggly when Trump asks if they want paid in free publicity now or free publicity when Trump doesn't pay them later...

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I mean there is a diffrence between a lawer fucking making a mistake and this is sort of a honest one but, Trump doing it over and over and over and over again, have they ever done anything correctly except dying in the court room seats/stand?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I mean... someone of his caliber will simply *know* whether a lawyer is good or not. Right?

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I'm assuming the best lawyers wouldn't go into court to try and force compliance against the wrong person.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Remember when that one idiot attorney he had forgot to apply for a jury trial, so it was instead just the judge. How can you screw up that bad on this big of a case?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Intentional. Foul shit up, claim innocence, ask for extension.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Delay, delay, delay.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This. I suspect they knew exactly what they were doing and this is just another stalling ploy.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No competent lawyer wants to work for someone who does not pay his bills.

2 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Defense lawyers work on retainer; i.e., you pay them in advance.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

Also one who can't keep his trash mouth shut.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'm still afraid that there is a strategy here...if all of the lawyers are this incompetent, he'll try to get leeway of some kind due to "ineffective assistance of counsel".

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

People have failed to prove 'ineffective counsel' in cases where the lawyers were asleep or drunk during the trial. The bar is relatively high, needing to prove that specific mistakes made were unreasonable, and that the trial could have gone differently if the counsel had been competent. Not to say they wouldn't try to invoke it, but it's not an easy tactic to pull off.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's actually reassuring.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s not easy if you’re poor. But for trump? Some appellate judge will probably give him a blowjob on account of it.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even if successful, it's just another delaying tactic. It doesn't flip the script from guilty to not guilty, it just gives you an avenue to appeal and try again to plead your case (with better counsel). ... I'd love to know if there have ever been trials that used such an egregious number of stalling tactics for good reasons.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It does flip the script if he makes it past the election.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Delay tactic, again

2 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 5

They might try to say they're not ready due to this mistake, but that's on them. Unless Trump gets another break, like the gd break appeals gave him, this shouldn't delay anything.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This wouldn't delay anything.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Maybe not for anyone else, but based on recent events I wouldn't be surprised if they give him an extra few weeks to try again.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Even delaying the proceedings by a day (which this does) serves Trump’s legal team. It also costs them nothing because it was an “error” on the part of his lawyers, obviously not something that is routinely double checked and verified by competent lawyers.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

And it adds weight to an ineffective counsel argument for purposes of mistrial. You absolutely can get a mistrial if your counsel is deemed to fail to meet the minimum standards for competency and diligence.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

How do you get them to go along with it, assuming they're not actually completely incompetent?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That’s trumps super power.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ask John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark and Jenna Ellis and Sydney Powell and Rudy Giuliani and Kenneth Chesebro and Michael Cohen and Alina Habba and Cleta Mitchell and Ray Smith and Robert Cheeley…..

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0