Sorry but....

Jan 22, 2017 1:01 PM

Syntax1985

Views

6233

Likes

7480

Dislikes

1645

Sorry but....

Final edit :

There are some really smart, thoughtful individuals on this site and I thank you for conversing with me and discussing the London protests. I still believe the London protests were a waste of time and will do nothing to change the mind of the POTUS.

I like that a lot of the American protestors ( who I full heartedly support ) enjoyed the solidarity from the UK protestors, but honestly, that could've been showing on imgur, facebook, twitter etc, the same way we always show solidarity ( the Paris attacks for example ).

Unfortunately, 90% of the comments have just been people telling me the USA affects the rest of the world ( No shit sherlock's! ), personal abusive attacks on me, or other pointless "fact" spewing in a vain attempt to look "internetz smartz"

So Although I've done my best to reply to most comments, I'm going to stop now.

Also Trump has a really shit global warming policy, so for those of you protesting, can you please pick up your shit. It's bad enough he's going to be pumping out more coal now. Don't make it worse.

Peace.

Original description & edits below.

====================

I mean, Sure he's a massive dick. But it's not anything to do with us.

And people really want to protest against bad leaders in the world......

I must've missed the Joseph Kony march, the guy literally raping and fucking children.

And I definitely missed the Kim Jong-un march, But I guess he was let off due to his amazing womens rights policies.

============
Most viral edit : So after filtering through the rage fest of comments, it seems the speculation for the protests in London filter down to;

#The protest will stop Trump using nukes
#The protest will stop Trump doing anything they don't agree with
#Solidarity: People just showing support to Americans
#Illusion: They actually think a protest in London will somehow overthrow Trump and change the future.
#Social media awareness: They are letting the world know, that Trump is president.
#A bit of fun

But I think what the real conclusion is, NONE OF YOU FUCKING KNOW! You're all just playing a guessing game as to why there were protests and what actual impact they could possibly have.

============
Another edit to counter more rage comments ( seriously.. some of you are so tilted it hurts )

I UNDERSTAND that the POTUS makes huge decisions that can affect the world.

Thanks for the information. But that has nothing to do with my post, which is why a protest in London will do anything to change that.

========

And another anti edgelord edit :

I love protests, and I think freedom of speech and expression are great things. so we can stop with the @op hates women now. thanks.

That literally has nothing to do with how a protest in London will have any affect on the POTUS.

Anyway, here's the most logical and non-rage filled comment on why it was a good thing

http://imgur.com/gallery/AxL9eAL/comment/930993770

Enjoy.

current_events

Wow, that's ignorant if you think that the US president doesn't have anything to do with your life.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

What a hock of shit. Let's be counter productive to humanities general existence by standing in the streets and shouting. Fuckin whiners.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

Because Britain and America are close allies, and our idiot president has the potential to fuck up your economy too.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

It wasn't supposed to be a specified anti-Trump protest (thank you, media). The other marches around the world showed solidarity for women

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Really? His climate change denial/energy policies alone should have the whole world up in arms.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

And yet no one seems to be protesting that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On the contrary, I've seen many a climate-related protest sign in the photos of crowds & a lot of scientists taking part for that reason.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well that is good, but the major news-worthy protests haven't said a word about it, even though global warming and environment are critical.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gotta keep my vag rights.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Did a protest in London against the POTUS help you to keep your vag rights?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

There are loads of solid comments in here explaining that and you're wilfully ignoring them.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

As an American, I really appreciate other countries expressing solidarity with women here. Many country's leaders have shown support of (1)

9 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 12

Trump and many of the protests that I saw were related to that. There are also countries experiencing similar changes in power (2)

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 9

and many see them as a western shift in thought that is anti-woman, anti-feminism, and anti-human rights. (3/fin)

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 7

See this is a good answer, and a point that hasn't been raised at all in this post.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 7

And I forgot to say thank you, Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

Because it's not a protest against Trump but rather a system of ideals he's the new figurehead for.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How is this a confession?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

News flash: our president is going to affect you too. Foreign relations? Ever heard of it? United Nations? Ring a bell?

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 15

I thought that initially, but this was about solidarity as much as the message, I think.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

See the problem right there is Trump being president has A LOT to do with you guys across the pond. It will affect you quite a bit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because this morons policies will affect the world.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

Trump is relevant, particularly with us distancing ourselves from Europe. He will affect plenty of issues globally anyway.

9 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 6

In that case shouldn't we be showing that we WANT to be friendly with Trump's administration, if only to make Brexit go smoother?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For me, I think we should be trying to stay as close to Europe as poss without necessarily being in the EU. Not cosy up to Trump

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But then again I want to stay in the EU so I'm obviously going to say that. I can't think of buddying with Trump as a good things though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He wants to dissolve NATO and clear the way for a Russian takeover of eastern Europe so I think it's a pretty global concern

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

I'm not sure he wants a stronger more threatening Russia - I'm not a fan but I suspect he understands how dangerous that is

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Every Intelligence agency in the US supports the claim that Russia intervened in the election for Trump. He knows exactly what he is doing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, that's optimistic of you. Why do you think Putin's ambitions stop at only the eastern part of Europe?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

(/2) Looks to me like he wants as much as he can take.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Y. Victory for Trump gave a boost to populist movement in Europe.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

So the nations of Europe will be great again?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

For real, it could be! If Trump manages to fuck up relations with China, this can indeed be great opportunity for Europe.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not if Europe splinters again through racism/fascism. If you want a strong Europe you need a united Europe. Contrary to what populists say.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Yeah, that's why the Euro worked so well. Not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's not entirely true. Some smaller countries could benefit of less "united EU". They lose ability to adjust over strenght in numbers.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Same way how some states could become economically more balanced if they could just get more power to decide about their own politics.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The UK protests weren't _really_ anti Trump so much as anti some of the the issues his election throws into sharp relief. The timing..

9 years ago | Likes 547 Dislikes 25

As a Canadian, we had similar reasons for protesting.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I received a flyer at my tube that literally said "oppose Trump and his racism; protest the inauguration" and protest was at the US Embassy

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As an American, it took me a moment to process "at my tube."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a Canadian, I'm still saying Skytrain/Transit etc. I should be saying Monorail.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

..maximises media attention.

9 years ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 2

Hey I was there all day yesterday and it was totally anti-trump and to a lesser extend anti-Brexit

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also sends a message to your politicians that you won't tolerate that behaviour

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Except that they will as they have with other world leaders/dictators. It's virtue signalling at best.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Except that they will as they have with other world leaders/dictators. It's virtue signalling at best.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Except that they will as they have with other world leaders/dictators. It's virtue signalling at best.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Feel like OP is honestly talking just to talk, edits after explanations are just about how it still makes no difference or no one can know.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

AND, given the American's place at the top of the food chain, sends a message that we won't tolerate shenanigans from them

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

You've been tolerating shenanigans from dictators and foreign leader for years. Outside of virtue signalling what is going to change?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Since when have you ever not tolerated shennanigans from any other foreign leader or dictator

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You've been tolerating shenanigans from dictators and foreign leader for years. Outside of virtue signalling what is going to change?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Not that I'm the type to liken Trump to Hitler, but people outside Germany were pretty concerned when Hitler rose to power weren't they.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

Depends on if they were east of Germany or west of it. The countries to the east were kind of "oh shit, stuck between Stalin and this nut"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not really.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Well, it was called a womens march.... i assume you have those in the UK? Maybe you're not treating them as well as they want?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Surely if we are treating them well then they have no reason to march.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Agreed, you should get on that.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1/ I don't understand. this article says "as part of UK-wide rallies to highlight women's rights". That's why people are marching

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you watch video & read signs, its mostly anti trump

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

2/ do you just not like that those protests got grouped with the anti-trump protests?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because Trump's shit will probably splatter on Europe, too. Could indirectly impact the UK.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 15

I don't think we are at the front of the queue sadly - he's a business man first and foremost and will assess the opportunities

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We have our own laws that protect womens rights, something neiother Trump or any other foriegn leader has control over.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 26

neither*

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 13

True, but this is a way of Brit women telling Brit politicians that Trump-style bullshit isn't cool with them. Likely nothing more

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

Thank you for this. It's something I hadn't considered.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

wow. a well thought logical reply. I was beginning to think such thing would not exist in this post.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

I try not to say stupid things, even on the internet. It's a horrible limitation of mine

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You're still the only one to post a viable reply. The rest have just been "because , social justice!" responces.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

I thought it was about womens' rights...

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

Yeah I have absolutely no idea what the marching is about. Women's rights? In USA what rights don't they have that men do?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 19

We do have all of the same rights and chances that men do. Some people just look for reasons to whine and protest, especially super-libs!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Trump opposes some serious women's issues. Hence why it was done the day of his inauguration.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

I'm an American in London and I went (obvious reasons). Others went to show solidarity for women in the US who feel a sexist president 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 9

won't be able to govern fairly. To support women's rights to choose. And to send a message that the rise of the far right which is 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

on the rise in Europe as well in America will be met with resistance. 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

This is a really good answer.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because we hold the US to a higher standard than the rest of the world. And when your friend makes a mistakes you tell them.

9 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 12

*same standard as other western democracys. People protested when Poland went crazy back in 2016

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

*democracies. And no, it's definitely held to a higher standard, as it should be, since it's the global hegemon.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Same standard as others. US just dominates the media picture because US is the biggest media creator

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's held to a much higher standard. The U.S. is ridiculed for relatively minor issues while unimportant countries with (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(proportionally) bigger problems fly under the radar.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

ay we done fucked up big time, apologies from across the pond.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

How old are you?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Username checks out.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, and by the way; the way the British seem to feel about our countries "relationship" is basically the way the Argentinians still feel

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

about the Falklands War. It only matters to you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are a group of people that believes it was a terrible mistake. Those are the Hillary supporters. I did not vote for him.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They're also a majority of the population.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only in her mind, biggest block are independents. She took California accounts for those millions. But CA does not award proportionally.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, I don't mean to say that a majority of the population likes Hillary. Only that a majority preferred/prefers her to Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Careful. Something over 90 million eligible voters chose to not vote. That number would probably have been smaller with other candidates.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She won the popular vote. Quite literally, the majority of voters prefer her.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're either ignorant or naive if you think that economical and foreign policy decisions made in the US don't affect you in the UK.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

To be fair you have to be pretty naive to believe a protest in London is going to affect what Trump does.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I don't think people here are naive to US influence but compared to many others - US policy isn't top priority or driver

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No? Look at the two biggest recessions of the century, both can be traced back to economical policy decisions made in the US.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

maybe because neither Uganda nor North Korea are considered close political allies/cultural role models.

9 years ago | Likes 739 Dislikes 52

Plus hating Kony went viral for...a bit. These marches did too. And yeah, those guys aren't supposed to be the "leader of free world" either

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Cultural role model? Americana is a huge cultural landmark but role model is just untrue.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

you're right. We never listen to their music, read their books, watch their films, eat at their fast food chains... wait.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or have near the same level of world influence that America has.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Since when does the UK view Americans as role models?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

You had me up until cultural role models

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

you're right, it's not like we listen to their music, their movies, the fast food chains, their... wait.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Hes right you know

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

@op is such a buffon.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Brittan must be so proud of us, once one of there colonies now... "role models"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Don't ever talk to me or my son ever again -kim

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

God help anyone who sees Americans as cultural role models

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 22

We all agreed back in '72 to let the Americans have their myths. They get a kick out of it and doesn't hurt us any.You go, land of the free!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Not so much role models, but are the world's sole super power. What you do affects us all. Not so much Kony or N. Korea.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Especially after this election... hence the protests ;-)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

We all agreed back in '72 to let the Americans have their myths. They get a kick out of it and doesn't hurt us any.You go, land of the free!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

In the time it took you to make this, you couldve looked up why they were, but that wouldn't've gotten you points. & Kony was protested LOL.

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 17

Lol read this comment thread, op is an ass man.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Could you re-type this in English please.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 51

Are you illiterate? Kony was the worst example b/c there were protests & it took you longer to make this than to research what it was about

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 12

Thank you for translating your earlier gibberish into a readable format. It took me about 20 seconds to make this.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 40

Probably about the same time it took your father you make you.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

How was the first one wrong? Just because you can't read doesn't make it wrong

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

I never said it was wrong, But an apparent disregard for basic grammar and syntax made it unclear. Thank you for fixing it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 25

Sorry, commented in the wrong spot. That wasn't ai edited at you fatpicasso

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Correct or not, it was easily understandable. You're really just being a dick.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

The anti-Trump message was only one aspect of the marches. The unifying theme is equality for all.

9 years ago | Likes 413 Dislikes 35

Uh huh. That sounds like a load of bull shit to me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

unless you were white, of course

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is that also equality for the half of women that believe abortion is murder

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you believe abortion is wrong, don't have one. If- God forbid- you need to end a pregnancy it should be safe and legal.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's pretty obvious that this was originally planned to be a celebration of Hillary becoming President, just got re-branded when she lost.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

*except for anyone with differing politics

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds as disorganized as occupy wall street

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Yes, a voice against the worldwide rise of nationalism and the rights it would limit should they gain more power

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 12

Im uneducated but why is nationalism bad?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Look at what Trump wants to do about international trade - "give and take, but mostly take". He thinks America deserves favourable rather 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

2/ than equal terms in any deal it makes because he's a nationalist who thinks his nation is superior. But of course every other country

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

3/ is going to resent being pressured to subservient terms in revised treaties, making trade wars & other economic retaliation a pressing

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Nationalism is not bad in moderation but many European nations remember all too well what happened the last time nationalism went out (1)

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

of control. This is one reason why the various nations of Europe often look down on American culture because such a major (2)

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

part of it is built on national pride. (3/3)

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Well, it magnifies differences between countries and tells each country 'you are the best'. A lot of (gruesome) wars were fought due to it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It isn't in its more moderate state. It can become extreme and violent. But so can globalization if its extreme enough.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's radical patriotism, the belief that your nation is so superior that it should rule over all other nations

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Because it lets emotions rule, and not the mind. It's a step back towards agression, it's focusses on a flag rather then a individual.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I hate to break it to you, but the progressive left embodies the tenents of facism

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It draws lines and pitts people against each other for fictional reasons and enforces stereotypes. Also it always comes with scape goats

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It also comes with authoritarian leaders who curb rights (see Trumps battle against the press), lie and enrich themselfs.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

I saw nothing about anything but black lives matter and fuck trump in Boston yesterday and there were about 100k people there

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 14

And you saw everything single one!

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

Obviously not, but I do work off of boston common, so I did see a large amount and can use that as a fairly representative sample.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Very very different vibe here in Toronto, then.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Outside of America is was more of a unity thing, inside it was a way to show that the people wouldn't tolerate rights being taken away.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

@OP if you think the president of the U.S. has no effect on anything outside of the U.S., that's just plain wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

It really isnt a matter if influence of the POTUS, its the influence of a protest in London , AFTER the POTUS has already been elected.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 16

So you're saying that people shouldn't protest in London because they won't affect anything?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Out of curiosity what difference does it make if other countries don't like the POTUS?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Out of curiosity what difference does it make if other countries don't like the POTUS?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Honestly not as much as people want to think. Given the position the US has in the world we're under a constant stream of hate (1)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

opposition, and ridicule to the point that we wouldn't really notice anything new especially since as usual it wouldn't (2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm saying they should have done it a few months ago, when it wouldve made a differnce.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

It still shows solidarity in what the people protesting in the States want. It speaks loudly to law makers.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think a few months ago, y'all didn't think we were stupid enough to actually elect him.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

you know, you raise a fucking good point.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's a statement of solidarity among women of the world. To show that many believe women shouldn't be treated that way.

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 9

I am a woman and I voted for Trump. Yep, I am a Trumpette. Yep, I am proud! Fuck all the cry babies!!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

I am a woman and I voted for Trump. Yep, I am a Trumpette. Yep, I am proud! Fuck all the cry babies!!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

People can say what they want, but the protests are really about *one* thing: "We don't like that people can think different than we do!"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Says the person who's whining about the protesters.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why aren't they protesting places like Saudi Arabia then? Why make it about an American president?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 31

I guess faults of Islamic culture are known, whereas the US is incredibly important in terms of western values that it's a concern

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Because they'd maybe be killed in Saudi Arabia? I don't know for sure but that is my speculation.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Because change comes from within always. The people of the country need to want and fight for change and then others can support them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just because it's bad in Saudia Arabia doesn't mean other women don't have problems.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

Okay but it comes off as a little entitled. "This guy MIGHT take away our rights" while real women are suffering horribly.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 26

So American women aren't real women? Having a problem with a president who brags about sexually assaulting women is entitled?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

I never said they aren't real women. I'm saying that their 'suffering' is not even comparable to what women in the middle east deal with

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 20

This is hard to do in 140 characters bursts, & I don't know if I'm the best person for it, but I'll try to sum it up without editorializing:

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why aren't the same people protesting the treatment of women in areas that are significantly more repressive?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(5/11) The US, on the other hand, is seen to be moving BACKWARDS on women's rights and gender equality. Also, there is historical precedent

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's a really well summarized bit of info. Too bad it will change literally nothing. Republicans won, and people need to accept it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(9/11) improve human rights all over the world, including in these repressive areas. Finally, I don't want to speculate about your

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(3/11) because they don't feel impacted by it. This is unlike the US, which has strong cultural and social ties to the areas which hosted

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(10/11) thoughts/opinions. But unless you are actively concerned about women's rights in Saudi Arabia, paying them lip service in order to

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(11/11) deligitimize another women's rights movement is deplorable.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(1/11) To an average American/Brit/European, your example of Saudi Arabia feels very remote. Since people don't feel connected to the

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/11) area/culture, the prospect that they can really change anything seems unlikely, and they feel less of an imperative to affect change

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(4/11) protests. There is also an impression (correct or not) that those parts of the world have always been that way and cannot be changed.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(7/11) is happening in Saudi Arabia (for example)? No. But it means that the protesters are human and are acting with human motivations, and

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(6/11) in the US of large protests sparking social change and affecting governmental policy. Does this mean that it is right to ignore what

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(8/11) regardless of your personal views, the protests serve a rational purpose. Also, keep in mind that there ARE women and men working to

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why protest outside the US?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(1/1) In a show of solidarity, like @LieutenantGordon said.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why protest?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(5/5) policies are widely opposed and to push back against the perceived social momentum towards the normalization of misogyny.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(1/5) The Rupublican party's policy goals (defunding planned parenthood, nominating a supreme court justice who would overturn Roe v. Wade,

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(3/5) election to arguably the most powerful position in the world was seen as both a political threat to women's rights and a potential

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(4/5) step backwards for all of the social progress that has been made on gender equality. The protests sought to make clear that these

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(2/5) etc.) are opposed to commonly expressed women's rights. In addition, Trump has made many, many comments that demean women. His

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So many people are not understanding that. It's not ANTI-Trump; It's ANTI racism, sexism and unequalness amount peoples. All people.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

* oops. meant among, not amount.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Didn't see anybody protesting when the goblin queen became prime minister.

9 years ago | Likes 1447 Dislikes 58

'goblin queen'? Why? Because of appearance or are we burning women in power in effigy again and pretending we aren't sexist?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Because it's a goblin faced politician. Got nothing to do with its gender.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Charlie Brooker describing her as a "haunted art dealer" tickled me.

9 years ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 4

that man married my childhood crush, konnie huq off of blue peter. still like his show though

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh shit Charlie Booker married Konnie Huq? She was the best newsround presenter tbh.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's because thoughtcrime has been outlawed by Overseer May's glorious new regime.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I don't see anything wrong with the woman who came up with, and then pushed through the 'everyone spy on my porn history bill' becoming PM.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nope, nothing at all

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Actually, there were protests objecting to her appointment as prime minister. But I think the Brexit vote exercised people more.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Weren't too many complaining when Juncker was 'selected' to be eu commission president, or Schulz as parliament president or Tusk...etc

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nobody is protesting against left-wing politicians. Some people have to go to work

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I, kinda wanted to protest her henchman: . ("Look at all these wankers.")

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I've met Boris, he's fucking hilarious. I mean he's also a walking stereotype of an eccentric toff, but still...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I would infinitely prefer Boris to High Chancellor May.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I did, I was standing next to them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Honestly I think everyone was busy at the time thinking "FINALLY! THE PIG FUCKER'S GONE! HAMERON IS DEAD, LONG LIVE WHATSHERFACE!"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That and we've arguably not had a decent politician bar 1 for the past 30 or 40 years, so all we can manage by now is resigned sighs.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Who is your bar 1?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was going to say "The guy between John Major and Tony Blair", but looking up the list of politicians I think I actually meant John Major.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(2/1) I'll be honest, my knowledge of any politician before Tony Blair comes from a mix of brief conversations and Spitting Image, so...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why would we be protesting our government functioning properly?

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

If your talking about EU, why was Diana cremated imminedetly after death? I hear it was against French law, yet no one's held accountable.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

why this old case? Because it's dire to help you realize that you will never know real truth. Perspective is skewed in all society.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm fairly certain that Diana was never cremated... she was buried six days after her death.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm fairly certain well never know.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the alternatives were worse.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wis a pure dreich morn so we all copped our scratchers

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As much as I hate Trump, at least he was elected. Ms May was not. Her husband is a rather rich too

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

She was elected, as a MP. The British system works that anyone who is an MP has the possibility of becoming PM. so...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

True, but that just means the system needs reworked. A lot of people probably wouldn't have voted Tory if she was standing for PM.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

not sure how you'd change the system, have a whole new general election when Cameron resigned? seems exspensive

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Having an equivalent to a VP, some1 who would fill the shoes if the PM steps down. Then people would know who the 2nd in line is when voting

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I did

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Especially when she wasn't even fucking elected

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 24

Nobody elects a prime minister

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Yeah sorry, I just realised how my comment sounded. My bad folks

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You absolutely do. You pretend that you dont but you know full well most prime ministers are preordained.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

But I think we needed a general election though

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No you vote for your MP and your MP votes for the prime minister. You can use that as a reason to vote but at the end of the day no one 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Literally votes for a prime minister 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who is the Goblin Queen?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Teresa May. She is a Tory, which is a shorthand for 'worse than Hitler'. Half the world is worse than Hitler, don't you know?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

I'm more Tory than labour but even I think May is a shrivelled old witch.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hey they don't actively harm minorities,well apart from the poor,the disabled oh and and the anyone from a different country

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Fuck off with this virtue signalling bullshit. Labour and con are basically the same party these days.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It not being a Tory that makes her worse than Hitler. Its her being worse than Hitler that makes her worse than Hitler.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm not looking for a political argument, but I'm just curious as to why she is 'the goblin queen'?

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

because it seems like shes aspiring to be as bad as thatcher

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Theresa May or Margaret Thatcher?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't really see it. Certainly not on the levels of Putin resembling Dobby.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

She physically resembles a goblin

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

The first time I saw here she reminded me of one of the goblins in the shelobs lair scene in the return of the king.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Oh fair enough then, I thought you were insulting her as PM and was just curious to know why she is so unpopular.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As am I.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I second this.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I prefer goblin queen over pig fucker being honest with you lad.

9 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 24

I prefer diarrhea over constipation, but I'd rather have neither

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

plot twist, the goblin queen was the pig.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 3

As an American, the fuck are you people talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

David Cameron fucked a pig head, Theresa May looks like a goblin.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Do y'all think the Black Mirror season 1 ep.1 was playing on this?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

our prime minister ( David Cameron ), put his penis inside of a pigs mouth when he was in UNI. ( pig fucker ) , after the brexit vote, he

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Surprised he has a dick since pigs literally eat anything, unless it was out of it or dead.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe there were some others from the same College (or Uni) that responded to the pig fucking by saying "It's just a spot of fun."

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

So wait, your PM actually fucked a pig? That wasn't just a Black Mirror episode?

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Do y'all think the Black Mirror season 1 ep.1 was playing on this?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Must be the first time in history left-wingers instantly believed the Daily Mail.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a disabled person looking down the barrel of yet more benefit cuts, I'd prefer the entire party to just throw itself in front of a bus.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 27, 2017 6:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Out of all those I'd still take the lib dems. They lie less often as far as I can see

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Could be worse... You could be living in the United States, where our welfare system is just a pipe dream to them.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agreed I work as a support worker in the community for people with additional needs and we are pushing ourselves to the limit to provide.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I get the sentiment, but any leader of a powerful nation's views on foreign affairs are relevant to everyone in the world.

9 years ago | Likes 948 Dislikes 61

Exactly! The POTUS isn't named the leader of the free world for no reason

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. Not to sound like that 'Murican, but we have our hands in EVERYTHING (for better or worse). Every1 should care who's our President.

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 5

Trade war for you, trade war for you, trade wars for EVERYBODY! :s

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It doesn't mean that protests will change anything. People are delusional.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Might as well not even try."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A threat to justice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about protesting the actual countries that suppress women rights like in the middle east?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

His views on climate change also have an impact on the rest of the world.

9 years ago | Likes 238 Dislikes 9

What's climate change? Wait don't answer that I can't hear you lalalalalalala

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

His views are awful. Not just "I don't believe in climate change" - it's "climate change is an evil lie and i will put an end to it"

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Especially as the US can basic dictate trade agreements to us after Brexit.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Not quite, about 14% of UK trade is with the US and without EU embargoes the U.K. will trade with more partners (or aims to at least)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Especially when they're close allies. Showing your own government you aren't happy with its allies may change how they interact with them...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Amen, brother:

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Still waiting. Shocked it didn't happen day one

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump wants to pull back to take care of ourselves. Isn't that what the world has been begging for?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 14

Except youre doing it after a fuckton of fiascos, a huge conflict and a massive immigration wave. One that you caused by trying to fill

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A power vaccuum which lead to ISIS and now that the shitstorm you caused is upon Europe, youre pulling out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah but they forgot they weren't paying into NATO, now Trump's gonna twist their arm to make them pay what was agreed upon or were leaving.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Which doesn't sound strange to me, really. Europe (combined) is richer than America but pays less? Makes no sense.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's because the US agrees to pay in so much, that the EU doesn't have to. With the US backing out, the EU has to make up the difference

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not just a powerful nation. The United States is inarguably the single most influential nation on world politics and economics.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How anyone can view the US elections as an isolated event and the US president as irrelevant is absolutely astonishing to me.

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

Britain voted for Brexit and the next day "wait, what's the EU?" They aren't the smartest when it comes to world politics.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I hadn't realized British media was as scummy as America's until I saw that "What's the EU" b.s. in the news after the referendum

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet many I have seen on Imgur are quick to dismiss the idea that the US is a world superpower. My theory is that many in the world (1)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

are realizing that their countries for all their supposed good they are, are in reality powerless compared with the "uncivilized" (2)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Americans and thus have a near obsessive desire to drag the US down to their level so they no longer have another nation looming (3)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

over them that does so in ways that are often complete opposite of how its done in their own countries. (4/4)

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Obama had 0 direct effect on my rights as a human being and pretty much my life in general.

9 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 255

Based on Obamas speech about brexit, he believed that it wasn't his place to try to influence other nations. Except for the one he bombed

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

*ones

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Actually we gave like 300 billion to the largest terror sponsor in the world, Iran. So that may bring some backlash eventually.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

"Direct effect". I've never had a politician knocking on my door, all politics are kinda indirect if you think about it

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Because he was a good president

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

You've been downvoted but I don't think anyone has disproven your statement...

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 20

2/? This led to the 5 armies war in Syria that triggered massive immigration into Europe.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

5/ I can go into the 2008 crash and other more subtle stuff if you want.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

1/? Obama was funding the insurgency in Syria and also his actions in the region helped in the creation of ISIS.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

4/? And also Trump presidential campaign, all of these played a role in Brexit referendum. Just a small one maybe, enough for the outcome.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

3/? That led to the rise of the far right parties in Europe and nationalisam.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Obama was not looking to shake up foreign affairs. He took boots off the ground in the Middle East. Trump wants to build a wall.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

Yeah from 2 countries to 5 where the US is in active conflict..

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Trump wishes to dismantle or at the very least weaken NATO. Tell me that won't affect you if Russia gets the old band back together.

9 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 20

Do you know what NATO does, and why it was established? Do you know how each member contributes to NATO? If you do, then you understand 1/

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 15

Why Trump and many others are critical of America's role in NATO and why it needs to change.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 15

As Lord John Marbury said: "That's the price you pay for being rich, free, and alive all at the same time." The US gets enough value out of+

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Being critical or not isn't the point. The point is that altering it WILL affect OP as a citizen of a NATO aligned nation.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

NATO was never meat to expand to the Russian border. This was the policy of W Bush and Berry. Eisenhower warned us against it years ago.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Which is a fair point, but thats not why they are protesting is it?

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 79

And where was this mass voice of the UK for american polotics before he won the election? when it could've actually mean something?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 54

Why would Americans ever feel influenced by what your country, or any country, thinks of their presidential candidates?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

He also wants to resind gay rights in america and take away abortions which could be effected on a global scale since its not the first

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

That is false information, you are fake comment news.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Country to do it. America is often one example of 'first world country'

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Irrelevant. You said it has nothing to do with your country, and it does.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 9

Right....

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 54

@OP Because he opposed the UN, want to minimize US help in NATO to start.

9 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 13

That's what I'm mostly concerned with. I'm stationed at a NATO post. Curious to see how it could affect me directly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You say that as if it's bad. Are you saying that's bad? May want to do some research if you are.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He wants NATO members to live up to their commitments. Y'all are shorting on the military spend, and Russia is getting pushy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So the answer to that is removing our funding so an already underfunded NATO has to deal with a "pushy" Russia? Brilliant!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NATO is an alliance, not a welfare program.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And I back Trump on NATO, most other countries aren't paying 1% gdp when 2% was agreed on, while the US has been at 3.6% for a decade. And >

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

If you haven't noticed, we've been fucking up our economy for the last few decades.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Yea, internally we need some work

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is why I half jokingly suggest that the members not paying for defense pay for American healthcare instead.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's pretty funny.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

he opposed the UN before he was elected, and had people protested then, it could've made a difference. They arent going to remove the POTUS

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 21

No one thinks the marches will result in his removal.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

No one thinks the marches would result in his removal.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nobody actually thought he would win.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It was a wild election night.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nobody? You mean, no Democrats. There were a lot of us who thought he had a very good chance of winning.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

because of a march in the UK.

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 18

He won't be removed because of a US march either. But it's a showing to remind him that the literal majority of US/world doesn't agree w him

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He has no mandate, and republicans in congress would be wise to remember that. This march was a visual illustration of that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

@OP I am sorry you have problems seeing big pictures, it's ok.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 28

Im sorry you feel you are such a special little flower you can make big changes overseas.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 24

You are correct that it probably won't help in the slightest, but the fact of the matter is that if trump does anything dumb(1/?)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I feel the same about the women in Canada who are marching

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I really don't understand this whole women's march thing.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

You and me both

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Nobody wants our influence but they all want our money and soldiers.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 7

Listen fucker all of Nato joined your shitty wars in iraq and Afghanistan, so stfu!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NATO wasn't directly involved in Iraq

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Why the fuck is the United States bankrolling the defense of the western world at the expense of our infrastructure and educations?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

Cause 'Murica Fuck Yeah! At some point we switch to walk loud and stupid while carrying the biggest stick you can afford.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because it is making a very few influential Americans rich as fuck and they keep pushing for it.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Globalism.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Because we're allies, and the only countries sharing the same virtues (freedom of press, equality). We form the most powerfull block in the

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

World. Thereby asssuring our view on life stays dominant. That is why putin wants to break us up

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So why does America need to bankroll this almost exclusively?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Why does America want this. Not need. No foreign nation is pushing us.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Because it's the leader and founder of the NATO. And is the one who is activaly using it (Libya, Afg. etc). But i agree us europeans should

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0