Hopefully, the CG characters get better now

Jul 26, 2021 2:05 PM

SuperGeniusPS

Views

94820

Likes

2152

Dislikes

27

The referenced deepfake: https://youtu.be/wrHXA2cSpNU

deepfakes

mandalorian

star_wars

luke_skywalker

Should have named movie the Malodorian.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Holy crap I still get teary eyed when seeing Luke as his young self like this

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was Corridor Digital but this guy beat them by a year

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now do Jarjar Binks!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best way to make him lose his passion in less than six months.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should have just had mark hamill? Not like they didnt de-age half the marvel cast at one point or another

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#1 do x

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I prefer the videos with the Luke Skywalker theme music overlaid...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't think his work was any better to be honest

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’ve noticed they never put enough light and reflection in eyes. Eyes need to be treated like glass/water, not an opaque surface.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shit. I can't see the difference.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn’t think it was that bad. These days Star Wars fandom seems to just be a hierarchy of whoever hates it the most.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

It wasn't bad. They chose someone who could believably pass off as Luke. This is just fandom being toxic about something trivial

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Meh, show went downhill after Season 1 anyway.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If anybody else want to give it a try https://github.com/iperov/DeepFaceLab

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, actors. Disney doesn't need any of you anymore. Ever.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Was really hoping it was the Corridor Crew's overhaul ?

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Me too, they did really good job. Will have to compare against this artist's work...

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This artists work is better imho

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I didn’t think it was bad until I saw the deepfake video.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Just checked more of his stuff out, and it's fucking UNREAL.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They should have just used a different actor. I really dislike this CGI/deepfake crap. Are we incapable of suspending disbelief anymore?

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 6

I prefer the deepfake because its a couple orders of magnitude cheaper and therefore Luke becomes likely to be a recurring character.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or they could, I dunno, do original stories with original characters?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I agree, but clearly some executive doesn't. I thought the recast for Mon Mothma was great and much better than the CG people

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Fun Fact: Mon Mothma in Rogue One first played the character in scenes that were cut from Revenge of the Sith.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Aha, I watched that corridor crew video. They did a great job and made the scene completely different.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it looked fine, the only one that bothered me was Leia in Rogue One. I wasn’t really even bothered by the Tarkin one, that everyone

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Got all worked up about.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tremendously better

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wasn’t there a guy that looked just like Hamill when he was young on a post here a while ago

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sebastian Stan who plays the Winter Soldier/Bucky is the one I usually see.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yeah but that was years ago

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They both look bad to me.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just read his YouTube comment on the video. He said it would be much better if he had the original before the CGI was added

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The guys from corridor crew made a good one I wonder if it was one of them.

4 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

Theirs was an entirely new shot though, which looked inconsistent when spliced into the actual footage. This one used the show scene.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it was good but considering the resources, what this guy did is way more impressive.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Looks to be Shamook. Same guy that made the deepfake that wrecked the multi-million dollar de-aging CGI they made for The Irishman.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Soooo.... basically they just added more glimmer to his eyes?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Fixed the shadows, as well.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*Sailormoon voice*: uWu force-chan, I weawy hate to use you wike this... *force chokes*

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Basically some guy (Shamook) with open-source deepfake software is outperforming multi-million dollar budgets for proprietary CGI software.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They also changed the nose contour and a bit of cheekbones, but latter varies by shot, it’s a bit n64 goldeneye-esque face mapping

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That.... that is not good. Did someone turn on DK mode too?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe now they can fix Grand Moff Tarkin in Rouge One.

4 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 5

They guy they hired already did. He also did an amazing job of young Han Solo

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Leia

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Definitely Leia

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Red One lol

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He should have just not been in the film. Krennic was a perfectly good villain on his own til he got sidelined for fan service

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Tarkin looked like the BFG

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They should've just hired Charles Dance to play Tarkin.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

HE ... wasn't bad. Leia yes, Luke here, kinda. Tarkin was ok. Imo.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Or the Rock in the Scorpion King

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Woah let’s let that abortion lie

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No its already the perfect unintentional comedy character, you can't improve on ir

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the original was supposed to make him look older. Deep Fake just looks like Return of the Jedi Luke.

4 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 6

Older isn't really the problem with it. Most of my issues were those dead eyes.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I suspect that's why you can only clearly see his face in really low key scenes, because they're the only context where the lack of>

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Expression makes sense.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the series was set just a few years after Return.

4 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

5 years specifically. I mean thats enough time where someone can look noticeably older.

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Eh. Five years after ROTJ means he's approximately 28. 19 in ANH, 22 in ESB, 23 in ROTJ, and 28 in Mandalorian.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but not for the age of Like in the change from ROJ to mando. Wouldn’t change much from 23 to 28

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but jedi tend to live longer/age slower. So a five year gap without something "massively" draining on them wouldn't mean much change.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Well we don't know what he was doing those 5 years. Point is, I didn't really question it when he looked a bit older. He looked old in TLJ.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, this is Mark Hamill in 1990, 7 years after Jedi. Not a huge difference: https://imgur.com/hG5QOKu

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Really splitting hairs here, but he kinda looks more like the original and not the deepfake.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or he looks like neither.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Excellent detective work.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the original looked ok

4 years ago | Likes 257 Dislikes 10

Just watch in 480p forehead.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The deepfake looks a lot better in everything but the mouth. The original mouth moves how I expect it to move.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First time I saw it, it looked perfect. But it might've been my teary eyes. All the other times, it looked super weird..

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

This

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The lip movement is better in the original version. The eyes are better in the deepfake.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

youtube and tiktok are full of better faceswaps made by some random 13 year olds.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It wasn’t good. But, I think the sequence and the scene was so great we were all willing to forgive it.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I think a lot of the criticism cam from KNOWING it couldn't have been real, so it made picking out flaws easier, but the scene forgave all

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It was kinda off but not enough to really be considered "bad". That being said his deepfake was REALLY good,

4 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 3

Llooked good enough for a cameo on a TV show budget but will really need an actual luke-a-like if they plan on doing more with the character

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's the eyes. The eyes are dead, glassy, immobile.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

The whole face looks like it was numbed for some reason. When he's talking, there is zero facial mobility.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, by eyes I mean the face around the eyes, too. So much emoting comes from the change to the shaped of your eyes, the lines around them.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it was ok but next to the amazingness of the rest of the series' effects it was really bad.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me too, I honestly didn't mind him looking a bit weird

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Legit, both look fine. I don't see much of a difference & I don't think it's worth the money to have a bit more eye glimmer & nose shading.

4 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 6

Then again, I think star wars has been milked to death & I will never watch the new ones or spin offs, so my opinion doesn't matter! :)

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

That is a gross oversimplification. But that's fine, there are SO many things involved in photorealism that we "can't put our finger on".

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Compared to his live performances in the original trilogy, his expressions were just dead. There's a reason why you can only see his face

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

While he's super low key - it's the only time the dead eyes match the context.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's not bad, really. But it's not good.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The lip sync was the main improvement I saw. Also the edges of his face are crisper in the second one

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Eyes reflect ambient light too. Original eyes were dark and artificial, deepfake eyes have life in them

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The lip sync, the expressionism - main things that looked 'off' in the original to me. It didn't quite 'look/feel' right, fhe rework 1

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Feels/looks more natural/realistic i think.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How do you have an original deepfake? Is that like an original copy?

4 years ago | Likes 330 Dislikes 7

i am sure Lucasfilm can dig through their archives and find some excellent source material for the algorithm to chew on.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More like the original rendering or if you want to think of it in more traditional artforms the original drawing of the person.

4 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 0

Something Something NFT

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Original and copy are relative

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"This one time, when I needed 10 sheets of blank paper, I took my blank page & made 10 copies. This made sure I wasn't just stealing paper."

4 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

"at band camp....."

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, that's still a pretty hefty price per page. With what copy shops charge nowadays you might as well just buy more paper than you need

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

and have extra the next time you need paper.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This joke might be from before Xerox.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Many schools include a certain amount of printing budget in tuition, which most students barely use. So, the paper is effectively free.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wasn't considering college. That's a much better explanation. Thanks!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did you pay copyright on the original though?

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yes, when you bought it from the store. ;)

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So a store bought prostitute permits you to the copy rights to prostitution? /s

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This slope is covered in lube and chicken fat!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Machine learning algorithms aren’t one size fits all, there’s a lot of art to adjusting hyperparameters and how training is conducted.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My comment was about syntax not AI

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Additionally the software pipeline for applying the output of the model into the footage is just as important as the algorithm itself.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By art do u mean randomly changing the sizes and parameters of the hidden layers until it performa better than the last?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, pseudorandomly unless you’re suggesting doing it manually at random.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless they recently came up with a better technique its very random there's no art to tuning the network mostly trial and error

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My guy, I’m half way through a PhD in machine learning. Sometimes it is very random, other times it really isn’t, but in either case there’s

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0