Andrew Tate Says Women 'Shouldn't Vote'

Sep 30, 2024 3:24 PM

"Women shouldn't vote because they don't care about issues outside of how THEY feel," he wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter. "They literally can't see the bigger picture for the good of a society and they certainly won't ever sacrifice for it."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/andrew-tate-says-women-shouldn-t-vote/ar-AA1rsPKF?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=2ae2012ab17b4f78b89df4533cabdfd8&ei=102

I guess he'll have to vote by ABSENTEE ballot, since he's under house arrest for human trafficking . . .

Keep your chin up, Andrew, if you can find it.

us_politics

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

tate shouldn't breathe outside air

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's sad, really, to see these salty little fuckers being given a platform. Like, yes, Andrew, we know you're sad that all the steroids made your tiny dick even smaller, and the repeated beatings made you even dumber, and you were laughed at for your homophobic self-loathing - but just shutting up would be a great way to look less stupid, and we won't have to listen to you.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Isn't he a human trafficker? How is that sacrificing for the good of society?

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What a waste of a human being. Stop making stupid people famous.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Assholes shouldn't be allowed to order a pizza.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

No no no, let them.. it gets them arrested.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I mean ... part of me is shocked it took him so long to say it. Given his "brand".

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Who cares what he has to say? Lol

2 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

Certainly not women

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately a lot of insecure internet dude-bros

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Can't wait for this turd to get locked up

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

this man is so full of shit that it amazes me he hasn't exploded from overpressure.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't give this chode the oxygen of publicity!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey OP, most hyperlinks can be truncated @ the ? . No need for the Cookie madness. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/andrew-tate-says-women-shouldn-t-vote/ar-AA1rsPKF

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you! I did not know that. I really appreciate your help. Have a great week!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Remember when this guy tried to troll a teenage girl and it led to him being arrested and held in a Romanian prison? Good times.

2 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Doubt she had anything to do with his arrest, pretty sure the romanian government knew where he was, wasn't exactly hiding. Fun headcanon though

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Tis was the best of times!

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pizzagate!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shut the fuck up, Taint.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Andrew Tate thanks you for the free publicity. Why even post about him? No one cares.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Thank you

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don’t propagate his words if you want to prevent them from being heard. Op, you are part of the problem

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You like what he says?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've got a better idea: Morons shouldn't be able to vote if their IQ score is too low.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Did you just stop the global fascist movement???

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wished... people have suggested a Geniocracy system before for long while. The problem is that intellects are always outnumbered by morons, it's hard to get that going.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Can’t we like grift for good ?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That will backfire by the people who cared about having good decorum... So no. We just have to make sure Democrat actually win more often, then we'll have a chance to apply good common senses.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The Founding Father's would have agreed with him.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

Which is just another reason we know the 'Founding Fathers' were terrible people, and there is nothing better than advancing past them.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That is why originalism is a perverse theory of judicial interpretation - and shrouded in its perversity is why Thomas wrote in an assent to Dobbs that they should look at all laws based on the Due Process and Equal Protection of the 14th Amendment.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agreed. I've never understood how anyone who isn't a white male, can argue the infallibility of the Founding Fathers.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

THIS a THOUSAND TIMES!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A Founding Father also said this:

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thank you for sharing this!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My pleasure. BTW the longer quote is engraved on his monument on the Southeast Portico: https://www.nps.gov/thje/learn/photosmultimedia/quotations.htm

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*tips hat*

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Immaterial. They are dead, buried, and their world no longer exists.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I'm all curious why I get downvoted when I point this out. I'm not defending them, just making a statement of fact.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Nationalistic idolism?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My answer is above, if you are willing to take it without it being anything other than a response and not an actual criticism of your reply. The world truly has changed from the 1780's and the thinking of most has also evolved. I hope this is helpful to you.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

irrational reactions and assumptions about your intentions. :-)

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Because it's an one liner without any context and seemingly has no connection with the subject of the post.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I get that but 1. They were right and 2. Assuming negative intent (projecting onto them) isn't really cool. Could they have communicated more effectively to avoid being (perhaps predictably) misunderstood? Of course. Do we also have a responsibility to verify our assumptions before condemning someone? Also definitely yes. it works both ways.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2