Scrutiny is important (a response to an FP post that seems to be spreading disinformation, albeit I assume not intentionally)

Small clarification: "Didn't mention her own death in 2020" is referring to when the report was being filed, as in the death of only the infant is mentioned and none else.

Or just a copy-paste of my comments, instead of the link there:

The person who filed the report claimed to be the mother whose child was killed.

So all of the stuff above(in the original post)? ALL of it?

Is unsubstantiated bullshit. It literally and directly disproves itself by claiming the mother herself was also killed. That means ALL THE RESEARCH, ALL THE CLAIMS, don't hold up at all. Plus, you know, the lack of links to actually corroborate any of the claims at all.

This directly puts us into "either the initial filed report was bullshit or these claims are bullshit". They intrinsically conflict and counter each other. Only one of them, at most, can be true.

Evidence needs to be solid. The claim that some idiots are trying to tie to the above is that of a woman in 2020 filing the report, directly, herself. The bullshit above has NO SUBSTANTIATION FOR WHERE IT'S FROM OR HOW THE CLAIMS WERE FOUND and, critically, claims the person who did the reporting is dead. It is FUNCTIONALLY IMPOSSIBLE for both to be true and accurate.

It's impossible because: Report A is the claim "I am the mother of the infant that was killed back in X-time"

And Report B is the claim "the mother of the infant was also killed back in X-time."

These can not BOTH be true. This is disinfo being used to drain your effort. Look elsewhere, look harder. Like here, maybe(in that I have no update on this one yet, and it is easier to check): https://imgur.com/gallery/nrwGtQl/comment/2485747263

One of the many methods of russian disinfo is the "flood the zone" method. This, the FP post mine is a response to, looks to be one such possible disinfo.