Einstein quote

Feb 29, 2020 12:42 PM

Joyika

Views

133015

Likes

4449

Dislikes

60

Speed of sound in a vacuum = 0

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is It a true E quote?.. Or Is It someone's idea of Einstein quote?

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

If it's on the internet, it absolutely must be true.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And yet today we are only graded on the “facts” we can remember. Study, remember, test, forget

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That’s an eloquent way of saying I don’t remember. I’ll have to save this for personal use.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

False. He was a physicist. He knew the speed of sound

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Meanwhile in highschool *memorize the first 25 elements

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Never memorize what you can look up, is another thing he said. You need to know where to look/whom to ask to find info

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

and now a lot of students will use this as an excuse not to study at school

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My grandpa used to tell me, "Being smart isn't knowing all the answers, it's knowing where to find them."

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Sometimes, also the ability to identify what questions to ask

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolutely true.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine if he had Wikipedia. Or Siri/GAssistant.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It wouldn't be much different I imagine.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He'd be able to find things like that even faster is my point. Also Siri uses Wolfram Alpha, which would be good for him.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True. However, he was use to finding things insanely quick at times. Also, while Google has its uses, it doesn't solve everything.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While really good, technology doesn't solve everything. While I'm not relating this part to your answer, it can make more problems instead.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correct. I just meant it *can* be faster for finding data.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Boom!

6 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 8

BOOM...!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

SONIC Boom!

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Spinning bird kick!

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yet here I am unable to forget it's 343 m/s

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

...at sea level, with 20C dry air?

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

In air, at sea level, at 70 degrees fahrenheit...

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Mar 5, 2020 8:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Mar 5, 2020 8:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Also pretty easy to remember the speed of sound in space..

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Lol

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha +1

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can’t get it out of my head either. Freaked out my boss when I knew it off the top of my head when we were doing some calculations

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Also can’t forget that the mass of an electron is 9.11E-31 kg

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Or that the charge of an electron is 1.60E-19 C

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I bet you dont remember your social security and credit card number

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure I do, it's 31-- wait a minute...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trust me, my man. I’ve ordered enough pizzas to have my credit card memorized.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Our schools do exactly what re does NOT like.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

U.S. universities: here’s a study guide but make sure you memorize everything because any word we say is fair game....AnYtHiNg

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

A) US universities are the best in the world, so I'm not sure why you are complaining about their policies. B) they tell you that

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 16

That's an overly broad statement.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When it comes to saying which countries are best at education, the statements are by definition broad. Would you like an itemized list of

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Worthwhile schools and commentary on how they stack up on an international level? Because that's going to be a tad more than 140 characters.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We may have some of the best, but we also have some shitty ones. Saying US schools "are the best" isn't quite right.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Personally, i think my US college education was a massive waste of time an money. I "need" the degree for the job I have, but all the >

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

relevant education could have been covered in 1 or maybe 2 semesters. A significant lack of training in what would have been useful skills >

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

and instead I was required to memorize the anatomy of obscure extinct aquatic species in order to pass. US education is not the best >

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's just prestigious.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What you're after is a vocational school. College is different.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because students insist on asking teachers for an itemized list of questions that will appear on the exam, and it's tiresome as fuck.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

I have lived and attended US colleges on and off for 10 years. I don’t want an itemized list, just consistency to professor’s claims of the

6 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Material they say WILL be on the test but never show. It’s not a good representation of real world work, though I value the knowledge of

6 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Many of my professors, some have even become friends I can rely on professionally.

6 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Hmm, nobody told my chem professor, why the hell was it necessary to memorize the periodic table?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maybe because he did and he measured your competence by that? He couldn't think of any better way to do so. Or maybe just messing with you

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While true, the road to learning how to think does require memorizing a lot of facts.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wouldn't say a lot, just basic logical and researching skills, should allow you to re learn anything as needed.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Less so today. Most people have the internet coming into their schools and workplaces. Knowing the right answer is less important than /

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

/knowing how to find the right answer, and how to analyze the information to determine the accuracy & trustworthiness of the answer.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Depends on the job. While I can look up dosages on my phone or in a handbook, I usually don't have time to do so and treat my patient.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Determining the accuracy of an answer requires having relevant information already known. Same with knowing where to look.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sure, but it requires practicing different types of thinking to analyze, than memorization & regurgitation. Most schooling only focuses on /

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

/having students practice memorization. Like what Musk said in interview, "in college they give you a question and expect an answer, they /

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the best "Fucked if I know" response that I've ever heard.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

a much catchier response than "I forgot"

6 years ago | Likes 554 Dislikes 9

"Mach 1" (also: 1234 km/h)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I once had to do a presentation about Einstein's life, so I did it as if I was him, German accent and all. When asked when he died, I 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 0

forgot, so I said "You want to know when I died?" and the teacher laughed and I didn't have to say. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 0

Even catchier response: yo mama

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's like Pi. To a "science enthusiast" the more digits remembered the more impressive. To a scientist, it's a button on my calculator.

6 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

God damn it I hate those pesky science enthusiasts

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Nah, they're wonderful people (who pay my salary). I just wish *some* would focus more on the actual important things.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But seriously, pi = 3, or 1, whatever. It doesn't matter when I'm doing envelope calculations. Otherwise, pi = np.pi()

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

I want to believe he said that. Someone please tell me so.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is bad advise with the way people rely on google and how fast that information can change.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hate the genius character in TV shows whose intelligence is just his capacity to constantly have available a bunch of obscure facts

6 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 0

I have major gripes with people knowing pi to the 10th+ decimal. Pi is overrated anyway. Learn something truly smart like Plank's constant

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate more the ability to recite perfectly from memory every Shakespeare play, sign of advanced intelligence and culture... PERFECT RECALL

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's one reason I love Johnny's Sherlock.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think its usually done fine. Having a good memory is definitely a component of intelligence and they generally lack wisdom and social skil

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

People tend to believe there is no connection between knowledge and intelligence. There is of course, but it is easier to consider yourself

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intelligent when you tell yourself that the ability to save information has nothing to do with intellect

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Storing information is useful.. USING that information is what most people lack. That's the true nature of genius.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think this train of thought is widely recognized as fact.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Not really. Though "common sense" does require one to be common.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Knowledge and intelligence are not the same.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Except that a detective who can't recognize that a clue is obscure like the squawk of a bird on a recording won't know to investigate

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's because it's fucking hard to write a character who's actually smarter than his writer, and most writers are of average intelligence.

6 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

This is why I read comments.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It *can* be done, it's just fucking hard. In the first Jason Bourne movie, Bourne needs to get out of the embassy so he rips off the (2/3)

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

(3/3) building plan off the wall and checks which window he can exit to climb to the next building. 5 seconds. It took the writers 2 weeks.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

It's easier to write a character who sees connections really quickly if you're the one writing those connections though.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also known as 'the Arthur Conan Doyle principle'.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Average upper niddle class intelligence. That being said, can definitely tell which shows have the smarter writers.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Futurama!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a young professor I try to take this approach, but the old guard is resisting tooth and nail

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Truth. Understanding the model is far more important than the minutiae.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know some people who graduated with no facts and no ability to think...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as a history teacher i LOVE this .. it’s not the WHY that matters most

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

it's not the why that matters most? i am confused.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I assume they started to say "it's not the..." and were going to talk about memorizing junk, then backspaced to say "it's the WHY". But typo

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Knowing why is great if you want to use a working concept. However, you may care more about the how if solving a problem or developing.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's like knowing why money exists versus how to spend it well. They both have their places.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s the whence.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He was a legend

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

he still is, but he was then too.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He is a legend, since you don't achieve legend status until you're dead

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm like 85% sure he was a real guy dude.

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Real people can be legends, just look at me!

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Is'

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also, the speed of sound is completely dependent upon the medium.

6 years ago | Likes 272 Dislikes 4

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You know...This is something I’ve always know but never knew that I knew. Like the speed in air vs water vs solid objects.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What the fuck has a clairvoyant got to do with the speed of sound?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why, by convention, physicists usually assume air at a standard temperature and pressure unless otherwise specified.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Cleo isn’t a good one I hear.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The tv show?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Even swallows vary in speed. Their wing velocity changes by species, and it can be an important distinction.

6 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

Your mom swallows

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

that too varies in speed based on the medium

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

African swallows?

6 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

No, your mom swallows.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um, I don't know. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh.

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Laden or unladen?

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Or European?

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

It's generally assumed in a vacuum though right?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So what’s the speed of sound in a vacuum then.... XD

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You’d be waiting forever.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oooh I know the answer to that one!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Zero.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be zero.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kirby or Hoover?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Birdo.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well technically so is everything, including light.

6 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 3

Even time.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not the speed of royalty in England. A new monarch ascends upon the death of the previous monarch at the same speed regardless of medium.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I would wager the speed at which they switch would sharply increase if they were underwater. Then stop altogether after a few minutes.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Close. The speed of light is an absolute. The speed of a specific signal is slowed down by the medium.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well yes and no, the actual speed of light never changes it's simply the path the light chooses to take through the medium that changes

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Light has a constant velocity, speed changes.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Think gears on a bike.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're correct in spirit, but you got them backwards. Speed is constant, however velocity is direction dependent and changes if the path 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's why we specify "speed of light in a vacuum" and "speed of sound in air" when referring to those things.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

We say this but this is actually a simplification. Light goes the same speed between particles, but bounces off more particles in matter.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That is definitely not how it works. https://youtu.be/CUjt36SD3h8

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's interesting. I was just in a college physics class but maybe the prof. Was just simplifying it. I always wondered why it didn't+

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is what I tell my students. I don't care if they don't know who the 17th Pres. of the U.S. is... it doesn't matter - we carry...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Computers in our pockets. What I care about is A: Can you find that information? B: Can you confirm that the info is true? ...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

C: Can you analyze the historical information you find?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NO COP will ever pull you over and demand to know who the 17th Pres is. So who cares if you have it memorized? BUT developing the ....

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ability to do meaningful research will serve you throughout your life.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also he said, 'There are 2 ways to live your life, one as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as everything is'

6 years ago | Likes 703 Dislikes 8

Also: "I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy"

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

And: "I honor Lenin as a man who completely sacrificed himself and devoted all his energy to the realization of social justice." Smart man.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Both of those make the word useless

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You had a coherent thought. How miraculous

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

"Fucking rainbows after it rains. There's enough miracles here to blow your brains." -Albert Einstein

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

He also was under surveillance by our govt and cried over a dead shark in CA.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That is awesome (the 2nd part)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So he had a soft spot for marine life?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Mar 5, 2020 8:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Mar 5, 2020 8:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yeah, miracle is the lazy answer. Then later someone figures it out and it's time to move the goalpost.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Not a single man on the face of earth knows how a pencil is made.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Idk there’s plenty of people that have died and then like minutes later they’re back with little to no brain damage

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I took it as a metaphorical statement over a literal one. In the same vein of thought as 'the glass half full'.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Probably shouldn’t considering he believed in a God but considered the God to be the entire universe as a whole (I also believe this 1/

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Whatever floats your boat mate.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m not saying you’re wrong but what I’m saying is true based on a quick google search with a few sources

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

However I do believe that the universe is the Christian God hence why we can’t comprehend him in the Bible. Frankly I believe God is the 2/

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Atom itself hence why were built “in his image”

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I never understood that until recently. Now I completely understand what he meant. Like there is something instead of nothing..

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

No, keep trying, that's not what it means.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Couldn’t give full explanation of what he meant. But it’s a statement about existentialism and perspective. Maybe I’m choosing poor words

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

His point is either everything is precious or nothing is. You can't pick and choose which pieces you value.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Essentially yes that’s what he is saying but its far deeper than that if I am coming to find

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I choose the latter.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

I choose violence

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I choose the former

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I still choose that one man's wife

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

AND I CHOOSE YOU!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

TIL Einstein was a Sith. Since only Sith deal in absolutes.

6 years ago | Likes 282 Dislikes 2

But "Only the Sith deal in absolutes" is an absolute. So the Jedi are Sith. Or those movies have shitty dialogue. Maybe both!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Only a Sith would say that

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

It JUST occurred to me how ironic that statement is haha

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Palpatine was right the jedi had become dogmatic in their views on the force.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That is also an absolute Young Jedi

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Wait a minute...

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hello there

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Okay but "Only the Sith deal in absolutes" is itself an Absolute, and is also a Jedi phrase. So...

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Obiwan says this in response to Anakin's "if you're not with me, you're against me." That's the kind of absolutes he means.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And also contradicted by Yoda...

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Do or do not.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I almost did.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1