Legal weed nationwide, as long as Republicans don’t block it

Aug 30, 2020 1:26 PM

wadatahmydamie

Views

148322

Likes

4830

Dislikes

152

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/08/28/marijuana-legalization-house-vote-404455

You can register to vote at vote.gov

Yippee but Mitch is gonna stop it

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Do "for-profit" prisons still exist? oh.. yes.. then this will fail.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

“As long as the Republicans don’t block it.”

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

McConnell won't ever let it see the floor of the Senate. Remember that when you "vote for the person not the party." The most important 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

vote your Congressperson casts is for leadership, and so any vote for a Republican is a vote for McConnell. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The tyrrany and the bullshit's gone on way too long, you old fucking shrivs, who blocked it's legalization. You're banished from the land!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is a smart thing to start the precedent. It gets the ball rolling. When the dems come back in then it is easier to have it passed.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They’re gonna try to block it. Guaranteed.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

You know they will block it. It will affect the bottom line of their private prison donor-buddies.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They'll block it, Mitch mcconnell is a bastard like that. Only hope is if Trump forces him for the good pr but I wouldn't hold my breath

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I don't know. Trump has said many times how much he hates drugs since his brother died of an OD in the 80's. I understand the CBD act. But

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For him to allow weed for recreational use is something I won't hold my breath for. I really want to see if legal too

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im surprised it is so difficult to pass considering the tax revenue.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Republicans make money off of prisons and tobacco

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Tobacco is on the decline last I heard.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

War on drugs has been very lucrative for the politicians who care more about their own income than the gov income

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

GOP senate would never ever allow the for-profit prison system to rid itself of its slaves.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

It won't pass.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It may pass the house, but it’s unlikely to come to a vote in the senate.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Criminalizing certain drugs was used to easily imprison hippies and minorities.

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 4

It was always about keeping minorities and idealists down.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

However you're forgetting that weed became illegal in the US in 1937, and the first people arrested for buying and dealing were white.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And allow wood pulp-based paper product lobbyists and the massive corporations they represent to thrive over those of hemp.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

"The Grass is Greener" documentary on netflix explains this perfectly!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

STATE'S RIGHTS! SMALL GOVERNMENT! FED BAD! oh, except keep weed illegal, also abortion should be federally regulated.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Republicans are not likely to block it. They are doing it now, just before the election, to score some political points and hopefully votes.

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

Never underestimate the mendacity of McConnell

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Other than the usual weed debate, tobacco states are republican states. Unlikely to support legalization

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They've already announced they will block it.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How many hundreds of bills sit on Mitch’s desk?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I hope you're right, but I don't have much faith.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Never underestimate the capacity for republican cruelty in support of the private prison industry

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

Actually The current administration has done more for criminal justice reform then any other time in recent history

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not defending republicans, but it's incredibly ironic to put the blame all on them when we have Biden and Harris.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Gotta wait until Mitch can turn a profit on it before he lets it get to the floor.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Mitch the Bitch incoming

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

v If weed become legal:

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's so groovy up here in Canada that I've got 28g being delivered to my house. From the government. Paid by credit card.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well it has to be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, so dont hold your bong hit too long.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

President Dipshit said he supported states rights years ago and he’s definitely known to keep every one of his promises so it’s all okay

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

+1 for a strong finish

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"As long as republicans don't block it" Ahahahahahahaaaaaahahahaha!!! You're kidding right? They will 100% block it because conservatism.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

What’s the prognosis in the Senate?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

DOA

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

lol no

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dead.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's good for the poor and bad for the rich, so DOA is the likely prognosis.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m all for legalizing it, with provisions... Basically give it most of the same laws as alcohol.

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

I would disagree on technicality. Alcohol laws are a patchwork and are ludicrous in some states. I'd prefer a more uniform approach w this.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This would just lift the federal ban. Provisions would be decided individually by states. If said state even allows it for recreational.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

would it also allow crossing state lines? (assuming states you go into allow it)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I think so? Not sure, but that would make sense, to me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an intense stoner, 100% agreed.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Next thing I want is an effective field sobriety test.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I could be dead sober but if they test me, I'll test positive af. I just like not being in pain

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is how it works here. Works very well.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

When you can’t lock up a first offender for a dimebag any more

5 years ago | Likes 645 Dislikes 29

Obligatory v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is why Moscow Mitch will never let this bill pass.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I cant up vote because its at 420. Peace to you, friend.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

'I am the senate'

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

When you are "denied a denial" for a cancer treatment medicine for a child.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd imagine most police officers would love this, on the other hand private prisons not so much.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Cops in 2020 are mostly ok with this. Most still think pot is a gateway drug

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’ve seen a lot of “but then how will I get probable cause to search the vehicle, if saying I smelled weed doesn’t count?!”

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

About two thirds support relaxing drug laws

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some? Why not all?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

People involved in trafficking large amounts through organized crime strictly to amass profit should still be punished.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I had to guess, I’d say it probably has to do with RICO cases and other larger crimes. I haven’t read it yet though

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ah yes that does make a lot of sense

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This would take power away from the police to terrorize people with no-knocks raids over a little shake

5 years ago | Likes 508 Dislikes 26

Correct

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Nah. they'll find other excuses. The police are monsters, and the cruelty is the point.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Yup. That’s why the senate is likely to kill it.

5 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 6

*republicans

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Yup. That’s why I put it in the title. They’ve bastards.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

The good ol' small government party, everyone

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well that and old white dudes hate all that ole’devil grass

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

They need to smoke some.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*snorts coke. “Damn kids and their Mary Jane!

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Until they need it.... just like when their 16 ywar old daughters get pregnant, all a sudden abortions ok

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

They'll just change it to another drug. Like suspected meth

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Friend's door got busted in last week and he was held at gunpoint for an hour in a state where it's legal.

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

They evidently thought he had a grow op or was a dealer or something. They also got the address wrong and won't pay for his door.

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Or apologize to the family for fuckin' terrifying them. Police gotta change.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

To apologise admits fault, and that's not good in the land where everyone sues each other for literally everything

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There are states that protect the act of apology from culpability, and they could damn well have a process regardless.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No consequences for them, why should they change or back off at all? :( :(

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

This is why turtle face is ramming judges through the judicial process. To keep things the same

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

this would not result in legal weed nation wide. It would remove a federal barrier to the states legalizing. good luck.

5 years ago | Likes 839 Dislikes 3

You’d think the party that is allegedly pro states and anti-big government, ya know, a Republic.... would support this state’s rights issue

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't minimize it too much, if this passes, this is a huge step.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It would remove the federal barrier but unfortunately would allow states to choose whether or not to legalize

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Funnily enough, it requires all sellers to add the personal information of every user to a federal database. Good bye ability to buy a gun.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah but Republicans are all for states rights... Right? Jk That filth wants those sweet campaign contributions from private prisons.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't it erase all felony charges? Anyone charged with distribution or possession of more than half an ounce?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, but it does use the money created from the tax to fund a program to help them get it expunged.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of the biggest impacts would be to businesses in states where it's legal. They can't take cards because of federal law.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It will also increase the sale tax on them. And require them to report personal information to the federal gov for a database.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That makes them extremely vulnerable to theft, being forced to be an all cash business.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What would this mean for government employees still subject to MJ screening in legalized states?

5 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

Currently still illegal. Idk what it would do, but If it goes through there will be another meme stating if it is or not.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I work as an aircraft mechanic, until the FAA says otherwise, it will likely still be illegal for mechanics like me.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

In most states it's legal your employer can tell you you can't use it still so i doubt this will change anything besides the legality of it

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Government employees get tested? Hmm I guess Florida doesn't do that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing; most states are still At Will so they can fire you for just thinking about weed, if the could prove it.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Heck, I got fired for recycling cardboard boxes. Because they didn't have a camera and maybe I stole one.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Look, I'd comment on that but I don't think I should be seen associating with a criminal mastermind of your ilk.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sounds reasonable. Stay out of trouble!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not gov't employee but union worker here, we've been told if its legalized it will be handled like alcohol, so if it's in your system it >

5 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

Ok so they should fire/random test people just for mentioning or taking about using alcohol like they would weed.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Counts as being high, so basically no change

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

yeah that won't hold up in court.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why not?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It doesn't leave your system for days though. Can't prove you're high from it. I guess you could still be given then fail a sobriety test.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

If it's an at will employment state, they can write that policy and enforce it without any issue. Otherwise I'm not sure.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It can stay in your system for up to a month, but there is no way to test if someone is high at that point or it's just residual, so they >

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

What we do here is pass test. If you fail piss test they swab the mouth for more recent use. Not perfect but reasonable.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

If you can't not smoke pot long enough to get a job you don't deserve it. I smoke every day. Never failed a test.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 22

The downvotes are funny. I quit for 6 months for a job. Didn't get it. Now I'm a local friendly handyman, and smoke when I get off .

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Yeah, while I COULD quit for 6 months, I'd be totally useless because of the chronic pain and inflammation it helps me with

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hope you get feeling better.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem is random testing. You could only smoke on the weekends and still fail

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then understand that when you get the job and choose a career over smoking pot lol. Some jobs you just shouldn't be high for.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

No one has to choose a career over alcohol and Its no better than pot. You can smoke after work just like booze

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some use it for pain management. It stays in your system for ages, even if you're not high. Employers have too much power. What I do in my

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Glad to know you don't think people in chronic pain should be employed. Should I just die because I'm in too much pain to function?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No just find work that suits you. Is that so hard?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ever been in chronic pain before? What job can you do when you can't pick up a phone or type without pain?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Following weeks headline "the MORE act died in the Senate today."

5 years ago | Likes 2291 Dislikes 13

Booooooooooo bad news :(

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Blame the Hastert Rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hastert_Rule

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocks consideration of MORE act on Senate floor"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only real obstical is that the house named kamala harris as the author, in a obvious attempt to make her palatable for the election.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Exactly. It's not even worthy of discussion without a dem controlled senate too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Suicide is suspected

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah if the Dems thought it'd pass they'd never have pushed it in the first place. This is just marketing.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Just politics* not much different than the wild ass abortion bills put forward in southern states earlier this year.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MORE like, how much other bullshit are they going to put into this act that will involve oil pipelines or tax breaks.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, can't imagine a more anti republican idea than letting people have freedom and freedom.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hard to say.There's an increasingly large amount of lobbying cash to be made with this, so the GOP may have a come to Jesus moment and flip.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If the house is voting on it then that means the Senate already drafted and voted to pass it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MORE ACT was introduced like last year. It died in committees getting shuffled around. I emailed the representative who sponsored it (1/2)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And got no reply, when I tracked it's progress, it was just drifting across random desks going nowhere. Good to see it found a direction 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

EDIT: I went to check and it was initially sponsored by Kamala Harris. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/s2227

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly, scumbag Moscow Mitch won't even acknowledge the bulls existence

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I also don’t acknowledge the existence of the Chicago Bulls

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was created by kamala Harris. It’s going to get denied either in the senate or by the president for sure now since she’s vp candidate

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It won't die Moscow Mitch will never even bring it to the senate floor to begin with so it can't be reworked by the house

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Along with the rest of democracy...

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Its all optics for the election. Elect Democrats to the Senate/Presidency, get weed! Worked in Canada lol

5 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 11

Everything for months now has been about nothing but this November, this is not new at all. Covid has changed things, but only a little.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is, yes, but lets not complain when party political considerations and the right thing happen to line up.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It'd never happen in the US, still too many anti-weed Dems (inc. Biden himself.) In Canada the PM can get the party to fall in line.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uhh Trudeau got elected because all of his opposition was shit. He was the shiniest turn in the pile.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

I'm definitely joking and oversimplifying. Marijuana legalization and Election reform were big platforms for him. He delivered one at least.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but reneging on election reform when nobody would agree to a version that favored his party again was real bad. We didn't want 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/ reform to help the liberals; we wanted it so nobody would get total majority power off 30-some percent of the population vote ever again.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MORE like "add it on the pile we won't vote on ever"

5 years ago | Likes 541 Dislikes 2

I see what you did there...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dies on their desks. Then when asked about it they say they're working on it

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

The number is around 700 bills that Mitch hasn't brought to vote. Just letting them sit while he sucks cheeto fingers

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Person from a civilised country here: I legit cannot believe that that is a thing.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Seriously. There are no rules around it because no one ever could imagine the need for them.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Like the next stimulus package amirite?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Thats why its called congress and not progress

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How does your government get anything done ever?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well friend you see... The thing is... THEY FUCKING DONT!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think only through self-interest, like if the politicians think taking action or not might influence an election. Or they get bribed.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It doesn't.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Mitch McConnell said earlier Tuesday that the bill "had no chance in hell." Of even being debated on the Senate floor. Proving once again

5 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 2

"No chance in hell" oh wow, so ballsy coming from a guy who takes it up the ass from big business every day.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

They did the same thing with the hush act.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Typical reefer madness mentality....

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Satan knows best I guess

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's those do nothing democrats working their evil again!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Aug 31, 2020 1:57 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I wonder how long it will take before you're getting a visit from the police over that comment?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

That the Republicans in the Senate refuse to do thier jobs.

5 years ago | Likes 306 Dislikes 9

As a conservative who smokes i can tell you they are idoits the amount of money that would go into circulation legally would be tremendous

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is a good thing for Dems, great way to draw a policy line between parties on a popular issue. Great way to get Dem voters out.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They've been refusing to do their job for at least 6 if not 8 years.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

thats not refusing, thats down right stating like they all already got together and said were not voting for it before even showing up

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

They didn't need to, it's clear that if they vote for it they will be cast out of the republican party

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

mass cliche corruption

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Depends on what you think their jobs are. Pandering to big corporations is where most of their income comes from, so that's the job they >>

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

>> want to do well.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

With the south turning blue, lhe old devil appearing as an elderly turtle-man, will have "no chance in hell" for reelection

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Is that true?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not really. McGrath still prob unlikely to beat him. And I say that having donated to her campaign, so holding out as much hope as possible.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

See i don't understand this, most of them smoke or do coke. This is power privilege

5 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 1

Spot on. ?

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Rules for thee not for me. Don't like it? Get more powerful. It worked for me! /rich white guy voice

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Well, yeah. The biggest reason you have these laws in the first place is to let cops harass the shit out of poor and/or black people.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

You see weed in the house, you get leverage you can use to (say) get them to roll on a friend

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They don't want to free the slaves... Uhm, I mean release the prison labor force that just happens to be mostly black by coincidence

5 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. For profit prisons need prisoners.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Do we drug test in congress?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

We should.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are onto something

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

?????

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0