Made well.

Sep 20, 2023 2:07 PM

iceage2012

Views

63342

Likes

1071

Dislikes

7

More reliable than other Teslas.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rub one out raging against planned obsolescence and then watch Technology Connections with clarity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb7Bs98KmnY

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Well, watt do you know!

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Well, czech that out.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

That was like, 10 years ago.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1990 is not THAT old :(

2 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 2

Bruh, it's two-ish years away from being old enough to run for US president

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that wasn't even 10 years ago.

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

It's a third of a century. It was the average world lifespan in the early 1900's.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

2 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Thank you

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im from 1990 D:

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What's so impressive about a 10 year old bulb

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Speaking of light bulbs. Here's a good video from Veritasium talking about how things are manufactured to intentionally not last for too long. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5v8D-alAKE

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Back when Tesla still made quality products.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

And consumed 10 times the energy of a LED

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Different Tesla. This one died in the 90s. Well, technically they still exist, but these days, they're just rebranding white label trash from China.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Designed obsolescence.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember watching an interesting video on this about how bulbs used to last super long and then basically all the bulb manufactures decided that they wanted to make more money so they made the bulbs shitty and made a testing setup to test each others bulbs to make sure nobody was making any that were too much better than their competitions.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nice! I still have some things from Czechoslovakia, like a mastermind game I play with my kid.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don’t make ‘em like that anymore!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Light bulbs absolutely can be made to last centuries, but capitalism forces obsolescence. It is well-documented how the early years of bulb production were rife with agreements between manufacturers to make sure bulbs died.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have a fluorescent lamp that is used on daily basis for more than 30 years (I had it when I was in primary school, still used as a bed lamp now). Good old times with robust things.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technology connections made an interesting video on the planned obsolescence of lightbulbs, and why the controversy might be a bit overblown. It's a 30 minute video, but it's a bit en-light-ening. www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb7Bs98KmnY

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like the logo TESLA.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: The Centennial Light is the world's longest-lasting light bulb, burning since 1901, and almost never turned off. It is located at 4550 East Avenue, Livermore, California, and maintained by the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department. It was originally a 30-watt (or 60-watt) bulb, but is now very dim, emitting about the same light as a 4-watt nightlight.

2 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 2

Sounds like me.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Woot Woot - Livermooooore!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maintained?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, same light output as a 4watt night light, but probably still guzzling down like 20 watts at least. That's the whole secret — you're making a trade-off between longevity and efficiency. Making long-lasting bulbs is easy, they're just crazy inefficient. In a world where incandescent bulbs cost less than $1, going for longevity at the expense of efficiency makes no sense.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It also uses a carbon filament instead of tungsten, which is what we use now. This is because carbon filaments are fairly brittle.

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Lightbulbs are a great example of planned obsolescence. They absolutely could be made to last much longer, but there is no profit in a bulb that costs $2 and lasts 30 years

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You wpuld also have to put up 10 more light bulbs to get any usable light. Don't mix conspiracies with eachother. That's how we get the Lochness monster controlling Hollywood.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never turning it off is the key. Turning on a light creates a jolting surge of current across the filiment. That's why most bulbs fry the instant you turn them on.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And the heat expansion and contraction shorten the life too when it is turned off and on

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'Every day since 1990' Yeah they don't have to do much during the day, it's at night they have to work hard.

2 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 13

7 people have brains so smooth you could use their measurements as mathematical constants.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Turning them on and off seems to be the biggest stress on the filament, so burning it 24/7 may make it last longer.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Me with blackout curtains who relies on one lamp for most of my light because screw the sun: “Haha, yeah, so true…”

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

2 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

I used to ride by this bulb everyday on the way to school...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I might be used in an area inside the building where there are no windows. I work in a large building that has lots of areas with no windows or natural light. *Thus being used during the day also*

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe this guy is Pink Floyd and he is on the dark side of the moon.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And just because the bulb was made in 1990 doesn't mean it was installed immediately after production

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just like your mom...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Depending on how they were used, incandescent bulbs could last quite a while.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Depending on how they were designed and built. You could always build (and buy) long life incandescent bulbs. Essentially (for you computer nerds) these were undervolted (by design) and therefore had an even worse efficiency than standard bulbs, but a lot higher life expectancy. On the other hand, you could drive the efficiency up by essentially overvolting the bulbs - and thereby shortening their lifetime.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Case in point were the small halogen bulbs for bicycle headlights: designed for a life expectancy of a few tens of hours, but very high efficiency - for a small halogen bulb.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they dont sell light bulbs like that anymore in the US ..LED only i think

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is a quality product. The next one will probably last 1 year. They don't make 'em like they used to. Guess why?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So cool!!! My house was built in 1949. The lights in the attic have never been changed. They stopped making them in the 1960s!!!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For my American friends, it is the capital of Paris

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I once had a sachs-dollar chainsaw that had printed on the case “made in west Germany, that was pretty cool.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wasn't there a thing in the 1930's or 1940's that Philips and others were involved in for planned obsolescence so they would consistently be able to make money? Wouldn't be surprised if this bulb was well before that time.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

So did a little checking, and it looks like bulbs like these were from the 50's~60's. Still old though.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the story, but not really what happened. The cartel existed, but the planned obsolescence bit stems from folks that don't understand the tradeoff between brightness and life in light bulbs. Long-life bulbs existed then as they do now, but are horribly energy inefficient.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

^that's according to the cartel itself, which still fined companies if they made bulbs that lasted over 1000hrs.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's according to anyone with eyes. A 1,000 hour standard bulb at wattage X is significantly brighter than a 2,500 long-life bulb at wattage X. To get an equivalent brightness out of the long-life bulb, you have to move to a higher wattage, meaning you're using more electricity for the same brightness. This tradeoff was well understood before the cartel was even formed, and modern incandescent bulbs are subject to it too. The fine existed, yes, but it had nothing to do with obsolescence.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Making light bulbs that wear out were the some of the first instances of planned obsolescence.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They're the go-to example folks bring up when discussing planned obsolescence, but that's not what actually happened. It's all comes down to a simple correlation - bright bulbs are more energy efficient but burn out more quickly. Dim bulbs last longer but are energy inefficient. Long-life bulbs were available during the time of the cartel, as they are available today, but they require significantly more electricity to achieve the same brightness.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's complicated: Watch https://youtu.be/zb7Bs98KmnY

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

100 watt? Was it a death ray?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

100 watts wasn’t exactly a blazing torch when it comes to incandescent bulbs. A “normal” bulb was 60, but 100 watt bulbs were also very common.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Could be why it lasted so long, 100w draw but not being very bright would mean it had a very thick filament and would last forever, not give off much light, and be way more expensive to run per watt than comparable lights.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's 220v so nothing special in 100w bulb.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It’s nothing special at 120 either.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I would think it might be bit rarer to have that sort of bulb with that high amperage, but not really familiar with 120v stuff.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Negative. 100W bulbs were common here in 120V land. It’s double the amperage, but still only 0.83A.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

121 is where the magic happens

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

220, 221, whatever it takes...

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

something something planned obsolescence

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Lightbulbs are consumables, not planned obsolescence. It's very possible to make them last way longer, but then they either barely give off any light or they eat electricity like crazy.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Did you know the original nylon fabric did not rip, and that the reason nylon stockings rip is because the owner of the company wanted a "consumable" product, not a reliable product?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

And that's relevant how? As I said, you can get longer-lasting lightbulbs if you sacrifice efficiency. That lightbulb that lasted 100 years still works only because it barely outputs any light. If you want usable lights you either need to sacrifice duration or increase power consumption. Technology Connections has an entire video explaining why lightbulbs are the way they are.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's relevant because, as you say, the rate of consumption is a choice. Yes a lightbulb has specific trade-offs made because there are physical laws that govern the universe, however, NONE of those limitations are a factor when they are made intentionally short using sup-standard material of manufacturing processes. Focusing on this specific bulb is meant to deflect away from the broader point, but as long as we're focusing specifically on light bulbs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not in the case of incandescent lightbulbs. There's engineering tradeoffs between brightness, lifetime, and efficiency. Though commonly used as an example of planned obsolescence, the Phoebus Cartel 1000 hr lifetime design goal standardized brightness and was based on the best compromises at the time.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why is there an array of incandescent lightbulb obsolescence defenders on imgur lmao. It's been 100 years, we know every excuse they gave was bullshit at this point.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Nov 8, 2023 4:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Oops, you forgot to actually talk about an actual video on your alt before making reference to the post

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Nov 8, 2023 4:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I remember when LED bulbs were introduced and they were promoted as being able to last 12 years (in some cases longer). I bought some and they did indeed last that long or longer. The ones made today last about as long as the incandescent bulbs they replaced, often a lot less.

2 years ago | Likes 417 Dislikes 7

Check out "The Lightbulb Conspiracy" movie, theyve been playing games like this since right after lightbulbs became a thing, and probably the only reason this one lasted that long is because it was made outside of the american/british cartels

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Welcome to the lightbulb cartel rabbit hole

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I work in the industry and this is simply not true. Incan last less than 2k hours and the cheapest LED you can find for sale are 5k. We consider failure when the bulb loses 30% of lumen output. So many last way beyond the posted life. Main cause of catastrophic LED bulb failure is bad circuits and using in enclosed fixtures (when not rated).

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The common ones use fewer chips and drive them harder so they are cheaper to produce and last less time

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I have one of those early ones with the heat sinks around the light element that I bought for a lamp in my first apartment 15 years ago. It just happens to be on right now as I type this.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have an LED bulb in a lamp with a timer from 2012. Weighs about 2 lbs. Runs all night, every night, still going strong.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Most of LED bulbs at my home has dozen of small LEDs on the PCB and usually one of them burn. I replace it and the bulb works again for another few months. They are not cooled properly and there is too much current pushed to them so they light brighter. If they would be properly powered, they would light for years.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

also the actual white light of home LED bulbs comes from phosphate layers converting blue/UV light. This layer does not last forever, it oxidises away and the bulb may turn ever more blue over time. I remember first gen "white" LEDs using a cluster of other primary LED colours instead, and the light they produces was very cold. My parents one of those decade old bulbs in their house still illuminating a stair well.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mattias Wendel on YouTube has taken a few apart after they failed and determined it is the circuit board that goes bad in these. Basically just bad manufacturing which is outweighed by people wanting new shiny things.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is a great youtube video about the "Dubai bulbs". LED lightbulbs only sold in Dubai, they are basically overengineered so they last way longer (under less load per component). But you can't buy them anywhere else.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Sounds like bigclive?

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

you're right, thats the channel!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The LEDs probably are still good it's the shitty PCBs and other electronics that shit the bed in less time than a good old incandescent

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Veritasium made a video about the Phoebus Cartel. https://youtu.be/j5v8D-alAKE?si=SQ4E8I0zqkX7AHZe

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Manufactured obsolescence

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude for real. I cannot find a reliable LED brand to save my life. If you know one please post it

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Check out some history of the big three bulb makers Sylvania GE and Phillips (IIRC) they all got together because the first bulbs lasted so long it was driving them all out of business. They all decided to make them last a certain amount of time (planned obsolescence). They really drove this in all types of manufacturing. Source: I'm an engineer at one of these places.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They actually introduced a maximum lifetime on bulbs, because they are much more energy efficient that way. Early powerplants would give away free bulbs to make sure they wouldn't get overloaded by the longer lasting but much less efficient bulbs. Planned obsolescence is indeed a thing, but not when it comes to lightbulbs. https://youtu.be/zb7Bs98KmnY

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Please visit HR on friday as your annual review is overdue.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There is a good video about a legit conspiracy of light bulb manufacturers limiting the lifespan of bulbs to drive up their profits. But the trick with the long living light bulbs is low wattage and continous use. The thermal cycling of a light bulb is the most damaging and usually the cause of a burn out.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

The engineering tradeoff in incandescent bulbs is brightness/efficiency and lifetime of the bulb. The Phoebus Cartel standardized brightness by designing for a lightbulb lifetime of 1000 hours because that was the best tradeoff. Even after the cartel's dissolution the standard stuck because it is a good one.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Buy cheep,and buy often.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are designed to fail. I've modified a couple to not do that. They have about 8 years now and still in use day to day.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of the 8 lights in my living room, 5 of them have burnt out. All on the span of 1-2 years. At this point I'm treating it as a Battle Royale, let's see who wins

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're handy with a soldering iron there are a couple of vids on bigclivedotcom's YT channel that explain why and how to make those >

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

bulbs last longer, although you do so by reducing the light output.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

And you might get lucky and not even need a soldering iron. Just some small pliers and a magnifying glass.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Inside you look led bulb there are many small LEDs. When one led dies the bulb stops working. If you open the bulb up and remove the broken led, the rest works fine. Google it

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Planned obsolescence. Gotta sell more bulbs.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The thing is that it’s really not profitable to make decent lightbulbs because it is very much possible but basically the largest manufacturers got together and decided to stop making them last..

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I doubt there was any collusion, they probably all arrived at that approach individually. It’s been their MO forever

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Here's a decent video from veritesium about it https://youtu.be/j5v8D-alAKE?si=0XVkmGSA8Xazl5Iq

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well perhaps not direct collusion. But if a single company started to drastically reduced its product lifespan and no others followed, sales would plummet

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I remember someone doing a yt vid on it once.. and I think I remember him mentioning an industry conference.. but it’s very distant in my memory so I don’t remember who

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A reminder that there actually was (and maybe still is) a straight up conspiracy to not make light bulbs too good.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've still got one CFL bulb that still works. It survived a move across country and 3 more local moves. The others mostly only broke due to blunt force trauma.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had that problem but switched brands and specifically bought bulbs meant for dimmers. The more robust electronics have lasted well.

2 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

Good tip

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Which brand? (Might as well add to my anecdata)

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cree, Philips, & TCP are all very good brands that use high quality leds and electronics. Most of their products also have good warranties.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've always had good experience with Philips

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

GE Reveal and the high end Philips are fine. Start swapping fixtures over to the canless "puck" lights though. The electronics are 1/?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

stored further away from the heat source (the LED), and they're bigger so they can use larger capacitors and often have full bridge 2/?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

rectifiers, meaning they flicker less and don't burn out from heat. The drop in replacement bulbs are bad because there's no way to 3/?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Cree last quite a while (over 4 years and counting)

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cree is the industry standard in LEDs. Many other brands use Cree's LEDs in their own lamps. Would highly recommend Cree. Source: I work in the lighting industry.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For some reason in Seattle they came to my apartment and gave me free ones.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They did that in my country to encourage the switch to led. It was tied to the power bill account number. I have PV installed and for some reason as a result the power company has changed my account # about 4 times. I got free bulbs every time they changed my account #. The older LEDs are built so much better than the new ones

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it's cheaper than upgrading electrical infrastructure

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

it's those damnable coastal elites forcing their good ideas on you.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Communists!!!! /s

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They also use about 1/5th the electricity

2 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 3

1/10th, they are 6-9W where incandescents were 40-100

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But cost 10x the price

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 12

Electricity costs keep going up (the for-profit US power companies being greedy, cost of production is going down) so the repayment period of LED gets shorter

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not true for the last LED bulbs I bought. However, even if it was, the break-even time (when you make back the increased purchase cost with cheaper running cost) is short, especially in regions with expensive unit costs.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

are you counting for inflation from 1990 to now? probably not. An LED bulb is about $1, an incandescent is sometimes more than that now.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Where the fuck are you getting a bulb for a dollar? LEDs are never less than 10

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

The emitter itself usually is fine, especially quality ones, it’s the rest cheap ass electronics that manufacturers put in there to ensure you have to replace them often.

2 years ago | Likes 168 Dislikes 2

I worked programming consumer electronics before, The added bonus is also that they get to use cheaper internals. Shaving off couple of cents from production costs can mean millions of dollars saved at scale AND you get repeat business. What an absolute win /s

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I wish we had an organized agency that would regularly expose this sort of thing. I mean it's fine that the the lower cost items have cheaper parts. But it harms the companies that are building higher quality items, when its impossible for the avg person to spot the diff = sucky goods for all

2 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

After all the low quality sellers want to max their $$$ so their incentivised to make it hard to spot trading on the high quality maker. Projecting in the future, the proce ends up in the middle and the avg quality is at the near bottom (min acceptable quality to buyers)

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Really modern governments should be handling that. It benefits everyone to produce good,ong lasting quality for cheap. Except for fuck nuggets who can never have enough money, of course. But they should be getting removed, too....

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Governments are really the only institution that could do it successfully.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's actually the opposite. Light bulb manufacturers have a private agency whose goal is to ensure light bulbs don't last too long. If a manufacturer is in violation of their regulation, there are fees that are issued. This is so one manufacturer can't make a forever bulb and drive everyone out of business.

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

*Looks up from Gravity's Rainbow* That's still going on?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What is this private agency?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not a conspiracy, my dude. There is a trade-off between brightness and bulb life. And the industry association has come to the agreement that 1000 hours is the appropriate lifetime for an incondescent Volt as the correct trade-off between brightness and long life

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Learn to read and than shut the fuck up with bs excuses that do nothing but boot licking on rich ppl. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That argument was sourced from a representative of one of the companies in the Phoebus Cartel. Do you really think they're incentivized to tell the truth here?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How do they enforce this at all? If I had a couple million sitting around I'd just fucking do it and middle finger the collector. What legal grounds do they have to enforce a private fee? I'm just genuinely curious, btw. I totally believe this, but my three second Google didn't give me a satisfying answer.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

They don't because the commenter is misleadingly referring to something from when light bulbs were brand new and was intended to keep companies from selling overly dim long-lasting bulbs. There is no agency like they describe today.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It does seem like collusion or trust forming behavior. But then again, we do have OPEC. Still, its anti consumer behavior and stifles innovation.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Its basically just a gentlemans agreemant like "hey, we would all make alot more money if we stop making our bulbs last longer

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That “agency” hasn’t existed in several decades, and it only regulated bulbs that were marked as having a standard life. Long-life bulbs could still be made and sold, but had to be labeled as being less bright. It was a PR campaign to promote electrification, with fear that dim (but long-lasting) bulbs would hurt interest in adopting the new “electricity” thing.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ah, PR. The truth's most formidable corporate enemy

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0