What a dick.

Oct 26, 2017 1:36 PM

Poor rats. The reason why I study plants and soil.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ummm, so you throw out or hate anything that doesn’t fit you hypothesis?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Congratulations 42. You have passed the first test

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LemmingWinks

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Onion?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There will usually be at least one outlier in a data set

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The hero Imgur NEEDS, but not the one it DESERVES right now.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a rat owner, I can honestly say that 99% of rats are assholes. The other 1% are jerks. 100% are special in their own way and I love them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

asshole+mouse+tube=sketchy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck yeah. You go little buddy. Fuck shit up

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a single rat can screw up your study, you're doing it wrong. That's what statistical significance is all about

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am not a number, I am a free mouse!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t know to edit comments. Being said, any scientist that rejects data in an experiment is not a scientist.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rats are not typically used for that long in animal testing labs though. I seriously doubt the same rat screwed multiple studies...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rule 42

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As spanish native tongue, reading doctor' name makes me laughing so hard. "Dr. es tu macho" wtf man!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One man's rat is another man's working class hero.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Things that happened.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Asshole rat"? You mean Lemmiwinks?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably has toxoplasmosis.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed. It takes away their fear of cats.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldn’t the one rat be an outlier?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah you could just cull his data

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh Dr. Stu macho at harvard. He is totally real guys.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

NIMH!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I love that the rat is #42. He is the answer to big question. What’s the question? Fuck you, figure it out.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Have you even bothered to figure out the big question?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a scientist, that there is what we call an outlier. One outlier won't ruin an entire thesis.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1 outlier out of 3 mice might. But having a sample size of 3 means your thesis was worth fuck all anyway...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why you don't design shitty studies with only 3 mice in a group.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fight the system, little brother, we got your back.

8 years ago | Likes 418 Dislikes 1

Agent 42

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

How can one wacky data point screw the whole research?..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who's side are you on, anyway???

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#42 is trying to break the fourth wall

8 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 2

That's because he's secretly performing experiments on us.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

I hope the answer to the experiments it's not his number

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It's gonna take some deep thought to figure that one out, come back in 7.5 million years.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Man if I was a scientist I would just remove this asshole from the study..... ......

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

i mean its funny if there is always this one mice that screws it up. funny to bring up when mentioning the outliers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That goes against core scientific practices. You cant cherry pick and stull be a meaningful result

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You know what goes against core scientific practice ? Using the same rat for two different experiments ! Now it's all skewed !

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You know what's also core scientific practices? Removing singular outliers.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

God dammit someone already said it and I'm just blind, feel free to downvote me... -_-

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh i know, i was referring to more extravagant cherry picking

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can remove statistically significant outliers, you just need to say when you do.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

yes....like when the rat stabs himself in the stomach while shaving, or, accidentally brutally cut his head off while combing his hair

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Im well aware

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Being #42, he's probably the answer to all your questions

8 years ago | Likes 339 Dislikes 2

I think 42 was actually a reference to the fact that White mice are the smartest on the planet in HGTTG

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Deep thought

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

But we shall never know the question.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mice are the protrusion into our dimension of hyper-intelligent pan-dimensional beings who are the most intelligent species on the planet1/2

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They spent a lot of their time in laboratories running complex experiments on humans

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's because he's a hyperintelligent, pandimensional being.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

he propably has an offer for the scientist... something about prosthetic brain i guess :D

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So, I'm gonna ruin everything (again), but with proper methodology you're not supposed to use the same rat for two different experiments...

8 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 4

Thank you and...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wh...what happens to the rats after the experiment is over, then?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

im almost poitive this is the onion

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"Dr. Stu Macho"... uh yeah

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Realistically they’re going to though, they’re not going to kill/give Away 40 rats every time they perform a non-invasive test

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im just gunna stop you here, this is a joke story. Don't think so hard into it

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Thinking too hard into things is how I broke my mind in the first place. Or was it my skull ? And a wall ? Whateverver....

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Having 1 outlier would more than likely not ruin an experiment alongside having new test animals. Also, rats do not wink...

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

Rats most definitely do "wink" perhaps not for the reason s humans do, but they definitely can...

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

... Thank you

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would you take one rat from an experiment for another experiment, especially if it doesn't teach you anything ? Also, rats can blink...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I said wink...?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You blink with one eye = you wink ! Animals don't attach any significance to it, but nothing stops them from doing it physically !

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Lol, out of context sure, but if you take it in context why would it wink without any attached significance?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also you already stated that, so I wasn't going to restate your point...?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What I meant is that nobody is gonna reuse rats in a serious laboratory. Unless you somehow attached yourself to it ? Bias !! Bias I say !

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I know, that's what your first comment said. That's why I said "restate" your point. I'm not finding flaw, but adding on with my comment

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0