Gave myself depression (again) with a neat statistics site. :/

Jan 19, 2023 9:38 PM

fakebritishguy

Views

89291

Likes

713

Dislikes

24

Initially just thought it was neat to look at stats and see how much things have changed in my adult years, between red/blue states, etc., but, well, I dug too deep and now I need to go find my zoloft.

usgovernmentrevenue.com and usgovernmentspending.com aren't for the faint of heart.

Kid Tax, because I'm worrying about the world their grandparent's generation have setup to leave em. :(

One does not simply give oneself depression. -1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

vote man/girl vote we can steer the ship back its going to take time but dont give up hope also flip the bird while you are at it at boomers

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's insanity. Lobbying and bribing work.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't boo, vote.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’d be curious to see a graph charting statutory and effective tax rates for corporations over time

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That also leaves out what lowered it to that effective rate though. Back then it was lowered by paying labor

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Instead of today being lowered by paying representatives and lawyers.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Try doing that but with education statistics. All day, everyday, because you decided that would be a rewarding career. I'm in therapy now.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I feel you bud, here in Texas every kid's absence takes away from the school's funding...there's also the crazy consuming school boards. :(

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am also in Texas. It's a shitshow from top to bottom.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, feels great that you all didn't have to pay union dues now, eh? Don't worry, you can start now. https://iww.org

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Corporations get tax breaks so they can pay their employees more Right???

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

All hail the glorious job creators.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ha….hahahahahahaha….ha

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

This is why I refuse to have kids. As a kid from the 90s, we never had a “great” America. That’s why our generation and beyond are 1/

3 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 2

becoming less conservative as we age. All we’ve seen is shit and nobody doing a damn thing about it. Kids these days have the bleakest 2/

3 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 2

outlook on their future than any generation. 3/3

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 2

I think that is much more bc of things like social media. Their world is too big and it’s a me culture where you compare yourself constantly

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

Nahh, the threat of fascism in the US or global warming are real dangers.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In fairness, that’s because they’ve the bleakest future of any generation.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I recently decided to not have kids unless I somehow move to a country with good social programs. But then other factors I’ve considered 1/

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Like overpopulation and potentially passing on my depression. I find that I don’t want to bring life into the world as it is currently. 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I told a Trumper that everything that used to be good in America was paid for with corporate/ultra wealthy taxes. (pothole fixing talk)

3 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 3

Ehhhhh. Dunno which arguments you made, but if it were based on marginal rates you prob made intellectually dishonest arguments. (1)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

(2)the peak of American culture occurred AFTER the crash of marginal rates. Why? Because deduction elimination mean it was one of the

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

(3)the largest peacetime tax increases in history.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Also why can business have the cost of running business as tax deductible but people cant put the cost to live as deductible.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yuuup!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 2

This also works at scale. My BIL is still a Trumper, and nimby as fuck. Yeah his house is an eyesore due to his lazy alcoholism.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Real fucking high on drugs.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreal

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That was before globalization. Raise corp taxes now and companies just can move offshore, outsource,etc. It’s a different world now.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 25

Pretty sure the US infrastructure can't be moved offshore.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not sure how that applies

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Than some other company moves in that spot, but since these companies have such big lobbies and propaganda people bought that lie.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont think it’s that simple

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It pretty much is, if there is a big enough market people will invest in it for profits and big companies leaving would give these markets.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh no! Not......them leaving.....that's terrible?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It would be terrible if you like having a job.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And you believe if they leave no one will ever create a business again and have job openings? That's stupid.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I would say consider Detroit, Philly & the 1000s of small towns that have died bc business left & never came back as examples.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Its not as easy to pack up and leave as people make it sound. The markets are not moving, if they want to leave we can kill their trademarks

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Companies have been doing this for decades now. Ireland is the tax haven for a ton of tech companies.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's actually an entire falsity since they'd still be charged taxes on business conducted here. They've already moved where they can.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Low taxes didn't stop them, high taxes didn't make them leave.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

In order to really ditch the taxes they'd have to not do business and they'd be replaced instantly. Capital is more replaceable than minwage

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

and again, the tax rate you want to look at is the EFFECTIVE tax rate, the rate that is actually paid, not the marginal tax rate, the rate

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Which is drastically lower today for the 1% and .01% than it used to be.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think I missed the first "and again" post, but I think I get your meaning. What got me was that in just the modern era, adjusting for /1

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

economic changes all along by using % GDP, Governments at all levels have been, effectively, carried more and more by individuals. /2

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've always heard "the middle class is dying" etc. but something hits different to see a bunch of numbers diverge like that and realize /3

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

how one, and their kiddos, are getting screwed over by sustained corporate oriented policymaking. :(

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

BUT! While googling stuff to respond learned that S Corps, created in '58, pass the taxes thru to the shareholder...not quite asbad mehbee?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that says how much you'd pay without any other extenuating factors.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I always understood 'marginal tax rate' as the rate for the next dollar you earn. Effective tax rate or average tax rate are the real ones.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess i should have said 'statutory' instead of marginal

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's more complex than that. Marginal rates were a thing in both time periods but the write offs were different in nature.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry i meant effective there not marginal. The mechanisms for how they lowered it to the effective rate is important.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both systems had tax write off. The older ones were mostly from paying workers more. The newer ones are from buying representatives.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So we start with 90% and reduce it with societal gains better paid work forces. Or start with criminally low taxes and reduce it to 0.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While they double tip taking tax dollars for ebt while paying people so little they need ebt.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0