Fake news.

Feb 24, 2017 9:50 PM

DaemonAldent

Views

68031

Likes

1572

Dislikes

130

Source: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/321049-white-house-hand-picks-select-media-for-briefing

Yeah, regardless of what party you align with, this is bad.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Truly terrifying

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

JFK interview on the press: https://twitter.com/AJ/status/835337459798065153

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's shitty now, but I have to hope against hope that the INEVITABLE downfall will be nothing short of epic.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Isn't he going a bit too far?!?! I'm just saying, i don't know...

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 9

this was a perfect opportunity for an It's Always Sunny title card.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

v

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Impeach. Now. Contact your houserep (find them using this http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/ ) and tell them to defend democracy.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

How many days did that take?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm legit curious: anybody know someone who still supports these idiots, and what's their explanation for doing so? (W/o mentioning Hillary)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"The Gang Bans Specific Media Outlets"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Everyone (OP) : Please link your source so we can all go see it. Thanks

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Ah, good call man. Edited to include source. Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So when do we start talking about the very real & dangerous possibility of us living in a legitimate fascist state in the next 4-8 years?

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 7

It wasnt a press conference. Its what is known as a gaggle. They arent required, theyre a curtesy to the press. No one is entitled to attend

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The actions of a cowardly, weak man

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Pulitzer prize winning journalists: "It was a ban". Trump supporters: "Uh-uh! 'Ban' means something different". Dictionary: "It was a ban".

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 4

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

How far are you letting this go, America?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I wish we knew. :(

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He said a lot of things that are proving to be lies.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

Boy it's like if you vote in a retard he is gonna do a bad job or something. Who knew?! Sad.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

But breitbart is allowed in why? They're an extremist wing ran by fucking nazis, but since they ask nice questions they're ok.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 10

Technically they're white nationalists, not Nazis. I know, Toh-MAY-toh, toh-MAH-to.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Steve Bannon used to run Breitbatshit. Of course they got in.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

"Been there, done that." - Germany

9 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 10

Ditto - United Soviet Socialist Republic

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

But the difference is Russia is still doing that. :/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Obama attempted to ban Fox news, sure this is bad, but it's also business as usual and not the end of the world.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yes he did, and as a liberal, I railed against it then too. And CNN was there as the 1st people defending Fox. This is absolute bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Source?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be clear, this was a case of administration officials, not the President directly. Same as with Trump

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What a bunch of cunts.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

v

9 years ago | Likes 356 Dislikes 21

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Explains why he's such a narcissist

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

I've seen this a few times now. Is this what he is actually saying or is this a bad lipreading?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

Said during the election campaign. His supporters were being criticized 4 stupidity. Trump, " quantity is its own quality", probably.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He actually said it. You can find the sound bite pretty easily

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

So when are his supporters ready to admit that maybe the comparisons to Nazi Germany aren't really that far off?

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 8

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 22

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

God that zinger was locked and loaded wasnt it. 11/10 perfect execution.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Maybe if Holocaust survivors or experts in fascism say something-

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Experts are liars, remember? Only trump knows the truth.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

-oh, wait that already happened. Well, maybe when various states start trying to strike down the right to protest-

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Anything that can be destroyed by knowledge deserves to be destroyed by knowledge. What does White House does not want us to know?

9 years ago | Likes 188 Dislikes 15

That's fucking beautiful. Absolutely yes!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

That our president is a two year old.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

The two year olds I know are quieter and more mature and have longer attention spans.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think you just ruined imgur secret santa

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That went over my head. Whatchamean?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The secret part can be destroyed by knowledge.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Duh! I need a new brain there must be plenty of spares around with so many people not using theirs! v

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, only two media outlets were banned, others are still allowed to attend. The news still gets out.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 82

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

For now

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also the LA Times. The AP didn't attend in protest

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Incidentally the ones who are more likely to ask uncomfortable questions. v

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Associated Press didn't get banned, so it wasn't done purely on partisanship

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

"Purely"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't know what's worse, partisanship or personal pettiness. In this case, probably both.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

The president having a personal grudge against several news sources is dangerous. Like, Obama disliked Fox, but he didn't bar them. Imagine

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

4, huffpost and buzzfeed were also banned

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure if you are serious, if you are... huffpost and buzzfeed are not exactly reputable news sources anyway. They are FB clickbait.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

Yet they are att he exact same level as braitbart soooo

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

What about New York Times and CNN? Are you really going to tell me Breitbart is more reputable then all of them?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

yes, this election season proved cnn and nyt are rags.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

Huffpost doesn't overtly lie, but are heavily biased. It's ok to get news from them just not ok to use them in arguments. Buzzfeed news is

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Huffpo is exactly what they claim, an aggregate news/ opinion company. As you say, heavily biased, but their news articles are usually news.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Separate from buzzfeed entertainment and you have to dig through a pile of shit to find a nickel, but again they don't overtly lie but are

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks to all you fucks who voted for him.

9 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 20

And to all the fucks who didn't vote at all

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 7

True I begged my mom to go out and vote for Hillary but she didn't vote at all so "I can't blame her"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And to all the fucks that wrote in Harambe or Sanders, or threw their vote away on Johnson or Stein.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 23

All the votes for Johnson and stein would have helped Hillary not a bit in Texas. //jill stein man :(

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sorry, I won't cast my vote for the best turd. I want the best or the absolute worst. I am sorry though.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 13

Do that in local elections. Not in a president election when you know you're going to get someone who can do the job or a complete buffoon.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

With the electoral college a lot of votes end up not affecting the outcome of your state. Voting third party could lead to a better system.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Bullshit. 3rd party still needs 270 electoral v's to win. Otherwise congress picks the president. 3rd party has no chance unfortunately...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

I don't think either candidate could "do the job". Their probably was a better choice but I think some people need some eye opening if he

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

can even be elected. So here's to hoping he is the worst presidential candidate in all of history so we might have a chance to progress.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

proud trump supporter, will vote for him again.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 120

Proud of what? Is pissing off liberals all he has to do to earn your approval?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

no, doing his job like: enforcing immigration law, repairing the infrastructure, and protecting the country from outside threats

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

the liberal thing is just gravy.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

People like you will be the downfall of our country.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

newsflash: we are already on the downfall, and mostly thanks to liberals(here in cali at least)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

Why though? Can't you see how awful of a job he is doing in office right now, or are you a stereotypical ignorant Trump supporter?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

what awful job? we are finally enforcing immigration laws in this country, hes proposed infrastructure reforms that would speed up repair 1/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 37

and required american steel be used in infrastructure jobs, and is trying vet people better from chaotic countries with rampant terrorism 2/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 40

I won't argue that he has had good moments, but he and his administration are lying and having temper tantrums.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But you are ignoring the blatant disregard to American standards, constitutional respect, and narcissistic tendencies.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

you apparently have never been to california.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Seriously, can anyone explain what "extreme vetting" means? A catchphrase isn't a policy...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That is not what makes our country great. Open discussion, thoughtful responses, and equal respect for opposing views are.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You could dip a turd in gold and present it as a beautiful work of art but at the end of the day it's still a pile of shit.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

thats why i didnt vote for hillary.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 18

Depending how big the turd is an how much gold adhered could be super super valuable

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Delusional thoughts from Fantasy Island.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Just goes to show, you can illegally detain people w/o probably cause due to their country of origin, and someone out there will say 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

all of what i have stated is fact, but then again i actually read his executive orders.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 21