I think this is important now more then ever

Feb 5, 2017 4:26 PM

RLDS

Views

68467

Likes

1236

Dislikes

226

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it were that simple it'd be nice.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Guns are stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*Distant laughter from the most free country in the world* (It ain't America by the way) inb4 downvotes Suomi prkl

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

LMFAO what next? ending poverty? wishful thinking OP

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except nazis. Nazis can still fuck right off

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"freedom" isn't happiness at best it removes one limitation from the pursuit of it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Happiness is subjective, only you can define it and only by being free you can pursue it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A lot of other countries have lots of great freedom that doesn't involve guns though. Maybe give that a try one day, maybe for a year.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I thought like this once. I was about 13 at the time.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 14

At 39, I still think this. Do I realistically expect it? Not for a while, no. But it's an ideal I still believe in.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

When the Christians want to ban the gays from getting married, that's where the fighting comes from.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If only the people who are free to have guns were more responsible with them.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

If only the world was a perfect place & no one ever needed a gun to protect themselves or their families.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i mean, more guns in the US than people, but the number of shooting related deaths is barely a blip next to other causes of death

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

yeah, but those same rights are had by all the gangs in chicago. and their shooting rate is just rising.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Freedom is like communism, it works in theory. Until someone thinks they are entitled to more freedom than the next person.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Heh... I think it's pretty much demonstratably more than theory, while communism can be demonstrably shown not to function.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Political establishment>Corporates>Free market>People and their freedom>Enviroment.. Too bad the system doesn't work in it's favor.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Alaska and Hawaii: "well fuck you too"

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

You have the freedom to do what makes you happy until you impose your beliefs on someone else against their will.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

A problem arises since many people think that you doing what you want isn't something you should be able to do.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well yeah, if it involves smoking near me or simultaneously having a gun and not knowing how to use it safely.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So sort of like Europe but with more guns?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol no

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sound an awful lot like the Netherlands with the exception of Guns.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

netherland is not europe.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oddly the "tolerant" ones seems to have a problem with my firearms. I've never been afoul of the law for any reason

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

The problem is each of those groups thinks that their freedom is more important than each of the other groups

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Especially those natives trying to stop the pipeline. Just because they live like cavemen doesn't mean we all do.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Did we suddenly go back to the 1700s?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or what they think their freedom is.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

why you say that? Obummer spend nearly 70080 hours embarrassing everyone in America.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

Obummer. 8 years and you all still couldn't think of anything more clever

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Whenever I see the word obummer I always feel the need to say it out loud

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

http://imgur.com/CZ7cTEs

9 years ago | Likes 166 Dislikes 4

I've always liked that quote. No particular reason why, just have. Anyone else?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Always upvote Keith David

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

America's also about killing people for their land, but that's not good on promotional art.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Yes, it was horrible how we killed all those Tibetan monks & stole Tibet. Then we invaded the Ukraine & Crimea. We are such Imperialists.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I mean that's true for any country. Only difference is the US was founded earlier so it's still fresh in terms of history

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's not so much something we're "about" as it is a thing we did. As flyingmonsters said, it's been done by all the major powers, and

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

most of the minor ones, too, I'd wager.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is the ideal, however the US today seems bent on driving itself into camps and I'm sorry for my US brothers.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 4

It's always been like that. In every country you have it.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

We have professional agitators & organizers pushing for a civil war between factions they have inflamed with propaganda over several decades

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Boy do we have similar names...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not only rednecks have guns.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

But are there rednecks that haven't handled guns?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on how far mangled machinery goes before you consider it a gun.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guns aren't the same as the others.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Neither is weed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The states should really remove "United" from their title.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 6

We could just turn into 50 separate nations. I'm sure that wouldn't be horribly complicated.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's pretty close to that now, honestly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Before the US Civil War official documents used "These United States", afterwards they used "The United States".

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I blame the Federalists.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty close to the line from National Treasure 2, so upvote from me.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Upvote for knowing your history.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The CSA thought the federal government was growing too powerful, and wanted to preserve states' rights. The USA felt we are stronger as a

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

3) made an appeal against it to gain an edge. In the end, the Union winning the war made us one nation that happens to be subdivided into

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2) whole, and wished to stress the bonds uniting us. As is probably well-known by now, slavery was a minor issue until 1863, when the Union

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4) states, rather than an association of States that worked together as a nation. In the long run, I think it was the better choice, but it

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5) still lost some things in the process. (end)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Pretty close to the line from National Treasure 2, so upvote from me.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I talked to a few religious people about why they don't like gay marriage, their response was it says in the bible that marriage is between

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I bet those ppl don't mind eating shrimp, crab, or lobster though..which the Bible also says is a sin

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

When gat marriage was legalised in the UK, it didn't even make the front pages of the newspapers.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Married gats. So hot right now.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A man and a woman, and then they went on further to say that they dont mind them getting some form of a legal contract that makes them

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I want to see the bible "source" for that. What do they say when you point out that many leaders in the bible had many wives?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"Together" but call it something other than marriage.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Imo, i could careless personal relationships are just that personal they dont affect me so you do you boo boo

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why does the Bible matter, though? Hindus and Sikhs and Native Americans all have to follow the Bible now? It doesn't make sense.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

It matters to voters, so it matters to representatives who want those votes. That's democracy

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

(Not "why does the Bible matter in the history of human civilization?" Rather, "why does the Bible matter in the context of that comment?")

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When people want their ceremony in a church it should matter, if you want it done in a court/ without any sort of priest then i agree

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It shouldnt matter

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OK... Name a single gay/lesbian couple who forced an unwilling priest to perform a ceremony. (Pretty sure you can't.) Non-issue.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I mean there was/is a concern within DOD about chaplins being forced to provide services to LGBT folks.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well... the military is different. You tend to give up a lot of rights. Additionally, you'd have to be pretty self loathing to have someone

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cool story. But who's gonna pay for the highways?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

People who use it. It is feasible since the invention of toll road

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

14 Trillion dollars spent in the past 30 years on war, spend that money on Americans and not giving it to the heads of war companies

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Hahahaha overpaid union workers who don't really work on a scheudle

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The state you live in

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

California relies on good roads from there to say, New York, to ship their produce. Classic interstate commerce clause application.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I thought interstate highways got federal funding, though. There's one in my state that's 10 miles long and doesn't exit our state.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where will they get the money?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Taxes

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But the Christians aren't satisfied with just being Christians. Everyone has to be Christian. Therein lies the rub.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

lol wtf are you even talking about

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Non-Christians have to abide by the Bible. Look at the majority of US states for examples. Constitutional amendments based on Bible text...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The post implies everyone is doing their own thing. "Let Christians be Christians" is certainly not the way evangelical politicians see it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I think you have them confused with Islam whose leader requires members to fight until it is the ONLY religion on earth. Source, Quran

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Your head is in the sand. Look at Mike Pence, Mike Huckabee, Rick Allen, Chuck Grassley, and the upcoming Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I have never heard them advocating the extermination of anyone. Sources please.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

a) Already gave you a source and you ignored it. b) Congressmen - *inside* the chambers of Congress! - prayed to thank the Orlando shooter.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

c) Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, & Alabama still put gay/lesbians on the sex offender registry. Non-Christians have to follow the Bible.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Easier said than done because "freedom" is a moving target. What I see as freedom, someone else has a problem with.

9 years ago | Likes 229 Dislikes 11

it's pretty straight forward actually. freedom to do/believe what you want as long as you don't hurt anyone. NOT imposing your belief others

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ah,but if you have a gun you can go freedom hunting.Im not sure when the season runs though.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's fine. They're free to have a problem with "it." But you're still free to do / be / have "it."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolute freedom is an incredibly easy concept to understand. Some people are just ok with restricting other's freedom.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I go with the simple definition of liberty. Do whatever you want, only up to the point that it infringes on my right to do whatever I want

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Republican = economic freedom democrat = personal freedom I know this is really a huge generalization

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

LOL, yeah... a possible oversimplification.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

no freedom is complete without the freedom to bear the consequences.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

*consequence bear*

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Excellent xD

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Freedom to hear yes when they say no... :(

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As long as your friendly, I guess it's fine...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Freedom until you cut someone else's. It's actually quite simple.

9 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 12

exception situations, 1st trimester I don't have a problem with, 2nd trimester I'm unsure about but open to discussion on. That's just (2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Until someone says they should be "free to live in a world without guns / religion / homosexuality." Bad interpretation of "freedom" is bad.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"I should be free to live in a world where you don't have freedoms" Wow that was a hard argument to dissect and see the flaws in

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

My opinion. Making the laws fit my opinion of how it should work would probably feel to someone like their freedom is being shat on (3)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Feel free to tell me I'm wrong with this logic. I needz coffee still lol (4)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Does my freedom to pollute trump your freedom to environmental resources for generations to come?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

No.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

No.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Again, it's simple but not at the same time. A simple example: I think 3rd trimester abortions should be illegal except for the obvious (1)

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

Congrats, pretty much everyone and the law agree with you.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The argument with the term for abortion is when that fetus becomes "someone else" whose freedom you impinge upon.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I feel it is more if they can survive outside of their host then it is now considered a living thing and not a parasite

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably when they become conscious. Which according to the mirror test is like... a few months after birth. I don't like thinking about it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The inherent problem is that rights cannot be recognized without impinging/infringing on those of the mother. 1 of 2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's the philosophical underpinning of slavery... that some have rights at the expense go others. Anti-abortion = advocating slavery.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Third trimesters(in the US 43 states illegal) is practically illegal. Currently there are only 5 clinics and 4 doctors that perform 1/

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

3rd trimester abortions, most of which were wanted pregnancies, only done in emergency's. Just a little over 1 percent of U.S. abortions 2/

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

take place at any point after around five months (20 weeks) of pregnancy. The 3rd trimester starts at week 28. 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0