Servers down

Oct 13, 2025 3:25 PM

crcb

Views

940

Likes

37

Dislikes

11

They are forcing us to become dependent on something they control... 1984 anyone?

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I lose a little more faith in humanity every time I hear someone say "I asked ChatGPT/Grok"...

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I hate how I'm agreeing with what's basically an old boomer joke. The problem isn't that kids are always dumber than the last "great" generation, it's that they're going to be learning from a machine that hallucinates answers. With the right tools, many kids can be smart, but if you put garbage in, you get garbage out.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah yes. Perfect for the people who own chatgpt

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Asking an old person if you actually had to remember people's names back in the day is going to be the new asking if you actually had to memorize phone #'s.

5 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Bold of them to assume schools would still exist and the teachers would be human and not the AI itself just injecting false information directly to their brains.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could imagine memes like this from around 2000 but talking about doing basic math when their calculators aren't working.

I'm skeptical on AI, but the problem is the education system, not the students. Schools should be doing what schools in Finland do which is teach the benefits and limitations of AI as part of their comprehensive critical thinking education.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I teach post grad students at a university. my students are all law graduates and they all use Chat GPT to answer even the most basic class questions. The scary part is that they believe anything it tells them. Critical thinking is gone completely. The future is terrifying.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's insane. Sure, it might have an 80% success rate, but especially with law, if you get hit with that 20% hallucination, that's your job and your license. And when you're working on a large case with lots of questions for the AI, statistics are going to statistic. Hell, even if it was 99% successful, you're still going to have to review it all by hand, so you might as well have done it by hand.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, because looking stuff up on Google is way harder. And looking things up in an Encyclopedia was way harder. And going to the library to look up things was way harder. And asking people for information was way harder.

Nailed it.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Yes, LLMs are equivalent to encyclopedias. For sure.

5 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I wish this was wrong, but it is painfully correct. AI can be good, but people are using it as a crutch and not a learning tool

5 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Oh it's way worse than even that. They straight up are letting it run their lives, and make decisions. It's scary as fuck.

5 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I have a coworker that I’ve put a complete moratorium on working with for my own safety, because he is exactly this way. Tries to ask ChatGPT how to fix train tracks instead of actually doing any work.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are letting AI run their companies decisions *without even verifying the answers*.

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I've been asked how do I know this. I'll answer here for public self shaming: I'm an IT consultant, with AI certifications.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Then they complain when teachers call them on it in school. We are so fucked in a few years

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why are teachers "calling them on it" instead of teaching them about the benefits and limitations of AI?

Do they/you think shame is an effective teaching method for anyone?

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They aren't necessarily shaming them, just telling them they can't us AI to write their reports or answer test questions. Students are complaining that they should be able to.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sounds like teachers haven't adequately explained the limitations of AI and why it shouldn't be used.

"Because I said so" is not a good explanation.

Again, I think this is a problem with the educational system, not teachers or students being lazy or incompetent. We have to teach AI as part of critical thinking.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

He's got a point though, teachers should be able to offer examples of acceptable use of AI, like a student writing up a report, and having the ai check it for errors, and factuality. Keep it paragraph by paragraph. I've found they hallucinate if you combine multiple topics.

But yeah, I use AI before I submit reports to make sure my shit reads correctly, and is factually correct. ChatGPT does catch my mistakes when I make them on purpose or not. So I genuinely think it's a great study tool

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0