Ouch

Jan 31, 2017 11:16 AM

Neveroutgunned

Views

78779

Likes

1848

Dislikes

201

"You got ketchup for them harsh Browns you be serving" - piece of fucking shit ass monkey Newt Gingrich, probably.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

Newt Gringrich, you hefty bag of coleslaw.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Oooh, dang, hit him right in the Newticles!

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 12

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Wow, rough

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Damn.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

what's this shit? -1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Well, in his defense, she did have cancer

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Geez, sarcasm people!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 3, 2017 5:50 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Like Satan?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His name is "Newt Gri-Grinch" ?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Gingrich Unless you're making a joke that's going over my head

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I always upvote the Dowager Countess of Grantham!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The way Gingrich went from cabinet hopeful to spiteful reject and back to mindless lackey is fucking pathetic.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Newt is as big of an embarrasment as wasserman schultz

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For those wondering, Jackie Battley-wife 1 of 3-did not pass away from her cancer in 1980 but lived a long life, passing at age 77 in 2013.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

So did newt lose his wifey to cancer ? Is that the joke?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Could it be He fired his wife so she could collect unemployment. You can't get it if u quit right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Hi sincerely hope I will never accomplish anything in this life that would cause this rectal thermometer to praise me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

She was fired by god.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

The savagery is at unprecedented levels.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

Definitely over 9000.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Saving this gif.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Someone explain pls

9 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 5

Donald Trump is the president of the United States

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wait, how fuking long did I nap for? AGAIN seriously America wtf

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oooøœøooohhhh&hhhh

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He wants to protect the sanctity of heterosexual adultery.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

*Republican heterosexual adultery. Since he led the witchhunt against Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Thanks! Totally forgot about that.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

While with regards to Trump, he recently fired the acting Attorney General because they opposed his EO-based travel ban,

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Oh, I got that part. Thanks though

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, that's a nice spin and all but more accurately, she was fired for announcing the DOJ would not uphold Trump's travel ban. >>>

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

>>> Whether she agreed with the decision or not, she didn't have the authority to do what she did as acting AG. >>>

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

>>> I'm not saying either side is right. Honestly, right now, the US gov't is a train wreck (IMO).

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Here's an interesting video of the incoming AG and recently fired one: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4653581/yates-sessons-saying-president

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. The AG is supposed to uphold the law, not do Trump's bidding. She refused to enforce it because of legal concerns...that was her job.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The Justice Department OLC had reviewed it and found the executive order to be lawful before she announced that DOJ wasn't upholding it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

(1) She was right to do as she did (act in line w/ her judgement re: legality of Executive action) buuuuuut

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

(2) His dismissing her was absolutely OK (she served at the pleasure of the President). He was wrong, though, to say that she betrayed DOJ.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

(3) Dude really needs to learn that acting against his desires =/= betrayal or lack of patriotism.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Well-stated, and well-reasoned.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He won't stop this until the entire fucking government is full of spineless hamsters eager to do his bidding.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Newt Gingrich very publicly left his wife who was battling uterine cancer for a younger woman after being elected to Congress on a (1)

9 years ago | Likes 449 Dislikes 2

platform of "Christian Family Values." It's something that has dogged him his entire political career. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 409 Dislikes 3

What a giant piece of shit. .."Values" ...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fact he still has a career is bullshit...

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

He can't at least wait for her to die before replacing her? Holy shit, he's an asshole.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

While he won't admit to this, the story is that he had her sign the papers while sitting in a hospital bed undergoing treatment.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If he left his wife for another woman, usually you do have to sign papers saying "Fuck you, I'm leaving you" regardless why.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whaaaa?are you saying religious people are bunch of hypocrites.i'm shocked!

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 13

Mmmkay.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Well "religious people" sounds a little too inclusive. How bout we tone that down and just say we wanna punch Newt in the face?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

SHOCKED

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

As it should. Should have ended any political career IMO as a person with no moral compass shouldn't be in a position of that much power.

9 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 3

Maybe she was a fucking cunt and also had cancer? We don't know every detail do we? cancer doesn't mean a free pass either

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 14

(Disclaimer: Son of a survivor) Cancer is one of those trying times that really, really should bring a family together unconditionally.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

But the party of said 'Christian family values' doesn't really behave according to those values, they just use them to get votes.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 4

*obviously not everyone or even most the party, but some of its leaders do things that are simply not compatible with it.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Maybe his constituents have no morals or values themselves.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Welcome to America. Though, to be fair, he flamed out not too long after.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh wow, what a nice guy.

9 years ago | Likes 164 Dislikes 1

It actually gets better. He cheats on wife 2 w/ a girl 20 years younger, during the Lewinsky scandal.

9 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 0

When you say during, it's worth noting that he was Speaker of the House and thus heading the impeachment trial at the time.

9 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

He's also basically the one that created the divided Washington and made Dems "the enemy." Read his wiki page, he is slimy as all hell

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

And then there's George soros...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 19

I've had enough slime this month I'll take your word that Newt is in fact a reptile

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Attorney General isn't supposed to carry out Trumps wishes. They are supposed to uphold the law. They can't be "insubordinate"

9 years ago | Likes 659 Dislikes 31

Got fired for 'betrayal' no less

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They can be churlish, just not insubordinate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AG's are supposed to enforce the law. She literally gave no reason as to what words in the order we're unconstitutional. This was political

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

“no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.” 8 U.S.C. 1152

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

STEP INFRONT OF THE TRUMP TRAIN AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

It's unbelievable how big this is. It's a fucking outrage.

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 10

Her job is to faithfully execute the law if it's Constitutional. The Off. of Legal Council had a valid argument for constitutionality 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 but she refused to use it in the courts bc she disagreed with the order. I don't care for Trump but poor facts are what got us here.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She said it was unlawful, as in it conflicted with the law -not just the Constitution. Trump can't execute orders that conflict with the law

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She got fired, because he didn't like her decision... This isn't a business you can play like monopoly, Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 17

She even said when she was being confirmed she would do what the law and constitution state over what the president says. The person asking

9 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 3

about that? The new acting AG, Jeff Sessions.

9 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 0

An executive order is the law. The Atty Gen doesnt hold the authority to make judicial decisions. Only the courts do.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

You need to re-take 8th grade U.S. History class, the executive branch enforces the law, the legislative branch makes them, basic stuff.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, it's direction to his departments on how to carry out the law. He can't override the law though. Only Congress can do that.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You mean like how she refused to carry out the one Obama signed into law stopping people from 7 countries known to harbor terrorists?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 20

That's not even remotely the same thing. It wasn't a ban, was tied to a specific event, and congress had the power to expedite visas.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Trump's action is a blanket ban on any entry from non natural citizens, not tied to any specific event, with no process or exceptions.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are supposed to uphold the law. If they fail in that duty then the president can replace them.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 35

The president is not the law.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

I bet many that were calling Barry king for his EO usage thing Trump is the law now.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

He is able to act within the law and his order is lawful.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Absolutely debatable

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Which is what judges do. Which is why the attorney general refusing to even bring it before them is bad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You do realise that an executive order isn't the law, it has to comply with the law. It didn't, so she upheld the law and was removed

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 7

The order was well within the law.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Clearly not everyone agrees with you. It conflicts with other laws against discrimination based on religion and country of origin

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, it is entirely lawful. See past Supreme Court decisions, the Alien and Sedition Acts, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Trump changed the law or rather added to an already existing one and she didn't want to apply the law.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Trump does not possess authority to change a law, and ignore its conflict with other laws. Her actions were correct, it is the duty of the

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

attorney general to question the law and ensure it is correct, free of bias, and based on justice. Trump acted as a CEO...not President

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wasn't her job pretty much up for replacement anyway?

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

She was acting AG until they swear in Sessions, which makes it worse. She got fired for someone to take the job on for a few weeks.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, but she was still acting AG. And her job is literally to defend the constitution. Don angrily fired her for "betrayal" against himself.

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 6

And he didn't even try to hide it, he straight up says that's the reason. Shows how bad he is at this, he could have held his tongue and...

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

When your constituents have no values or morals you can do whatever you want.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Scary, but true, and we're seeing that now. Thankfully there's enough moderates who voted for him that are now distancing themselves...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...wait out for her to be replaced in the near future and not given us liberals a martyr for the cause. He's just that stupid, but I'm...

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

...happy that he is in this case.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Trump changed the law or rather added to an already existing one and she didn't want to apply the law.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Trump doesn't have authority to change one law so that it now conclicts with other laws. So she was correct in questioning it

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

We have checks and balances for a reason, Trump is not god-king of America

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

There were valid legal arguments from the Office of Legal Council, she just didn't want to apply them b/c she disagreed with the order.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

She got fired, because he didn't like her decision... This isn't a business you can play like monopoly, Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 14

Actually that's exactly what he thinks it is. The first POTUS to ever state he was going to make $$ from his term in office.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

It's a cabinet position. The cabinet is not a democracy. The president has the final say. I don't care for Trump but bad facts got us here.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It was a lawful. She had no right to send those orders...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 60

She's the head of the DOJ

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

She didn't send any orders, and it was HER JOB to speak out against his EO.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 5

They had to rescind her orders to DOJ lawyers to not defend the EO...those orders and defiance to a lawful eo is why she was justly fired...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 40

It's cool that people want to be involved in politics and discussions, but ffs educate yourself don't just guess what you think is right.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"the president did it" isn't the same as "lawful", remember Nixon?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

She literally decides what's lawful.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

The EO wasn't lawful according to the top justice official in the country.

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

The executive order was completely lawful.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 25

Not according to her. I give her more credibility on the law over your sources

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Tell that to John Adams, to FDR, and Obama, all three of which enacted similar legislation.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well I know you're lying about Obama. Can I just assume you're full of shit on the other two as well?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Look it up. The executive order is an extension and somewhat expansion of an Obama policy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't like to hear that. It wasn't a problem when Obama signed it into law and used it.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 14

He banned visa holders? Didn't think so....

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

He didn't use it to ban people that already had visa documents approved

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0