Republican Logic

Mar 1, 2017 9:25 PM

FakePlasticTreehugger

Views

130826

Likes

3384

Dislikes

458

'murica

For real though I would be FURIOUS if I found out my husband bought a $54 sword, at that price it's guaranteed to be a hunk of shit

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

apples and oranges

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I'd sing Sesame Street's "One of these things is not like the other" song, but they want to cut PBS, too.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No. Just that persons logic. Not the entirety of one side.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let me see, $75 Billion to educate or $54 Billion to figure out how to kill better when we already spend more on defense than any other.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

PSA: if you buy a sword for $54, maybe don't hit anything with it unless your country has free healthcare.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Maybe we wouldn't need to spend do much if we didn't need to protect the rest of the free world.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Read the tweet and laughed. Read the quoted part and laughed even harder.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Mass amounts of the Selfish gene.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just use realpolitik: If you don't invest in those colleges, you'll lose the arms race down the line.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Typical American Political logic: Bitch about where the $$ is allotted too, but don't worry about waste and abuse when it gets there?!?!?!?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is one of the worst comparisons I've ever seen.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

People get upset over 54B and say nothing when the Pentagon can't account for 3T.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

But they did have a problem with it; that's why Hillary ran, not Sanders...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yeah. If only we led the world in education spending, by an enormous amount...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am def. for making college cheaper. i dont think i am for making them free. People with college degrees earn more but 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

they still shouldnt come out with 50k+ in debt

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But... b-but... v

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 8

Is that sped up, or was he that cocainely spastic?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It does look a bit sped up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dunno. His thoughts are spastic, why not movements?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"We need to increase defense spending" country that already spends more than the next 10 countries combined

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Blow people up, educate people... can't decide. Lets do both. Wheres that kid who makes digital clocks

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

He emigrated once his work was done lol. No joke

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a professor, found fully 1/4 of students just would not do the work - period. Another quarter clearly weren't going to graduate. Waste.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

"That one guy isn't doing his work! Better not help those other three, or the one might get away with it!"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That works both ways had plenty of professors that couldnt give a rats ass about teaching and had adjunct professors that could barely teach

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but libtards! PC culture! SJWs! THEY TOOK OUR JOBS! It's less important to stand for something than to stand against something.

9 years ago | Likes 245 Dislikes 58

You forgot one:

9 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 4

goddamn cuckflakes

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You forgot *clears throat* "FAKE NEWS!"

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

All cucks

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Than providing jobs, tech, structure, etc

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Dont forget snowflakes!

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

That's right. I still think it's funny anyone calls me a snowflake. I'm not a little fella. I actually realized that most /1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

(and I mean by a narrow margin) Conservatives I know are physically weaker and less healthy than most Liberals I know. Even adjusted for age

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Humans in general are biased towards negative emotions.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tbh, if Sanders presented the budget for free higher ED, it would get shot down in a second by both sides.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

lol... education. Who needs it rght?

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 12

I don't need no education

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You don't need no thought control?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We already have it, though.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Shit, what third world state do you live in that doesn't have schools? Oklahoma?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Wot in replied to wrong commentation. Thanks Ob..Trum... Imgur!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the US military defends all the nato alliance. as all the others have nearly abdicated their own duty to protect their own property. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

OH you meant he one trump doesn't give a fuck about?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

One person out of 52k who gets it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

this allows those countries spend what otherwise would be on defense on their social programs which are awful if over 40.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

US mil. spending: 3.3% of GDP; UK: 2%, France 2.1%, most others close to that mark. They're spending plenty compared to everyone except us.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

u.s. gdp=18.5 trillion German=4tril u.k=2.65tril fran=2.48tril . the US is paying for their defense

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2/2 Besides, Trump is not exactly a staunch supporter of the transatlantic alliance, he's not spending more to protect Europe.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But you need the sword to defend those valuable vegetables from THEM. Are you forgetting about how bad THEY are?

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 10

So bad that the 39 swords you already have are insufficient.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's the governments first responsibility to protect the country. It has no responsibility to pay for anybody's college education.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 25

They're already doing that. It's already got an enormous budget. Why does it need more?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Oh? What is the threat to the US that justifies its defense expending being bigger than several of its first world allies combined?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

China, Iran, North Korea, ISIS. I think the US is just in having a larger military budget, however, I think its already big enough as is.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That's not how defense spending works. Once the threat materializes there is no time to play catch up.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Ah common sense, so refreshing

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Not to mention, you talk as if the entirety of the military budget was actively to "protect the country". It isn't. A large part of it

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

actually goes into research of new weapon. Weapons that very often ends up being just expensive waste of time and resources.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

And also keep the US on top militarily, which is the point. It costs money to have things first, less to drag along behind.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

The fact that several of our first world allies under shoot their EU military budgets and we're stuck reinforcing them from small dictators.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Because they had too little, like you said. Theyunder shoot it. There is also such a thing as "over shoot it". /1

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Don't get me wrong. Of course Defense Budget is important, but so is moderation. /2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well I doubt Europe has too little to meet their defense budgets. Their GDP is greater than the US's. In terms of military size, the 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would we buy books and educate our citizens to long term better the country, when we can just destroy the world.

9 years ago | Likes 470 Dislikes 33

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 2

Because when kids are properly educated, they might realize that army is a pretty lousy career choice.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Blood for the blood god

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Someone convince the republicans that college is a defense appropriation.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My main problem with it is that we already have more than enough military, why spend more? Just make it more efficient.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be fair.. America is basically the world police, and allot of other countries rely on Americans for that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If we make da utter people dumb den dat means we the smarter wons.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

More educated people, less mercenaries fighting, that's no good.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Assuming those people who go to college do so for useful degrees

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Need the picture of the guy that's pointing at his head that's not Eddie Murphy but kinda looks like him.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless you are going to require the students to get minimum grades, free college is absolutely no guarantee that anyone gets educated.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

We don't need free collage, we need laws against treating education as a product that's main goal is to make money and not educate

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I think we need both. One ensures equality and the other ensures skilled people. Investing in education always pays off.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And Crack down on book publishers who jack up the price or their books

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why buy groceries to survive, when we can just destroy the world desu

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is kind of incredible how much money the US spends on "defense" when they have never really been attacked by a militar force since /1

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

thats why we haven't. .been..attacked. we build them so as to never have to use them.watch any nature show. better creatures win

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

I agree. I feel like we should cut back on NATO. We really don't need take 70% of the bill. Europe needs to contribute more!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

the revolution. There has to be a limit for "better safe than sorry". /2

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

TIL the war of 1812 didn't happen

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its about the Military Industrial Complex. We sell weapons to other countries after we develop better ones

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i would prefer to think of it as helping friends so thay could help you if you get knocked down. it can happen. if so,we gona need friends

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we are also selling to Iran Afganistan and other potential enemy's

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a pretty bad example, imo, for all we know the defense budget might be exactly what's preventing attacks

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

What about all those countries who don't have the absurd "defense" expenses and haven't been attacked either?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

TIL The attack by Japan on Pearl Harbor was either not done by a military force or happened before the revolution.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I was about to say hahaha

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Touché. Attacked once since the revolution.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

What about 1812? (Though admittedly we picked that fight)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 times. 1 by the japanese, one by alqueda, and the Boston marathon.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Right? May as well go out with a bang.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How DARE someone try and spend money to make people's lives better when there are still tanks we haven't bought!

9 years ago | Likes 1443 Dislikes 87

WE HAVE TO PREPARE TO BE ABLE TO KILL HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE RELLY FAST

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not governments job to pay for peoples college. It is to defend tho (even if i don't agree with that much)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

The amount of taxes $75B in post-secondary education investment would more than pay for itself and those tanks, as well.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not all about buying tickle dick. It's more about infastructure for things we have.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

If you let anyone get proper education, how will the privileged kids maintain their "deserved" status ? (Social reproduction, P. Bourdieu)

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 8

Yes. How fucking dare we make a family without children pay for someone else's education, or struggling college students for others.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*black/white image of a tank* Every year, thousands of tanks are left unbuilt due to lack of funds. *in the arrrrrms oooof the aaaaangels*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Afaik most money spent in US defense goes pretty much directly to the economy, since most materials and jobs are from US.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but he's gonna make the lives better for the few dozen people who build the tanks. much more rewarding than educating thousands.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

There are WHOLE countries that we haven't bombed yet!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why give out free education when an increased defense budget pays tuition for those that have given back to the US people

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 23

I'm sorry you have. Negative points on this....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US spends more on education (local, state, federal) as percentage of GDP than on defense.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

IIRC total GDP spent towards defense is 2.5%

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I don't think that's true at all.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

That's good.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Education spending is 6.4% of GDP. Defense is 3.5%. Education spending should still be higher than 6.4%.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

More college degrees = increased supply and value drops. Simple economics. Yes, I am college educated

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 17

That doesn't make you right. More educated populace = more productive populace.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Not really

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Not if the majority of those looking to get an education study something like liberal arts. Depending onthe field college may not be best 1/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

You don't necessarily need a degree to learn to work. Ie. Experience might be a better teacher than a classroom in something like sales...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Because social sciences don't provide jobs? Wtf dude?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Never said that they don't. The reality is that people don't usually work in the field that they are trained in. Automation will replace /

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

lol youre a fool if you believe that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

oh, shit. i just realized that they're gonna build the wall out of unused tanks!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

We're gonna build a great wall.. no, scratch that, the GREATEST wall! A wall made out of M1 Abrams!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"we have enough tanks" - the military. "nonsense, if we don't spend the money on you we might have to help people" - Republicans

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

Not tanks, the F-35, only chosen because it's cheaper than the f-23 while the F-22 is far better and approaching the same price.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Besides, I own a LOT of stock in these companies" - republicans

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

If we don't by those tanks from general dynamics then how are they gonna pay their factory workers! They'll have to shift their business 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 10

My buddy works for General Dynamics! They have been letting people go like crazy the last 2 years. Im guessing thats going to change now...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I can't WAIT until we protect our freedoms by using those tanks to kill brown people on a different continent! Freedom isn't free!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Sweden might need some help.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Model to something crazy like clean energy and we all no there's no future in that right, or so the oil lobbyists tell me.

9 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 10

There is no future in anything as far as the physics theory of universal entropy is concerned.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 6

I was just sitting here eating mac and cheese but now I think I'll just end it all...

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

i mean... heat death's billions of years away.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Billions of billions of billions of billions of billions etc...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do you believe the universe is a closed system?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Read it as General Atomics, then everything sounded like Mr Gutsy in my head.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why are we not funding this!?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't support the defence budget increase, but defence is a way more important part of government than free college

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

I like your point of view.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You'll have state of the art weaponsystems but nobody smart enough to operate them or stop cyber- bio- or chemical attacks

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't be an officer without a higher level degree. And the richest country in the world can support both education and military.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

There are these wonderful things called scholarships...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Scholarships are wonderful, however there are only so many. You'll eventually run into the dilemma of someone stuck between two choices 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

of someone choosing their scholarship to benefit the military or to benefit the economy directly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I chose mine to benefit myself... sooooooo where is this dilemma you speak of

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Get a job you sparkling wiggle

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

To be fair, buying a katana that costs $54 is a horrible fucking idea.

9 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 11

There are replica weapon stores that sell "functional" swords for like 20$. They sometimes have discount bins.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i don't see how buying a katana can ever be a bad idea

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I beg to differ. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s0dRcdyizU

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

well the bad idea there was hitting a table with a katana

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Actually it was hitting a table with a $44 katana.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's the point

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 6

I'm honestly not sure what the point of this image is. Can you explain it for me? :|

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah, but I meant outside the relative price discussion here. I know plenty of people who think flea-market bargain blades are usable.lol

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

What exactly are you using the blades for?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Friend of mine tried cutting some stuff in his backyard. I think some water jugs and small branches. Handle broke. All the cheap ones break.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

A $54 sword is decorative, intended for display. A basic blade of a couple of feet doesn't get "usable" until $150+.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Anything fancier is, of course, handily exceeding that. That's a rule of thumb as I understand it, anyway. I don't buy swords.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 17, 2022 6:08 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0