Net Neutrality Isn't A Hypothetical

Nov 25, 2017 8:46 AM

BeardedCoffeeMonkey

Views

143310

Likes

2326

Dislikes

86

The telecoms have already tried shit in the past and been stopped. What makes you think they won't do it again if given free reign?

My book budget is going to get an increase if this crap happens

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Didn't AT&T just try to buy Time Warner for $85B? I feel like this is relevant somehow so I thought I'd mention

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

When will the private sector start charging US citizens for the air they breathe? At the rate things are going there, it can't be far off.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Please repost this often

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of the old AOL days, you paid so much for their service, but if you wanted to go into the chat room you had to pay more.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Holy shit is this new?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is there no alternative to these cunt telecoms giants?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trying to send texts like..

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2017 Comcast denies that they throttle back bandwidth to residential customers to provide extra bandwidth to business class customers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that finger though

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m a noob. Sorry. Serious question, tho. Don’t those companies own the infrastructure? I actually don’t know, but want to know.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Virgin Media gives me free data for twitter and whatsapp lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Run into yet another net neutrality post:

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Soooo... Why is your phone giving you the bird?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So werent most if not all of tgese blocked/fined and reversed without the net neutrality title 2?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You all have been owned by telecom for some time, you are about to get super-owned.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not to be that guy but they've been stopped every time. What's to say they won't keep being stopped without NN?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only rule that is being taken away is from 2015... This post doesn't help the argument

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's insurrect if they shoot down net neutrality I'm done with all this political bullshit time for a good ol revolution my dudes

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Or you could just vote Democrat, since they are the ones that enforced NN and they oppose efforts to repeal it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Nah our 2 party system is busted we need more

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Oh god you're one of them. One party is fucking me in the ass and the other one isn't perfect. Revolution!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

This how thing is so corrupt and it makes me so angry! I thought the US was a civilized country but its run by corporates instead of the gov

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Net neutrality is equal to free speech. How can there be free speech if corporates decide what we read and see?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No. 'Freedom of Speech' is exclusively freedom from limitations and retaliation by governmental forces. It is not applicable here.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This would be comparable to the great firewall of China. This is what happens if you put corporate people in charge of the country

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i guess I can start birdwatching or something.

8 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 1

In Soviet Russia, bird watch you!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

This internet is a train wreck anyway. Good riddance to it. We'll make a new internet. With hookers and blackjack.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

But this one already had blackjack and hookers...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The internet will become like cable: there'll be only a few hundred websites you can go to, all of which are chosen by your isp

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hear there are these things made out of wood pulp with ink on it

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gotta pay if you want to see twitters

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess I can send letters to my friends with Polaroids.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Will we all have to become hipsters?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

What if you used VPN?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Even the use of Tor can be blocked now, there is really no way out of it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Block vpn connections. Happens all the time. Xc

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Same goes for the TOR network.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Depends what protocol. GRE, PPTP and L2TP can be easily blocked by ISPs since they operate on specific ports. You can configure your...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... Router with openvpn on basic tcp/udp ports to get around most isp blocks and authenticate over ssh or ssl to access what you want...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... The problem is the traffic is slow

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a toll booth at your house, and at the grocery. Just because you stop at the gas station doesn't mean you don't go to the grocery.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The VPN still has to make the request to the website and THAT lane can be slowed down can't it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically, yes. YOUR connection can be slowed, and THEIR connection can be slowed; using a different middle doesn't change that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Based on username I don't know whether to trust you...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

→→it basically means if the server is with the host's competition, they can slow it to a crawl, just like they can slow you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just remember, this is the shit that they have been caught doing. Imagine the other shit that has not yet come to light.

8 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 1

I remember during my training at cockmast, we talked about how the isp big wigs get together once a year to discuss which territories...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... The ISPs will take and who gets what. This effectively kills any competition between big ISPs and is illegal. But of course there's...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No proof. Just the word of my trainer

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After my mom got unlimited data with verizon i started using my hotspot to play games online (i live out in the sticks no other options) 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And when i reached about 80 gigs used on my phone verizon threatened to drop our data below 3g. I forget what they called it but 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing would load. Not imgur or youtube or even clash of clans would work. Then my ma called them and sorted stuff out 3/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But Im sure as soon as NN is gone Im screwed. I guess unlimited data is limited at about 80 gigs when you have verizon

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It‘s called fair usage policy, there‘s a limit to what you can download. I agree calling it unlimited is misleading but all contracts got it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also today, Trump put his deregulation fuckwit in charge of the CFPB. It's like we're about to be fucked with sandpaper and alcohol.

8 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 7

I can't say it's incompetence anymore; it has to be just flat-out malice to keep appointing people as agency heads that hate the agency.

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 2

Greed, malice, evil- call it what you want. It adds up to the most corrupt government in our lifetime. Maybe ever.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Corrupt American government, yeah. Tame if you include third-world dictatorships, but for America's short history, it's atrocious.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yeah. What pisses me off is how brazen it is- they know they have no checks or balances just now and they just flaunt corruption as freedom.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's greed. Always has been. He's not a total idiot. He has some vague idea of 'want money'

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

It's not malice. Just money.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I would argue greed falls under the "malice" heading.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Yep. Trump is making things better. That swamp is sure drained.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

That man is a joke and tells lies or just plain wrong things every day. How anyone can take him serious is beyond me.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't know what the people that voted him in expected.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He promised to put the boot in on the blacks and muslims."He hates the people I hate. Give me the damn ballot!"

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Buttery males

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now that's a fresh reference

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Net neutrality regulations were implemented in 2015.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

The communications act of 1934 set the ground rules for telephone services, the Telcom act of 1996 extended that to ISPs. (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

The 2015 regulations were just explicitly outlining additional rules on top of all of that.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

So, since the frame work to stop abuses has been in place since ‘34 the Net Neutrality regs would seem superfluous. And a power grab...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

The problem is actually even bigger. The ISPs (att in particular) are trying to subvert the original regs permanently by forcing a new class

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

telephone carriers fall under "title-2", but 'broadband carriers' are in a grey area. This entire circus is to avoid having that label apply

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Seriusly, fuuuuck the telecoms. In every country, they’re the worst. People really need to unite over this. Freedom is at stake

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

I wonder if this infringes on freedom of assembly in the same way the poll tax interfered with voting rights. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You know they'll take down forums with dissenting opinions. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wasn't it 2013-2014 when Comcast throttled connections to Netflix until they coughed up more money?

8 years ago | Likes 466 Dislikes 0

There's more rational to the story than just that but yes

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Got any peer reviewed academic sources to back up that ridiculous claim?

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 122

this is a troll account, look at his history. ignore him.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Username checks out.

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

/a/9YvCX graph is from Washington Post, but you don’t generally get “peer reviewed” for non-academic reports.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

I’ve added a link above. Basically, Comcast and others refused to upgrade a very minor piece of equipment to connect with backbone providers

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jan 20, 2018 12:17 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Because that's what their customers pay them for

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It’s not Netflix’s traffic, it is Comcast’s clients’. Netflix already paid their ISP. Comcast agreed to provide their clients their request

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Jesus dude you can just Google it no need to go all scholar on us

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

They're not a scholar. Just a moron with a schtick phrase that has netted them no favor.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

You can’t just pull a statement out of your ass an claim its true. You need hard data

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 33

Yes I can.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He says effectively pulling a statement out of his ass by claiming you need analytical data for anything to be true

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You can’t just drag your scrotum on my face and call it a breakthrough

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 21

Probably just some annoying college kid.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Notice how some ISPs actually *weren't evil*? If the regulatory framework allowed for actual competition...

8 years ago | Likes 148 Dislikes 0

Then the evil ones would go out of business, their executives would find jobs in the non-evil ones, and those ones would become evil. Genius

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Wait, when has Cox not been shit?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What happened in September?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Half the isps realised they could squeeze money out of Netflix by holding their service hostage

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cablevision is separate now? Interesting...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is the real solution. Stop local government from giving ISPs monopolies and ISPs couldn't do this kind of shit

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 5

Not really. The startup costs for an ISP are all too high when including laying down cable. The "deals" are to stop new ISPs from instantly-

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

-going bankrupt due to not enough profits.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It needs to be both. Neutrality needs to be safeguarded and labeled as a utility.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

This horseshit situation where there's only one cable company in your area is largely driven by minimum access laws and other gov't policy->

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

which the cable company will of course use to beat down anyone else who wants to expand in their area. Worse, two cable companies will->

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1