Map of First Nations

Aug 11, 2021 8:23 AM

possiblyafakeaccount

Views

111442

Likes

3055

Dislikes

79

American genocide

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

divided by language not borders

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Native-land.ca has an updated world map of indigenous tribes.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

that was really neat. Thank you for sharing. I used to live in South Dakota and I remember some of the names of the peoples there.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That map resolution is as low as their chances of survival.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Worth a look. https://native-land.ca/

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

very worth a look. very detailed.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Much better

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be clear on what this represents: these are the major linguistic groups of North America, that is, the ensembles of languages that are>

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

thought to be related to each other in the way Italian is related to Spanish or Russian is related to Polish, and the map represents the>

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

distribution *at the time of European first contact*, which means that the map is almost certainly anachronistic, as the west and east of >

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

the map are distant in time by several decades at least.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

How do you know they were the first ????

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Anyone have a version of this with more pixels?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did they eat all the pixels?

4 years ago | Likes 260 Dislikes 6

Yo, i was told by Civ5 that Iroquis were a thing but i cant find them here cuz of that...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Iroquois were a nation of several tribes who worked and allied together, not just one. Nations that made them up are there, like the Mohawk.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wasting nothing, every part of the pixel was used. Often paired with corn, or as the indians called it "maize"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Only someone under 25 bitches about pixels. We were born with SD, molded by it. I didn't see HD until I was already a man! *Bane Mask On*

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm nearly 60 - perhaps I just act under 25.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah, you just complain about the pixels because you thought you were looking at the picture without your glasses on

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The pixels were encouraged to move west. They're in Oklahoma.

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

"Oklahoma, where the pixels come sweepin' down the plain"

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Where are the puebloans?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I really want to know more, maybe somebody can link me up with some more pixels?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don’t get the colour coding… Cree and Blackfoot aren’t traditionally allies, for instance, why are they both green?

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

I read the map based on the key and it doesn't seem to imply anything about alliances or ownership of land where do you get that?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Sure they were! Just like the Mayans had a mighty Empire that reached all the way to Alaska!

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Looks like it is based on linguistic groups if I can see the 5 pixels correctly. Bottom left.

4 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

Hard to make out with the poor resolution, but it looks like the color coding is based on lingual roots. Maybe.

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

The green represents the major linguistic group known as 'other'

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Further south, yes, but the Cree/Blackfoot shade of green is the Algonquian language family.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The same green the Aztecs occupy stretches up to Alaska

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, "other", but it is a different shade of green than the one being referred to.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As per my other comment, Algonquin looks more goldenrod than green

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Algonquin language family is more of a goldenrod, anyways

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know what you mean by "goldenrod", but Algonquian is a pretty well-supported First Nations language family.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The colour. The colour used on the map is more of a goldenrod than green. Goldenrod refers to a colour.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#LandBack

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They moved around a lot. And the Kiowa had more territory that the map indicates…

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I am confused about the Miami though. Is that accurate? If so, how did the city get named Miami all the way down there? I'm missing somethin

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This map is based on linguistic families

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Map of America

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

*Map of First Nations linguistic groups of North America, pre colonization.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There is a lot wrong with this map that I can't even begin to start with using 140 characters.

4 years ago | Likes 122 Dislikes 2

The Inuit didn’t call themselves “Southampton Eskimo”???

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My wife is Cree, her first words...that's not Blackfoot Territory...that's Plains Cree Territory! Her eyes...fiery!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't even find the Navajo nation at all...

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's there just to the left of apache

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

susquahanocks should be here ny the delawares

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

by*

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For starters you can barely read it.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

it helps to note that its not a map of tribes or territories but rather linguistic groups. post's title is unclear

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Note: the map itself reads major language groups (not nations). Beyond that i don't know enough to comment on the accuracy of the map.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

The Cree and Blackfoot were not the same nation living peacefully? Yeah, I started to type stuff out too but bailed 141 char in.

4 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

wheres the susquahanocks? i only know thats wrong for sure

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think this is misstitled, this is more of a language group map rather than a tribal map. Also it seems way out of date

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Add to this that 'nation' is a quite unfitting shoehorned term for tribe. It's not a derogatory term, it's a different form of organization.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

First Nations is the preferred term for Native Americans in Canada. It's the term they chose themselves and a choice I try to respect.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Fair point. Given 'nation' doesn't have an empirically useful application anyways. I just think it's better to not go down that dead end.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Iirc they chose that term as they felt the plural of nations better represented the diversity of tribes and cultures. But yeah

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which language group doesn't share similar roots?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The term you're looking for is Linguistic Isolates, and they're common. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_isolate

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Welsh

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

welsh doesn't seem to be depicted anywhere on the map of native North American languages.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even within specific regions. Where are the pueblo and o’odam, why are the diné not colored Athapaskan, where are the yavapai etc.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I think this is misstitled, this is more of a language group map rather than a tribal map. Unless are those unique language groups? Idk

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Dine are Athapaskan showing Algonquin, yavapai are uto-aztecan showing Algonquin, as are puebloans who are labeled as Athapaskan

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Correction, Hopi are uto Aztecan and other pueblos are tanoan, probably due to the influx of southern tribes into Hopi back in the day

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whoa that's amazing that the Hopi are part of that language group! Thank for that info

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imagine if the US government had been presented with as smaller local version of this map and signed treaties to recognize tribal land.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Oh... wait... they did, several times, and then just ignored that they signed those treaties and claimed the land as US territory.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

It's Inuit, not Eskimo.

4 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 25

Why are you fighting someone else's fight without even knowing the stakes?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

No shit right. But it looks old.

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Was gonna say, this map is obv outdated and some of the labelled names are offensive.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its also Mi'kmaq not Micmac (east coast)

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And Innu, not montagnais

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There were just as many varied tribes in AK as any part of the americas, this map just doesn't want to show it

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Sioux is the Ojibwa word for "little snakes", their enemy. Why not just say Lakota/Dakota/Nakota?

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Because this map is wildly inaccurate.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

hahaha you got outwoked in the replies.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 16

I'm thinking many of these names are exonyms because obviously foreign words are just too hard sometimes!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Aha! I nu it!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, and « Montagnais » should most likely be « Innu », and I think « Algonquin » is corrected to « Anishnabeg » now. It’s an old map…

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Theres no susquahanocks on there, I live near their territory

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember seeing this in school (Ontario) at least 20+ years ago, so it's probably at least 30 years old.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

The line from the song mentions "it's nobody's business but the Turks"; I get the joke, but "it's nobody's business but the Inuits", here.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

yes very inuitively

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Eskimo describes a collection of peoples, like how Scandinavian describes people from Scandinavia

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Nkt really. 'Eskimo' is a Cree term used to describe them. It means something like "raw meat eater."

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes, i was going to say that. and they took it as an insult

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, we know that the current people living in the arctic were not the "first": they displaced the Dorset culture about 1000 years ago.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Your point? It's a map of the native cultures at tone of colonization

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

My point is that it was/is a dynamic situation. BTW the Dorset were still there when the Norse came, so which colonization?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Oh look, it's an idiot!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

Dude you always take the dumbest fucking positions in comment threads.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Inuit also didn't historically live that far north. Canada moved them up there in order to have a stronger claim to the arctic.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There were more people living in North America than all of Europe when the Colonizers arrived.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

So I guess no sauce...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sauce?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I like to play these in EU4

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Europeans: v

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Italian

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes was an Italian actor! There's another actor that plays a really good Hispanic Thug, but he's not Hispanic. Can't remember either name.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cliff Curtis? He’s from New Zealand

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So much genocide against them from the immigrants who these days continue the genocide while complaining about other immigrants,USA at least

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Here is our map of First Nations: https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/map-indigenous-australia

4 years ago | Likes 314 Dislikes 5

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the wrong side up

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thx for posting!!! i feel slightly less ignorant (slightly) :)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

God damn

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s really cool. Do you know what the dead people name/voice/image warning is about?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a standard warning on any media related to First Nations in Australia. Images or names of recently deceased are a cultural taboo.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you, had no idea!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s rad, I didn’t realize there were so many tribes

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heheh... Peerapper.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neat!

4 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

This is incredible! Thank you.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and then the poms arrived and started genociding.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We gave it the hug of death

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dooot

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People live in the middle part?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought Waka Waka was just something Fozzy Bear said. Didn’t know it was an indigenous Australian tribe

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Quite a few Aboriginal names are doubled words. Also, just about any Aboriginal place name ending in 'up' means water can be found there.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I have a good friend (& her family) from Grong Grong, just outside Wagga Wagga! I beg for fridge magnets & tshirts every time they go lol

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I was Gunna post the same thing.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Some of those areas are in the middle of nowhere. Couldn't imagine living there with modern amenities, let alone 40,000 years ago.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Well if you just imagine some of the toughest people on the planet it becomes clearer.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They had a much more accepting culture. We have what we have, and that's fine. Had little use for gifts from explorers, leading to confusion

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Interesting I didn’t assume they would of been one people, but that amount of different groups I did not envision

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's important to note that lines weren't quite like this. Some groups shared resources and move around. In QLD, many would travel to a

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

massive Bunya tree and share the fat-filled nuts as a big occassion. It makes native titles hard, because there weren't strict boundry lines

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

definitely especially in a land as arid as Australia you’d have a lot of migratory people, I was just surprised at so much differentiation

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Of cultural groups for them to be able to separate them by name

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I didnt think anyone ever really lived in the middle/western Oz. I kinda figured original people stuck to coasts as well.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They inhabited the whole place. Local languages and customs are better preserved in those areas westerners didn't colonise.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Makes sense since colonizers only take land they can easily use, but how locals lived from all that so-called useless desert is beyond me.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any idea what drives the frequent use of double words....like Waka Waka?

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It usually implies either a plural or an intensifier. Wagga means crow, the town of Wagga Wagga means many crows.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Thanks for my new neato-fact of the day!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are many crows in Wagga Wagga. We have the word wirra meaning bush. So wirra wirra means lots of bush. This is in Kuarna

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cool. So that's why the brewery there is called the thirsty crow

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"We... don't go to Wagga Wagga Wagga Wagga any more."

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's crazy that the Apache language is in the same group as the one way up in Canada. Wonder how that happened.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's weird, Navajo is part of the Athabaskan linguistic group.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Migration, same way Finnish is related to Hungarian and German to Afrikaans

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I always thought the root of Afrikaans was Dutch, I guess German would be a parent of Dutch too though

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The root is Dutch, I said related not descended. German and Dutch have a shared ancestor but neither is descended from the other.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course, but I'm more curious about the actual history that led to this language group being so geographically separated.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We don't know for sure but the Pueblos make mention of their 'invasion'.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ohhh thats why there is a university of Miami in Ohio

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay, then why is there a city of Miami in Florida? I'm still confused on that one.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

when the spanish arrived, lake Okeechobee was called Mayaimi by the locals, which meant very large. so they called the river Miami

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and then the city was called Miami. so just a coincidence I guess?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Spell check cannot figure it out but the Spanish and the English merged local words. So that probably is true.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's Mi'kmaq not Micmac

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

English isn't known for it's accuracy. Do you know what "Hungarian" sounds like in Hungarian? "German" in German? "Japanese" in Japanese?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never understood why English was so frustrating to learn as a 2nd language for migrants until I realized that it's just a mishmash of

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Vowel and consonant sounds from other languages. And without those accent marks how are you supposed to know how to pronounce it? I have

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Much more patience with ESL speakers now.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A lot of countries call the Netherlands Holland in their own language.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, Hungarian and German are both guilty on that one. I wonder what the history of that is.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Denmark too. It is because Holland was a very successful economic and maritime power in the region.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My major problem is that we've pretended that this isn't our entire human history. We pretend we aren't fucking barbarians.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

In Europe, they get to pretend it's ancient history. I think it's a little more in our face here in the Western Hemisphere.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think they get to pretend in Europe either, Hitler killed a fuck ton of people for fun.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

like super dumb, like maybe the toilet has cut the blood flow off to my brain instead of my legs, dumb.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jesus, did I breathe this morning ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a good point, ironically I had forgotten that! I feel really dumb right now ?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

xD dooon't, I'm just bein' silly. I just enjoy the observation of society's mentality that we're soooooo advanced and civilized.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the jolly giggle though. I have been really struggling and I needed that!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0