This will limit poor people from getting food

Feb 14, 2018 1:04 AM

Dionysianmasks

Views

2655

Likes

84

Dislikes

46

https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2018/02/12/585130274/trump-administration-wants-to-decide-what-food-snap-recipients-will-get

8&9 omitted cause people find one questionable thing and dismiss all other concerns.

Hunger free America doesn't want this, President of WIC says its bad idea.

The poor are people too and deserve to choose between the cheapest stock available like you would deserve if you were poor.

This looks like communism, but is pushed by a republican.

These were all very good question on a topic that affects me 0%

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's so bad and fucked up it will succeed with the Republicans.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 8

I’m positive crooked politicians would take advantage of this program. But if not I feel like it would be worth exploring.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If anyone cares to argue that this has any merit at all. Please PM me. I'd love to hear from you.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Here's your box of soylent green. Stop whining and try to be more bootstrappy next time.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

22% more people flavor, right on!

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

It's almost like they're purposefully trying to destroy our country. Don't even get me started on Betsy Devos and her cuts to education...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It does seem that and even worse when you consider trump influence by Russia. It sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it's also kinda obviou

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm all for reform that helps SNAP recipients eat healthier... but after seeing Trump handle PR I see rich people profiting off the poor.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Over and over again cousin.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Since SNAP goes to lower income folks, what are they supposed to do when it's STOLEN off their doorstep?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Diet

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Dark humor is a lot like food, not everyone gets it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

"American poor people aren't wretched enough!" ~says President

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

I'll take this moment to invite anyone thinking poor people are getting too much money to try the SNAP Challenge for themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

Why should the government be obligated to take care of poor people? Aren't there plenty of independent programs that work better?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Taxes are the dividends the government collects for investing in its people. It can't withdraw its investment and still continue to collect.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. It's the governments job because they represent those poor people. Are you serious?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Who is the food bought from, and which gov't agent gets to make that choice? Sounds like a great chance for more cronyism.

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 4

I've read the NPR article, it realllly looks like General Mills had a hand in it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a chance for the government to involve itself in farm price fixing, nothing more nothing less. Huge markets have one more buyer

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

All that idiot would have to do is shut the fuck up and not do any fucking thing at all and he'd get my approval. But nooooo.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Anybody remember the (justified, IMHO) outrage over "Michelle Obama lunches"? Google that if you forgotten already.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or the equally justified outrage over schools throwing away children's lunches they brought from home because "they weren't healthy"?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is not about healthy. "healthy" is just to f you from the fact they're cutting funding by half. With no back up plan.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's what it is, a petty, pointless "fuck you".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll agree the logistics on this are pretty bad, but god forbid people want their tax dollars meant to feed people to be used wisely.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 18

Exactly, they won't starve but they aren't getting lobster either

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

This is not a plan for spending wisely. It's a call to the pork barrel.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

As usual with this administration it’s “proposal” is seriously lacking on details so it’s highly questionable that it will actually save 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

money and is likely to create more problems.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you're going to take that tack, consider: who has better knowledge/judgement about what the poor need? A politician in DC...

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Or the person who actually knows what their exact situation is

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

This is exactly the kind of govt overreach the GOP claim to care about, but implement as soon as they have the chance.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

so they can say `see, govt doesnt work'.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's a terrible idea. I have no idea how it's suppose to be cheaper unless the boxes are filled with the crappiest of food.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

he says the govt can negotiate prices when they bulk buy...which they say they CANT do with meds.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

oh they will be.....they will be

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Not crappy food. Staple food. Stuff you can survive on. Dry rice, beans, peanut butter, government cheese. Sure as hell no hamburgers

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

All the stuff that food pantries have tons of. SNAP is good because it let's the poor buy non staples.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Exactly. So ask yourself what is this program supposed to accomplish? GOVERNMENT PRICE FIXING in volatile food markets

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hard to see that when the consumer gets to decide how to spend their benefit. School lunches are a better example.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an aside, anyone who thinks rice and beans is crappy food have never had an abuela to cook for them

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I didn't say it was crappy food.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just like all the previous "reforms" this is designed to punish people for being poor, going back to the BS about "welfare queens."

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 10

Since Rome we have been arguing about feeding the poor.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Its funny b/c it will punish his base more than he understands....which im fine with.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I's not so funny for me b/c I have family and friends who get to eat because of food stamps.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On the one hand,I'm a little ok with this, otoh, I grew up on food stamps, so... no.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Naw I want it to happen it will end a stereotype and in a glorious way America needs some harsh truths thrown in its face.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is how it worked in the early 80's. My Nana had a box delivered to her every month with dry rice, beans, powdered milk, gov. cheese \1

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

\6 be given the immense market leverage over dairy and grain markets that haven't seen intervention in several decades. Small gov. idealists

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

\5 decide for yourself whether you believe the recipients ought to be able to choose shitty food over staple food and whether the gov should

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

ur nana shouldve got a jerb /s

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

She retired at 68 and lived to be 94 on social security and food stamps. We're all fucked now with our 401k's subject to market swings.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

\2 peanut butter, and some other stuff that varied monthly. The program gave the Reagan admin more weight in price fixing dairy prices. If

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

\7 should be up in arms over the change but they won't

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

They are the ones backing it. It's a republican idea

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yes. The party that has foresight to invest in Johnson & Johnson before they force huge numbers of people to bend over and spread

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They run government into the ground.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They sure do, and they get fucking FILTHY rich doing it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They caused every economic collapse in the past 100 years

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And they're going to keep doing it so long as people have knee-jerk reactions to changes that half the people voted for with the \1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

\2 unseen side effect of consolidating more power into fewer hands and those hands are not ones that have ever touched an EBT card

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

\4 be bartered away or sold for illicit substances etc. but it has the effect of limiting freedom of choice for beneficiaries. You have to

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Is better if it's stolen off the porch.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Literally everyone will get the exact same box in neighborhoods where you have to worry about someone stealing your peanut butter and rice

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Hungry people don't steal, right? Let's just distribute it like meals on wheels, a system he said doesn't work.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Your anger is making you miss the real point of this. The federal government does not need the power to manipulate BASIC food prices

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

\3 you ask me my opinion, this is a better program from a federal standpoint because it isn't just giving money away on debit cards that can

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

It is bad for consumers, specifically the most vulnerable people in our society.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

\2 surplus dairy to keep milk prices high and the free market will no longer adjust to the surpluses

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

No, it's not. It's still feeding the poor. It's bad for everyone else because the dairy market doesn't need the influence of the fed buying

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

make one comment and then reply to yourself like the rest of us do please:/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I did but i kept my replies flat and numbered... should I have nested each one?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because the poor need the gov to decide what they eat

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You need to see the bigger picture here. Nobody is going to care that a poor kid can't eat at mcdonalds on the government's dime.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This reform is attempting to address the abuse of the SNAP system, which you're apparently not familiar with. The poor in America are (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Is an attempt to cut spending on the poor. Very obvious. Making us fight for food.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The food they will be mailed is healthy and edible and they still have SNAP dollars. The saying "beggars can't be choosers" applies.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Beggars are still people and deserve to have a choice in the food they eat. They get the cheapest because poverty, now they can't choose?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

(2/3) not in danger of starvation, and frankly they tend to eat very unhealthily. This reform is not the end of times.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

(3) besides which, it's fucking free food, stop complaining.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Yes, so much this. While some people are honest the ones in my town sell the majorty of the stamps they get to buy pot and pills.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Exactly. Personally I would alter EBT/SNAP so you can only buy fruits, meat and veggies. Maybe baking supplies.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The only people fighting for EBT are the honest people and it seems like they dont think the people that abuse the system are real.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Free food they already had access to in a business, not a government supply depot. This is America, not the ussr with bread lines

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

This is not a coherent thought.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

-1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Hunger is always a danger. You're talking to someone who struggled with hunger. Watch your mouth.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

You're talking to someone who did as well, but my hispanic mom was too proud to get welfare. Watch your assumptions.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's her problem. The help was there. She refused. Blame your mom. I do.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

This will not limit poor people from getting food. The poor in the USA are the only poor people in the world with an obesity problem.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So let's give them a mandatory diet plan.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

\2 So maybe stop fighting me. Start fighting against an executive branch with too much power. Fucking Republicans will respond to that

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You know the Trump administration is suffering from one catastrophic failure after another. This could actually pass and gain some traction

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This won't because it's an insult to the impoverished and like everything else nearly no one wants it. Like we're being raped. Imagine that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

This is what I'm trying to hammer into your head... You don't have the numbers you think you have.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

IF - You have to make a moral argument, do you really want it to go the same unsung accident as election night? Where everyone is surprised

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where are your numbers from

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Every $ spent on the SNAP program generates $1.73 in GDP. Wconomic growth is good so whats Whats the real reason for a cut?

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

Some people gotta be hungry to be fiscally responsible.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 11

I'm diabetic. SNAP was what allowed me to have a diet that wouldn't actively make the condition worse.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Trump admin takes a page from Reagan and wants to get into price fixing basic food markets. Markets that haven't seen federals in decades

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Deliberately trying to break the US government. Just look at Trump's appointment of people to head agencies they have directly attacked.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

put everyone on SNAP!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

It o ly works when someone who wouldnt have normally bought that food buys it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

so if I had kept that money in my paycheck, I wouldn't have spent it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's if you assume that the money taken from the economy by taxes just magically appeared out of nowhere instead of someone else's pockets

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That makes no sense and that number is from the CBO so not partisan in any way.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

We don't have a problem with the cbo calculating it we have a problem with them calculating the velocity of snap but ignoring the velocity +

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The dollar it took would have had and saying we've created a positive program.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Makes perfect sense. Where do YOU think the gov't gets money from?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You know they have to pay that money back right and if they don't it leads to inflation which is a tax on savings.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Some people use foodstamps to buy stuff that isn't food, and over-react.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 20

I know, its just funny how something that greatly benifits all people gets reduced to trivial arguements

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

I know it off topic but I think your username is fantastic!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You, sir or madam, have no idea what you can or cannot buy with food stamps. I pray you never need to learn.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Was on food stamps growing up, so I know a thing or two about them like how you can (could? this was back when they were paper) trade 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

them for $.70 on the $1 to other people or shady shop keeps to buy whatever you want. MOST people don't do this, but because it happens 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

at all the crowd that cries about "welfare queens" go apeshit and over react.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Here's a kick in the balls. Walmart doesn't pay it's employees a livable wage so they have to get on food stamps. They in turn spend those..

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

food stamps at Wal-Mart because the prices are so cheap. So basically the government is giving money to walmart through employee subsidizes.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yet everyone losses their shit when people sugest minimum wage increase. This is fucking craziness.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Because min wage increase is a zero sum alternative, as prices just go up. Inequality in corporate profit margins is the problem.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

These programs are made to help, but people abuse them and now they are doing more harm than good. Speaking from personal experience.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

By "personal experience" you mean you sold your ebt card for drugs?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The other way around, I traded pot for food stamps. Not sure what your argument was because either way it is abusing the system.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is not worth cutting families food in half and give them whatever is in surplus. Great plan. Matthew 7:12. It's hungry at the bottom.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It just sounds like you dont have a family or youre just a shitty parent.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My sister and her two daughters rely on it and I have to help with rent every single month. May the light of Christ warm your heart

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

So because of a small percentage of fraud you want to fuck the entire system

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ok so YOU said "fuck the entire system" so thats YOUR idea, personly I think more attention needs to be given to those who abuse the system1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So that actions can be done to correct and regulate how govt assistance works.2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Who will regulate it if not the government

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Who said the government wouldn't regulate it? The point is the system is being abused and needs to be revised, which is what is happing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They feed children. That's harm? My children are fed.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I see kids in my town drink soda and eat snack cakes because their parents have sold most of the stamps for weed and pills.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So the kids should go hungry? May the light of Christ warm your heart

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This reply has nothing to do with my comment, and what does religious beliefs have to do with govt assistance?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It is to warm your heart. May the light of Christ soften your heart. Children don't deserve food. There's a blackness in you.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's not that the government spends too much on SNAP, it's that food, through inflation, cost so much more than it did just 5 years ago.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 12

The easiest way to steal your wealth is to cheapen your money.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Hey thanks

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Appreciate your hard work with this post.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thank you

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

I'm just trying to advocate for a bunch of people I know. I don't need snap but 50% of the people I know do.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

No, this gives food to people who are living on MY dime. You don't want gubbamint cheese? Get a job, you lazy fuck.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 23

Some families in the military are on food stamps... do they need to get a job , too?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

and what happens when YOU get cancer and your house burns down in a lightning storm?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Treat others as you wish to be treated. May the light of Christ warm your heart +1

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 8

Maybe he wants to be cast aside and left to rot in the gutter of society. He’s certainly acting like it

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

This is America. We're better than that to allow it to happen.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I want to agree with you, I really do, but it IS happening and has been for a long time. You want it to stop? Get America to make a moral

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Him being cast away? No that's not acceptable either.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Commitment to this and stop electing politicians that abuse people like this. I hate to say it, but it’s mostly GOP

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How many people do you know that get food stamps?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

zero personally

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

I know a lot more people who sell their stamps for drugs than use them for food. Source: I sell drugs.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Aug 1, 2018 10:26 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

And the ones that I know are between 18-30 years old and would rather get high than keep food in the fridge.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They have kids? They work ? They giving you their food card money in exchange for weed?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Aug 1, 2018 10:26 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yup, $200 on an EBT card gets most people an oz

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You are part of the problem then. You are literally doing the thing you are against and for that you deserve a thrashing and a fine.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0