Contempt of poor

Jan 24, 2023 3:09 PM

Lanhdanan

Views

80793

Likes

928

Dislikes

27

Ah, the "Fuck Poor People" Bill.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disgusting

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Slaves can eat or not eat from what I declare. I am your master, your owner, I control you. Fuck RepubliKKKlans

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Damn can't even get government cheese

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Thanks to the Third Way, many Democrats agree! We need to do a better job of electing progressive Democrats instead of diet Republicans.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is the party that's always preaching about more freedoms, right?

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

and small government staying off your back

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When social benefits are means tested it'll inevitably become a class war. The solution is usually just make it a public-wide benefit.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wasn't American cheese literally advocated for by the government as food for people on benefits? Like, there were/are giant stockpiles.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, but I think it was really more about keeping the price of milk from crashing while feeding massive subsidies to the dairy industry.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That list is just dripping with classist undertones. No fresh meat?!

3 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

*Put on monocle and top hat.* "Those... poors... don't deserve fresh meat. If they want it they can eat each other and decrease the surplus.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There's a a couple of ways of getting rid of poor people. Increase pay and access to assistance so everyone can survive, or starve them 1/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

so they either die, or commit crimes to survive allowing you to stock up your for-profit prisons. Which one will the Government choose? Hmm

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Next proposal will be expanding SNAP for ammunition and gas burners.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They want to tell them what kind of beans they can buy? Give people the freedom to buy whatever food they want.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What do you mean "no american cheese"? Feeding poor people was the whole point of it's creation.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wtf? Definitely the party that gets off on telling ppl how to live (without doing the homework of understanding)

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

LOL, whole wheat bread, brown rice, and wheat pasta tend to cost more. But srsly, what prompted these specific idiot-brain rules?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought American cheese already wasn't covered by Food Stamps and the like. It's not cheese; it's a cheese food product.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Cheese -food! you're not supposed to eat it, you're supposed to feed it to the cheese ?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only restrictions are on prepared hot food (including restaurants), and alcohol. Everything else is free game.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

whole wheat stuff would be beneficial for health, but that no fresh meat directive is a huge mistake.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Whole wheat would be more expensive. People on SNAP are just trying to get by.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Whole wheat is not beneficial for everybody. If someone has Celiac it could put them in the hospital.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

white bread also has gluten though. so while celiac is its own issue, that is not the issue here.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

ah yes. those "christian >values<" at work /s

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

none of these things really make sense but chili beans? chili is like one of the most budget friendly meals you can do

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

next: "ration stamp" introduced '39 in germany? nah, sry, it's already worse

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're poor, therefore you don't deserve food with taste

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

"No baked beans". Like why give them a great and extremely cheap source of nutrients?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was just in hospital. Cardio restricted meal (no fat, no salt, no flavor) cost more than you would believe. I finally rebelled 1/

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(yes really, I threw a tamper tantrum), they pulled me off cardio restricted, tested me, decided I could leave the hospital. I'm now 2/

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Super weak and trying to recover. American healthcare, everyone.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be fair, you really do have to actively manage your own care. They've got boxes to tick.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean that in a "Good job" way, but I don't think it came out right

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

From others who have commented on it, apparently this is like tailor made to target hispanic folk. It's horrible, cruel, AND racist

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

It's not though. It's the WIC list for the state https://time.com/6249096/iowa-bill-threatens-snap/ doesn't mean it makes sense necessarily

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

and what makes us believe that the WIC list wasn't racially targeted when it was made?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean... what can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. It's another federal program

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure. my point was that smth being a federal program or guideline is not necessarily mutually exclusive with it being racially motivated

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could see the first few as trying to get people to eat healthier (I don't think the should be forced, personally), but no fresh meat? I-

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

-thought processed meat is way worse, is there some pseudo-reasoning for that other than hating the poor?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Standard American Diet has way too much meat consumption and doesn't need to be subsidized. This is to encourage alternative proteins.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That makes sense, but I hope they'll at least give people advice on what the alternatives are. I don't eat meat myself but I wouldn't want-

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-that choice to be forced on me.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I already commented on how classist this shit is. I was also thinking about one of my kids has a sensitivity to gluten. And how there are

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

ppl who do require special diets. I’m pretty sure all wheat grains contain gluten. But of course the GOP dosnt fkn care.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

this. Why are we even having this conversation? Just fucking FEED PEOPLE GOOD FOOD. We have it. We have the ability to let people choose.-

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I pay taxes, and I am fine with those taxes being spent on making sure people have healthy, nutritious food in a nation that can afford-

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

billionaires. If we can't afford to feed people, then we can't afford billionaires. Math checks out.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So do "white breads." It's just wheat flour that's been processed. Dietary restr. and sensitivities are just a whole problem on their own.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile

3 years ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 0

Good! More of this, please!

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Wow, the tax-exempt scam of running a church wasn't enough for them, they needed to scam Covid relief as well.

3 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

it is the republican "christian" thing to do, gawd bless... with a cleansing fire!!!

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No american cheese? What's next, no French whiskey?

3 years ago | Likes 157 Dislikes 2

Just wait until you discover that "american cheese" isn't really american. *laughs manically in Canadian*

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see what you did there

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

tbf, Brenne is good

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Isn't american cheese cheaper than most others?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It depends. Generic individually wrapped slices? Yes. Kraft singles? Not necessarily.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No Russian chocolate?

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

nah, American chocolate is worse

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You can have my Mexican maple syrup when you pry it from my cold dead hands!

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What about Scottish applesauce?!

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Are they known for being bad at that?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no, only worst-chester-shire sause! tahp-ah-dah-mahrnahng-tah-yah guvnna!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

British spices?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*stares in rest of the world*

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cheeky

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have had two French whisky recently and both quite good. La Piautre .

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

And in real life America makes some excellent cheeses. But it's a good joke anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Wisconsin don't fuck around

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

American cheeses can be quite good. The cheese variety "American" is one of two things: plastic crap or a blend of cheddar and colby

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well when the food stamp users can’t buy food they’ll have to eat the rich

3 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't that be like eating shit tho?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i feel like a lot of political issues in the united states could be resolved rn by arming the homeless. they have a 2A right too, after all.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or fall back on the old "Oops, I forgot to scan a few things at the self check-out". Walmart will lose a few dollars, but oh fucking well.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I heard that Walmart employees are being told to chill on shop lifter crackdown. They're not paid enough, or anyone else for that matter.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oh, it's way beyond that. Self-checkout cashiers can intervene if they see someone blatantly ring up an item incorrectly, but no Walmart 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

employee, other than asset protection or contracted security guards, can touch a customer or shoplifter. They will be fired for it, or 2/3

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

even for accusing a person of stealing. The liability of compensating an employee that gets hurt while confronting a customer is far 3/4

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The R myth that poor people use SNAP to buy steak & lobster because "someone saw" one person do it once. It's another Welfare Queen tale.

3 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

They're way more aggressive about catching welfare recipient fraud than they are about catching wage theft, that's for sure.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

and welfare fraud is fairly uncommon. it's a lot harder now that there's a plastic card instead of slips of paper you can sell.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The fraud is more on the side of lying to qualify for more benefit. Claiming to be a single parent, for instance. Again, uncommon still.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I got into it with some fuck here on Imgur who thinks that everyone uses SNAP to buy huge amounts of candy. It's a myth with legs, sadly.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Someone once talked about buying a huge cake on SNAP & some ass in line gave them crap. Person's kid had just finished chemo. MYOB, people.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

frankly, if that's what people are doing, that's their business, right? If we want people to have a balanced diet, then we feed them one. -

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

for free. Because we generate so much wealth, we can afford to do that. Wealthy people do not need all the welfare we're giving them.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A balanced diet, btw, TASTES GOOD. It's appealing. It's not about demotivating people to work. People will work for a new sofa or to help-

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

save elephants. We shouldn't be working to eat or have a home, but to better our lives and our world.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Without the Senate or the Presidency, it's all a big circle jerk in the US House of Representatives. Nothing they pass will become law

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 5

They're OK with that, because that lets them say the Democrats are obstructionist do-nothings and holding back progress.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or states then use it as a roadmap to repress more quiely in their own state programs.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's the Iowa GOP, there's a real risk of it becoming law for them.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

EBT is a federal program.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's a federal program that's administered by the states. They can and do place restrictions on it.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

But they’ll use it to make sound bytes to shore up their primary campaigns. And we all suffer.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's Iowa's legislature, not Congress. They absolutely can put this into practice. They already do the same shit w/ their WIC aid.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That sounds like a Iowa problem. Maybe they should burn their State Congress to the ground if they want to get the infection out.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

maybe YOU should. Why the fuck would you want your country to have this ANYWHERE?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I can't vote in Iowa elections. What would you like me to do to fix THEM being fucking idiots?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0