You wouldn't steal this post.

Jun 18, 2017 9:56 AM

bananist

Views

156133

Likes

3390

Dislikes

166

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ironically, the music for this video was pirated

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...yes i would. Free cars

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But they make cars to sell. If everyone did this noone would make cars except as free hobbyist builds, for which you get your money's worth.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They both are good in flawed logic. They should get married.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BUT I WOULD TOTALLY DOWNLOAD ONE IF I COULD

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is so dumb, u dont steal a game vor movie but u steal the profit for being a not paying consument. Who is that dumb seriously

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Some people who pirate wouldn't have purchased it if they couldn't pirate it, and some people who pirate are trying the product and 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

will later buy it if it's good, and wouldn't have ever bought it if they couldn't test it by pirating

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You wouldn't steal this comment.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

You wouldn't steal this comment.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

COMMENT THEFT IS NOT A VICTIMLESS CRIME!

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah COMMENT THEFT IS NOT A VICTIMLESS CRIME!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Guys, someday making original content may be the only job people can get

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An ironic thing about the original commercial, I'd that the music they used was illegally downloaded and used.

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 3

Sure, you devote your life to your craft for years and then everybody makes copies of your work while you live on potnoodles. Great system.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

can you name an example of this? a popular, frequently downloaded musician who is poor?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is this a unix joke?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

reads, *you wouldn't steal this post* "Oh yea? WITNESS MEEEEEEEE!" - imgurians everywhere.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Keep theirs and get paid for the car you got?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You wouldn't download the opensource schematics of a car and then print one at home on your metal 3D printer would you? Oh you would?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

actually the owner of the individual car has shared it for anyone to copy so that we all can benefit from safer and smoother travel

8 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 13

but some ass who claims to own the idea of the car puts the owner in jail even though the cars engineer has been dead for 50 years

8 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 10

And then all the people who design and make cars lose their jobs. Brilliant.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 24

but research shows that people that copy cars also buys more cars and that companies that gets copied alot sell more. the math doesnt add up

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

Popular cars are likely to be stolen more and bought more. Doesn't mean they aren't losing out on sales.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Except studies show they aren't actually losing out on sales

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well at the point that we can literally COPY CARS, we're a post scarcity post money situation would be my guess..since we can all have w/e.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not to mention that the majority of people who copy cars would not have bought the car anyway, so they aren't actually losing out on money.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You say that, but you can't prove it. At the end of the day, people are benefiting from the work of others without paying.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I'd do it even if the owner lost it. If I could just click a button and steal a car, I'd fuckin do it and so would you.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didn't this anti piracy ad use pirated music?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Janeway - thug life - in space

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

imgur.com/4awZR3n.jpg

8 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 2

I assume they aren't, but the parts look like they're made of wood. Would be shitty to wreck a wooden car. Splinters...splinters everywhere.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's called a mold. To mold he shape of the body on.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Used to be a car/ car company named Morgan that had wooden frames

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The hamster's favorite car company.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What you mean used to? They are still in business as far as I am aware.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh I didn't know they were still around my bad

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is one of those powers id pick if I had the choice. I've literally thought about it for years

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You wouldn't download a bear!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Bitch I might.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hell yes I would!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We should make one for Hollywood. "You wouldn't scam the government out of money with 'creative' acounting!"

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

That same creative accounting screws the actors out of their royalties too.. Who honestly believe that Return of Jedi still haven't made $?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean, isn't that exactly one of the reasons GTA has been popular for 20 years?

8 years ago | Likes 692 Dislikes 5

I used GTA to practice my parallel, down hill and uphill parks since I didn't have someone to help me practice before my test..i passed lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Till the Devs change the code.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, it was popular until the publisher decided to fuck up and say "no modding allowed anymore".

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

I thought Rockstar said they like modders (as long as they're not cheating in Online)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Rockstar might've said that, Take 2 didn't though.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Just saying... https://imgur.com/4FmoVy9.png

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Wow, that is... that doesn't look good.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure its still going to sell

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

not for the singleplayer it won't!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, the amount of people who mod is a small percentage of all the people who buy it. Millions of console players dont even touch mods

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

and those who don't mod it will generally already have it, mods are the number 1 cause of later sales of games, adding life to dead games.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's a reason console players don't usually mod.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Have you been on pic recently. They had a crackdown on modders after the new update. 2 days later, I met 4 modders in 3 sessions

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 20

There is a difference between Modding and Cheating. Recommend you learn it before commenting.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

I'm someone who knows the difference, but there's still modders on PC after the update.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The cheaters in gta online are often called modders

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

My daughter used to watch me play. She forced me to be a law abiding citizen. No car stealing, no speeding, couldn't even carry guns

8 years ago | Likes 219 Dislikes 1

There's a series on Polygon's YouTube channel called "Law Abiding Citizen" just like that

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My niece is a 9 year old car-stealing psychopath in GTA V.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*laughs in american*

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My gf tried playing it. It concerned me at how much fun she was having killing people

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've actually tried that once or twice for kicks, but there was always some idiot AI driver that bumped into me, so I had to kill him.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

In GTA V, trying to drive normally just gets you the same angry "fuck you"s from the AI drivers as driving max speed on their lane

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The AI can't drive. Also, there's an intersection with like a 8 minute light cycle. They will lose patience and run it.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lmao yea sounds about right

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Did you stop at the traffic lights too? :P

8 years ago | Likes 147 Dislikes 1

Yup. It was actually kind of fun.

8 years ago | Likes 135 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of the king of the hill episode with Pro-pain!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Play sa-mp roleplay. Police will put you in jail if u do something against thr law

8 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

How many missions did you do?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

None. Not with her watching

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I convinced my roommate that there were turn signals and he spent the next thirty minutes trying different combinations to get them to work.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

I... i spend 30 minutes trying to figure that out too... i saw other cars use them, so i figured i should be able to do so too...

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

There are (were now I guess) mods that add turn signals, seat belts and door locks. MoreControl is one.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly how bad is the mod nerf?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be determined. The issue is OpenIV got a cease and desist, and most mods rely on it to function.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've never played GTA5; there's a mod nerf!?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'll stop violating copyright law when Hollywood stops bribing congressmen to keep extending copyrights.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

That's Disney, not Hollywood. US copyright length is pretty much [current year - age of Mickey Mouse].

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

you don't consider disney part of hollywood? Weird. I thought their headquarters were in burbank.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The copyright problem is specifically because of Disney, not the rest of Hollywood (and crazy that one company gets to hold the law hostage)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This fucking post is my exact point. THIS is why it is still theft. Just because it is EASY doesn't mean it's not fucking theft. You're just

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 14

not stealing a physical, traceable item that you have to risk yourself for. You are stealing the profit from the creator. If a person makes

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 12

ANYTHING physical you'll pay for it but if it's digital it's suddenly not theft? It's a load of absolute BS. Someone made that just the same

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

as someone makes any other physical good.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

I think it needs to be separated from theft, but also do agree that it's wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It already is separated from theft. It's not "theft" under the law/in courts. It's "piracy". Because there are technical differences in it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, basically that. I pirate a lot, but I don't try to justify it in bullshit ways like OP does. I'm just cheap and it's easy.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

And the thing is- with some things I really don't think it's pirating. EG if an image is posted online by someone on an account, they should

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

There wouldn't be any car in the first place if that worked. Who'd wanna work and produce if you can just steal whatever you want?

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 12

If your statement was logical there would be no musicians/artists.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The music industry has been saying that exact thing for 40 years, and it's never been true.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

People who want a better car than the shitty clone everyone's been driving around for years, maybe?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Isn't this the same argument people made about Wikipedia? Who would invest the time and effort if they didn't get paid?...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because I can enjoy a live show featuring my favorite car

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

But if you copy cars easy as, would they need to be made? Besides, infinite metal!

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

The metaphor's not strong enough, Captain! She's falling apart!

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

There would still be someone making the original and I doubt they'd be willingly miss the opportunity to make money of it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But who am I to preach? I download music and movies on a regular basis!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes, how'd you copy something that wouldn't exist?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Such a crap argument. The people making the stuff that gets pirated make it because they expect payment so they can feed themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 22

A better analogy is if a car dealer shit was selling cars and you took a copy of their car instead of paying for it, but they still had it.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Sure but depriving someone of their expectation still isn't the same as depriving them of their property.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

So, making an exact copy of their property, and undermining their chance of making a living off of their work is not bad?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure that's not what I said.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's exactly what you said. Take someone's IP, and you've opened the door for everyone else. An unavoidable consequence.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I said "not the same thing." It's not. I never said it was ok.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I know it doesn't make it right, but I only pirate from big companies who make fuckloads anyways. I pay when it's someone who needs it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

that whole "copyrights last 70 years after the death of the author" kinda flies in the face of feeding creators

8 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 6

What's the point of that, exactly? For businesses? Dead guy doesn't exactly need a copyright. Passed down to family, maybe?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Or the fact that creating backups is also piracy(at least in the US), all the while draconian DRM which wrecks your PC is totally legal(1/?)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

...and don't forget stupid shit like "1 copy=1 lost sale" fallacy. Apparently, Limewire caused more damage than the *world* GDP at the time.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm just waiting for spotify to start reporting revenue in "avoided loss of sale"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's also companies like Disney that keep lobbing to extend their copyright claim on their stuff.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

That was designed to protect the family of the author, who might be relying on the copyright for income.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

No. Copyright extensions are almost exclusively due to Disney. Look it up if you don't believe me. It's nothing but corporate greed.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Certainly that has influenced it, but it was definitely originally intended to help widows and their families.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You are talking about the "original" extension to the copyright act... which did that. All the subsequent extensions have been solely 1 of ?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Because Disney is still a company making products. It's different when an author dies and someone makes a new book based on their characters

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We would not want to live in a country without IP laws.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Besides, there are worlds of possibility between no IP rights at all & current IP law that sends children to jail and indebts people for...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

life for the terrible crime of copying a song.To someone who grew up in a time when everyone recorded mixtapes from the radio,this is insane

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Industries with little to no legal IP protection, such as the fashion industry, make decent revenues too even tho their designs are "stolen"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Piracy is theft, and if you bear with me I can explain why. The point is that creators are trying to make a living off of this

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, someone writes a book. They release that book electronically hoping that people will buy, not pirate. Only, people pirate.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every pirated copy means that the creators have no control over how their work is distributed. Worse, they receive no compensation

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No compensation for the 100s of hours of work they put into their projects. Everyone has it for free, and the creator's dream job is lost.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one can do or make anything for free. If you allow someone to take something meant for sale, instead of buying it, you condone theft.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah the classic argument. Every time something is pirated, it is -1 copy sold.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I'm a sense yes, the company is losing out on a sale.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It is ridiculous to think that everything that gets pirated would be bought if there was no chance to pirate it.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But I would download something, but I wouldn't go out and buy it. I just wouldn't have it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, because talented people in the movie/music/entertainment industry are poor as fuck. There is still a HUGE profit to be made,especially>

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 24

it affects more than just the lead actors. Animators, editors, extras, etc if a movie has less of a budget, then it will higher less people

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

hire*. So for lets say the sequel instead of employing 50 animators for 2 years, they only employ 30.thats 20 middle class ppl not working.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really the point at all.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Normally, no. But the comment made it sound like it's just about money, which is what I'm discussing. The moral principle of the matter is >

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

a whole other thing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

considering pirated content either isn't as high quality as the original, or takes a long time to come out, or both. A lot of people still>

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

purchase originals, and there are great benefits for doing so. And the profit margins are still numbers that a regular person doesn't see>

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

in most, if not all, of their lifetime.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

However they put their time and money into rendering a good or service, and therefore should be paid recompense for its use if the demand so

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it isn't a response to the point you put forward. It's a response to equating piracy with physical theft. Your point is more of a- 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

2/2 -statement of fact than an argument for or against piracy, unless you falsely assume pirates would otherwise pay for what they download.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's like when the RIAA tried to sue for 72 trillion dollars based on what it would have cost had they bought it. The world's GDP.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think art would cease to exist in a moneyless and egalitarian society. Artists create art because they feel driven to do so, not...

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Artists still have to eat, pay rent, and raise a family. We don't live in a moneyless society, so when you don't pay, artists suffer.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I suggest you read the rest of my argument, which addresses your point.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you a moron? Money is a huge factor in productivity. You'd still get some, but you wouldn't get nearly the same quantity nor quality.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Do yourself a favor and learn to make a point without resorting to insults. It doesn't add to your argument, it only takes away from it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're right about that. I just get touchy when people seem to think that artists don't need money to create.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree that they do need money under the current system. And the ones who are popular enough to be pirated earn quite well too.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As someone who works in the music industry I can tell you it absolutely has an effect on not just the super wealthy. Mid-level bands used 1/

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be able to make a decent living from record sales and touring, but record sales are non-existent and it's created a culture where 2/

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Music is not valued. Streaming services are definitely the way of the future, but for now they don't pay enough. I have worked on 3/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Music that has millions of streams on Spotify and the artist is no where near paying their bills with that. If they even recouped the 4/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

just for the prospect of fame and wealth. Besides, you're ignoring that under the current system, artists who are popular enough to ...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

have their work illegally reproduced (not stolen) are also popular enough to earn quite a bit of wealth and social status. There is no ...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

research to support the claim that so-called pirates pay for media they can't illegally access. On the contrary.Studies show that pirates...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

tend to be media enthusiasts who spend more money on media than the average person.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3