Technology in 1983. Now all of this is a smart phone

Dec 20, 2025 10:35 PM

HotPinkk

Views

19023

Likes

252

Dislikes

6

...except the printer

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And he did not, in fact, save any pussy for the rest of us.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Now all of this is [done poorly] in a smartphone [with appropriate software].**

**Subscription services may be required, cloudy connection mandatory, ownership not implied, everything you do may be monitored and used for targetted advertisement, individual pricing, behavioural modification and evidence of incorrect thought processes. Access may be removed at any time for any reason. You will own nothing and be happy.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is that Stephen Mann, the professor famous for "the wearable computing project"?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ahh, better times

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A little bit of everything all of the time.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What was this picture for, originally? For a computer?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

beat me to it! +1

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The first time I heard music through the headphones of a Walkman it blew me away. It was at an outdoor gear show, I took off the head of my Woodsy the Owl costume (hoot hoot don’t pollute) to try it. Around 1979.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sound quality is DRASTICALLY worse though - I've been struggling to find a decent portable speaker/set (most budget-friendly speakers suuuck)

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The eq sucks on a phone.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How exactly is my phone a dot matrix printer?

3 months ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I will say that I am mesmerized by the fact that my phone could at least talk to a printer. However, never will I ever trust the technology to do so, since I would inevitably print to the wrong printer and or open my printer to print jobs from my next door neighbor. I suppose that makes me a millennial.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

how often do you need to print out now vs when The Screechy Ones ruled schools/offices?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

And they include like, five different audio sources. They really overdid it.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have that radio...

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Half of that now requires a monthly subscription...

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Exactly. And you don't really own anything once the subscription ends.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not the printer

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except for good speakers

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and just how did that happen...? https://pbfcomics.com/comics/technorgy

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't watch OTA TV on my phone

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bob Sirott

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shoutout to smartphone for replacing headphones, nobody uses those anymore

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I read an interesting article about the tanking backpack industry.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow I kinda wish I had a device to let me watch OTA TV like the watchman today, without using up bandwidth. Would be a fun toy.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yea? Try print something with a smartphone

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bluetooth thermal printer, but then you'll need two pockets. Or something like an Epson Workforce or HP Officejet 250 if you want a full A4 thing that can fit in a slim backpack.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

speakers and cameras back then had better quality. the audio receiver could play 8-track cassettes and disks!

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I know, right? My phone just plays 30 seconds of the same James Blunt song over and over.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

nope! not cameras. not even close. your iphone camera today takes WAY better images by every metric than even very expensive film cameras and certainly better than early DSLR's

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's not just higher resolution, it's glass, clarity it's color science, it's gamma and dynamic range etc. stills and video are so much better now and billions have it on them all the time. plus, the recording fresh out the camera is much easier to edit in post with powerful programs that make it even better because there's so much more data to edit

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are we from the same planet or do you actually think the VHS camcorder recorded in better quality than any phone made in the last 10 years?

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My phone's not a boom box!! https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1dDBzcXA5MTE1ZmF6MmQwMTFqazZlMzMxcnExeW1uZXhwcGFyODA5byZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/hQUKlc421NIoU/200w.webp

3 months ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

Something like this, if you need a bigger boom (with the one shown you even can link two of them together)

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

tell that to people on the bus

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Slightly off topic - I recently was watching some Lonely Island Vids and realized in this video Andy Samberg gets tazed in the ass by Ryan Reynolds.

Which is probably pay back because in I Just Had Sex he banged Blake Livley Reynolds wife.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Thanks for that! I missed that link

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Every phone speaker sounds like shit. You will never get that level out of a speaker the size of a Claritin.

3 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

My phone sounds way clearer than my old boombox and I can compare them live with a radio station or the same song on youtube vs a cassette. It can't get so loud nor bassy but I think the engineering ingenuity of these little squeakers is underestimated

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

No optical disks in 1983 if I remember correctly. 93, sure.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Some manner of optical disks was nainstreamed with the IBM PS2 series in 1987.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

First commercial CDs were released in 82 and 83.

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Well shit on me. Those had to be astronomically expensive. My dad bought us a 100 mb hard drive in the late 80’s and it was like 600 bucks.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

DO you remember longboxes? There was a whole packaging format to fir on Vinyl LP shelves.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But at what cost??

3 months ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

'bout tree fiddy

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vastly cheaper than buying that lot when it came out

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think they were speaking metaphorically.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SO much. You will have everyting and nothing in tha palm of your hand. Whenever you wish to look something up or communicate with a friend there will be constant clamours for your attention from other things. You will see how many undread emails you have when you wish to look at the time. It will be the most interesting thing at any given moment, and less fulfilling than 10 minutes of gardening or a good fart 99 percent of the time.

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Just the fact that you can’t call anyone out of the blue anymore is the worst effect of all this. Second worst is there’s never a daily newspaper lying around in the break room to read. You can’t buy the paper for $1.50 and then give it to someone else to read.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I never thought there's such straightforward relation between the fact I can't call smb out of the blue and technological progress... I mean I never could but the others... I shall think about it.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh I still call people. But it’s not the same since nobody checks their voicemail. You’re expected to text the reason you called, and it’s like if it was a text I wouldn’t have called in the first place.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well I just hate being distracted whether the distraction is a call or a visit. Text is much less distractive. The dislike of distractions is because of the lack of time. Not sure if it's the gadgets who eat all the time or there are other reasons...

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends what brand and model you buy.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Is there a brand where they aren't buying me instead? Some device which I have control over? I guess not.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Actually yes. Pinephone. Open source Linux based phone.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Indeed. There were rumors about a Linux based phone for a long time, maybe some prototypes and finally there's a commercial one. Let's hope it survives.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just don't think enough people care about privacy and control. They would sell their mother's butthole pics for a convenient app.

And then there's the whole tribalism thing that comes natural to humans. There are more people than I like to remind myself of that will literally buy an iPhone only because that's what that popular kid has.

All that depressing stuff said -- phones like the Pinephone will always exist because small companies can build them with off the shelf components.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0