David Beckham joins waves of public figures speak out, after Israel incinerated Palestinian families sheltering in tents. Israel is committing genocide with full American military & diplomatic support. Both America and Israel are guilty of genocide.

May 28, 2024 7:39 PM

Establishment

Views

10874

Likes

477

Dislikes

22

As if their voice matters? Isn't it clear that nobody can stop the people in power?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I oppose the killing of those children. But I also oppose the killing of the adults around them.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Biden and all GOP lawmakers should be indicted by the ICC and ICJ!

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

wow.. so brave of them...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

Not America's first time either.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

While I absolutely think Bibi needs to go, every time I see one of these news stories, "Israel bombed a refugee camp" or some variant, a day or two later there's a new news story where it turns out the camp had Hamas leaders or a cache of weapons hiding among the refugees. How do we fix this?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Remember the American soldier who burned himself to death because he didn't want to take part in genocide?

I think about him every day and I'm not even American.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Hamas launched a rocket from a refugee camp that just happened to be full of Hamas ammunition. Israel retaliated for the rocket attack and the Hamas ammunition all blew up. Maybe Hamas doesn't care about its own people.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

It was eight rockets, not one: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0kkqkngnedo

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

This is a very well worded neutral stance, he’s taking the side of ceasefire not the side of either party involved.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

But that's why both Israel and Hamas are so happy to keep volleying facetious ceasefire deals back and forth: As long as this is framed as a bilateral problem with nothing but a bilateral solution, they can each posture as the reasonable one while rejecting the other side's patently unacceptable terms out of hand.

Israel has to stop the genocide. They do it unilaterally or it doesn't get done. Hamas is never going to do it because, um, they're fucking terrorists and frankly, they're winning...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

...Pressure should be squarely on Israel to stop doing because That's Not How We Do Things Around Here and Never Again and if you keep acting like a rogue state we're going to start treating you like one. We can't bring any of that same pressure to bear on Hamas because it's already been in place for decades.

Neutral framing is unproductive. Hamas doesn't give a shit. Israel has a lot more left to lose, and that's where the pressure needs to be applied. Neutrality only helps Bibi keep killing.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

He's spent a long time trying to prove he deserves a knighthood. Can't afford to say anything too controversial.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is it better than nothing? probably :)

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He didn't say that, he retweeted a quote from the UNICEF director. UN organizations tend to be very neutral in how they state things.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep, release the hostages. Still have over a hundred. If Hamas cared for its people…

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

So your neighbor takes hostages, nice guy normally, you had him over for dinner. So the police barge into your house and shoot your kids in the face. "YOU SHOULD HAVE TOLD HIM TO RETURN THE HOSTAGES.

You're the lowest of the low.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Do they have visiting hours where you live?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Remember: In 2024 the United States assisted in the Palestinian genocide. NEVER let them hide that.

2 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 7

Maybe also look into the Gulf of Tonkin incident, it gets much worse the more that you look.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so proud that my country is super reluctant to fund the defense of a nation from an invader, but is fully happy to fund an actual genocide with no qualms. Proud to be an American, right?

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

It has decidedly not just been "in 2024". The genocide would never have happened if not for decades of US support for Israeli atrocities.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He is right, however.. politics from soccer-man. Now, onwards to get my medical opinions from Shaq.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

So many politicians and military leaders in Israel and the US should be in jail or worse.

2 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

Pretty telling that you exclude Hamas' leaders from the list of people that should go to jail.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Not so sure about the military leaders thing. Of course there have to be bad apples, but people forget the US military does not decide policy, where it goes, or why. That is entirely up to elected officials. Which means it's up to us.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I don't say this to excuse terrible leaders or the corrupt systems that have put many in place. But I think it's too easy to forget how the military works and how much we could affect government if we tried.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Soldiers were able to choose if they want to massacre civilians in Vietnam and they decided to rape and massacre them.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh boy you really don’t get the difference between “maintaining an alliance” and “full support” the US is not and has not been supporting Israel. The US has been maintaining existing alliance commitments while trying to talk them down, build international support for Palestine, and provide aide to Palestine, every step of the way. We haven’t cut off all military aide to Israel because of a combination of existing agreements, republican interference, and geopolitical stability.

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

This is an ally and a sovereign nation going off the deep end. Unless we want to use force we can’t actually force them to do anything. The existing status quo of using them to extend the US sphere of influence into the Middle East also depends on them. We have tried what limited diplomatic means we have to resolve the issue short of sanctions or full military cut off and that would mean an end of the alliance and the status quo. There is an ocean between “full support” and what we are doing.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

There's also an ocean between "reacting to a terror attack, that killed over 1200 people in one day, by fighting a war in a densely populated area against an enemy that actively hides its fighters and military assets amongst civilians" and committing genocide.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That would be the “going off the deep end” part. Israel is committing active genocide, of a people they have been slowly genociding for 50 years. To say the US is currently supporting that genocide is ignorant at best.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There’s also an ocean between what we are doing and everything we could and have been doing. Biden’s ‘hug BeBe’ strategy was a mistake and has been a failure that has tied us to everything Israel has done.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are only two ways the bloodshed stops. Either Netenyahu's government slaughters every Palestinian they can get their hands on, or Netenyahu and his entire Cabinet is arrested.

2 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

You forgot the easiest way, America stops providing Israel weapons. Liberals seem to be in denial about the most obvious solution.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Israel hasn't spent millions of dollars in lobbyist funding over the decades for that to be a viable solution, sadly. They're getting what they paid for.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I keep hearing that we can't stop sending ammunition because we have a contract to supply ammo regardless of how it's used. The bureaucracy of the contract is more important than the lives of the children.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That argument is untrue. It's actually the other way around. The Leahy Law prohibits the US from providing weapons to foreign forces that violate human rights. It's actually against our own laws to provide Israel with weapons.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think Biden's genuinely unwilling to end the alliance, come what may. If it's genocide of the Palestinians or casting off Israel, he chooses Israel, so there's not much leverage he's willing to use.

I wonder if it was different for Reagan when he told Menachem Begin to pull out of Beirut or else. Maybe he was bluffing; that was a whole thing for him, the madman nuclear brinkmanship and all. Either way, Begin did as he was told.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or, you know the Palestinians can give up those hostages they took and surrender.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 23

I wasn't aware Palestinians as a whole had seized hostages. I was only aware internationally recognized terrorist organization Hamas had done that.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Anyone who targets innocent civilians, including children, is evil no fucking exceptions.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

And yet people like you downvote the only reasonable option that will lead to peace... they need to give back the hostages. You know, the ones they took while targeting innocent civilians, including children, while they were being evil on October 7th.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

You got downvoted for trying to claim every single Palestinian belong to Hamas, dickshit. Fuck off.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

There is significantly less of a gap there than you might imagine, even as Hamas deliberately sacrifices them to score PR points.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Remember, the sentiment should be "thank you for joining those speaking out" not "what took you so long?"

2 years ago | Likes 219 Dislikes 5

Thabks for the brainwash sesh

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

The thousands of dead are saying it much louder than I ever could.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

How Israel has been in the past, well before last October...
I think this report may be the one referenced. Chilling read. On page 143 it starts detailing the deaths of individual children, and what they could gather happened leading up to their deaths. https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/A.HRC_.40.CPR_.2.pdf 2019

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Some of those had already been made even more homeless orphans near Rafah before the ICJ ruling. This is who Israel target.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The one thing that gets me about this is how much it facilitates fence sitting on issues while waiting to see where the court of public opinion lands.
Inaction as people die to covid, or Russia bombs, or Israeli genocide... Until you're sure that you won't look bad for saying we should do something.
Sure, I'd obviously rather they did do something in the end, but condemning something terrible months after public support and vocal celebrity influence was needed... Shouldn't be equally praised.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 20

Nah, both. Good job eventually making it to the right side of history, what took you so long dipshit?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes!! This. Recently, I read a post about Eurovision and someone mentioned the presenter had been using they/them and was pleased to hear it. Another person said "this was the minimum expected". While this might be true, you can't be negative about someone doing something you want them to do.

2 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

Reward desirable behaviour. Dog trainers know.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No, they aren't 2 sentiments, they are 1, with a comma in between

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not if you're interested in convincing people to your point of view, rather than criticize them for not having the right one.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Finally understanding doesn't negate accountability for previous actions, these aren't 5 year olds, and an accurate answer as to why, can indicate how to talk to those still to be convinced

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No tough conversations! The people who were actively and aggressively wrong might get upset.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0