This man just got fined 80 000 € for not stopping before the crosswalk

Mar 23, 2017 8:40 AM

neuzgi

Views

44114

Likes

1614

Dislikes

82

Antti Aarnio-Vihuri, 77, didn´t hit or harm anyone, but he happens to be a billionaire and in Finland fines are adjusted based on your income. There was another car stopped before the crosswalk on line next to him when he failed to stop his own car by it to check for any approaching pedestrians.

Citizen with average income would have walked (or driven) away with about 400 € fines. So, if you are a billionaire coming to Finland, we strongly recommend hiring a poor driver.

Source: http://www.hs.fi/kaupunki/art-2000005138418.html

It is only 80K... who cares?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Vois kai torille mennä ku aurinkokin paistaa

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Seems legit to me

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

In my country,if a common person misses something when doing his taxes, he goes to jail. If a banker walks away with 1 mil,he gets a warning

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Wow.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

He seems to have Lipton Iced tea packets on the table, I see he is a man of culture as well.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think this is really cool. Not only is he not getting away with it because he's rich, he actually got fined more. This is how its done.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Torille!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They dish out heft speeding fines too. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1759791.stm .... I think it's fair.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Oh poor thing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Much better sysrem. We should do that in usa. But trump won't stand for it.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

9 years ago | Likes 228 Dislikes 3

When I get back I'm going to put my mouth where this money is...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples’ money." - Thatcher

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But it's based on a percentage of your income, you're bitching about like the fairest method of taxation there is.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I don't think OP's complaining, just mentioning that it's a significant amount of money as a fine. Also showcasing the great system in place

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do feel sorry for him if it was unintentional, but it does make a lot of sense, actually.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

If it was unintentional, it means he was not paying attention while driving, which is just as bad, tbh.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Good.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

I feel bad for him. Oh wait, no I don't.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Christ... 400€ for pulling a little too far into the intersection is still crazy. That's a mistake that could be corrected by 50€

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

It's not just pulling too far, but blowing past a stopped vehicle. You won't see the kid walking in front of you from behind the other car.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 cars going the same direction each on their own lane. First car stops to let a pedestrian cross the street. Other car doesn't. 400 is fair

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

He didn't pull too far. He completely ignored stopping at all.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Read again.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Seems fair to make the punishment matter to the punished.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

It's like this for drunk drivers in both Sweden and Denmark as well. You are fined based on income.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In America it is over $10k, even if you only make 12k a year.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He can likely afford 80k more than most can afford 400.

9 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 10

That is the idea (;

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Man for 400 euros in America is kinda close to a wreckless endangerment fine...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Ignoring a stopped car at a pedestrian crossing is reckless endangerment, basically a deathtrap for the pedestrian if both don't stop.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

At this point, I refuse to cross the street if there's someone coming up on the other lane behind a car that's letting me cross. Zero trust.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, though children for example lack this intuition.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's been quite a bit of talk on the topic recently, so I'm hoping parents will teach kids to be extra careful in intersections like that

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm unemployed.. I would have a blast driving there! Damn!

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Except there's a minimum fine. Which is about 150€ if I'm dont remember completely wrong

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No, the minimum is 6 eur per 'day fine' which would in this case mean a 72 euro fine.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

okie dokie... It was speeding which had minimum fine. Still 6€/day, but minimum of 200€ (100€ for mopeds)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Et puhunut ylinopeudesta mitään, vaan sakoista yleisesti, niin oletin.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Juu, en... Muistin vain, että jossain oli minimisakot ja menin sillä oletuksella että se on kaikissa liikennerikkeissä

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People, especially children get ran-over and killed that way every year. He deserves that fine and he will have no trouble paying for it.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

There's a 4-lane crosswalk in front of my apartment. At this point I'm pretty much expecting every driver to just blow past stopped cars.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm supposed to feel sorry for a 77 year old billionaire that's sitting in a private jet because he lost a tiny fraction of his fortune?

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 10

Yes, same logic Trump voters in trailers are happy billionaires get tax cuts.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I don't think the post asks anyone to feel sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

You're quite right, it doesn't. My bad

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

dam. i could live like 80 months of 80k.

9 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 4

You mean someone else can pay for you to mostly live and the rest is chump change.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

that pays about 60% of my college loans

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shit, you're right

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

yeah and it's like 1$ for him

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pretty much the same in my case, and pretty comfortably (no car needed where I live)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you live off $1k a month? Way to flaunt your financial prowess 1%er

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

We are the 73%!!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This seems a fair system,

9 years ago | Likes 126 Dislikes 39

It's awesome

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's 'cause it is.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

I didn't even know we have billionaires in Finland.. Apparently there are 5.

9 years ago | Likes 420 Dislikes 5

That's it?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.... congrats?

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Australia: 27 (US Billion)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have too many- California

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Richest is Antti Herlin owner of Kone. World's third largest elevator and escalator company.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Otis FTW

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

yeah fuck those socialist elevators

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Forbes actually just listed him to be worth as much as Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Four Herlin's are billionaires. And this guy up there is the fifth. Crazy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably 4 now

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Just 251 in Norway

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

According to wiki only 13

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm reading 222 but that's still a lot for such a small population.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Norway isn't mentioned on that list

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, it is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really? *checks the net worth of all five members of Nigthwish*

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

You don't actually think Nightwish, even as a whole band, made more than a billion right...?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm kind of surprised that anyone even entertained the possibility that that was a serious comment.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I dont know man, fishmaster and steven seagull are fuckin hits.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fair comment is fair

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is this TED talk about the "socialists" Nordic countries being the best place to become billionaire. Let me find that...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tedx is 99% bullshit, sadly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well obviously that's not working out to well

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha! We have 6! -Ireland

9 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 1

That and all those multinationals looking for a tax break.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 in NZ. Guess that means there's room for me to make it there lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow, 720 billionaires?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You funny little...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

....math teacher? Yup.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My ancestors have 1,

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I bet you cant wait till he/she dies

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm indifferent to him, I'm Mexican American, but don't know what's going on in MX so I don't know what type of person Carlos Slim is.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

powerful.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Google says Sweden has about 150(!!!), but only 20-ish of them tax and make their money in there.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

One of our's Björn Wahlroos moved his books to Sweden because of our inheritance tax.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Think how much more income Sweden would have if they taxed the other 130 billionaires at a lower rate within their tolerance level

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I believe that the majority of their wealth comes from businesses outside home country with its comperatively small markets.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, taxes are high there but in the other hand there's free health care, school(even food) and in general a well working society.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not knocking Sweden at all. Clearly a great and functioning society. I was just looking at the opportunity cost.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep but "buying back" the rich by lowering taxes may result in a more unequal society. But that's just my left sided opinion. Haha

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You just contradicted yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

i just stated a fact

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I was a billionaire I would quit Finland in no time.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 13

On the other hand, not breaking the law would also be an option. It's not exactly difficult.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So basically you're saying you like to break the law? This isn't an issue unless you commit a fineable offense.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The issue is not breaking the law but the unequal application of punishment for breaking said law. You can not discriminate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Its not unequal in anyway. The fine is proportional to your income. Its the most fair way to assign fines.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are other punishments propositional to income? Theft? Rape? Assault? Murder?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Prison time isn't affected by income outside US.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You would leave your home and family in order to be be slightly more wealthier?

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 8

Happens all the time.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I would leave Denmark to live someplace warmer. Even if it meant I would be poorer.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I read it more as "If I had money I wouldn't live here."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

With that kind of money you could take our family and house with you.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My home and family would be very happy in Sweden or Switzerland, Monaco. Not the money it's the fact that all are not treated equal...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

Yes, the poor, put-upon billionaires who have to pay the same proportion of their incomes as impoverished people. It's a travesty.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're defending a billionare because you think one day you may become one. LOL

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It's a day-fine. You pay a fine based on how much money you make in a single workday.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Do you have different sentencing for murder? It's like giving a good student a 4 page essay vs a bad one 1 page for punishment.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

affect them to pay ~400 usd. Adjusting them makes it so that crimes are equally hurtful for all classes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Your counter example doesn't make sense. Spending time in jail is a punishment for everyone regardless of income. But 400 euros is only a 1

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

You get a day-fine for violent crimes too, in a way. Days incarcerated.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

The problem is that if the fines aren't adjusted per income, then a billionaire would be able to just do whatever, since it wouldn't 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Income-adjusted fines are how it should be. If not, people with enough money can basically just ignore any fineable offence.

9 years ago | Likes 450 Dislikes 50

Problem in the US is that traffic court is not setup to handle every person making above median wage suddenly fighting tickets with lawyers.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Those same people fight traffic tickets anyhow. Poor people would put up less of a fight if you didn't take their whole pay for it too.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure he can ignore this if he truly wanted

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Eventually they'll just take away your license or put you in jail.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Here in Thailand, about 70% of the population are poor, so fines are ridiculously cheap.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about mandatory community service for low level stuff?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Then you're not going to be able to work for the duration and will still be worse off financially.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure they have lawyers for any other offenses

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Police in the US can charge them with criminal driving offenses to get around that. Bigger issues is stuff like Georgia Super Speed poor tax

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Almost got hit with that once. Shit was not fun

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think that would run afoul of the 14th amendment (at least in the US)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please note we also have points for each offence, enough points and you lose your license

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup. But you need organized and fair system for that. In Switzerland a guy paid ~70k € for speeding, also based on income/worth.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes! Punish success! Soon we will have our utopia!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How about punish breaking the law, such that everyone feels punished at the same rate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Life is easier when you have a lot of money. Deal with it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. That is exactly what is happening here. They're punishing success. /s

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To be clear, income-adjusted IS NOT FLAT % - flat % would be regressive to poor people living paycheck-to-paycheck. Do not confuse the two!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Stuff. You make 100k i make 50k. Sales tax is 5%, so proportionally since i spend 40% of my income and you soend 20% (3)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I pay 2% of my income on sales tax and you spend 1%. If we both get fined .1% we both lose .1%. Not regressive. Also since this is crime (4)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or at least ordinance violation, one could simply choose to follow the law. No cost to stopping at a crosswalk. (5-end)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mention this to highlight the difference between this and food. Not eating certainly has a cost, stopping the car? Not so much.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Less food/etc relative to their income. A flat % here would not be regressive here. For example: we both spend 20k (2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Regressive taxes refer to things like sales tax where a bigger portion of income is spent on sales tax because rich people purchase (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How is he supposed to create jobs with this type of system?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 16

Maybe follow the law?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Always a good place to start.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I suppose I should start adding /s on the end of my comments.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Probably. I got it, though, and even though you lost a couple of fake internet points, you at least made me smile.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I can make at least 1 person smile today, then it is a good day.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure all punishments should be equal and fair instead of turning punishments into government income.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 39

The point of a fine is to deter the offense. If it doesnt hurt you'll keep doing it. This seems like a good deterrent to me.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

The way I see it this is exactly equal punishment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree with the first part of your comment, which is why I approve of how Finland does it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Punishments are intended to teach people to do better. A millionaire probably doesn't care about a 10€ fine, it doesn't teach him anything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 9, 2017 3:14 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Why the frock should I have to pay more because I made the right decisions and worked my ass off to get somewhat wealthy? Screw that jazz.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do you trust the government to trust "what you can afford" to determine fair? Especially if it isnt based on deterrance but as income grabs

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

so how how about incarceration, the same percentage of your remaining lifespan for that felony?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

No, the same percentage of total expected lifespan.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Flat percent is NOT fair to poor people, they need a far larger % of their income just to eat. That's why % taxes (sales tax) are regressive

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

What does equal and fair mean, though? Isn't it fair if all citizens are equally disincentivized to break safety laws? Or should we 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

2 just eliminate fines as punishment and he can just spend a day in jail instead for his minor infraction? I'm not saying this is the only

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

3 or even best solution, just that it's a complicated issue and perhaps you shouldn't dismiss this approach so quickly.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

400€ is no "punishment" for a multi billionaire though. So, in a way, adjusted fines ARE fair.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 11

Why is it "for a billionare?" Are Billionares commonly just running past stop lights and speeding on purpose in most nations without this?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 21

As much as anyone else - probably more often per capita if the fine doesn't hurt proportionally

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Bullshit. People dont commit traffic violations based on the cost of the fine. This is fantasy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Hey look at that, ignoring the entire spectrum to focus on the dichotomy.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

What if I make 90k and have a family and still struggle. Why should I pay more at all? Doesnt that hurt me just as much?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

For a poor person that fine can ruin their whole month, a Billionare wouldn't even notice. A fine should hit his wallet hard too.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

If they wont notice why arent they committing more violations? Why arent the American highways plauged with rich millionares flouting cops?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

It is fair. You pay a percentage instead if flat rate.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

Haha "fair"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

So then why isn't a percentage tax rate fair?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He got fined 12 day fines, so ~12 days worth of salary, based on the income tax. So it is progressive since it goes up with the income tax.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Apr 1, 2017 3:51 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I am not confusing them, I simply explained it poorly. I literally even said it's not flat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you not pay a percentage tax rate?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, we have a progressive tax rate

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1