Do you ever just... think

Sep 6, 2016 12:32 PM

TehChubbehViking

Views

50252

Likes

1406

Dislikes

101

Stopped reading after the Milky Way one... Yup, humans first drank cow's milk, def not their mother's milk like near every mammal

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We're in space. I know you are mate, yeah, we're both in space.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You are currently a plain ape standing at the rocky bottom of a gravity well floating around a giant nuclear explosion. Have fun with that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Something incredibly exciting did happen; we discovered fuckloads of "planets"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My eyes are bleeding

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This. This is good shit.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well if you think like this, Then what? you Still have to go to work and eat food.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

neat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Our understanding about the position of the stars is also completely wrong in reality, since we're looking back in time

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Billions of stars, yet one pixel.

9 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 6

Winnah!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

+1 for making me smile

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, I have never thought those things. I do think about Becky and how sweet her ass is though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A dangerous pastime I know

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can't handle that shit on some strong acid

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hits blunt* bruh.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I prefer to think that light has traveled light years only too see me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is scarier, that we might not be the first species to get this far, or that we might be?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

very nice op. but matter can in fact be created into energy (light) and vice versa. Hence E=mc^2

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 4

Yeah mass, and matter are not the same thing...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Created is the wrong word. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted. The Law of Conservation. Total energy/mass doesn't change.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks Einstein

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's just rearranging things; mass is energy, energy is mass.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Unless you consider matter and energy to be the same thing

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Its all aproximatons. Everyrhing is one (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It is: E=mc^2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"If you read this all the way to the end, you probably have a migraine."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

RE: Last panel: Photons don't experience time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But they do technically travel through it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Chinese (and other Eastern languages), the name for the Milky Way translates to "Silver River," which I think is way better.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was pretty good until the last two.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If matter cannot be destroyed or created, explain "the big bang theory "

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The moment we figure that shit out, you'll probably be the 100,000,000th to know.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Please Google, Lorenz covariance

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How does it relate to the Big Bang theory?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Big Bang created time and space, based on what we know about the universe. In a timeless universe, physics would be different.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Please Google, Lorenz covariance

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please google singularities. The laws of physics as we know them don't work right when infinity is added to the equations.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think even with the scope of the universe it's very unlikely that a species would name a constellation after a sex organ it has never seen

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we make a movie in space with real spaceships and such then it's not really a sci-fi movie.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Also using real space measurements, it would be shitty with ships firing invisible lasers from 2000km away

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The matter one is false.

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 5

You can't create matter, you can just turn energy into mass, or mass into energy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So Is the milk one. Cats have nipple for chrissake, could be catmilky way for all we know.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or, y'know, Hera's (Greek/Roman Goddess) breast milk.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

nothing really matters. toooOOO MEEEEE

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tooooo meeeee

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, all of the neutrons in our bodies started out as hydrogen which was converted to carbon and such in stars. i'm not sure how the 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/ hydrogen formed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By bonding of free protons and electrons 378,000 years after the Big Bang, probably on a Friday night.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Law of conservation of mass?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Perhaps he is referring to matter annihilation --> photon, gluon etc.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's actually conservation of mass/energy; while you can't create matter or energy you can convert one to the other.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Its not destroyed though. and if anti-matter is a thing. they could destroy their matter oposites.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well it isnt destruction. Its annihilation, which is entirely different and converts matter + antimatter into energy and other particles.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 19, 2017 6:56 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It looks fine on mobile too

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not pixelated. It's a problem with mobile. It looks fine on desktop.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Mobile browser also working fine.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, a problem on mobile for some*, I should say. I see those "it's pixelated" comments on normal images a lot from mobile users.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeh, I think it might just be an app issue. It seems most of the mobile user issues don't affect me in any way using the browser version.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0