For those curious about implications of Parler getting kicked off AWS.

Jan 11, 2021 2:21 PM

lovesmathandsunshine

Views

129393

Likes

3848

Dislikes

84

For the record, it only powers the menu part of Netflix which is a pretty simply web app. The video streaming part is Netflix’s own CDN

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

Yes, I agree, but any CTO worth their pay engineers in redundancy

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+++ HOW ABOUT A NICE GAME OF CHESS? +++

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Yasss

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thank you for sharing. Very interesting stuff

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah it's not just "Big Tech." Turns out the whole world is sick of their shit

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

They sued Amazon today.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Suing Amazon isn't going to get their site back, and it'd be almost as devastating if they'd been given, say, 30 days notice.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

alot of this isn't true, for example. if the data is hosted on RDS, you can still choose a oracle/mysql database, and the export functions t

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

he same, also if the server are just ec2 instances, those data can be save in images, and this images can be used in a range of softwares.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

those images, even the amazon ami, are all linux based, so whilst there might be some differences, you should still be able to run a e.g. ph

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

p program like you would on any other linux distro.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very informative. Thank you.+1

5 years ago | Likes 377 Dislikes 5

Amazon keep their servers in big units controlled by Switch. They handle the security & AC. Conceivably, Parler could rent space at Switch

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The impact it will actually have on them is being dramatized however. Its completely possible that they have a microservice artitechure ....

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And don't necessarily rely on too many of their services. It really depends, also while the site may not be as robust, it doesn't spell END

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is a phenomenal description of AWS. I bet AWS employees would struggle to do it so succinctly since they are used to customers who 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

have to understand it in order to purchase and operate it. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the explaination

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Her is something that many people are missing. Paler would still be up if they had only agreed to moderate their site to weed out the part..

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Where people where organizing to violently overthrow the government or directed people to kill others.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Does fate exist?

5 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 3

Yes Fate exists. But our choices “help” determine our Fate. Each moment our choices are made, our Fates can be altered (?!?)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think we are seeing it in real time. Maybe ask Merrick Garland. I bet he believes in fate.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

bUt mY fReEdUmB!

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

note: if you're a huge customer like Netflix, other cloud providers will bend over backwards to make the migration as painless as possible.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And it still takes a long time and a lot of money to make the move. Parler's first challenge isn't the migration, it's just finding *anyone*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

willing to even consider them as a customer. It's almost certain that none of the other big cloud players will be interested.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The guy who owns Parler is an ex secret service guy. Maybe he wanted them to incriminate themselves lol

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Interesting idea

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Matze is reported to have married Russian Alina Mukhutdinova after they met in Las Vegas; she was on a two week road trip around the US.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Putin makes James Bond look like Mr Bean. He bought Trump for less than the price of a destroyer. No wonder he's always smiling.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

oh dear. I can see the little box in the closet that runs VOAT screaming as it gets ready to . . . . .

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What blew up there? I mean, originally - Voat has been a dumpster fire since day one.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

originally, at the dawn of time it was great, Then Reddit refugees of various sorts took over and trolls trashed the place. AssholesRuinedIt

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I just discovered that it shut down on Xmas day. Which is weirdly sad because I remember what it was before the assholes took over.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Question: Why is imgur hosted on a Pentium II when it could be hosted on this AWS thingy?

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

AWS is convenient but it's also hella expensive if you want a lot of power.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Redgifs stole their 386, so they had to improvise.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Aren't you assuming a bit much? Pentium II, who on Earth can afford a Pentium II?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Correction: Imgur ads are on AWS, just not the actual content.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The real question. ^^

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@sarah found it in her basement and windows 95 runs just fine on it, damnit!

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Window Me*

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is hosted on AWS, just not using enough servers

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

they probably use the micro servers, probably about 2 of them.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They probably don't have their scaling configured properly

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Today I learned people don’t know about AWS. Literally where they make all their money...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Member when it was alleged trump pushed the inquirer to blackmail bezos, leading to his divorce, costing him billions? Looks like he does.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I liked Parler. It kept all the shitasses in one convient area and out of my feeds. It also revealed all the closet pieces of shit.

5 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 3

But I’m glad it’s gone. Too much shit clogging humanity

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is parler down now tho? Like do the Nazis talk to a wall today?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Parler is currently no longer supported by any major media outlets for lack of mods & trump is scrambling to find a new digital magaphone.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So in other words Parler is down?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For the time being till they have formally addressed all policy issues in accordance to major providers.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Keep it down for the next 40 years

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gab is still up AFAIK.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Extrajudicial shutting down of legal websites by a handful of tech companies having a veto is a terrible, terrible precedent.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

I couldn't agree more.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Parler's lack of moderation makes "legal website" on hell of an asumption.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It isnt. They were given a notice to either enact moderation, and remove violent content, or get shut down. This is not a political stance

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If you violate the rules of the platform you're using, or on, you get shut down or action taken against you. It's very quite simple.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I would agree if it were a legal website and not a domestic terrorist meetup tool.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Removal of service from those non compliant with the T&Cs is commonplace and well established in precedent.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's true. There's also a great reason why corporate world outsources this resource to specialists... It's complicated. 30 hours? HA!

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

MAYBE with a huge team, and LOTS of overtime pay and bonuses (And we're talking 6 to 7 figures here...), and even then it would be a gamble

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Putting a huge team on a migration can be counterproductive. They start to get in each other's way at some point.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When MVP is so very very M and possibly not even V. XD

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

#facts

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Those last few tweets about deploying to multiple cloud providers is incredibly misleading. Yes, using AWS pre-configured things 1/

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Will definitely make it super time consuming and thousands of development hours to migrate, but the whole point of cloud native and 2/

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Containerization is to make yourself as agnostic as possible. That's why things like teraform exists. Hell, Hashicorp's entire sales 3/

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Pitch is that you can take the same teraform code and point it at aws, azure, gcp qnd nothing syntactically needs to change. End/

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's not true, Terraform resources are still vendor specific. Terraform works across all those platforms but it's not as simlle as that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, it's "syntactically the same". You'll have to make changes based on what you're pulling in, but the structure can largely go unchange

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Running the same code on another cloud is easy. It's the databases, cache servers, CDN, storage services, API mgme, etc that are hard.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Depending on your db solution, that's also pretty easy. When you say storage i assume you mean s3? That's also "easy". CDN could be 2/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or just a docker file away?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I kinda wish they hadn’t given everyone a heads up so they couldn’t plan where they were going afterwards. I wish they’d been blindsided.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

30 hours, for all practical purposes, is blindsided. I've yet to meet the business that could make a big decision in less than a week.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

30 hrs of knowing you are fated to be kicked offline. 30 hrs of torment. 30 hrs of denial. 30 hrs slipping slowly away. Sounds good to me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

did you read what I did? I read that Parler has 30 hrs to plan and execute a transition that typically takes companies months or years.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah. I guess that’s not really that much time.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just POOF gone. I’m sure they will still find a way to communicate with each other but it would’ve been nice to make it a little harder.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

GAB and Telegram apps are where they are going now.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is already basically blindsiding them. There's no way they get an alternative hosting situation together fast enough to avoid downtime.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

That would open Amazon up to civil liability. They have to go by the contract and the law.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

But this way, people were able to archive the entirety of Parler posts.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

...so you’re saying this is an assault on free hate speech? /s

5 years ago | Likes 514 Dislikes 20

hehehe

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Free to talk but never free of the consequences.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That hate speech was never free; they had to pay for hosting

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It’s sad you have to explicitly say /s

5 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 2

And still gets downvoted... *facepalm*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep. But there were times I thought, “there’s no way someone could think I’m serious.” *gets downvoted to oblivion*

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

If that /s wasn't there I'd 100% think you are serious.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I feel your pain.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

To be fair, sarcasm is always more difficult over text, and not everyone speaks English as their first language. So thank you for the "/s"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I miss those times. When you knew ppl thought like that but they had the decency to hide it in public settings

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Make racism shameful again!!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a fickle thing. Like, take pretty much anything on Parler for example, used to be I'd never believe those were serious.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Netflix accounts for 15% of all global internet traffic and it just runs on the back of AWS. Netflix accounts for ONE percent of AWS' 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 222 Dislikes 2

Approx 60% of the cloud server market is owned by AWS, Azure, and Google. With AWS holding 40% or so.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Most time we only listen to Netflix, I've often wondered how much bandwidth could be saved by an only stream audio option. Call it Notflix.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Jan 11, 2021 8:52 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

and it added like 50% to the total file size. obviously, difference audio and video qualities will affect this, but still...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They could also start streaming porn and call it Nutflix

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I vote this option

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NetTrax?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Like, listening to shows and movies?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Poscasts and/or audiobooks

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I recall hearing an option for exavtly this.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

revenues. Its hard to understate how large AWS is and the fraction of the internet it controls. Being kicked off it is huge. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 164 Dislikes 0

.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is one of the reason, the intel cpu bugs were so monstrous. Escaping the sandbox on cpu level, could compromise a serverfarm- and aws

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

down below, is just a titanic sever-farm with a mono-culture of Operating systems. One jumpy virus- and half the internet goes down.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People underestimate, how much of a danger centralization is..

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A fraction underestimate it. 99.9% of users aren't even aware how this whole system works. They simply use it and depend unknowingly on it

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

on a side note: when does everyone in the world become citizens of United States of Amazon? Jesus Christ, is Amazon a HUGE company.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Netflix probably still uses Akamai quite a bit.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Not really - they have their own CDN which is basically shipping “Netflix in a box” to peering locations and ISPs

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Right, but something has to feed those. Akamai and their competitors all use each other too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Giving one company that much power is a bad thing

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Only a matter of time until people start to call for public cloud to be a utility.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

At this rate it should be, living in modern society without internet is damn near impossible

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh. There are viable alternatives. The problem for parler is none of the alternatives are going to tolerate their bullshit either.

5 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

There's at least one company out there that specifically hosts right wing sites, can't remember the name though.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nazi Net?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an ignoramus (I'm into old-style hardware, this cloud stuff is a bit too ethereal for me) what viable alternatives are there?

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, and IBM, and some smaller: https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/18819.jpeg

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

... digital ocean, rack space... the list goes on.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

In addition to all the other services listed nothing is stops them from setting up their own servers. It sucks but there isn't a monopoly.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Running their own servers is far more expensive and difficult, due to both hardware and talent. I know a lot of the kind of people with /1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe in this instance the customers of parler killed that buisness

5 years ago | Likes 1382 Dislikes 9

I feel like they intentionally attracted those kinds of customers. Marketing as a "Free Speech" app to people who got kicked off other sites

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep even before the 6th, they were known as the shitstain social media

5 years ago | Likes 212 Dislikes 2

Now if we can just get a business of killing the customers of parlor. State executions for treason perhaps.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Parler is defintely blaming the wrong people for their demise. Sucks when you bite the hand that feeds.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Should have done like that bartender in that story about not serving a Neo Nazi. Eventually they will overtake and run you out of business.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

not really relevant, these guys knew EXACTLY who their target audience was and what they are like.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well maybe if Parler had moderated, you know, how EVERY OTHER FUCKING FORM OF SOCIAL MEDIA DOES

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Yeah or don't use a cloud service provider with a ToS guideline regarding public safety if you wanna allow discussion of violent gatherings

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

like, know the ToS of the services your app uses lol.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They do moderate. They just allow all the crazy shit and encourage it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They do moderate. They just allow all the crazy shit and encourage it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They did moderate. People found if you wrote anti-Trump stuff, you get banned.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

can i get a source on this? would be hilarious if true

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn, stuffs extremely hard to find now with the closure of Parler.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Amazon justified the boot with 98 posts that should have been modded; they had warned Parler about this before.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The users aren't the customers

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Correct. They’re the product. Just like we are here.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Makes you wonder if it was really "accidental" that all that data was leaked, or an attack out of spite against the Qult that killed parler.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I mean, the business model was catering to customers who were kicked off other social media.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s almost as though there’s a reason certain material is absolutely banned from being distributed on platforms. This could be why

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why didn’t Parker mod and ban people? In my eyes allowing your users to run amuck and say that stuff makes you partly responsible

5 years ago | Likes 184 Dislikes 0

Not doing that was their entire business model, essentially.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Their whole business model is being mostly unmoderated. Which is a bad business model.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I hope libertarians get the parallel.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They won't.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This raises an interesting point to me. I'm not defending anyone, but from a neutral perspective - where do you draw the line on free ...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Speech on the internet? Is it in fact the duty of the medium to determine what is hateful or detrimental or riot inducing?...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...or is it the duty of the medium to uphold free speech as much as possible? The anonymity and potential audience really changes this...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...concept imo, when the amendment was written it was not tailored to this scale and while general enough, this is not a foreseen...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The whole point of parler was launched to have an unmoderated social media platform. The terms of use users legal responsibility for content

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fun Fact:Just before the end they did restrict one of the crazier ones (LLinWood) and half the site went bananas accusing 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

Them of pandering to communism to try to keep the site up.

5 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that communist bezos...

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

His full name being jeff lenin bezos

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Saying and posting racist stuff was the point of Parler.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And this is why Amazon booted them. They don't want to be involved with a company that will surely see litigation in its future. /1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why Craigslist removed the personals section from their site because of the risk of human trafficking was high. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Parler only disagrees with those users in retrospect, the platform was very literally made for the people getting banned elsewhere. The

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

real kicker is if Parler wanted to continue they absolutely could, they are backed by multiple billionaires, they could buy their own infra.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imgur allows people to talk about setting up guillotines for the rich.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Yes it does. Until some one actually kills someone with a guillotine it is not a priority. However if someone was to gives details on how, 1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When, where and who it would probably be a big deal. Walking a fine line between venting frustration and murder. Memes are venting.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but noticeably absent are posts saying "hey, this rich guy is going to be at this location on this day. Let's arm ourselves, kidnap him

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

and put him into this guillotine I built. Who's with me?" See the difference?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So you're ok with the platform allowing people to post things like "we should guillotine all the liberals?"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

There’s a big difference difference between “we should do this” and “on this day at this time we will meet in this place and do this thing”.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

One is abstract with no intent and the other is a specific threat.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So you're ok with the platform allowing people to post things like "we should guillotine all the liberals?"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Unless they start getting specific and credible with their threats, yes. "We should guillotine the XYZ" isn't even a threat. It's an opinion

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure, as long as it’s not “we should meet In at the Bastille on July 14th with a guillotine and put liberals in it”. or as long as when /?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Because their entire business model is "we allow free speech" (read, we allow shit stains to say shit stainy things).

5 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

So basically like 4chan?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bingo.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4chan has a mod team... These are people /b banned...

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Imgurs not far off. Used to be kittens and memes. Now it all angry politics. And any disagreement gets suspended or banned.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

Thats cause Imgur for a while was reddits photoboard, and so users of reddit would post on imgur. They all left.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Imgur can get quite intolerant. There has been plenty of posts here about just straight up killing repubs. I do like kittens though

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Funny. You've been "disagreeing" for a long time here, and still haven't got banned. You prove your own lie.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Been suspended repeatedly. Once for saying the word "no". Lol

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I actually think they were given that option to remain functional and they turned it down. So, adios amigos.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I can’t remember where I read that though so don’t take that as gospel or anything. But IIRC, that’s what happened.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

When your USP is 'anything goes', moderation is not on the cards

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Very true.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, you're right. There wouldn't have been an issue if they'd of banned them like other platforms. That's why everyone else is still up.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

But like @ThisUsernameIsRegisteredToMe said, if they did ban people they wouldn't have a user base left, so it was a lose/lose situation.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I do recall hearing apple giving them that option in order to remain on their App Store but I don’t have a source for it either.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yep. Apple gave them 24 hours to come up with a moderation plan, to keep shit stains off the site. They said no.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think it went like this: moderate or be gone. Okay. They moderated a big agitator. Everyone freaked. They closed down.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What’s the fastest land animal?

5 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 5

Charlie Kirk

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Running it's the cheetah, but airborne it's the peregrine falcon. Most people will say the peregrine falcon because cheetahs never prosper

5 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

Cheetah can do 70mph, an ass with Ferrari goes 200mph

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A cat strapped to a spaceshuttle

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I like your style !

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MAGA terrorist when it’s turning into antifa member.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The cheetah. Next?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

QuinnyPig, obviously.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A toddler with something in its mouth

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yo momma at the opening of a new buffet

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Trump on his way to Russia after being indicted for treason.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cheetah

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Human. Hey, if they count certain birds because of how fast they can dive, then we can count humans for driving really fast. ;)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Maximum speed or sustained?

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

"Fastest" doesn't require taking sustainability into account. So clearly the answer is "any animal shot out of a cannon-like-device"

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

You made me lol.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Frozen chicken

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Smooth bore or rifled barrel?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Smooth as a babys bottom

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But does have to be ground based so shot out of a cannon at the ground with an angle that it mostly stays on said ground...

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Rocketsled?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why are we shooting animals out of cannons?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

To sink the other ship

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because this is America?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Because hitting them with tennis-rackets is frowned upon.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

To see how fast they can go

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0