Tupolev planes

Apr 28, 2025 10:46 PM

Felimelinesk

Views

48320

Likes

1148

Dislikes

39

@YouthPastorRyan on YT

IIRC there was also a helicopter which used alcohol to supplement the fuel/air mixture which would get depleted when and while they fired the main weapon because the exhaust *of* the weapon would be sucked into the engine intakes... Or something to that effect, it's been like a decade since I read that article.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The latter happened with a lot of fighters, especially the early jet fighters that were still relying on guns which they installed in the nose right next to the air intakes. So much trail & error.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

LOL

11 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Whats so special about using ethanol as antifreeze?

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My mom was a secretary at Ladd Field in Fairbanks, Alaska during WW2, and told how she and the girls "requisitioned" barrels of ethanol and frozen orange juice to throw parties for Soviet lend-lease personnel who were stationed there. Wild times.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So now we know where Boeing got it's last round of engineers.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mistakes were made.

11 months ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Like, all of the mistakes possible.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Da.

11 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Possibly designed at least in part by Russian resisters?
I mean there had to be people forced to work on those programs. Submit a bunch of trash design proposals to waste time and resources, and maybe a few even make it into production...

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell, the F104 Starfighter had a downward-ejecting seat. https://www.ejectionsite.com/f104seat.htm

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I feel obligated to point out the Lazerpig Loop because Russian engineering is consistently bad.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Holy shit is it ever. Read anything on Chernobyl: Russian engineering almost killed every human in Asia

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This dude makes me laugh, thanks for sharing this one

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"became a real BITCH keeping the ground team from drinking the coolent" XD The fact that there were russians that thought, "Hey this plane FUEL is made of Vodka, and we are all out of Vodka, Can we drink this instead?" Igor:"....да!"

11 months ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

It's not that uncommon. Nazis had the exact same problem with their rocket programme. V-2 used 75% ethanol as fuel. Made with potatoes, of course, as if famine wasn't a problem.

Anyway, the tried dye which immediately got filtered out and laxatives, which backfired by causing even worse delays than the fuel evaporating. Then methanol got mixed in, either intentionally or through worsening quality control, killing one guy and blinding another.

11 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

the t-160 is a beast in dominations though

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is there anything they won't cool with vodka? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYTJfLyo_vE

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tupolev related: A video about the Tu-104, which suffered a number of fatal crashes due to a design issue which caused an uncommanded pitch up the pilots couldn't overcome. 'Was This The Most Dangerous Airliner Ever?' by Mustard: https://youtu.be/tqhtkG6glug

11 months ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Good thing no modern planes made the same mistake. Especially not any airlines starting with 'B' and ending in 'oeing'

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

AKA when arrogant officers overload the cargo bay with objects liable to move around when unchecked.

11 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Same plane, different incident. See: 'When the Soviet Navy Lost 16 Admirals in a Single Accident: The Tu-104 Crash at Pushkin' by Paper Skies: https://youtu.be/ZU1f47SC_A8

11 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Mustard is an excellent channel! Watched all the vids in a single day.

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The ground crews drinking the aircraft coolant to get drunk is the most Russian thing ever I feel.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bylat

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This guy’s videos are great. You can also look him up as Ryan Kelly

11 months ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 2

I lost a lot of respect for his videos when I saw the Rolls-Royce one. I'm not sure he got more than 50% of his statements correct

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well... uh... that's a bit unfortunate. Make sure you do NOT abbreviate his first name! Lol

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I still crack up at the GE one.

"I like things that spin."

11 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

“That’s what the washing machines are for”

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I've spent enough time on imgur to be wary of anyone claiming to be a youth pastor....

11 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

It was to avoid such a topic as the main discussion in the comments that I didn't give the source...

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So, he's a comedian, not ACTUALLY a youth pastor. He goes by that handle because people say that's what he looks like. He is most definitely NOT a pastor, youth or otherwise

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pitch-up on landing is the result of the swept wing-tip stalling which was a problem early MiGs addressed to some extent with wing fences. Apparently Tupolev did not get that memo. BTW some US planes also had downward ejection.

11 months ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 1

downward ejection is what i did to your mother last night

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

25+ years ago. its me your brother

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Funnily enough, Eurofighters had the same problem in testing. They just added forward canards.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Lockheed F-104 Starfighter also had a downward ejecting pilot's seat.
https://veteransbreakfastclub.org/the-short-history-of-the-f-104s-stanley-c-1-downward-firing-ejection-seat/

11 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Wasn't that the plane they called the "widowmaker"?

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That had to do, in part, with West Germany getting them and deciding they'd be a good ground attack/CAS aircraft for some reason. IIRC they legit lost around 1/3rd of their fleet purely to lawndarting into the ground.

11 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

They have a turning radius measured in time zones and they might be the only aircraft to take off by traveling in a straight line while the earth curves out from under them.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

also the Coffin Nail.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup, due to their propensity to lawn dart into the ground when they were used in low-altitude operations (something they weren't designed to be very good at).

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What is a wing fence?

11 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

It keeps the clouds on the other side.

11 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

lane dividers for airflow - they reduce the stall speed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wing_fence

11 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Also I just learned what a Vortilon is thanks to this.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh god damn I had no idea what those were for/called. Thank you!

And yes I know I could've Google'd that but given the choice I prefer asking people who seem to know their stuff.

11 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I also forget some of those aerodynamic devices from time to time. I still have to read up about the pros and cons of delta wings.

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The B-52 still has downward ejection for some crew (navigator and radar navigator).

11 months ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

B17 Ball-turret gunner: “You guys are getting ejection seats?”

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are correct.

11 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

"...Hey, Carl. That wasn't a bomb we just dropped, was it?"



"...Carl?"

11 months ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Classic Carl. We still miss him but we didn't miss with him

11 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Wow, I'd thought that the B-52 was retired already... but apparently there's still over 70 in service that actually received some upgrades for extended service until 2050.

11 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

BUFF is Eternal.

11 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The rest are parked out behind the Love Shack.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's only so many ways to make a tube with wings, and there's next to nothing attritting them. See also: Tu-95.

11 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I just think of airframe aging over time. Micro cracks forming in the structural components. The B-52 has been in service for over 60 years. At least from what I've found on-line, a total of 744 were made, the last one rolling off the production line in 1962.

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The B52 is the (air)ship of Theseus at this point. They have pretty much all of the airframes saved that aren't in service stashed in the desert to control corrosion (off the top of my head I think it's Nevada, can't recall the name of the facility), along with other aircraft, for parts. Also, lots of aircraft parts are routinely x-rayed to check for stress like you described. Pretty cool stuff lol

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A lot of the wearing components have been rebuilt over time. Or at least the wings have. And remember; Peace Dividend meant there was a glut of spare parts.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0